Mediating Program Evaluations

Abstract

Organizations conduct external evaluations for several reasons. They might want an independent assessment showing that their program is effective to garner community support, favorably influence public policy related to their mission, support their future bids for financial support, provide critical information for continuous quality assessment (although much of the latter is conducted internally by the organizations themselves), or because an external evaluation is required under the terms of a grant they received. The author focuses on the latter and argues that the quality of these evaluations is dependent on the continued involvement of funding agencies after the grant is awarded. He suggests four things that funders can do to address this challenge.