This paper uses the experiences of a sociologist as an expert mitigation witness in capital murder cases that involved the death of a child. The common themes (scripts) in these cases are explored. The paper then explains why these scripts are important in mitigation work. Finally, the paper fits this research into the previous sociological literature on routines, typifications, and their function in organizations/professions handling large numbers of like clients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BabbieEarl. 2001. The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
2.
BalintMichael. 1957. The Doctor, His Patient, and the Illness. New York: International Universities Press.
3.
BeckerHoward S.1998. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research While You're Doing It. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
4.
BergBruce. 1989. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5.
CharvatAnn. 1996. “Mitigation Evaluation: Preparation for a Death Penalty Trial.”Clinical Sociology Review14: 119–35.
6.
CrockerP.L.1985. “The Meaning of Equality for Battered Women Who Kill Men in Self-Defense.”Harvard Women's Law Review8: 121–53.
7.
DayanMarshall. 1991. “The Penalty Phase of the Capital Case: Good Character Evidence.”The Champion: 14–17.
8.
ForsythCraig J.1995. “The Sociologist as Mitigation Expert in First Degree Murder Cases.”Clinical Sociology Review13: 134–44.
9.
ForsythCraig J.1996. “Sociology and Capital Murder: A Question of Life or Death.” Pp. 57–69 in Witnessing for Sociology: Sociologists in the Courtroom, edited by JenkinsPamelaKroll-SmithSteven. New York: Greenwood Press.
10.
ForsythCraig J.1997. “Using Sociology and Establishing Sociological Turf: The Sociologist as Expert in Capital Murder Cases.”Sociological Spectrum17, 4: 375–88.
11.
ForsythCraig J.1998. “The Use of the Subculture of Violence as Mitigation in a Capital Murder Case.”Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology14, 2: 67–75.
12.
ForsythCraig J.BankstonCarl L.III1997. “Mitigation in a Capital Murder Case with a Vietnamese Defendant: The Interpretation of Social Context.”Journal of Applied Sociology114, 1: 147–65.
13.
GlaserBarneyStraussAnselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
14.
GreenleeEdward R.2002. “The Louisiana Indigent Defense Assistance Board”Louisiana Bar Journal50, 2: 97, 101.
15.
Kroll-SmithSteveJenkinsPamela J.. 1996. “Old Stories, New Audiences: Sociological Knowledge in Courts.” Pp 1–15 in Witnessing for Sociology: Sociologists in the Courtroom, edited by JenkinsPamelaKroll-SmithSteven. New York: Greenwood Press.
16.
LeBoeufDenise. 2002. “Capital Post-Conviction Project of Louisiana”Louisiana Bar Journal, 50, 2: 98, 102.
17.
NajmiM.A.1992. “Sociologist as Expert Witness.”The Useful Sociologist13:4.
18.
PryorDouglas W.1996. Unspeakable Acts: Why Men Sexually Abuse Children. New York: New York University Press.
19.
RadeletM.L.1987. “Sociologists as Expert Witnesses in Capital Cases: A Case Study.” Pp. 119–34 in Expert Witnesses: Criminologists in the Courtroom, edited by AndersonP.R.WinfreeL.T.. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
ReisnerRonald L.1998. “Victim Impact Testimony in New Jersey Capital Cases: A Case Study in Criminal Justice Policy Development.”Criminal Justice Policy Review9, 3/4: 335–64.
21.
RoseArnold M.1967. “The Sociologist as an Expert Witness in Court Cases.” Pp. 100–118 in The Uses of Sociology edited by LazarsfeldPaul F.SewellWilliam H.HaroldL. Wilensky New YorkBasic Books.
22.
ScheffThomas. 1978. “Typification in Rehabilitation Agencies.” Pp. 172–75 in Deviance: The Interactionist Perspective, edited by RubingtonE.WeinbergM.. New York: Macmillan.
23.
SudnowDavid. 1965. “Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender's Office.”Social Problems12, 3: 255–76.
24.
ThoresenJean H.1993. “The Sociologist as Expert Witness.”Clinical Sociological Review11: 109–22.
25.
TurowScott. 2002. Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer's Reflections on Dealing with the Death Penalty. New York: Picador.
26.
U.S. Department of Justice. Office for Victims of Crime. 2002. Victim Input into Plea Agreements, Legal Series Bulletin #7. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
WeberMax. [1925] 1946. “Science as a Vocation.” Pp. 129–56 in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited and translated by GerthHanWrightC. Mills. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
WolfgangMarvin. 1974. “The Social Scientist in Court.”Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology65: 239–247.
