Since the 1980s, China and Mexico adopted market-oriented public policies, which impacted all spheres of their respective societies. This study pays special attention to the areas of income, literacy, and urbanization; identifies relevant policies effects on their educational systems; and proposes a model of education index for analyzing their transformations. It found regional inequalities between west and east China and southern and north-central Mexico a crucial factor that affects the Education Index. In conclusion, we provide a theoretical and practical understanding of the education inequalities occurred in both countries.
AguilaEmmaAkhmedjonovAlisherBasurto-DavilaRicardoKumarKrishna B.KupsSarahShatzHoward J.2012. “Inequality, Poverty, and Social Policy in Mexico.” Pp. 103–28 in United States and Mexico: Ties That Bind, Issues That Divide, edited by E.AguilaBasurto-DavilaR.KupsS.KumarK. B.AkhmedjonovA.Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
2.
Andrés-RosalesRoldanCzarneckiLukaszMendoza-GonzálezMiguel. 2019. “A Spatial Analysis of Precariousness and the Gender Wage Gap in Mexico, 2005–2018.” The Journal of Chinese Sociology6:13. doi:10.1186/s40711-019-0104-2.
3.
BlancoEmilio. 2017. “¿Reproduccióon movilidad cultural? Recursos culturales, disposiciones educativas y aprendizajes en PISA 2012 en México.” [Reproduction cultural mobility? Cultural resources, educational arrangements and apprenticeships in PISA 2012 in Mexico]. Estudios Sociológicos35(103):3–32.
China National Human Development Report. 2016. Social Innovation for Inclusive Human Development. Beijing, China: China Publishing Group Corporation, China Translation & Publishing House.
6.
CreightonMathewParkHyunjoon. 2010. “Closing the Gender Gap: Six Decades of Reform in Mexican Education.” Comparative Education Review54(4):513–37. doi:10.1086/653702.
7.
CzarneckiLukasz. 2017. Programas de transferencia monetaria en la Ciudad de México. El caso de personas mayores y estudiantes. [Money transfer programs in Mexico City. The case of the elderly and the youth]. Mexico City: Secretary of Institutional Development, Institute of Economic Research, National Autonomous University of Mexico.
8.
CzarneckiLukaszVargas-ChanesDelfino. 2018. “Chapter 3: Welfare Regime, Neoliberal Transformation, and Social Exclusion in Mexico 1980-2015.” Pp. 72–88 in Social Welfare Responses in a Neoliberal Era: Policies, Practices and Social Problems, edited by FallovM. A.BladC.Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
9.
De los ReyesGuillermo. 1997. “NAFTA and the Future of Mexican Higher Education.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science550(1):96–104.
10.
DomańskiHenryk. 2006. “Barriers of the Selection to Secondary and University-Level Education.” Polish Sociological Review156:471–87.
11.
DongWeizhenLeXin. 2019. “Employment and Income Policy.” Pp. 124–45 in Social Policy in China: From State-Led to Market-Led Economy, edited by DongW., Oakville, Ontario, Canada: Rock’s Mills Press.
12.
DongWeizhenWangZhennanQinLichun. 2019. “Education Policy in China.” Pp. 146–69 in Social Policy in China: From State-Led to Market-Led Economy, edited by W.Dong, Oakville, Ontario, Canada: Rock’s Mills Press.
13.
DubetFrançois. 2014. La préférence pour l’inégalité. Comprendre la crise des solidarités [The Preference for Inequality. Understanding the Solidarity Crisis]. Paris, France: Seuil.
14.
El Colegio de México. 2018. Inequalities in Mexico 2018. Mexico City: Red de Estudios sobre Desigualdades, El Colegio de México.
15.
GuJiafeng. 2012. “Harmonious Expansion of China’s Higher Education: A New Growth Pattern.” Higher Education63(4):513–28.
HavighurstRobert. 1967. “Urbanization and Education in the United States.” International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue Internationale de l’Education13(4):393–409.
18.
HuBi YingSzenteJudit. 2009. “Exploring the Quality of Early Childhood Education in China: Implications for Early Childhood Teacher Education.” Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education30(3):247–62.
19.
Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. 2016. “Infraestructura, mobiliario y materiales de apoyo educativo en las escuelas primarias: ECEA 2014.” [Infrastructure, furniture and educational support materials in primary schools: ECEA 2014]. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación.
20.
LaiFangLiuChengfangLuoRenfuZhangLinxiuMaXiaochenBaiYujieSharbonoBrianRozelleScott. 2014. “The Education of China’s Migrant Children: The Missing Link in China’s Education System.” International Journal of Educational Development37:68–77.
21.
LaurellAsa Cristina. 2015. “Three Decades of Neoliberalism in Mexico: The Destruction of Society.” International Journal of Health Services45(2):246–64.
22.
Mier y Terán RochaMaría MartaRomeroCecilia Rabell. 2002. “Inequalities in Mexican Children’s Educational Attainment.” Revista Mexicana de Sociología64(3):63–89. (In Spanish)
23.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2016. China Statistical Yearbook 2016. Beijing, China: China Statistics Press, National Bureau of Statistics of China.
24.
National Institute of Statistics and Geography. 2015. Intercensal Survey 2015. Mexico City: National Institute of Statistics and Geography.
25.
PeugnyCamilleVan de VeldeCécileHamiltonPeter. 2013. “Rethinking Inter-Generational Inequality.” Revue Française de Sociologie54(4):641–62.
26.
SEP, Dirección General de Educación y Planeación Pública. 2015. Sistema Educativo de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Principales Cifras 2014-2015. [Mexican Education System, Top Figures 2014-2015]. Mexico City, Mexico: Secretaria de Educación Pública. (In Spanish)
27.
SEP, Dirección General de Educación y Planeación Pública. 2016. Sistema Educativo de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Cifras preeliminares 2015-2016. Mexico City, Mexico: Secretaria de Educación Pública. (In Spanish)
28.
ShenJianfa. 2006. “Estimating Urbanization Levels in Chinese Provinces in 1982-2000.” International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique74(1):89–107.
29.
SolísPatricio. 2018. Barreras estructurales a la movilidad social intergeneracional en México: Un enfoque multidimensional. Santiago, Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (In Spanish)
30.
TellesEdward. 2014. Pigmentocracies: Ethnicity, Race, and Color in Latin America. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
31.
TorcheFlorencia. 2010. “Economic Crisis and Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Latin America.” Sociology of Education83(2):85–110.
32.
TsuiMingRichLynne. 2002. “The Only Child and Educational Opportunity for Girls in Urban China.” Gender & Society16(1):74–92.
United Nations Development Programme. 2015. Human Development Index of the Federal Units. Mexico City: United Nations Development Programme.
36.
WangLi. 2012. “Social Exclusion and Education Inequality: Towards an Integrated Analytical Framework for the Urban–Rural Divide in China.” British Journal of Sociology of Education33(3):409–30.
