Three-dimensional (3D) (bio)printing has emerged as a relevant approach in bone tissue regeneration, enabling the precise fabrication of biomimetic scaffolds. The incorporation of extracellular vesicles (EVs) into 3D-(bio)printed constructs represents a promising cell-free strategy to enhance bone regeneration. EVs, as natural mediators of intercellular communication, contribute to osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and immune modulation. This review aims to evaluate current evidence on the use of EVs-enhanced 3D (bio)printing for bone regeneration. The literature search was conducted across different databases. In vitro and in vivo studies using EVs-containing (bio)printed constructs to assess osteogenic differentiation and/or bone regeneration were included. Out of 552 articles, 35 met the inclusion criteria. Most EVs were derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and were incorporated into scaffolds either before or after printing. Extrusion-based bioprinting was the most commonly used method. Nearly all studies reported enhanced osteogenic differentiation and bone formation in EV-treated groups, underscoring their therapeutic potential. EVs-based bioinks retain the regenerative benefits of stem cells while avoiding challenges associated to cell-based therapies. Despite encouraging results, standardization in EV isolation, storage, and delivery remains crucial for clinical translation. This review highlights the growing significance of EVs in regenerative medicine and identifies key areas for future research and development.
Impact Statement
This systematic review highlights the potential of extracellular vesicles (EVs)-based (bio)printed scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. By harnessing EVs’ regenerative properties, such as promoting osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and immunomodulation, this method presents a viable alternative to traditional cell-based techniques. When integrated with 3D (bio)printing, EVs facilitate the creation of bioactive scaffolds for bone regeneration, addressing challenges, such as cell viability and scalability. However, issues regarding the standardization of EV isolation, preservation, and integration must be addressed to fully realize the clinical potential of EV-enhanced (bio)printing technologies. Overall, EVs play a significant role in advancing personalized regenerative medicine solutions.
XueN, DingX, HuangR, et al.Bone tissue engineering in the treatment of bone defects. Pharmaceuticals (Basel), 2022; 15(7):879.
2.
HenkelJ, WoodruffMA, EpariDR, et al.Bone regeneration based on tissue engineering conceptions—A 21st century perspective. Bone Res, 2013; 1(3):216–248.
3.
XuF, RenH, ZhengM, et al.Development of biodegradable bioactive glass ceramics by DLP printed containing EPCs/BMSCs for bone tissue engineering of rabbit mandible defects. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2020; 103:103532.
4.
PapeHC, EvansA, KobbeP. Autologous bone graft: Properties and techniques. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2010; 24(Supplement 1):S36–S40.
5.
LeeJW, KangKS, LeeSH, et al.Bone regeneration using a microstereolithography-produced customized poly(propylene fumarate)/diethyl fumarate photopolymer 3D scaffold incorporating BMP-2 loaded PLGA microspheres. Biomaterials, 2011; 32(3):744–752.
6.
CabbadNC, StalderMW, ArroyaveA, et al.Autogenous bone cranioplasty: Review of a 42-Year experience by a single surgeon. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019; 143(6):1713–1723.
7.
García-GaretaE, CoathupMJ, BlunnGW. Osteoinduction of bone grafting materials for bone repair and regeneration. Bone, 2015; 81:112–121.
8.
CanceddaR, GiannoniP, MastrogiacomoM. A tissue engineering approach to bone repair in large animal models and in clinical practice. Biomaterials, 2007; 28(29):4240–4250.
9.
PantermehlS, EmmertS, FothA, et al.3D printing for soft tissue regeneration and applications in medicine. Biomedicines, 2021; 9(4):336.
10.
CuiH, NowickiM, FisherJP, et al.3D bioprinting for organ regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater, 2017; 6(1); doi: 10.1002/adhm.201601118
11.
ThayerP, MartinezH, GatenholmE. History and trends of 3D bioprinting. In: Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 2140. (CrookJM., eds.). Springer US: New York, NY; 2020; pp. 3–18; doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0520-2_1
12.
JiS, GuvendirenM. Recent advances in bioink design for 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2017; 5:23; doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00023
13.
GenovaT, RoatoI, CarossaM, et al.Advances on bone substitutes through 3D Bioprinting. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21(19):7012.
14.
DwivediR, MehrotraD. 3D bioprinting and craniofacial regeneration. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 2020; 10(4):650–659.
15.
ScaleraF, Esposito CorcioneC, MontagnaF, et al.Development and characterization of UV curable epoxy/hydroxyapatite suspensions for stereolithography applied to bone tissue engineering. Ceramics International, 2014; 40(10):15455–15462.
16.
Falguera UcedaMI, Sánchez-CasanovaS, Escudero-DuchC, et al.A narrative review of cell-based approaches for cranial bone regeneration. Pharmaceutics, 2022; 14(1):132.
17.
YuY, ZhangY, MartinJA, et al.Evaluation of cell viability and functionality in vessel-like bioprintable cell-laden tubular channels. J Biomech Eng, 2013; 135(9):91011.
18.
LamEHY, YuF, ZhuS, et al.3D bioprinting for next-generation personalized medicine. Int J Mol Sci, 2023; 24(7):6357.
19.
MandryckyC, WangZ, KimK, et al.3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv, 2016; 34(4):422–434.
20.
LeberfingerAN, RavnicDJ, DhawanA, et al.Concise review: Bioprinting of stem cells for transplantable tissue fabrication. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2017; 6(10):1940–1948.
21.
XingF, XiangZ, RommensPM, et al.3D bioprinting for vascularized tissue-engineered bone fabrication. Materials (Basel), 2020; 13(10):2278.
22.
SchieleNR, CorrDT, HuangY, et al.Laser-based direct-write techniques for cell printing. Biofabrication, 2010; 2(3):032001.
23.
GuillemotF, SouquetA, CatrosS, et al.High-throughput laser printing of cells and biomaterials for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 2010; 6(7):2494–2500.
24.
Gungor-OzkerimPS, InciI, ZhangYS, KhademhosseiniA, DokmeciMR. Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: An overview. Biomater Sci, 2018; 6(5):915–946.
25.
MurphySV, AtalaA. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol, 2014; 32(8):773–785.
26.
KhoeiniR, NosratiH, AkbarzadehA, et al.Natural and synthetic bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Advanced NanoBiomed Research, 2021; 1(8):2000097.
27.
LeeJ. Trends in developing extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics. Brain Tumor Res Treat, 2024; 12(3):153–161.
28.
WangQ, LiuY, ZhangS, et al.Exosome-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. IJB, 2023; 9(6):0114.
29.
HuangCC, KangM, ShiraziS, et al.3D Encapsulation and tethering of functionally engineered extracellular vesicles to hydrogels. Acta Biomater, 2021; 126:199–210.
30.
KalluriR, LeBleuVS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science, 2020; 367(6478):eaau6977.
31.
ZhangY, LiuY, LiuH, et al.Exosomes: Biogenesis, biologic function and clinical potential. Cell Biosci, 2019; 9(1):19.
32.
SelvamS, ThomasMB, BhowmickT, et al.Bioprinting of exosomes: Prospects and challenges for clinical applications. Int J Bioprint, 2023; 9(2):690.
33.
McLaughlinC, DattaP, SinghYP, et al.Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for therapeutic use and in bioengineering applications. Cells, 2022; 11(21):3366.
34.
WuY, SongP, WangM, et al.Extracellular derivatives for bone metabolism. J Adv Res, 2024; 66:329–347.
RhimWK, KimJY, LeeSY, et al.Recent advances in extracellular vesicle engineering and its applications to regenerative medicine. Biomater Res, 2023; 27(1):130.
37.
VigS, FernandesMH. Bone cell exosomes and emerging strategies in bone engineering. Biomedicines, 2022; 10(4):767.
38.
IvanovAA, KuznetsovaAV, PopovaOP, et al.Modern approaches to acellular therapy in bone and dental regeneration. Int J Mol Sci, 2021; 22(24):13454.
39.
Al-SowayanB, AlammariF, AlshareedaA. Preparing the bone tissue regeneration ground by exosomes: From diagnosis to therapy. Molecules, 2020; 25(18):4205.
40.
OlaecheaA, BenabdellahK, Vergara-BuenaventuraA, et al.Preclinical evidence for the use of oral mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in bone regenerative therapy: A systematic review. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2023; 12(12):791–800.
41.
HuangX, LinJ, Demner-FushmanD. Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 2006; 2006:359–363.
42.
PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021; 372:n71.
43.
McGowanJ, SampsonM, SalzwedelDM, et al.PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol, 2016; 75:40–46.
44.
OuzzaniM, HammadyH, FedorowiczZ, et al.Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev, 2016; 5(1):210.
45.
WaltmanL, Van EckNJ, NoyonsECM. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J Informetrics, 2010; 4(4):629–635.
46.
ShethVH, ShahNP, JainR, et al.Development and validation of a risk-of-bias tool for assessing in vitro studies conducted in dentistry: The QUIN. J Prosthet Dent, 2024; 131(6):1038–1042.
47.
HooijmansCR, RoversMM, De VriesRB, et al.SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2014; 14(1):43.
48.
SunY, ZhangB, ZhaiD, et al.Three-dimensional printing of bioceramic-induced macrophage exosomes: Immunomodulation and osteogenesis/angiogenesis. NPG Asia Mater, 2021; 13(1):72.
49.
ZhangY, HuoM, WangY, et al.A tailored bioactive 3D porous poly(lactic-acid)-exosome scaffold with osteo-immunomodulatory and osteogenic differentiation properties. J Biol Eng, 2022; 16(1):22.
50.
HanP, RaveendranN, LiuC, et al.3D bioprinted small extracellular vesicles from periodontal cells enhance mesenchymal stromal cell function. Biomater Adv, 2024; 158:213770.
51.
LeiH, CaoH, ChenX, et al.A functionalized 3D‐Printed Ti6Al4V “cell climbing frame” inspired by Marine sponges to recruit and rejuvenate autologous BMSCs in osteoporotic bone repair. Advanced Materials, 2025; 37(11):2413238.
52.
BariE, ScocozzaF, PerteghellaS, et al.Three-Dimensional bioprinted controlled release Scaffold containing mesenchymal stem/stromal lyosecretome for bone regeneration: Sterile manufacturing and in vitro biological efficacy. Biomedicines, 2022; 10(5):1063.
53.
KsouriR, OdabasS, Yar SağlamAS. Exosome loaded 3D printed magnetic PLA constructs: A candidate for bone tissue engineering. Prog Addit Manuf, 2025; 10(1):247–260.
54.
LiX, ZhangH, XiongY, et al.Porous Titanium/SF sponge composite scaffold with loads of gentamicin and small extracellular vesicles to improve antibacterial and osteogenesis properties. Adv Materials Technologies, 2024; 9(10):2301385.
55.
ManK, BarrosoIA, BrunetMY, et al.Controlled release of epigenetically-enhanced extracellular vesicles from a GelMA/Nanoclay composite hydrogel to promote bone repair. Int J Mol Sci, 2022; 23(2):832.
56.
WuZ, PuP, SuZ, et al.Schwann Cell-derived exosomes promote bone regeneration and repair by enhancing the biological activity of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2020; 531(4):559–565.
57.
WangT, LiW, ZhangY, et al.Bioprinted constructs that simulate nerve-bone crosstalk to improve microenvironment for bone repair. Bioact Mater, 2023; 27:377–393.
58.
ZhaoR, ShenY, DengX, et al.From brain to bone: Harnessing extracellular vesicles released from TBI to enhance osteogenesis by 3D-Printed hydrogel scaffold. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2023; 264:110909.
59.
ZhangY, FangM, ZhuJ, et al.Exosome-loaded hyaluronic acid hydrogel composite with oxygen-producing 3D printed polylactic acid scaffolds for bone tissue repair and regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol, 2024; 274(Pt 1):132970.
60.
LiXR, DengQS, HeSH, et al.3D cryo-printed hierarchical porous scaffolds provide immobilization of surface-functionalized sleep-inspired small extracellular vesicles: Synergistic therapeutic strategies for vascularized bone regeneration based on macrophage phenotype modulation and angiogenesis-osteogenesis coupling. J Nanobiotechnology, 2024; 22(1):764.
61.
MaevskaiaE, GuerreroJ, GhayorC, et al.Functionalization of ceramic scaffolds with exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells for bone tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci, 2024; 25(7):3826.
62.
MaL, LiG, LeiJ, et al.Nanotopography sequentially mediates human mesenchymal stem cell-derived small extracellular vesicles for enhancing osteogenesis. ACS Nano, 2022; 16(1):415–430.
63.
GaoW, DengJ, RenJ, et al.3D-printed hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds combined with exos from BMSCs cultured in 3D HA scaffolds to repair bone defects. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2022; 247:110315.
64.
XieH, WangZ, ZhangL, et al.Development of an angiogenesis-promoting microvesicle-alginate-polycaprolactone composite graft for bone tissue engineering applications. PeerJ, 2016; 4:e2040.
65.
SunX, MaoY, LiuB, et al.Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes enhance 3D-Printed scaffold functions and promote alveolar bone defect repair by enhancing angiogenesis. J Pers Med, 2023; 13(2):180.
66.
HuH, ZhangH, BuZ, et al.Small extracellular vesicles released from bioglass/hydrogel scaffold promote vascularized bone regeneration by transferring miR-23a-3p. Int J Nanomedicine, 2022; 17:6201–6220.
67.
LianM, QiaoZ, QiaoS, et al.Nerve growth factor-preconditioned mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome-functionalized 3D-Printed hierarchical porous scaffolds with neuro-promotive properties for enhancing innervated bone regeneration. ACS Nano, 2024; 18(10):7504–7520.
68.
LiuH, GuR, LiW, et al.Engineering 3D-Printed strontium-titanium scaffold-integrated highly bioactive serum exosomes for critical bone defects by osteogenesis and angiogenesis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2023; 15(23):27486–27501.
69.
ZhaY, LiY, LinT, et al.Progenitor cell-derived exosomes endowed with VEGF plasmids enhance osteogenic induction and vascular remodeling in large segmental bone defects. Theranostics, 2021; 11(1):397–409.
70.
MaL, KeW, LiaoZ, et al.Small extracellular vesicles with nanomorphology memory promote osteogenesis. Bioact Mater, 2022; 17:425–438.
71.
ZhaiM, ZhuY, YangM, et al.Human mesenchymal stem cell derived exosomes enhance cell‐free bone regeneration by altering their miRNAs profiles. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2020; 7(19):2001334.
72.
KongW, RenY, ZhangC, et al.Exosomes endow photocurable 3D printing 45S5 ceramic scaffolds to enhance angiogenesis-osteogenesis coupling for accelerated bone regeneration. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2024; 280:111455.
73.
LiuH, LiuX, LiuT, et al.Hierarchical microstructure design of multifunctional soft collagen-incorporated 3D hard polyetherketoneketone scaffolds for augmented bone regeneration. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2024; 287:111833.
74.
WangT, FangX, ZhaoH, et al.Small extracellular vesicles from 3D PCL/HA scaffold-cultured and EMF-stimulated BMSCs promote lumbar fusion via PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2025; 294:112165.
75.
MaS, MaB, YangY, et al.Functionalized 3D hydroxyapatite scaffold by fusion peptides-mediated small extracellular vesicles of stem cells for bone tissue regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2024; 16(3):3064–3081.
76.
PizzicannellaJ, DiomedeF, GugliandoloA, et al.3D Printing PLA/Gingival Stem Cells/EVs upregulate miR-2861 and -210 during osteoangiogenesis commitment. Int J Mol Sci, 2019; 20(13):3256.
77.
DiomedeF, GugliandoloA, CardelliP, et al.Three-dimensional printed PLA scaffold and human gingival stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: A new tool for bone defect repair. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2018; 9(1):104.
78.
SunT, FengZ, HeW, et al.Novel 3D-printing bilayer GelMA-based hydrogel containing BP,β-TCP and exosomes for cartilage-bone integrated repair. Biofabrication, 2023; 16(1); doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad04fe
79.
KangY, XuJ, MengL, et al.3D bioprinting of dECM/Gel/QCS/nHAp hybrid scaffolds laden with mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes to improve angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Biofabrication, 2023; 15(2); doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/acb6b8
80.
LiQ, YuH, ZhaoF, et al.3D printing of microenvironment‐specific bioinspired and exosome‐reinforced hydrogel Scaffolds for efficient cartilage and subchondral bone regeneration. Advanced Science, 2023; 10(26):2303650.
81.
ZhangB, PeiZ, HeW, et al.3D-printed porous zinc scaffold combined with bioactive serum exosomes promotes bone defect repair in rabbit radius. Aging (Albany NY), 2024; 16(11):9625–9648.
82.
YunJH, LeeHY, YeouSH, et al.Electrostatic attachment of exosome onto a 3D-fabricated calcium silicate/polycaprolactone for enhanced bone regeneration. Mater Today Bio, 2024; 29:101283.
83.
McGuinnessLA, HigginsJPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods, 2021; 12(1):55–61.
84.
CaiH, GuoH. Mesenchymal stem cells and their exocytotic vesicles. Int J Mol Sci, 2023; 24(3):2085.
WangS, LiuZ, YangS, et al.Extracellular vesicles secreted by human gingival mesenchymal stem cells promote bone regeneration in rat femoral bone defects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2023; 11:1098172.
87.
WangY, KongB, ChenX, et al.BMSC exosome-enriched acellular fish scale scaffolds promote bone regeneration. J Nanobiotechnology, 2022; 20(1):444.
88.
ImanishiY, HataM, MatsukawaR, et al.Efficacy of extracellular vesicles from dental pulp stem cells for bone regeneration in rat calvarial bone defects. Inflamm Regen, 2021; 41(1):12.
89.
XieH, WangZ, ZhangL, et al.Extracellular vesicle-functionalized decalcified bone matrix scaffolds with enhanced pro-angiogenic and pro-bone regeneration activities. Sci Rep, 2017; 7:45622.
90.
ZhangS, LuC, ZhengS, et al.Hydrogel loaded with bone marrow stromal cell-derived exosomes promotes bone regeneration by inhibiting inflammatory responses and angiogenesis. World J Stem Cells, 2024; 16(5):499–511.
91.
BianX, MaK, ZhangC, et al.Therapeutic angiogenesis using stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: An emerging approach for treatment of ischemic diseases. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2019; 10(1):158.
92.
VahkalB, AltosaarI, ArianaA, et al.Human milk extracellular vesicles modulate inflammation and cell survival in intestinal and immune cells. Pediatr Res. 2024. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41390-024-03757-5
93.
HurYH, CerioneRA, AntonyakMA. Extracellular vesicles and their roles in stem cell biology. Stem Cells, 2020; 38(4):469–476.
94.
ChenW, WuP, JinC, et al.Advances in the application of extracellular vesicles derived from three-dimensional culture of stem cells. J Nanobiotechnology, 2024; 22(1):215.
95.
CharoenviriyakulC, TakahashiY, NishikawaM, et al.Preservation of exosomes at room temperature using lyophilization. Int J Pharm, 2018; 553(1–2):1–7.
96.
AmsarRM, WijayaCH, AnaID, et al.Extracellular vesicles: A promising cell-free therapy for cartilage repair. Future Sci OA, 2022; 8(2):FSO774.
97.
ZhangW, LingY, SunY, et al.Extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells promote wound healing and skin regeneration by modulating multiple cellular changes: A brief review. Genes (Basel), 2023; 14(8):1516.
98.
ShenH, YonedaS, Abu-AmerY, et al.Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles attenuate the early inflammatory response after tendon injury and repair. J Orthop Res, 2020; 38(1):117–127.
99.
HercherD, NguyenMQ, DworakH. Extracellular vesicles and their role in peripheral nerve regeneration. Exp Neurol, 2022; 350:113968.
100.
WitwerKW, BuzásEI, BemisLT, et al.Standardization of sample collection, isolation and analysis methods in extracellular vesicle research. J of Extracellular Vesicle, 2013; 2(1):20360.
101.
WelshJA, GoberdhanDCI, O’DriscollL, et al.; MISEV Consortium. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): From basic to advanced approaches. J Extracell Vesicles, 2024; 13(2):e12404.
102.
Van DelenM, DerdelinckxJ, WoutersK, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials assessing safety and efficacy of human extracellular vesicle-based therapy. J Extracell Vesicles, 2024; 13(7):e12458.
103.
AlleleinS, Medina-PerezP, LopesALH, et al.Potential and challenges of specifically isolating extracellular vesicles from heterogeneous populations. Sci Rep, 2021; 11(1):11585.
104.
NieuwlandR, SiljanderPRM, Falcón-PérezJM, et al.Reproducibility of extracellular vesicle research. Eur J Cell Biol, 2022; 101(3):151226.
105.
JeyaramA, JaySM. Preservation and storage stability of extracellular vesicles for therapeutic applications. Aaps J, 2017; 20(1):1.
106.
AhmadianS, JafariN, TamadonA, et al.Different storage and freezing protocols for extracellular vesicles: A systematic review. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2024; 15(1):453.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
