Historically, U.S. sociologists employed outside the professoriate had lower status and were less likely to be considered professionals than those inside. Academic restructuring may result in a closing of the status gap. This article, based on the responses of 600 PhD sociologists employed in applied, research, and policy positions, focuses on whether historically agreed upon professional characteristics, such as use of specialized knowledge, autonomy, ethical norms, and basic research, are related to overall job satisfaction and satisfaction with economic security. We expected that professional characteristics were significantly related to overall satisfaction, but not to satisfaction with economic security. Our expectations were generally met. Respondents used sociological theories, methods, and concepts to analyze social issues, design interventions, and evaluate solutions. Professional job characteristics result in higher job satisfaction, when other factors are held constant. In contrast, professional characteristics do not significantly increase satisfaction with economic security; rather sector; occupation, and age cohort appear to do so.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottAndrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BelousRichard. 1989. The Contingent Economy: The Growth of the Temporary, Part-Time and Subcontracted Workforce. Washington, DC: National Planning Association.
3.
BurawoyMichael. 2005. “2004 Presidential Address: For Public Sociology.”American Sociological Review70: 4–28.
CamicCharles. 2007. “On Edge: Sociology During the Great Depression and the New Deal.” Pp. 225–80 in Sociology in America: A History, edited by CalhounCraig. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
6.
CurtisJohn W.JacobeMonica F.. 2006. “Consequences: An Increasingly Contingent Faculty.” Pp 98–AAUP Policy Documents and Reports, volume 10.
7.
FreidsonEliot. 1984. “The Changing Nature of Professional Control.”Annual Review of Sociology10: 1–20.
8.
FritzJan. 2005. “The Scholar Practitioners; The Development of Clinical Sociology in the United States.” Pp. 40–56 in Diverse Histories of American Sociology, edited by BlasiAnthony J.. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
9.
GeeMary. 2007. “Applied and Clinical Sociology Careers by the Numbers.”Footnotes, January: 8.
10.
George Mason University, Center for Social Science Research. 2006. Survey of the Job Market for Recent Sociology Ph.D.s in the Washington DC Metropolitan Area. Center for Social Science Research, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA. Unpublished report.
11.
HackettEdward. 2006. Evaluation and HSD. Paper presented at the HSD 2006 Principal Investigators Meeting, September, Washington, DC.
12.
HackettEdward. 2001. “Science as a Vocation in the 1990s: The Changing Organizational Culture of Academic Science.” Pp 101–38 in Degrees of Compromise: Industrial Interests and Academic Values, edited by CroissantJ.RestivoS. P.. New York: State University of New York Press.
13.
HarrisonBennettBluestoneBarry. 1990. The Great U-Turn: Corporate Restructuring and the Polarizing of America. New York: Basic Books.
14.
KallebergArne L.1977. “Work Values and Job Rewards: A Theory of Job Satisfaction.”American Sociological Review42, 1: 124–43.
15.
KallebergArne L.RasellEdithCassirerNaomiReskinBarbara F.HudsonKenWebsterDavidAppelbaumEileenSpalter-RothRoberta. 1997. Nonstandard Work, Substandard Jobs: Flexible Work Arrangements in the U.S. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
16.
KleinmanDaniel LeeVallasSteven Peter. 2006. “Contradiction in Convergence: Universities and Industry in the Biotechnology Field.” Pp. 35–62 in The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power, edited by FrickelScottMooreKelly. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
17.
LeichtKevin T.FennellMary L.. 1997. “The Changing Organizational Context of Professional Work.”Annual Review of Sociology23: 215–31.
18.
LengermannPatriciaNiebruggeGillian. 2007. “Thrice Told: Narratives of Sociology's Relation to Social Work.” Pp. 63–114 in Sociology in America: A History, edited by CalhounCraig. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
19.
LightDonald. 1974. “Introduction: The Structure of the Academic Professions.”Sociology of Education47: 2–28.
20.
MarburgerJohn H.2006. The Role of the Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences in Interdisciplinary Research. Paper presented at the HSD 2006 Principal Investigators Meeting, September, Washington, DC.
21.
McAdamDoug. 2007. “From Relevance to Irrelevance: The Curious Impact of the Sixties on Public Sociology.” Pp. 411–426 in Sociology in America: A History, edited by CalhounCraig. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
22.
MooreWilbert E.1970. The Professions: Roles and Rules. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23.
MortimerJeylan T.LorenceJon. 1989. “Satisfaction and Involvement: Disentangling a Deceptively Simple Relationship.”Social Psychology Quarterly52: 249–65.
24.
NelsonRobert I.SandfurRebeccaHeinzJohn P.LaumannEdward O.. 2005. “From Professional Dominance to Organizational Dominance: Professional Inequality and Social Change among Chicago Lawyers, 1975–1995.” Pp 313–42 in Reorganization and Resistance: Legal Professions Confront a Changing World edited by FelstinerW.L.F.. Portland: Hart Publishing.
25.
Owen-SmithJason. 2006. “Commercial Imbroglios: Proprietary Science and the Contemporary University.” Pp. 63–90 in The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power edited by FrickelScottMooreKelly. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
26.
PrechelHarlandGupmanAnne. 1995. “Changing Economic Conditions and Their Effects on Professional Autonomy: An Analysis of Family Practitioners and Oncologists.”Sociological Forum10: 245–71.
27.
QuinnRobert P.StainesGraham. 2001. Quality of Employment Survey, 1973–1977. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
28.
RaginCharles C.NagelJoaneWhitePatricia. 2004. “Workshop on Scientific Foundations of Qualitative Research.”National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA. Unpublished manuscript.
29.
RosichKatherine J.2005. A History of the American Sociological Association, 1981–2004. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
30.
RothmanRobert A.1984. “Deprofessionalization: The Case of Law in America.”Work and Occupations11: 183–206.
31.
SlaughterSheilaLeslieLarry L.. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
32.
Spalter-RothRobertaErskineWilliam. 2004. “Academic Relations: The Use of Supplemental Faculty.”ASA Research Brief. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
33.
StraussGeorge. 1974. “Is There a Blue-Collar Revolt Against Work?” Pp. 40–69 in Work and the Quality of Life: Resource Papers for Work in America, edited by O'TooleJames. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34.
TurnerBryan S, ed. 2006. “Durkheim.” Pp 151–56. “Parsons.” Pp 430–32. “Weber.” Pp. 662–66 in The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
TurnerStephen ParkTurnerJonathan H.. 1990. The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
