This work is based on the assumption that youth violence continues to be a serious problem in American society. It is exacerbated by the history of violence, cultural factors, and the nature and quality of interpersonal relations encountered by youth in their daily lives. The metaphor of “a nation at war with itself” is used to highlight the fact that more Americans are regularly killed by other Americans at home than those killed in foreign wars. These conditions set the stage for the development of a psycho-social model of youth violence in America today.
The model is a take-off from the author's earlier hypothesis that all violence may be construed as a powerful reaction to overcome powerlessness. It identifies four correlates of powerlessness: disconnection, anonymity, selfishness, and lack of adult-youth communication about violence. These variables are subsequently integrated into an explanatory and predictive device for one category of violence only, homicides committed by youth. The model may, however, apply to other categories of interpersonal violence as well. It is dedicated to the urgent task of curbing youth violence in America, and by implication, in other similar cultural contexts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhmadA.1970. Book Review, The New Politics of American Policy, edited by LittEdgar. American Sociological Review35:1106.
2.
AhmadA.1995. “Nonviolence of the Brave: Powerful Reaction to Powerlessness.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 22, Washington, D.C.
3.
AhamdA.1996. “Powerful Reaction to Powerlessness.”Peace Review8:423–429.
4.
AhmadA.2000. “A Theoretical Model of Powerlessness and Resistance.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Humanist Sociology, November 18, Covington, KY.
BarlowH. D.1978. Introduction to Criminology.Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
9.
BartunekJ. M.GreenbergD. N.DavidsonB.. 1999. “Consistent and Inconsistent Impacts of a Teacher-led Empowerment Initiative in a Federation of Schools.”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science35:457–78.
10.
BlumsteinA.1995. “Violence by the Young People: Why the deadly Nexus?”National Institute of Justice Journal August:2–9.
11.
BrooksD.2000. Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There.Simon and Schuster.
12.
BrownJ. D.1998. The Self.New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
BrownsteinH. H.2000. The Social Reality of Violence and Violent Crime.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
CalvertS. L.1999. Children's Journey through the Information Age.Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill College.
15.
ClinardM. B.1974. The Sociology of Deviant Behavior.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
16.
ClinardM. B.AbbotD. J.. 1973. Crime in Developing Countries.New York: John Wiley.
17.
CourtwrightD. T.1996. Violent Land: Single Men and Social Disorder from the Frontier to the Inner City (Chapters 5 & 6). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
CurryG. D.MaxsonC. L.HowellJ. C.. 2001. “Youth Gang Homicide in the 1990's,”OJJDP Fact Sheet #3. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington, D.C.
19.
DeanD. G.1961. “Meaning and Measure of Alienation.”American Sociological Review26:753–758.
20.
DerberC.1994. “Individualism Runs Amok in the Marketplace.”Utne Reader November/December: 111–115.
21.
DerberC.2002. The Wilding of America.New York: Worth Publishers.
22.
DurkheimE.1950. Rules of the Sociological Method. Translated by SolvayS. A.MuellerJ. H.; edited by G. E. G. Catlin. New York: Free Press.
23.
EhrlickP. R.2000. Human Nature: Genes, Culture, and the Human Prospect.Washington, D.C: Island Press.
24.
FaganP.F.1995. “The Real Root Causes of Violent Crime.”Backgrounder. The Heritage Foundation, March 17.
25.
FatoutM. F.1995. “Using Limits and Structures for Empowerment of Children in Groups.”Social Work with Groups17:55–70.
26.
FawcettS. B.Paine-AndrewsA.FranciscoV. T.SchultzJ. A.. 1995. “Using Empowerment Theory in Collaborative Partnerships for Community Health and Development.”American Journal of Community Psychology23:677–697.
27.
Federal Bureau of Investigation.1996. Uniform Crime Reports.
28.
Federal Bureau of Investigation.1997. Uniform Crime Reports.
29.
Federal Bureau of Investigation.1998. Uniform Crime Reports.
30.
Federal Bureau of Investigation.1999. Uniform Crime Reports.
31.
Federal Bureau of Investigation.2000. Uniform Crime Reports.
32.
Foster-FishmanP. G.SalemD. A.ChibnallS.LeglerR.YapchaiC.. 1998. “Empirical Support for the Critical Assumptions of Empowerment Theory.”American Journal of Community Psychology26:507–536.
33.
FoxJ. A.ZawitzM. W.. 2000. “Homicide Trends in the United States: 1998 Update.”Bureau of Justice Statistics - Crime Data Brief (NCJ 179767), March.
34.
FridayP. C.1980. “International Review of Youth Crime and Delinquency.” Pp. 100–129 in Crime and Deviance: A Comparative Perspective, edited by NewmanG. R.. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
35.
FrommE.1969. Escape from Freedom.New York: Avon Publishers.
36.
GarbarinoJ.1999. Lost Boys: Why Our Sons Turn Violent and How We Can Save Them.New York: Free Press.
37.
GartnerR.1990. “The Victims of Homicides: A Temporal and Cross-National Comparison.”American Sociological Review55:92–106.
38.
GarverN.1994. Violence in America. James Harvey Johnson Lectures. San Diego State University, April-May.
39.
GilliganJ.1996. Violence - Our Deadly Epidemic and its Causes.New York: Putnam Book.
40.
GillespieN.1999. “Schools of Alienation.”Reason31:4.
41.
GitlinT.1996. “Media Violence Does Not Cause Societal Violence.” Pp. 70–78 in Violence: Opposing Viewpoints, edited by BenderD.LeoneB.. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.
42.
GuterlF.1996. “Gunslinging in America.”DiscoverMay: 85–89.
43.
HallC. S. G. LindzeyCampbellJ. B.. 1998. Theories of Personality.New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
44.
HattemerB.1996. “Violence in the Media Causes Youth Violence.” Pp. 62–69 in Violence: Opposing Viewpoints, edited by BenderD.LeoneB.. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.
45.
HirschiT.1969. Causes of Delinquency.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
46.
HornsbyA.2001. “Surfing the Net for Community: A Durkheimian Analysis of Electronic Gatherings.” Pp. 73–113 in Illuminating Social Life: Classical and Contemporary Theory Revisited, edited by KivistoP.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
47.
JacksonJ.NaurecksJ.. 1996. “The Threat of Violence is Exaggerated by the Media.” Pp. 23–29 in Violence: Opposing Viewpoints, edited by BenderD.LeoneB.. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.
48.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.. 1996. “Conflict Resolution and Peer Mediation Programs in Elementary and Secondary Schools: Review of the Research.”Review of Educational Research66:459–506.
49.
KaplanM. S.GelingO.. 1998. “Firearm Suicides and Homicides in the United States: Regional Variations and Patterns of Gun Ownership.”Social Science and Medicine46:1227–1233.
50.
KappelerV. E.BlumbergM.PotterG. W.. 2000. “Juvenile Superpredators: The Myth of Killer Kids, Dangerous Schools, and Youth Crime Wave.” Pp. 176–195 in The Mythology of Crime and Criminal Justice, edited by KappelerV. E.BlumbergM.PotterG. W.. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
51.
KennedyD.1994. “Lost in the Cyberspace.”Utne ReaderJanuary/February: 104–105.
52.
KrugE. G.MercyJ. A.DahlbergL. L.PowellK. E.. 1998. “Firearm and Non-Firearm-Related Homicide Among Children.”Homicide Studies2:83–95.
53.
LaschC.1979. The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations.New York: Norton.
54.
LantieriL.1995. “Waging Peace in Our Schools: Beginning with the Children.”Phi Delta Kappan76:386–388.
55.
LevinJ.FoxJ. A.. 2001. Deadlines: Essays in Murder and Mayhem.Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
56.
LoeberR. L. KalbHizingaD.. 2001. “Juvenile Delinquency and Serious Injury Victimization.”Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Department of Juvenile Justice Series, August.
57.
MaguireK.PosterA. L.. 1997. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics.United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
58.
MalesM.1996. “Youths are Unfairly Blamed for Violence.” Pp. 52–57 in Violence: Opposing Viewpoints, edited by BenderD.LeoneB.. Sand Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.
59.
McGuckinF.1998. Violence in American Society.New York: W. H. Wilson Co.
60.
MertonR. K.1957. Social Theory and Social Structure.New York: The Free Press.
61.
MillerJ. G.1991. Last One Over the Wall.Columbus, OH: Ohio University Press.
62.
MurdockT. B.1999. “The Social Context of Risk: Status and Motivational Predictors of Alienation in Middle School.”Journal of Educational Psychology91:62–75.
63.
MyersD. G.DienerE., 1997. “The Science of Happiness.”The Futurist September/October: 1–7.
64.
NaisbittJ.1984. Megatrends: Ten New Directions Transforming Our Lives.New York: Warner Books.
65.
NettlerG.1957. “A Measure of Alienation.”American Sociological Review22:670–677.
66.
OlafsenR. N.ViemeroeV.. 2000. “Bully/Victim Problems and Coping with Stress in School Among 10- to 12-Year-old Pupils in Aland, Finland.”Aggressive Behavior26:57–65.
67.
PampelF. C.WilliamsonJ. B.. 2001. “Age Patterns of Suicide and Homicide Mortality Rates in High Income Nations.”Social Forces80:251–282.
68.
PerkinsD. D.1995. “Speaking Truth to Power: Empowerment Ideology as Social Intervention and Policy.”American Journal of Community Psychology23:765–794.
69.
RichR. C.EdelsteinM.HallmanW. K.WandersmanA. H.. 1995. “Citizen Participation and Empowerment: The Case of Local Environmental Hazards.”American Journal of Community Psychology23:657–676.
70.
RiggsJ.1995. “Empowering Workers by Setting Goals.”Nation's BusinessJanuary:83:6.
71.
SaegertS.WinkelG.. 1996. “Paths to Community Empowerment: Organizing at Home.”American Journal of Community Psychology24:517–550.
72.
SchwartzI. M.1992. “The Problem of Youth Violence is Exaggerated.” Pp. 49–54 in Youth Violence: Current Controversies, edited by BiskupM. D.CozicC.P.. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.
73.
SeemanM.1959. “On the Meaning of Alienation.”American Sociological Review24:783–791.
74.
ShymanskyJ. A.HandB. M.YoreL. D.. 2000. “Empowering Families in Hands-on Science Programs.”School Science and Mathematics100:il.
75.
SkinnerB. F.1971. Beyond Freedom and Dignity.New York: Knopf.
76.
SleekS.1998. “Isolation Increases with Internet Use.”APA Monitor September. 1, Pp. 30–31.
77.
SmithP. K.MadsenK. C.MoodyJ. C.. 1999. “What Causes the Age Decline in Reports of Being Bullied at School? Toward a Developmental Analysis of Risks of Being Bullied.”Educational Research41:267–285.
78.
SmithP. K.BrainP.. 2000. “Bullying in Schools: Lessons from Two Decades of Research.”Aggressive Behavior26:1–9.
79.
SmortiA.CiucciE.. 2000. “Narrative Strategies in Bullies and Victims in Italian Schools.”Aggressive Behavior26:33–48.
80.
SnyderH. N.2000. “Juvenile Arrests 1999.”Juvenile Justice Bulletin.Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. December.
81.
SpeerP. W.HugheyJ.. 1995. “Community Organizing: An Ecological Route to Empowerment.”American Journal of Community Psychology23:729–748.
82.
SpreitzerG. M.1995. “An Empirical Test of a Comprehensive Model of Interpersonal Empowerment in the Workplace.”American Journal of Community Psychology23:601–629.
83.
SwisherK. L.WekesserC.. 1994. Violence Against Women: Current Controversies.San Diego, CA: The Greenhaven Press.
84.
TobyJ.1974. “The Socialization and Control of Deviant Motivation.” Pp. 85–100 in Handbook of Criminology, edited by GlaserD.. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
85.
TreasterJ. B.TaborM. B. W.. 1992. “Teenage Gun Use Is Increasing.” Pp. 31–36 in Youth Violence: Current Controversies, edited by BiskupM. D.CozicC. P.. San Diego, CA: The Greenhaven Press.
86.
TurkW. L.1999. When Juvenile Crime Comes to School.Lewiston, NY: F. Mellen Press.
87.
ValdeG. A.1999. “Schools Without Souls: Moral Community & Public School.”Tikkun14:47–52.
88.
VogelJ.1994. “Throw Away the Key: Juvenile Offenders are Willie Hortons of the '90s.”Utne ReaderJuly-August:56–60.
89.
WallinskyA.1995. “The Crisis of Public Order.”The Atlantic MonthlyJuly:39–54.
90.
WeberM.1985. Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.Boston, MA: Unwin Paperbacks.
