Optimized control of gas temperature and relative humidity during non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants: A simple and low-cost intervention
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024
Optimized control of gas temperature and relative humidity during non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants: A simple and low-cost intervention
Background: During non-invasive respiratory support, administration of gases at high flow rates requires proper air conditioning to avoid upper airways complications. However, closed-loop control of temperature & relative humidity (T&RH) of mixed gases systems with wired-heated circuits are not commonly available in low-middle income countries (LMIC). Thus, a policy for close control of gas T&RH to overcome our system limitations was implemented. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of this intervention.
Method: Single center retrospective study including preterm infants admitted to a level II unit (June 2019–2020). Close control of gas T&RH was implemented in Dec 2019 and consisted of starting with the heater at a set number higher than previously and followed by adjustments every 6 h based on intermittent temperature checks (target: 36.5°C–37°C). Humidity was controlled by adjusting the water level every 6 h and checking for the presence of condensation. Two groups were identified: infants treated with or without the close T&RH control. Primary outcome was the occurrence of nasal bleeding. Secondary outcomes were adherence to the policy, need to change the original mode of respiratory support or endotracheal intubation. Appropriate statistical tests were applied.
Results: A total of 128 neonates were included: 63 managed without and 65 with close gas T&RH control. Rates of nasal bleeding decreased significantly with the close T&RH control, from 30% to 14% (p = 0.026) despite longer duration of non-invasive support (CPAP: 1.8 ± 1.9 vs 4.3 ± 5.8 days; p = 0.002 and NIPPV: 1.8 ± 1.4 vs 4.2 ± 5.2; p = 0.009). Adherence to the policy was 93%. Changes of the original mode of respiratory support also decreased significantly (14% vs 3%; 0.024) with no intubation.
Conclusion: In the absence of advanced and expensive systems, a simple and low-cost intervention to optimize gas T&RH during non-invasive respiratory support in LMIC is feasible and associated with clinical improvements.
OhumaEOMollerABBradleyE, et al.National, regional, and global estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet2023; 402(10409): 1261–1271.
2.
Gyamfi-BannermanCThomEABlackwellSC, et al.Antenatal betamethasone for women at risk for late preterm delivery. N Engl J Med2016; 374(14): 1311–1320.
3.
LawnJEBhuttaZAEzeakaC, et al.Ending preventable neonatal deaths: multicountry evidence to inform accelerated progress to the sustainable development goal by 2030. Neonatology2023; 120(4): 491–499.
4.
FinerNCarloWWalshM, et al.Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med2010; 362(21): 1970–1979.
5.
HatchLDClarkRHCarloWA, et al.Changes in use of respiratory support for preterm infants in the US, 2008-2018. JAMA Pediatr2021; 175(10): 1017–1024.
6.
SchulzeA. Respiratory gas conditioning and humidification. Clin Perinatol2007; 34(1): 19–33.
7.
MoredduEMeisterLDabadieA, et al.Numerical simulation of nasal airflows and thermal air modification in newborns. Med Biol Eng Comput2020; 58(2): 307–317.
8.
SahniRSchiaraturaMPolinRA. Strategies for the prevention of continuous positive airway pressure failure. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med2016; 21(3): 196–203.
9.
NørgaardMStagstrupCLundS, et al.To bubble or not? A systematic review of bubble continuous positive airway pressure in children in low- and middle-income countries. J Trop Pediatr2020; 66(3): 339–353.
10.
SessionsKLSmithAGHolmbergPJ, et al.Continuous positive airway pressure for children in resource-limited settings, effect on mortality and adverse events: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child2022; 107(6): 543–552.
11.
WilliamsRRankinNSmithT, et al.Relationship between the humidity and temperature of inspired gas and the function of the airway mucosa. Crit Care Med1996; 24: 1920–1929.
12.
SleighMABlakeJRLironN. The propulsion of mucus by cilia. Am Rev Respir Dis1988; 137: 726–741.
13.
HirschJATokayerJLRobinsonMJ, et al.Effects of dry air and subsequent humidification on tracheal mucous velocity in dogs. J Appl Physiol1975; 39(2): 242–246.
14.
KawazaKMachenHEBrownJ, et al.Efficacy of a low-cost bubble CPAP system in treatment of respiratory distress in a neonatal ward in Malawi. Malawi Med J2016; 28(3): 131–137.
15.
EsquinasACarrilloAGonzalesG. Humivenis Working Group: absolute humidity variations with a variable inspiratory oxygenation fraction in noninvasive mechanical ventilation. A pilot study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2008; 177: A644.
16.
International Organization for Standardization. Respiratory tract humidifiers for medical use–particular requirements for respiratory humidification systems (ISO 8185:2007). Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2007.
17.
SchulzeA. Goldsmith’s assisted ventilation of the neonate, In: KeszlerMSuresh GauthamK (eds), Chapter 17 - respiratory gas conditioning. 7th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2022. pp. 196–200.
18.
DadaSAshworthHSobitschkaA, et al.Experiences with implementation of continuous positive airway pressure for neonates and infants in low-resource settings: a scoping review. PLoS One2021; 16(6): e0252718.
19.
Nyondo-MipandoALWoo KinshellaMLBohneC, et al.Barriers and enablers of implementing bubble continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP): perspectives of health professionals in Malawi. PLoS One2020; 15(2): e0228915.
20.
SilveiraCSLeonardiKMMeloAP, et al.Response of preterm infants to 2 noninvasive ventilatory support systems: nasal CPAP and nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation. Respir Care2015; 60(12): 1772–1776.
21.
BrownJMachenHKawazaK, et al.A high-value, low-cost bubble continuous positive airway pressure system for low-resource settings: technical assessment and initial case reports. PLoS One2013; 8(1): e53622.
22.
MwathaABMahandeMOlomiR, et al.Treatment outcomes of Pumani bubble-CPAP versus oxygen therapy among preterm babies presenting with respiratory distress at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania-Randomised trial. PLoS One2020; 15(6): e0235031.
23.
CarnsJLiaghati-MobarhanSAsibonA, et al.National scale of neonatal CPAP to district hospitals in Malawi improved survival for neonates weighing between 1.0 and 1.3 kg. Arch Dis Child2022; 107(6): 553–557.
