This study applied an institutional logics framework to examine issues that challenged revitalization efforts in three distressed neighborhoods in an urban Midwest U.S. city. Specifically, it examined whether emergent hybrid (organizational) logics influenced multiple disconnected partnerships and collaborations. Thematic analyses were conducted on data from 39 semi-structured interviews conducted in two phases (n = 11 and n = 28, respectively). The interviewees were from the public, private, academia, and faith-based sectors and included interventions that impacted food insecurity, education, health, the built environment, crime, and substance and alcohol abuse. The findings showed the importance of trust as a hybrid logic impacting collaborations at multiple levels; we link this to additional findings on the level of structural embeddedness in the studied neighborhoods. The findings support the need for public health and community leaders to address gaps in trust/embeddedness in order to improve the success of community interventions. Practitioners and future researchers can apply the concept of hybrid institutional logics in the analysis of neighborhood collaborations, especially when there are multiple collaborations involving partners from different sectors.
AlexanderJeffrey A.ComfortMaureen B.WeinerBryan J.BogueRichard. 2001. “Leadership in Collaborative Community Health Partnerships.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership12(2):159–75.
2.
AnanatElizabeth Oltmans. 2011. “The Wrong Side(s) of the Tracks: The Causal Effects of Racial Segregation on Urban Poverty and Inequality.” American Economic Journal-Applied Economics3(2):34–66.
3.
ArnsteinSherry. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners35(4):216–24.
4.
AvendanoMauricioKawachiIchiro. 2014. “Why Do Americans Have Shorter Life Expectancy and Worse Health than Do People in Other High-Income Countries?” Annual Review of Public Health35:307–25.
5.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W.1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48(2):147–60.
6.
DubinJon C.1993. “From Junkyards to Gentrification: Explicating a Right to Protective Zoning in Low-Income Communities of Color.” Minnesota Law Review77:739–801.
7.
FawcettStephenSchultzJerryWatson-ThompsonJomellaFoxMichaelBrembyRoderick. 2010. “Building Multisectoral Partnerships for Population Health and Health Equity.” Preventing Chronic Disease7(6):A118.
8.
FieldingJonathan E.TeutschStevenKohHoward. 2012. “Health Reform and Healthy People Initiative.” American Journal of Public Health102(1):30–33.
9.
FinchamRobinForbesTom. 2015. “Three’s a Crowd: The Role of Inter-Logic Relationships in Highly Complex Institutional Fields.” British Journal of Management26(4):657–70.
10.
FriedlandRogerAlfordRobert R.1991. “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” Pp. 232–63 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Paul J. DiMaggioPowellWalter W.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
FulliloveMindy T.2004. Root Shock: How Tearing Up City Neighborhoods Hurts America and What We Can Do about It. New York: New Village Press.
12.
GhaffariLeilaKleinJuan LuisBaudinWilfredo Angulo. 2018. “Toward a Socially Acceptable Gentrification: A Review of Strategies and Practices against Displacement.” Geography Compass12(2):e12355.
13.
GiordanoGiuseppe NicolaLindstromMartin. 2016. “Trust and Health: Testing the Reverse Causality Hypothesis.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health70(1):10–16.
14.
GlaserVern L.FastNathanael J.HarmonDerek J.GreenSandy E.Jr.2016. “Institutional Frame Switching: How Institutional Logics Shape Individual Action.” Pp. 35–69 in Joel Gehman, Michael Lounsbury, and Royston Greenwood (eds.) How Institutions Matter! (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 48A) Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
15.
GoetzEdward G.2011. “Where Have All the Towers Gone? The Dismantling of Public Housing in US Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs33(3):267–87.
16.
GranovetterMark S.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology78(6):1360–80.
17.
GranovetterMark S.1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology91(3):481–510.
18.
GreenLawrenceDanielMarkNovickLloyd. 2001. “Partnerships and Coalitions for Community-Based Research.” Public Health Reports116(Suppl. 1):20–31.
19.
GulatiRanjay. 2007. Managing Network Resources: Alliances, Affiliations, and Other Relational Assets. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
HarkavyIra. 2016. “Engaging Urban Universities as Anchor Institutions for Health Equity.” American Journal of Public Health106(12):2155–57.
21.
HartmanLaura PincusKanwalroopKathy D.2018. “Cross-Sector Partnerships: An Examination of Success Factors.” Business and Society Review123(1):181–214.
22.
HeinzeKathryn L.SoderstromSaraHeinzeJustin E.2016. “Translating Institutional Change to Local Communities: The Role of Linking Organizations.” Organization Studies37(8):1141–69.
23.
Institute of Medicine Committee on Assuring the Health of the Public in the 21st Century. 2003. The Future of the Public’s Health in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
24.
JarrisPaul E.MonroeJudith A.PestronkRobert M.2012. “Better Health Requires Partnerships and a Systems Approach.” American Journal of Public Health102(11):4–5.
25.
KushnerHoward I.SterkClaire E.2005. “The Limits of Social Capital: Durkheim, Suicide, and Social Cohesion.” American Journal of Public Health95(7):1139–43.
26.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy A.1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
MayerVictoria L.HillierAmyBachhuberMarcus A.LongJudith A.2014. “Food Insecurity, Neighborhood Food Access, and Food Assistance in Philadelphia.” Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine91(6):1087–97.
28.
MeschGustavo S.SchwirianKent P.1996. “The Effectiveness of Neighborhood Collective Action.” Social Problems43(4):467–83.
29.
MeyerJohn W.RowanBrian. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology83(2):340–63.
30.
MurrayFiona. 2010. “The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions.” American Journal of Sociology116(2):341–88.
31.
PetersB. Guy. 2018. “Governance: Ten Thoughts about Five Propositions.” International Social Science Journal68(227–28):5–14.
32.
PfefferJeffreySalancikGerald R.1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
33.
PostJames E.PrestonLee E.SachsSybille. 2002. Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
PowellWalter W.1990. “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization.” Research in Organizational Behavior12:295–336.
35.
RichMichael J.GilesMichael W.SternEmily. 2001. “Collaborating to Reduce Poverty: Views from City Halls and Community-Based Organizations.” Urban Affairs Review37(2):184–204.
36.
SandmannLorilee R.KliewerBrandon W.2012. “Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Power: Recognizing Processes that Undermine Effective Community-University Partnerships.” Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship5(2):4.
37.
ShierMicheal L.HandyFemida. 2016. “Cross-Sector Partnerships: Factors Supporting Social Innovation by Nonprofits.” Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance40(3):253–66.
38.
SkelcherChrisSmithSteven Rathgeb. 2015. “Theorizing Hybridity: Institutional Logics, Complex Organizations, and Actor Identities: The Case of Nonprofits.” Public Administration93(2):433–48.
39.
SmithSteven RathgebLipskyMichael. 1993. Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
StokerGerry. 1998. “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.” International Social Science Journal50:17–28.
41.
SugrueThomas J.2014. The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit. Updated ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
ThorntonPatricia H.OcasioWilliam. 1999. “Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958-1990.” American Journal of Sociology105(3):801–43.
43.
ThorntonPatricia H.OcasioWilliamLounsburyMichael. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
44.
TseliosVassilisNobackIngeMcCannPhilipvan DijkJouke. 2015. “Local Social Engagement, Satisfaction, and Embeddedness in the Netherlands: Which Effects Matter and for Whom?” Environment and Planning A47(5):1132–54.
45.
UzziBrian. 1997. “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness.” Administrative Science Quarterly42(1):35–67.
46.
VermeulenFlorisMinkoffDebra C.van der MeerTom. 2016. “The Local Embedding of Community-Based Organizations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly45(1):23–44.
47.
WagenaarHendrick. 2007. “Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation: How Citizens and Public Officials Harness the Complexities of Neighborhood Decline.” The American Review of Public Administration37(1):17–50.
48.
WilliamsonOliver E.1981. “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach.” American Journal of Sociology87(3):548–77.
