Low back pain, linked to nucleus pulposus degeneration and annulus fibrosus (AF) defects, is a significant cause of global disability. The AF’s multilayered structure supports the spine, but its limited self-repair capacity makes treating AF injuries and herniation difficult. Traditional surgical interventions like discectomy often fail to restore AF integrity, resulting in high reherniation rates. In response, biomaterial-based strategies have emerged as promising alternatives, aiming to replicate AF structure, deliver bioactive factors, and promote tissue regeneration. This review evaluates the composition, biomechanics, and pathophysiology of the AF, emphasizing the fundamental properties of available biomaterials, integration with host tissues, mechanical properties, and biomimetic microenvironments in AF tissue remodeling and repair. We examine recent advances in AF repair biomaterials, including natural and synthetic hydrogels, decellularized extracellular matrix, electrospun scaffolds, and emerging technologies like three-dimensional bioprinting. These materials provide mechanical reinforcement, enhance cell adhesion, and modulate the degenerative microenvironment through controlled drug or growth factor release, offering a comprehensive approach to address the challenges of AF repair.
Impact Statement
This review systematically expounds on the revolutionary role of innovative strategies based on biomaterials in the field of AF repair. By applying advanced materials such as smart hydrogels, electrospun scaffolds, decellularized matrices, three-dimensional bioprinted structures, and smart microneedles, the limitations of traditional surgical intervention have been overcome. These biomaterials possess excellent biological properties, enabling them not only to reconstruct biomechanical integrity through biomimetic microstructures but also to actively regulate the degenerative microenvironment through delivery. Such cutting-edge tissue engineering technologies significantly reduce the risk of reherniation, promote endogenous regeneration, and pioneer new technologies for functional and long-lasting AF repair. The synergy between materials science and tissue engineering marks a new frontier in spine medicine, offering scalable solutions to alleviate dysfunction caused by disc degeneration worldwide.
JiangY, WangJ, WuR, et al.Bioinspired construction of annulus fibrosus implants with a negative Poisson’s ratio for intervertebral disc repair and restraining disc herniation. Bioconjug Chem, 2023; doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.3c00105
2.
FjeldOR, GrøvleL, HelgelandJ, et al.Complications, reoperations, readmissions, and length of hospital stay in 34 639 surgical cases of lumbar disc herniation. Bone Joint J, 2019; 101-B(4):470–477.
3.
KreinerDS, HwangSW, EasaJE, et al.; North American Spine Society. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Spine J, 2014; 14(1):180–191.
4.
WangY, ChengH, WangT, et al.Oxidative stress in intervertebral disc degeneration: Molecular mechanisms, pathogenesis and treatment. Cell Prolif, 2023; 56(9):e13448.
5.
CroftAS, ĆorlukaS, FuhrerJ, et al.Repairing annulus fibrosus fissures using methacrylated gellan gum combined with novel silk. Materials (Basel), 2023; 16(8):3173.
6.
TavakoliJ, DiwanAD, TipperJL. Advanced strategies for the regeneration of lumbar disc annulus fibrosus. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21(14):4889.
7.
TakeokaY, YurubeT, NishidaK. Gene therapy approach for intervertebral disc degeneration: An update. Neurospine, 2020; 17(1):3–14.
8.
HanF, YuQ, ChuG, et al.Multifunctional nanofibrous scaffolds with angle-ply microstructure and co-delivery capacity promote partial repair and total replacement of intervertebral disc. Adv Healthc Mater, 2022; 11(19):e2200895.
9.
JuY, MaS, FuM, et al.Polyphenol-modified biomimetic bioadhesives for the therapy of annulus fibrosus defect and nucleus pulposus degeneration after discectomy. Acta Biomater, 2024; 189:116–129.
10.
ChoyWJ, PhanK, DiwanAD, et al.Annular closure device for disc herniation: Meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2018; 19(1):290.
11.
HeindelP, TuchmanA, HsiehPC, et al.Reoperation rates after single-level lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017; 42(8):E496–E501.
12.
BatemanAH, BalkovecC, AkensMK, et al.Closure of the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc using a novel suture application device-in vivo porcine and ex vivo biomechanical evaluation. Spine J, 2016; 16(7):889–895.
13.
WangH, WangD, LuoB, et al.Decoding the annulus fibrosus cell atlas by scRNA-seq to develop an inducible composite hydrogel: A novel strategy for disc reconstruction. Bioact Mater, 2022; 14:350–363.
14.
PeredoAP, GullbrandSE, MauckRL, et al.A challenging playing field: Identifying the endogenous impediments to annulus fibrosus repair. JOR Spine, 2021; 4(1):e1133.
15.
DistefanoTJ, VasoK, PanebiancoCJ, et al.Hydrogel-embedded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres for the delivery of hMSC-derived exosomes to promote bioactive annulus fibrosus repair. Cartilage, 2022; 13(3):19476035221113959.
16.
ZhouD, LiuH, ZhengZ, et al.Design principles in mechanically adaptable biomaterials for repairing annulus fibrosus rupture: A review. Bioact Mater, 2024; 31:422–439.
17.
SongC, HuP, PengR, et al.Bioenergetic dysfunction in the pathogenesis of intervertebral disc degeneration. Pharmacol Res, 2024; 202:107119.
18.
BoremR, MadelineA, TheosC, et al.Angle-ply scaffold supports annulus fibrosus matrix expression and remodeling by mesenchymal stromal and annulus fibrosus cells. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2022; 110(5):1056–1068.
19.
TavakoliJ, CostiJJ. New findings confirm the viscoelastic behaviour of the inter-lamellar matrix of the disc annulus fibrosus in radial and circumferential directions of loading. Acta Biomater, 2018; 71:411–419.
20.
MolladavoodiS, McMorranJ, GregoryD. Mechanobiology of annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus cells in intervertebral discs. Cell Tissue Res, 2020; 379(3):429–444.
21.
TavakoliJ, ElliottDM, CostiJJ. The ultra-structural organization of the elastic network in the intra- and inter-lamellar matrix of the intervertebral disc. Acta Biomater, 2017; 58:269–277.
22.
PirvuT, BlanquerSB, BennekerLM, et al.A combined biomaterial and cellular approach for annulus fibrosus rupture repair. Biomaterials, 2015; 42:11–19.
23.
KimMKM, BurnsMJ, SerjeantME, et al.The mechano-response of murine annulus fibrosus cells to cyclic tensile strain is frequency dependent. JOR Spine, 2020; 3(4):e1114.
24.
IuJ, SanterreJP, KandelRA. Inner and outer annulus fibrosus cells exhibit differentiated phenotypes and yield changes in extracellular matrix protein composition in vitro on a polycarbonate urethane scaffold. Tissue Eng Part A, 2014; 20(23–24):3261–3269.
25.
KrausP, LufkinT. Bovine annulus fibrosus cell lines isolated from intervertebral discs. Genom Data, 2016; 10:83–84.
26.
ClaytonSW, SebastianA, WilsonSP, et al.Single cell RNA sequencing reveals shifts in cell maturity and function of endogenous and infiltrating cell types in response to acute intervertebral disc injury. bioRxiv, 2025:2024.08.10.607363.
27.
SunY, LiZ, DuanJ, et al.From structure to therapy: The critical influence of cartilaginous endplates and microvascular network on intervertebral disc degeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2024; 12:1489420.
28.
HsiehAH, TwomeyJD. Cellular mechanobiology of the intervertebral disc: New directions and approaches. J Biomech, 2010; 43(1):137–145.
29.
HuS, ZhuM, XingH, et al.Thread-structural microneedles loaded with engineered exosomes for annulus fibrosus repair by regulating mitophagy recovery and extracellular matrix homeostasis. Bioact Mater, 2024; 37:1–13.
30.
ChoiY, ParkMH, LeeK. Tissue engineering strategies for intervertebral disc treatment using functional polymers. Polymers (Basel), 2019; 11(5):872.
31.
TorreOM, MrozV, BartelsteinMK, et al.Annulus fibrosus cell phenotypes in homeostasis and injury: Implications for regenerative strategies. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2019; 1442(1):61–78.
32.
SwahnH, MertensJ, OlmerM, et al.Shared and compartment-specific processes in nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus during intervertebral disc degeneration. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2024; 11(17):e2309032.
33.
LiS, DuanceVC, BlainEJ. Zonal variations in cytoskeletal element organization, mRNA and protein expression in the intervertebral disc. J Anat, 2008; 213(6):725–732.
34.
SettonLA, ChenJ. Cell mechanics and mechanobiology in the intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004; 29(23):2710–2723.
35.
SunZ, MiC. On the identification of the ultra-structural organization of elastic fibers and their effects on the integrity of annulus fibrosus. J Biomech, 2023; 157:111728.
LiuZ, WangH, YuanZ, et al.High-resolution 3D printing of angle-ply annulus fibrosus scaffolds for intervertebral disc regeneration. Biofabrication, 2022; 15:15001.
43.
ZhangW, WangH, YuanZ, et al.Moderate mechanical stimulation rescues degenerative annulus fibrosus by suppressing caveolin-1 mediated pro-inflammatory signaling pathway. Int J Biol Sci, 2021; 17(5):1395–1412.
44.
XinL, LiX, YangY, et al.Polyphenol and metal ion-reinforced supermolecular hydrogels incorporating nanofiber drug and peptide for annulus fibrosus regeneration. Theranostics, 2025; 15(12):5756–5771.
45.
ShamsahAH, CartmellSH, RichardsonSM, et al.Material characterization of PCL:PLLA electrospun fibers following six months degradation in vitro. Polymers (Basel), 2020; 12(3):700.
46.
LiuC, XiaoL, ZhangY, et al.Regeneration of annulus fibrosus tissue using a DAFM/PECUU-blended electrospun scaffold. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 2020; 31(18):2347–2361.
47.
FujiiK, LaiA, KordaN, et al.Ex-vivo biomechanics of repaired rat intervertebral discs using genipin crosslinked fibrin adhesive hydrogel. J Biomech, 2020; 113:110100.
48.
MengQ, XieE, SunH, et al.High-strength smart microneedles with “offensive and defensive” effects for intervertebral disc repair. Adv Mater, 2024; 36(2):e2305468.
49.
LiuC, LiY, ZhangY, et al.The experimental study of regeneration of annulus fibrosus using decellularized annulus fibrosus matrix/poly(ether carbonate urethane)urea-blended fibrous scaffolds with varying elastic moduli. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2022; 110(5):991–1003.
50.
MoxonSR, McMurranZ, KibbleMJ, et al.3D bioprinting of an intervertebral disc tissue analogue with a highly aligned annulus fibrosus via suspended layer additive manufacture. Biofabrication, 2024; 17:15001.
51.
PanebiancoCJ, RaoS, HomWW, et al.Genipin-crosslinked fibrin seeded with oxidized alginate microbeads as a novel composite biomaterial strategy for intervertebral disc cell therapy. Biomaterials, 2022; 287:121641.
52.
ZhaoY, SongS, RenX, et al.Supramolecular adhesive hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Chem Rev, 2022; 122(6):5604–5640.
53.
XieC, XuJ, WangX, et al.Smart hydrogels for tissue regeneration. Macromol Biosci, 2024; 24(3):e2300339.
54.
ChoiSW, GuanW, ChungK. Basic principles of hydrogel-based tissue transformation technologies and their applications. Cell, 2021; 184(16):4115–4136.
55.
BuckleyCT, HoylandJA, FujiiK, et al.Critical aspects and challenges for intervertebral disc repair and regeneration-harnessing advances in tissue engineering. JOR Spine, 2018; 1(3):e1029.
56.
HanF, TuZ, ZhuZ, et al.Targeting endogenous reactive oxygen species removal and regulating regenerative microenvironment at annulus fibrosus defects promote tissue repair. ACS Nano, 2023; 17(8):7645–7661.
57.
DistefanoTJ, ShmuklerJO, DaniasG, et al.Development of a two-part biomaterial adhesive strategy for annulus fibrosus repair and ex vivo evaluation of implant herniation risk. Biomaterials, 2020; 258:120309.
58.
YangJJ, LinYY, ChaoKH, et al.Gelatin-poly (γ-glutamic acid) hydrogel as a potential adhesive for repair of intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus: Evaluation of cytocompatibility and degradability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2021; 46(4):E243–E249.
59.
LongRG, FergusonSJ, BennekerLM, et al.Morphological and biomechanical effects of annulus fibrosus injury and repair in an ovine cervical model. JOR Spine, 2020; 3(1):e1074.
60.
ZhaoR, HanF, YuQ, et al.A multifunctional scaffold that promotes the scaffold-tissue interface integration and rescues the ROS microenvironment for repair of annulus fibrosus defects. Bioact Mater, 2024; 41:257–270.
61.
DewleA, RakshasmareP, SrivastavaA. A polycaprolactone (PCL)-supported electrocompacted aligned collagen type-I patch for annulus fibrosus repair and regeneration. ACS Appl Bio Mater, 2021; 4(2):1238–1251.
62.
SongH, GuoC, WuY, et al.Therapeutic factors and biomaterial-based delivery tools for degenerative intervertebral disc repair. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2024; 12:1286222.
63.
WangZ, WeiH, HuangY, et al.Naturally sourced hydrogels: Emerging fundamental materials for next-generation healthcare sensing. Chem Soc Rev, 2023; 52(9):2992–3034.
SkuhrovcováK, KotzianováA, BardoňováL, et al.Nanofibrous material from hyaluronan derivatives preserving fibrous structure in aqueous environment. Carbohydr Polym, 2022; 276:118785.
66.
VanderhooftJL, MannBK, PrestwichGD. Synthesis and characterization of novel thiol-reactive poly(ethylene glycol) cross-linkers for extracellular-matrix-mimetic biomaterials. Biomacromolecules, 2007; 8(9):2883–2889.
67.
SerbanMA, PrestwichGD. Synthesis of hyaluronan haloacetates and biology of novel cross-linker-free synthetic extracellular matrix hydrogels. Biomacromolecules, 2007; 8(9):2821–2828.
68.
NieMD, LiN, HuangZB, et al.Innovative hydrogel-patch combination for large annulus fibrosus defects: A prospective approach to address herniation recurrence. Spine J, 2024; 24(10):2002–2012.
69.
HoCY, WangCC, WuTC, et al.Peptide-functionalized double network hydrogel with compressible shape memory effect for intervertebral disc regeneration. Bioeng Transl Med, 2023; 8(2):e10447.
70.
ColinC, AkpoE, PerrinA, et al.Encapsulation in alginates hydrogels and controlled release: An overview. Molecules, 2024; 29(11):2515.
71.
BaruchL, MachlufM. Alginate-chitosan complex coacervation for cell encapsulation: Effect on mechanical properties and on long-term viability. Biopolymers, 2006; 82(6):570–579.
72.
LongL, JiD, HuC, et al.Microneedles for in situ tissue regeneration. Mater Today Bio, 2023; 19:100579.
73.
SharabiM, WertheimerS, WadeKR, et al.Towards intervertebral disc engineering: Bio-mimetics of form and function of the annulus fibrosus lamellae. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2019; 94:298–307.
74.
SoroushanovaA, DelgadoLM, WuZ, et al.The collagen suprafamily: From biosynthesis to advanced biomaterial development. Adv Mater, 2019; 31:e1801651.
75.
SowbhagyaR, MukthaH, RamakrishnaiahTN, et al.Collagen as the extracellular matrix biomaterials in the arena of medical sciences. Tissue Cell, 2024; 90:102497.
76.
CalixtoS, GanzherliN, GulyaevS, et al.Gelatin as a photosensitive material. Molecules, 2018; 23(8):2064.
77.
YingY, CaiK, CaiX, et al.Ex-vivo biomechanical evaluation of the application of a novel annulus closure device to closure of annulus fibrosus. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2024; 12:1337269.
78.
ShenoyM, AbdulNS, QamarZ, et al.Collagen structure, synthesis, and its applications: A systematic review. Cureus, 2022; 14(5):e24856.
79.
ChuahYJ, WuY, ChiaYQ, et al.The co-influence of hyaluronic acid and collagen on the development of an engineered annulus tissue model with bone marrow stromal cells. Biomed Mater, 2022; 17(5); doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ac7cac
80.
YinX, HuY, KangM, et al.Cellulose based composite sponges with oriented porous structure and superabsorptive capacity for quick hemostasis. Int J Biol Macromol, 2023; 253(Pt 6):127295.
81.
Ruiz-AlonsoS, Lafuente-MerchanM, CirizaJ, et al.Tendon tissue engineering: Cells, growth factors, scaffolds and production techniques. J Control Release, 2021; 333:448–486.
82.
PeredoAP, TsinmanTK, BonnevieED, et al.Developmental morphogens direct human induced pluripotent stem cells toward an annulus fibrosus-like cell phenotype. JOR Spine, 2024; 7(1):e1313.
83.
SongJ, JuY, AmarasenaTH, et al.Influence of poly(ethylene glycol) molecular architecture on particle assembly and ex vivo particle-immune cell interactions in human blood. ACS Nano, 2021; 15(6):10025–10038.
84.
WeiZ, ZhangJ, GuoZ, et al.Study on the preparation and properties of acellular matrix from the skin of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2023; 111(6):1328–1335.
85.
IbrahimM, RamadanE, ElsadekNE, et al.Polyethylene glycol (PEG): The nature, immunogenicity, and role in the hypersensitivity of PEGylated products. J Control Release, 2022; 351:215–230.
86.
GanM, ZhouQ, GeJ, et al.Precise in-situ release of microRNA from an injectable hydrogel induces bone regeneration. Acta Biomater, 2021; 135:289–303.
87.
KozmaGT, ShimizuT, IshidaT, et al.Anti-PEG antibodies: Properties, formation, testing and role in adverse immune reactions to PEGylated nano-biopharmaceuticals. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2020; 154–155:163–175.
88.
DuJ, LongRG, NakaiT, et al.Functional cell phenotype induction with TGF-β1 and collagen-polyurethane scaffold for annulus fibrosus rupture repair. Eur Cell Mater, 2020; 39:1–17.
89.
ArshadN, BatoolSR, RazzaqS, et al.Recent advancements in polyurethane-based membranes for gas separation. Environ Res, 2024; 252(Pt 3):118953.
90.
ZiaF, NazliZI, ZiaKM, et al.Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyethyl cellulose copolymer modified polyurethane bionanocomposites. Int J Biol Macromol, 2021; 179:345–352.
91.
ShresthaBK, ShresthaS, TiwariAP, et al.Bio-inspired hybrid scaffold of zinc oxide-functionalized multi-wall carbon nanotubes reinforced polyurethane nanofibers for bone tissue engineering. Mater Des, 2017; 133:69–81.
92.
AzarmginS, TorabinejadB, KalantarZadehR, et al.Polyurethanes and their biomedical applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2024; 10(11):6828–6859.
93.
Tofighi NasabS, RoodbariNH, GoodarziV, et al.Novel electrospun conduit based on polyurethane/collagen enhanced by nanobioglass for peripheral nerve tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 2022; 33(6):801–822.
94.
SavinG, Sastourne-ArrayO, CaillolS, et al.Evaluation of porous (poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-co-(ε-caprolactone)) polyurethane for use in orthopedic scaffolds. Molecules, 2024; 29(4):766.
95.
Ramírez-RuizF, Núñez-TapiaI, Piña-BarbaMC, et al.Polycaprolactone for hard tissue regeneration: Scaffold design and in vivo implications. Bioengineering (Basel), 2025; 12(1):46.
96.
SowmyaB, HemavathiAB, PandaPK. Poly (ε-caprolactone)-based electrospun nano-featured substrate for tissue engineering applications: A review. Prog Biomater, 2021; 10(2):91–117.
97.
DwivediR, KumarS, PandeyR, et al.Polycaprolactone as biomaterial for bone scaffolds: Review of literature. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 2020; 10(1):381–388.
98.
LiangHY, LeeWK, HsuJT, et al.Polycaprolactone in bone tissue engineering: A comprehensive review of innovations in scaffold fabrication and surface modifications. J Funct Biomater, 2024; 15(9):243.
99.
HuangT, ZengY, LiC, et al.Application and development of electrospun nanofiber scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2024; 10(7):4114–4144.
100.
AhmedR, Ul Ain HiraN, WangM, et al.Genipin, a natural blue colorant precursor: Source, extraction, properties, and applications. Food Chem, 2024; 434:137498.
PengB, DuL, ZhangT, et al.Research progress in decellularized extracellular matrix hydrogels for intervertebral disc degeneration. Biomater Sci, 2023; 11(6):1981–1993.
103.
YeleswarapuS, DashA, ChameettachalS, et al.3D bioprinting of tissue constructs employing dual crosslinking of decellularized extracellular matrix hydrogel. Biomater Adv, 2023; 152:213494.
104.
WangX, GuoJ, YuQ, et al.Decellularized matrices for the treatment of tissue defects: From matrix origin to immunological mechanisms. Biomolecules, 2024; 32:509–522.
105.
FengY, SuL, LiuL, et al.Accurate spatio-temporal delivery of nitric oxide facilitates the programmable repair of avascular dense connective tissues injury. Adv Healthc Mater, 2024; 13(14):e2303740.
106.
YangR, WangM, ChenH, et al.Negative Poisson’s ratio scaffold-reinforced sodium alginate/gelatin hybrid hydrogels for intervertebral disc repair. Int J Biol Macromol, 2025; 330(Pt 1):147926.
107.
AdaliML, NieMD, ZhangQ, et al.Advances in annulus fibrosus repair: Hybrid scaffolds and fabrication techniques for regeneration. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 2025.
108.
WangZ, WangL, LiS, et al.Crosslinking stabilization strategy: A novel approach to cartilage-like repair of annulus fibrosus (AF) defects. Mater Today Bio, 2025; 31:101625.
109.
WerbnerB, LeeM, LeeA, et al.Non-enzymatic glycation of annulus fibrosus alters tissue-level failure mechanics in tension. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2022; 126:104992.
110.
TangJ, LuoY, WangQ, et al.Stimuli-responsive delivery systems for intervertebral disc degeneration. Int J Nanomedicine, 2024; 19:4735–4757.
111.
DistefanoTJ, ShmuklerJO, DaniasG, et al.The functional role of interface tissue engineering in annulus fibrosus repair: Bridging mechanisms of hydrogel integration with regenerative outcomes. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2020; 6(12):6556–6586.
112.
LiC, ChenJ, LvY, et al.Recent progress in electrospun nanofiber-based degenerated intervertebral disc repair. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2022; 8(1):16–31.
113.
WangXX, YuGF, ZhangJ, et al.Conductive polymer ultrafine fibers via electrospinning: Preparation, physical properties and applications. Prog Mater Sci, 2021; 115:100704.
114.
XueJ, WuT, DaiY, et al.Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibers: Methods, materials, and applications. Chem Rev, 2019; 119(8):5298–5415.
115.
HabanjarO, Diab-AssafM, Caldefie-ChezetF, et al.3D cell culture systems: Tumor application, advantages, and disadvantages. Int J Mol Sci, 2021; 22(22):12200.
GluaisM, ClouetJ, FusellierM, et al.In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an electrospun-aligned microfibrous implant for annulus fibrosus repair. Biomaterials, 2019; 205:81–93.
118.
YuanD, ChenZ, XiangX, et al.The establishment and biological assessment of a whole tissue-engineered intervertebral disc with PBST fibers and a chitosan hydrogel in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2019; 107(7):2305–2316.
119.
AshinskyBG, GullbrandSE, BonnevieED, et al.Sacrificial fibers improve matrix distribution and micromechanical properties in a tissue-engineered intervertebral disc. Acta Biomater, 2020; 111:232–241.
120.
MohammedY, HolmesA, KwokPCL, et al.Advances and future perspectives in epithelial drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2022; 186:114293.
121.
De PieriA, ByerleyAM, MusumeciCR, et al.Electrospinning and 3D bioprinting for intervertebral disc tissue engineering. JOR Spine, 2020; 3(4):e1117.
PereraK, IvoneR, NatekinE, et al.3D bioprinted implants for cartilage repair in intervertebral discs and knee menisci. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2021; 9:754113.
124.
CaiB, GongY, WangZ, et al.Microneedle arrays integrated with living organisms for smart biomedical applications. Theranostics, 2021; 11(20):10012–10029.
125.
EconomidouSN, DouroumisD. 3D printing as a transformative tool for microneedle systems: Recent advances, manufacturing considerations and market potential. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2021; 173:60–69.
126.
ZhouZ, ZeiterS, SchmidT, et al.Effect of the CCL5-releasing fibrin gel for intervertebral disc regeneration. Cartilage, 2020; 11(2):169–180.
127.
Saghari FardMR, KruegerJP, StichS, et al.A biodegradable polymeric matrix for the repair of annulus fibrosus defects in intervertebral discs. Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2022; 19(6):1311–1320.
128.
PageMI, EasleyJT, BonillaAF, et al.Biomechanical evaluation of a novel repair strategy for intervertebral disc herniation in an ovine lumbar spine model. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2022; 10:1018257.
