Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In recent years, essential oils (EOs) have gained popularity for their potential as natural antimicrobial agents and mosquito larvae control. This study aimed to explore the chemical composition of EOs extracted from the leaves and rhizomes of Distichochlamys benenica Q.B. Nguyen & Škorničk, and to evaluate their mosquito larvicidal and antimicrobial activities. The EOs were obtained using hydrodistillation and subjected to gas chromatography (GC) and GC-mass spectrometry to determine their chemical constituents. The main components identified in the leaf EO were β-pinene (47.7%), cis-β-elemene (8.5%), and α-pinene (7.8%), while the rhizome EO mainly consisted of geranyl acetate (25.7%), geranial (23.3%), neral (16.6%), and geraniol (8.4%). The mosquito larvicidal activity of the EOs was evaluated using larvae of Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus during 24 and 48 h of treatment. The results demonstrated that these EOs effectively inhibited the mosquito larvae, with LC₅₀ values ranging from 31.15 to 71.53 μg/mL and LC₉₀ values ranging from 46.28 to 148.66 μg/mL. Additionally, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values were used to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of EOs. Both EOs exhibited potent antimicrobial effects against Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 299212, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and Candida albicans ATCC 10231, with MIC values ranging from 16 to 64 μg/mL and IC₅₀ values ranging from 4.67 to 45.67 μg/mL. Overall, the mosquito larvicidal and antimicrobial activities of D. benenica EOs highlight their potential as natural alternatives for combating mosquito-borne diseases and microbial infections.

Keywords

Zingiberaceae essential oil monoterpenes antimicrobial activity

Introduction

The family Zingiberaceae, commonly known as the ginger family, comprises approximately 50 genera and over 1600 known species.¹ Zingiberaceae species are predominantly found in tropical and subtropical regions around the world, with a significant presence in Southeast Asia, India, China, and Africa.² From an ethnobotanical perspective, Zingiberaceae plants have been valued for their culinary, medicinal, and cultural uses. Many members of this family are renowned for their aromatic rhizomes, which are extensively used as spices and flavorings in various cuisines.^3–5 Apart from their culinary applications, Zingiberaceae species have also been extensively used in traditional medicine systems across different cultures. In traditional Vietnamese medicine, Zingiberaceae species have been employed for treating digestive disorders, relieving pain and inflammation, and boosting immune function.⁵ In recent years, scientific research has focused on exploring the phytochemical composition and pharmacological potential of Zingiberaceae species. Studies have identified several bioactive compounds, including gingerols, curcuminoids, and zingiberene, which contribute to the medicinal properties of these species.^6–8

Essential oils (EOs) have gained significant attention in recent years due to their diverse therapeutic properties, including mosquito larvicidal and antimicrobial activities.^9–15 Mosquitoes are known vectors for diseases such as malaria, dengue fever, Zika virus, and West Nile virus, causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide.¹⁶ EOs have shown promise as effective mosquito larvicides, offering an eco-friendly approach to controlling mosquito populations and preventing the spread of mosquito-borne diseases.⁹ Furthermore, they have the potential to address the issue of microbial resistance, which has become a significant concern associated with conventional antimicrobial agents.¹⁷ Studies suggest that the complex chemical composition of EOs makes it difficult for microorganisms to develop mechanisms of resistance, thereby reducing the likelihood of resistance formation.^18,19 Among these EOs, those extracted from the Zingiberaceae family have gained significant attention due to their potential applications in the fields of vector control and medicine.^20–23

Distichochlamys is an endemic Vietnamese genus belonging to the family Zingiberaceae.²⁴ Four species have been identified since the genus was established in 1995 by M.F. Newman: D. citrea M.F. Newman,²⁴ D. benenica Q.B. Nguyen & Škorničk,²⁵ D. orlowii K. Larsen & M.F. Newman,²⁶ and D. rubrostriata W.J. Kress & Rehse.²⁷ D. benenica was the last of these species to be described following its discovery in 2012 in Ben En National Park, Vietnam.²⁵ Several recent studies have focused on the phytochemical composition and bioactive properties of Distichochlamys species.^28–31 Additionally, investigations have been conducted into the chemical composition and biological activity of EOs derived from the leaves and rhizomes of D. citrea, D. orlowii, and D. benenica.^32–37 Notably, a study by Hoang et al³² demonstrated the acetylcholinesterase activity of D. benenica rhizome EO collected from Quang Nam, Vietnam. Furthermore, variations in chemical composition were observed in the EOs of D. citrea leaves and rhizomes collected from different regions of Vietnam, including Quang Binh, Quang Tri, Thua Thien Hue, and Quang Nam.^35–37 However, there is currently no information available regarding the chemical composition of the leaf EO of D. benenica. Moreover, the mosquito larvicidal and antimicrobial properties of the EOs derived from the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica have not been investigated. Given this knowledge gap, we conducted the present study to report on the chemical constituents, mosquito larvicidal activity, and antimicrobial properties of the EOs obtained from the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica collected from Ben En National Park, Vietnam.

Results and Discussion

Chemical Constituents of EOs

Hydrodistillation was performed on the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica using a Clevenger-type apparatus, resulting in the production of light-yellow oils. The yields of EOs obtained from the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica were 0.22% and 0.35% w/w, respectively, based on the dried weight of the materials. Table 1 presents the compositions of the EOs, with the constituents listed according to their elution from a HP-5MS column.

Table 1.

Chemical Constituents of EOs From the Leaves and Rhizomes of Distichochlamys benenica.

No.	Compound^a	Molecular formula	RI^b	RI^c	Concentration (%)		Identification^d
No.	Compound^a	Molecular formula	RI^b	RI^c	Leaves	Rhizomes	Identification^d
1	α-Pinene	C₁₀H₁₆	939	932	7.8	4.0	RI, MS
2	Camphene	C₁₀H₁₆	955	946	0.4	1.3	RI, MS
3	Sabinene	C₁₀H₁₆	979	969	0.8	0.2	RI, MS
4	β-Pinene	C₁₀H₁₆	985	974	47.7	2.6	RI, MS
5	Myrcene	C₁₀H₁₆	992	988	0.5	0.5	RI, MS
6	o-Cymene	C₁₀H₁₄	1029	1022	1.1	0.5	RI, MS
7	Limonene	C₁₀H₁₆	1034	1024	1.8	0.4	RI, MS
8	(Z)-β-Ocimene	C₁₀H₁₆	1037	1032	0.2	−	RI, MS
9	1,8-Cineole	C₁₀H₁₈O	1038	1026	0.2	4.8	RI, MS
10	(E)-β-Ocimene	C₁₀H₁₆	1048	1044	−^e	0.2	RI, MS
11	γ-Terpinene	C₁₀H₁₆	1061	1054	−	0.6	RI, MS
12	Terpinolene	C₁₀H₁₆	1094	1086	0.2	−	RI, MS
13	Linalool	C₁₀H₁₈O	1101	1095	−	1.9	RI, MS
14	p-Ethylanisol	C₉H₁₂O	1118	1122	0.8	−	RI, MS
15	endo-Fenchol	C₁₀H₁₈O	1121	1114	0.1	−	RI, MS
16	Lavandulol	C₁₀H₁₈O	1146	1165	−	0.2	RI, MS
17	trans-Sabinol	C₁₀H₁₆O	1148	1137	0.6	−	RI, MS
18	Isoneral	C₁₀H₁₆O	1166	1160	−	0.7	RI, MS
19	Pinocarvone	C₁₀H₁₄O	1172	1160	0.3	−	RI, MS
20	Borneol	C₁₀H₁₈O	1175	1165	−	0.8	RI, MS
21	Isogeranial	C₁₀H₁₆O	1184	1177	−	1.0	RI, MS
22	Terpinen-4-ol	C₁₀H₁₈O	1185	1174	0.5	0.3	RI, MS
23	p-Cymen-8-ol	C₁₀H₁₄O	1190	1179	0.1	−	RI, MS
24	α-Terpineol	C₁₀H₁₈O	1197	1186	0.7	0.6	RI, MS
25	Myrtenol	C₁₀H₁₆O	1204	1194	0.5	−	RI, MS
26	Myrtenal	C₁₀H₁₄O	1206	1195	0.3	−	RI, MS
27	Nerol	C₁₀H₁₈O	1231	1227	−	0.8	RI, MS
28	Neral	C₁₀H₁₆O	1246	1235	−	16.6	RI, MS
29	Geraniol	C₁₀H₁₈O	1256	1249	−	8.4	RI, MS
30	Geranial	C₁₀H₁₆O	1273	1264	0.2	23.3	RI, MS
31	Bornyl acetate	C₁₂H₂₀O₂	1294	1284	−	0.2	RI, MS
32	Dihydroedulan II	C₁₃H₂₂O	1300	1288	0.1	−	RI, MS
33	Dihydroedulan I	C₁₃H₂₂O	1306	1290	0.3	−	RI, MS
34	δ-Elemene	C₁₅H₂₄	1348	1335	0.1	−	RI, MS
35	α-Cubebene	C₁₅H₂₄	1360	1345	0.1	−	RI, MS
36	Neryl acetate	C₁₂H₂₀O₂	1365	1359	−	0.1	RI, MS
37	Geranyl acetate	C₁₂H₂₀O₂	1384	1379	0.5	25.7	RI, MS
38	α-Copaene	C₁₅H₂₄	1389	1374	0.4	−	RI, MS
39	cis-β-Elemene	C₁₅H₂₄	1403	1385	8.5	1.1	RI, MS
40	β-Caryophyllene	C₁₅H₂₄	1437	1417	1.7	0.5	RI, MS
41	(Z)-β-Farnesene	C₁₅H₂₄	1460	1440	0.6	−	RI, MS
42	α-Humulene	C₁₅H₂₄	1471	1452	0.4	−	RI, MS
43	9-epi-(E)-Caryophyllene	C₁₅H₂₄	1479	1464	0.6	−	RI, MS
44	β-Chamigrene	C₁₅H₂₄	1490	1476	0.9	−	RI, MS
45	β-Selinene	C₁₅H₂₄	1504	1489	1.4	0.2	RI, MS
46	trans-Muurola-4(14),5-diene	C₁₅H₂₄	1509	1493	0.2	−	RI, MS
47	α-Selinene	C₁₅H₂₄	1512	1498	1.1	0.3	RI, MS
48	δ-Cadinene	C₁₅H₂₄	1537	1522	0.4	−	RI, MS
49	trans-Calamenene	C₁₅H₂₂	1538	1521	0.4	−	RI, MS
50	(E)-Nerolidol	C₁₅H₂₆O	1569	1561	0.8	−	RI, MS
51	Palustrol	C₁₅H₂₆O	1588	1567	0.2	−	RI, MS
52	Spathulenol	C₁₅H₂₄O	1596	1577	0.8	−	RI, MS
53	Caryophyllene oxide	C₁₅H₂₄O	1604	1582	0.7	−	RI, MS
54	1-epi-Cubenol	C₁₅H₂₆O	1646	1627	0.4	−	RI, MS
55	epi-α-Cadinol (= τ-Cadinol)	C₁₅H₂₆O	1658	1638	0.1	−	RI, MS
56	α-Muurolol (= δ-Cadinol)	C₁₅H₂₆O	1661	1644	0.3	−	RI, MS
57	α-Cadinol	C₁₅H₂₆O	1672	1652	0.3	−	RI, MS
58	neo-Intermedeol	C₁₅H₂₆O	1675	1658	2.1	−	RI, MS
59	Intermedeol	C₁₅H₂₆O	1681	1665	0.3	−	RI, MS
	Monoterpene hydrocarbons				60.5	10.3
	Oxygenated monoterpenes				4.0	85.4
	Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons				16.8	2.1
	Oxygenated sesquiterpenes				6.0	−
	Others				1.2	−
	Total identified				88.5	97.8
	Yield (%)				0.22	0.35

aElution order on HP-5MS column.

bRetention index on HP-5MS column.

cLiterature retention index taken from either Adams³⁸ or NIST.³⁹

dIdentification: RI, coherence of the temperature-programmed retention index with respect to those reported by Adams³⁸; MS, matching with mass libraries.^38,39

eNot identified.

In the present study, we identified 47 compounds in the leaf EO, accounting for 88.5% of the total compounds detected, and 28 compounds in the rhizome EO, accounting for 97.8% of the total compounds detected (Table 1). The predominant chemical class of the EOs from the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica was that of monoterpenes. However, the leaf EO was primarily composed of monoterpene hydrocarbons, comprising 60.5% of the composition, whereas the rhizome EO was dominated by oxygenated monoterpenes, accounting for 85.4% of the composition. The most abundant component in the leaf EO was β-pinene, with a concentration of 47.7%. Additionally, cis-β-elemene and α-pinene were also present in significant quantities in the leaf EO, representing 8.5% and 7.8% of the total chemical composition, respectively. In the rhizome EO, geranyl acetate was the main compound, constituting 25.7% of the chemical composition, followed by geranial (23.3%), neral (16.6%), and geraniol (8.4%). However, these compounds were either absent or found in lower amounts in the leaf EO. Our findings demonstrated that not only the quantity but also the qualitative composition of the EOs obtained from the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica differed.

It is important to mention that there has only been one previous study examining the composition of an EO derived from D. benenica rhizomes. Hoang et al³² reported the major components of the EO collected from D. benenica rhizomes in Quang Nam, Vietnam, which included 1,8-cineole (54.39% of the total chemical composition), β-pinene (7.50%), geranial (7.26%), and neral (6.79%). Interestingly, the present study yielded different results compared to those reported by Hoang et al.³² Specifically, we found geranyl acetate to be the most abundant component in the rhizome EO, whereas it was not detected in the rhizome EO studied by Hoang et al.³⁰ Moreover, the concentration of 1,8-cineole was higher in Hoang et al's study of the rhizome EO than in our study.³² These differences may be attributed to variations in the plant organs used, as well as geographical and environmental factors.^40,41 Furthermore, our study represents the first report on the components of D. benenica leaf EO.

Although there is limited specific information available about D. benenica, numerous studies have been conducted on the EO compositions of other Distichochlamys species (Table 2). Previous studies have shown that terpene compounds make up the majority of EOs in Distichochlamys species, which aligns with the composition of the EOs obtained from the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica in this study. However, the main compounds vary between species. For instance, a previous investigation revealed that the primary constituents of the rhizome EO of D. orlowii were geranyl acetate (16.5%), β-elemene (9.2%), β-pinene (9.0%), and β-caryophyllene (7.9%), whereas 1,8-cineole (23.0%) was the most abundant compound in the rhizome EO of D. citrea from Nghe An.³⁴ Furthermore, EOs derived from the leaves and rhizomes of D. citrea collected from different geographical locations have shown notable variations in their chemical composition.^35–37 These findings indicate that the chemical composition of EOs in Distichochlamys is primarily influenced by the specific species under investigation, as well as factors such as the plant organ used, environmental conditions, geographic variations, and EO extraction methods.^33,41,42

Table 2.

Major Components (> 5%) Identified From Distichochlamys EOs.

Distichochlamys species	Collection location	Plant part	Extraction	Major components (%)	Reference
D. citrea	Thua Thien Hue, Vietnam	Leaves	HD	β-sesquiphellandrene (54.95%), β-pinene (18.26%)	36
D. citrea	Quang Binh, Vietnam	Leaves	HD	β-pinene (29.23%), β-elemene (10.62%), β-caryophyllene (10.32%), hexadecane (10.32%), germacrene B (6.69%), β-sesquiphellandrene (6.53%), α-pinene (5.11%)	35
D. citrea	Quang Tri, Vietnam	Leaves	HD	β-pinene (35.35%), β-sesquiphellandrene (27.44%), α-pinene (6.82%)	35
D. citrea	Quang Nam, Vietnam	Leaves	HD	β-pinene (22.74%), β-sesquiphellandrene (17.81%), β-caryophyllene (6.97%), α-pinene (6.31%)	35
D. citrea	Quang Binh, Vietnam	Rhizomes	HD	1,8-cineole (43.67%), β-linalool (14.79%), neryl acetate (10.81%)	37
D. citrea	Thua Thien Hue, Vietnam	Rhizomes	HD	1,8-cineole (30.34%), geranial (20.88%), neral (11.05%), neryl acetate (9.90%), cis-geraniol (7.61%)	37
D. citrea	Quang Tri, Vietnam	Rhizomes	HD	geranial (18.38%), neral (13.98%), neryl acetate (11.11%), cis-geraniol (8.89%)	37
D. citrea	Quang Nam, Vietnam	Rhizomes	HD	geranial (19.13%), neral (13.49%)	37
D. citrea	Thua Thien Hue, Vietnam	Rhizomes	HD	geranial (26.03%), α-terpineol (14.82%), neral (13.42%), 1,8-cineole (7.52%), β-pinene (6.98%), α-pinene (6.37%)	33
D. citrea	Nghe An, Vietnam	Rhizomes	HD	1,8-cineole (23.0%), geranial (18.9%), neral (15.0%), geraniol (9.3%), α-cedrol (5.2%)	34
D. citrea	Thua Thien Hue, Vietnam	Rhizomes	SD	geranial (22.56%), neral (15.21%), α-terpineol (12.40%), β-pinene (7.06%), 1,8-cineole (5.24%)	33
D. citrea	Thua Thien Hue, Vietnam	Rhizomes	MAHD	geranial (26.12%), neral (17.89%), α-terpineol (14.87%), 1,8-cineole (9.18%), α-pinene (5.35%), β-pinene (5.17%)	33
D. benenica	Quang Nam, Vietnam	Rhizomes	HD	1,8-cineole (54.39%), β-pinene (7.50%), geranial (7.26%), neral (6.79%)	32
D. orlowii	Nghe An, Vietnam	Rhizomes	HD	geranyl acetate (16.5%), β-elemene (9.2%), β-pinene (9.0%), β-caryophyllene (7.9%)	34

Abbreviations: HD, hydrodistillation; SD, steam distillation; MAHD, microwave-assisted hydrodistillation.

Mosquito Larvicidal Potential of EOs

The mosquito larvicidal potential of the EOs extracted from D. benenica leaves and rhizomes was assessed. The results, presented in Tables 3 and 4, clearly indicate distinct larvicidal activity of the leaf and rhizome EOs against Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. For A. aegypti, the rhizome EO showed higher activity against the larvae than the leaf EO, with LC₅₀ and LC₉₀ values of 32.78 and 49.96 µg/mL after a 24-h exposure, respectively. The corresponding values after a 48-h exposure were 31.46 and 46.28 µg/mL, respectively. On the other hand, the leaf EO was more effective against C. quinquefasciatus than the rhizome EO, with LC₅₀ values after a 24 and 48-h exposure of 39.01 and 31.15 µg/mL, respectively. The corresponding LC₉₀ values were 67.36 and 69.01 µg/mL, respectively. It is worth noting that previous studies have indicated that EOs exhibit promising larvicidal activity when their LC₅₀ values are below 100 µg/mL.^43,44 Therefore, based on this criterion, we can conclude that the EOs derived from the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica in our study demonstrated significant larvicidal potential against A. aegypti and C. quinquefasciatus larvae.

Table 3.

Mosquito Larvicidal Potential of EOs From the Leaves and Rhizomes of Distichochlamys benenica Against Aedes aegypti Larvae.

Essential oil (EO)	LC₅₀ (μg/mL) 95% CI^a	LC₉₀ (μg/mL) 95% CI	χ²	P
At 24 h
Leaf EO	71.53 (64.24−80.60)	142.89 (119.57−186.51)	6.9149	.075
Rhizome EO	32.78 (30.15−35.75)	49.96 (44.70−58.40)	1.0652	.785
At 48 h
Leaf EO	69.59 (62.14−79.03)	148.66 (122.58−198.09)	4.4142	.220
Rhizome EO	31.46 (29.06−34.27)	46.28 (41.47−54.26)	0.6940	.875

aConfidence interval at 95%.

Table 4.

Mosquito Larvicidal Potential of EOs From the Leaves and Rhizomes of Distichochlamys benenica Against Culex quinquefasciatus Larvae.

Essential oil (EO)	LC₅₀ (μg/mL) 95% CI^a	LC₉₀ (μg/mL) 95% CI	χ²	P
At 24 h
Leaf EO	39.01 (35.51−42.84)	67.36 (59.43−80.04)	2.9138	.405
Rhizome EO	45.64 (41.71−49.90)	76.23 (67.47−90.78)	6.9512	.073
At 48 h
Leaf EO	31.15 (27.84−34.88)	69.01 (58.63−86.01)	8.5581	.036
Rhizome EO	43.71 (39.85−47.91)	74.74 (65.96−89.10)	6.9520	.073

aConfidence interval at 95%.

The mosquito larvicidal potential of EOs from leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica may be due to the presence of major components such as β-pinene, α-pinene, geranyl acetate, geranial, neral, and geraniol. EOs containing these components have been previously studied, and showed good larvicidal activity.^44–48 β-Pinene, for instance, exhibited larvicidal activity against A. aegypti, with LC₅₀ values ranging from 12.1 to 42.5 μg/mL, and C. quinquefasciatus, with an LC₅₀ value of 19.6 μg/mL.^44,45 Similarly, α-pinene has been shown to possess larvicidal properties against both A. aegypti and C. quinquefasciatus.^44,45 Geraniol and geranyl acetate displayed larvicidal activity against A. aegypti,^46,47 while geranial and geraniol exhibited larvicidal effects against C. quinquefasciatus.⁴⁵ Cymbopogon flexuosus EO, containing geranial, neral, geranyl acetate, and geraniol as its primary components, has demonstrated significant activity against A. aegypti.⁴⁸ In addition to the main components, minor compounds in EOs may also contribute to their larvicidal properties.⁴⁹ The synergistic effect between the major and minor components in EOs provides a multifaceted approach to combating mosquito larvae. Despite this, some specific larvicidal mechanisms have been proposed; for example, it is assumed that the volatile compounds in EOs can penetrate the respiratory system of the larvae and interfere with their oxygen uptake.^44,50 Furthermore, they can also interfere with neurotransmitters, ion channels, and enzymes that are vital for the proper functioning of mosquito larvae.^44,50 As a result, EOs can disrupt the larvae's physiological processes, including feeding, locomotion, and development, resulting in larval mortality and preventing the emergence of adult mosquitoes.

Antimicrobial Potential of EOs

The antimicrobial effects of EOs derived from D. benenica leaves and rhizomes were assessed against 7 test microorganisms, comprising 3 Gram-positive bacteria, 3 Gram-negative bacteria, and 1 yeast. The potency of these EOs was quantitatively evaluated using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values, as presented in Table 5. The results indicated that the EOs from the leaves and rhizomes demonstrated activity against all 3 Gram-positive bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus cereus) and 1 yeast (Candida albicans), with MIC values ranging from 16 to 64 μg/mL, while the IC₅₀ values ranged from 4.67 to 23.45 μg/mL. Additionally, both EOs showed activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with a MIC value of 64 μg/mL. The leaf EO had an IC₅₀ of 45.67 μg/mL, while the rhizome EO had an IC₅₀ of 26.56 μg/mL. However, these EOs did not exhibit activity against the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. It is worth noting that the antimicrobial activity of both EOs was comparable to that of the positive controls. These findings are consistent with a study conducted by Thinh et al,³³ which reported the antimicrobial activity of EOs from D. citrea against various microorganisms. Notably, the MIC values of D. benenica EOs were lower than those of D. citrea EOs, indicating the more potent antimicrobial activity of D. benenica EOs. Previous research has demonstrated that EOs exhibit strong antimicrobial effects when their MIC values are below 100 μg/mL.^51,52 According to this criterion, the EOs derived from the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica in our study exhibited significant antimicrobial activity.

Table 5.

Antimicrobial Potential of EOs From the Leaves and Rhizomes of Distichochlamys benenica.

Microorganisms	Essential oil				Positive control^c
	Leaves		Rhizomes		Positive control^c
	MIC^a	IC₅₀^b	MIC	IC₅₀	MIC
Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 299212	32	8.25	16	8.32	32
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923	64	20.31	64	20.11	64
Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579	32	23.45	32	8.34	32
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922	na^d	na	na	na	64
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853	64	45.67	64	26.56	64
Salmonella enterica ATCC 13076	na	na	na	na	128
Candida albicans ATCC 10231	16	4.67	16	8.45	16

aMinimum inhibitory concentration (μg/mL).

bHalf-maximal inhibitory concentration (μg/mL).

cThe positive controls for bacteria and yeast were streptomycin and cycloheximide, respectively.

dNot active.

The primary reason behind the antimicrobial properties of D. benenica EOs seems to be the presence of active components, particularly monoterpenes and their derivatives.^53,54 Notable compounds like β-pinene, cis-β-elemene, α-pinene, geranyl acetate, geranial, neral, and geraniol were identified as major constituents of the D. benenica EOs, and are well-known for their antimicrobial properties.^54–56 Indeed, β-pinene and α-pinene, 2 monoterpenes, have exhibited antimicrobial activity against bacterial and fungal strains, including drug-resistant ones.⁵⁷ EO from Syzygium szemaoense, primarily consisting of cis-β-elemene, has demonstrated noteworthy antimicrobial properties against bacteria and fungi.⁵⁸ Many EOs contain geranial, neral, geraniol, and geranyl acetate as their primary components, which have shown antimicrobial activity against a broad range of bacteria, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains.^59,60 These compounds commonly exert their antimicrobial properties through mechanisms including disruption of cell membranes, inhibition of enzymatic processes, interference with protein synthesis, and disruption of essential microbial metabolic pathways.⁶¹ Furthermore, the synergistic interaction of both main and minor components is frequently cited as the cause of the antimicrobial activity of EOs.⁶² As a result, minor components such as 1,8-cineole, linalool, and β-caryophyllene may also contribute to the antimicrobial properties of EOs. Overall, the antimicrobial activity of EOs is a complex phenomenon that involves a variety of chemical and biological interactions with microbes. Additionally, compared to Gram-negative bacteria, the EOs from D. benenica were more effective against Gram-positive bacteria. This disparity in efficacy is thought to be due to the different cell wall structures of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.⁶¹ Gram-positive bacteria have a thick coating of peptidoglycan on their cell walls, which makes it easier for EOs to enter the cell and rupture the membrane.⁶¹ On the other hand, Gram-negative bacteria have an outer membrane made of lipopolysaccharides and a thinner peptidoglycan layer, acting as a barrier that prevents EOs from entering and interfering with the cell membrane.⁶³

Conclusions

In summary, we conducted an investigation into the chemical composition of EOs derived from the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica collected from Ben En National Park, Vietnam, as well as their mosquito larvicidal and antimicrobial activities. The main components of the leaf EO, as determined by gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis, were β-pinene (47.7%), cis-β-elemene (8.5%), and α-pinene (7.8%). Meanwhile, the rhizome EO contained geranyl acetate (25.7%), geranial (23.3%), neral (16.6%), and geraniol (8.4%). Furthermore, our study yielded promising results with regard to the mosquito larvicidal and antimicrobial activities of D. benenica EOs, which was significant. This activity highlights the EOs’ potential as natural alternatives for the management of mosquito-borne diseases and microbial infections. However, further research is needed to explore the mechanisms of action, optimize formulations, and assess the safety and long-term effects of these EOs for potential vector control and therapeutic applications.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material and EO Extraction

Fresh leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica were collected from Ben En National Park, Thanh Hoa, Vietnam, in December 2020. The collection site was located at 19°36'24.66"N and 105°23'42.80"E, with a relative humidity of 62.1% and a temperature of 27.4 °C. The plant sample was authenticated by Assoc. Prof. Dr Le Thi Huong from Vinh University (Nghe An, Vietnam) and subsequently assigned a registration number in the herbarium with the voucher code DND 880. The leaves and rhizomes were chopped into small pieces and air-dried at room temperature (25 °C) for a week before the EO was extracted. Each sample was then separately hydrodistilled for 4 h at normal pressure using a Clevenger-type apparatus, as previously reported.^64,65 The EOs obtained were dried using anhydrous Na₂SO₄ and carefully stored in tightly closed dark vials at a temperature of 4 °C until it was ready for analysis.

Analysis of EOs

According to the previously stated procedure,⁶⁶ GC and GC-MS were used to examine the EOs extracted from the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica. A gas chromatograph of Agilent Technologies, model number HP 7890A Plus, was utilized for the GC analyses. It was connected to a flame ionization detector and an HP-5MS capillary column measuring 30 m in length, with an internal diameter of 0.25 mm and a film thickness of 0.25 µm. The GC oven temperature program was designed to start at 60 °C for 2 min before rising to 220 °C at a rate of 4 °C/min. The injector and detector were kept at temperatures of 250 °C and 260 °C, respectively. Helium was employed as the carrier gas, flowing at a rate of 1.0 mL/min.

The GC-MS analyses were conducted using the same equipment and experimental conditions as the GC analyses connected to the HP 5973 MSD mass spectrometer. The split ratio was set at 10:1, the ionization energy at 70 eV, and the emission current at 40 mA. The sampling rate was 1.0 scan/s and the mass range was 35 to 350 amu. To identify the components in the EO, their GC retention times were compared to those of known compounds, and their mass spectra were compared to those stored in the computer database and published spectra.^38,39 The normalization of peak areas without the use of corrective factors served as the foundation for calculating the percentage composition.

Mosquito Larvicidal Screening

A. aegypti mosquitoes were maintained continuously at Duy Tan University, Vietnam. C. quinquefasciatus wild larvae were collected from the Hoa Khanh Nam district (16°03'14.9"N and 108°09'31.2"E) and were maintained in a laboratory. Dog biscuits and yeast powder were combined in a 3:1 weight ratio to feed the larvae. The mosquito larvicidal activity of the EOs extracted from the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica was tested based on the method previously described by Huong et al.⁶⁷ Briefly, EOs dissolved in 1% ethanol (EtOH) were placed in a 500-mL container and added to water containing 20 larvae at the third and early fourth instar stage. The experiments took place at a temperature of 25 ± 2 °C. Each test included 4 repetitions and 5 concentrations (100, 75, 50, 25, and 12.5 μg/mL). Permethrin and EtOH were used as positive control and negative control, respectively. The mortality rate was observed after 24 and 48 h of exposure, without the addition of any nutritional supplements. LC₅₀ values, LC₉₀ values, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using log-probit analysis in XLSTAT v. 2018.5 software (Addinsoft, Paris, France).⁶⁸

Antimicrobial Screening

The antimicrobial effects of the EOs extracted from the leaves and rhizomes of D. benenica were evaluated against 7 microorganisms: 3 Gram-positive bacteria (E. faecalis ATCC 299212, S. aureus ATCC 25923, and B. cereus ATCC 14579), 3 Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and S. enterica ATCC 13076), and 1 yeast (C. albicans ATCC 10231). These microorganisms were provided by the Institute of Marine Biochemistry, VAST, Vietnam. The determination of MIC and IC₅₀ values was conducted using the previously described broth microdilution susceptibility method.⁶⁷ The bacteria were cultured in Mueller-Hinton broth, whereas the yeast was grown in Sabouraud broth.

To determine the MIC values, the EOs were dissolved in 1% dimethylsulfoxide, then diluted to the greatest concentration. In a 96-well microtiter plate, serial doubling dilutions of the EOs were made. The final concentration in each well was set to 5 × 10⁵ CFU/mL for bacteria and 1 × 10³ CFU/mL for yeast after overnight broth cultures of each strain were made. After that, the bacteria and yeast were cultured for 24 h at 37 °C and 30 °C, respectively. Positive controls included streptomycin for bacteria and cycloheximide for yeast. The lowest concentration at which no visible growth of the microorganism occurs was defined as the MIC value.

To determine the IC₅₀ values, the percentage of microorganisms exhibiting growth inhibition was determined by measuring turbidity using an Epoch 2 Microplate Spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies Inc., USA). The obtained data were analyzed using the RawData computer software (Brussels, Belgium). The IC₅₀ values were defined as the concentration at which the EO inhibits 50% of microbial growth, indicated by a 50% reduction in turbidity.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-npx-10.1177_1934578X231193541 - Supplemental material for Essential Oils of Distichochlamys benenica: Chemical Constituents, Mosquito Larvicidal and Antimicrobial Activities

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-npx-10.1177_1934578X231193541 for Essential Oils of Distichochlamys benenica: Chemical Constituents, Mosquito Larvicidal and Antimicrobial Activities by Le Thi Huong, Do Ngoc Dai, Dau Ba Thin and Nguyen Huy Hung, Bui Bao Thinh in Natural Product Communications

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments and efforts toward improving our manuscript.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Do Ngoc Dai

Bui Bao Thinh

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Christenhusz

Byng

. The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa. 2016;261(3):201‐217. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1

Saha

Sinha

. Distribution, cytology, genetic diversity and molecular phylogeny of selected species of Zingiberaceae–A review. Feddes Repert. 2020;131(1):58‐68. https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.201900013

Rachkeeree

Kantadoung

Suksathan

Puangpradab

Page

Sommano

. Nutritional compositions and phytochemical properties of the edible flowers from selected Zingiberaceae found in Thailand. Front Nutr. 2018;5:3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2018.00003

Vasala

. Ginger. In: Handbook of herbs and spices. Woodhead Publishing; 2012:319‐335. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781855736450.195

Loi

. Vietnamese Medicinal Plants and Herbs. Medical Publishing House; 2006.

Pancharoen

Prawat

Tuntiwachwuttikul

. Phytochemistry of the Zingiberaceae. Stud Nat Prod Chem. 2000;23:797‐865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572-5995(00)80142-8

Deng

Yun

Ren

Qing

Luo

. Plants of the genus Zingiber: a review of their ethnomedicine, phytochemistry and pharmacology. Molecules. 2022;27(9):2826. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092826

Sun

Wang

Zhao

, et al. Chemical constituents and biological research on plants in the genus Curcuma. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(7):1451‐1523. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1176554

de Souza

da Silva

Dos Santos

, et al. Larvicidal activity of essential oils against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: culicidae). Curr Pharm Des. 2020;26(33):4092‐4111. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612826666200806100500

10.

Vivekanandhan

Panikar

Sethuraman

Usha-Raja-Nanthini

Shivakumar

. Toxic and synergetic effect of plant essential oils along with nano-emulsion for control of three mosquito species. J Nat Pestic Res. 2023;5:100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.napere.2023.100045

11.

Vivekanandhan

Usha-Raja-Nanthini

Valli

Shivakumar

. Comparative efficacy of Eucalyptus globulus (Labill) hydrodistilled essential oil and temephos as mosquito larvicide. Nat Prod Res. 2020;34(18):2626‐2629. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2018.1547290

12.

Vivekanandhan

Venkatesan

Ramkumar

Karthi

Senthil-Nathan

Shivakumar

. Comparative analysis of major mosquito vectors response to seed-derived essential oil and seed pod-derived extract from Acacia nilotica. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(2):388. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020388

13.

Thinh

Thin

. Essential oil composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of Pluchea eupatorioides Kurz collected from Vietnam. J Essent Oil Bearing Plants. 2023:1‐11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2023.2234398

14.

Thin

Korneeva

Thinh

Ogunwande

. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of essential oil and methanol extract from the stems of Dasymaschalon rostratum Merr. & Chun. Russ J Bioorg Chem. 2023:1‐8. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162023040209

15.

Chouhan

Sharma

Guleria

. Antimicrobial activity of some essential oils—present status and future perspectives. Medicines. 2017;4(3):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines4030058

16.

Franklinos

Jones

Redding

Abubakar

. The effect of global change on mosquito-borne disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(9):e302‐e312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30161-6

17.

Michael

Dominey-Howes

Labbate

. The antimicrobial resistance crisis: causes, consequences, and management. Front Public Health. 2014;2:145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00145

18.

Chávez-González

Rodríguez-Herrera

Aguilar

. Essential oils: a natural alternative to combat antibiotics resistance. In: Antibiotic resistance, mechanisms and new antimicrobial approaches. Academic Press; 2016:227‐237. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803642-6.00011-3

19.

Tariq

Wani

Rasool

, et al. A comprehensive review of the antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral potential of essential oils and their chemical constituents against drug-resistant microbial pathogens. Microb Pathog. 2019;134:103580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103580

20.

Phukerd

Soonwera

. Larvicidal and pupicidal activities of essential oils from Zingiberaceae plants against Aedes aegypti (Linn.) and Culex quinquefasciatus Say mosquitoes. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2013;44(5):761‐771.

21.

Huong

Chung

Huong

, et al. Essential oils of Zingiber species from Vietnam: chemical compositions and biological activities. Plants. 2020;9(10):1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101269

22.

Van

Thang

Luu

Doan

. An overview of the chemical composition and biological activities of essential oils from Alpinia genus (Zingiberaceae). RSC Adv. 2021;11(60):37767‐37783. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA07370B

23.

Van

. Chemical constituents and biological activities of essential oils of Amomum genus (Zingiberaceae). Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2021;11(12):519‐526. https://doi.org/10.4103/2221-1691.331267

24.

Newman

. Distichochlamys, a new genus from Vietnam. Edinb J Bot. 1995;52(1):65‐69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096042860000192X

25.

Nguyen

Leong-Škorničková

. Distichochlamys benenica (Zingiberaceae), a new species from Vietnam. Gard Bull Singapore. 2012;64(1):195‐200.

26.

Larsen

Newman

. A new species of Distichochlamys from Vietnam and some observations on generic limits in Hedychieae (Zingiberaceae). Nat Hist Bull Siam Soc. 2001;49:77‐80.

27.

Rehse

Kress

. Distichochlamys rubrostriata (Zingiberaceae), a new species from northern Vietnam. Brittonia. 2003;55(3):205‐208. https://doi.org/10.1663/0007-196X(2003)055[0205:DRZANS]2.0.CO;2

28.

Pham

Hoang

HNT

Nguyen

, et al. Anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities of compounds isolated from Distichochlamys benenica. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:6624347. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6624347

29.

Chen

Cuong

Quy

, et al. Antioxidant activity and α-glucosidase inhibitability of Distichochlamys citrea MF Newman rhizome fractionated extracts: in vitro and in silico screenings. Chem Pap. 2022;76(9):5655‐5675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-022-02273-2

30.

Chen

Thong

CLT

Tran-Trung

Nhung

NTA

Triet

. Phytochemical constituents isolated from Distichochlamys citrea MF Newman rhizomes and their antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities. Nat Prod Commun. 2023;18(5):1‐7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X231177878

31.

Hue

Cuong

Quy

, et al. Antimicrobial properties of Distichochlamys citrea MF Newman rhizome n-hexane extract against Streptococcus pyogenes: experimental evidences and computational screening. ChemistrySelect. 2022;7(17):e202200680. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202200680

32.

Hoang

HTN

Dinh

TTT

Pham

HBT

. Chemical composition and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of essential oil from rhizomes of Distichochlamys benenica. Hue Uni J Sci: Nat Sci. 2020;129(1D):43‐49. https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijns.v129i1D.5804

33.

Thinh

Hanh

Hung

Thin

. Comparison of yield, chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Distichochlamys citrea rhizome essential oils obtained by different extraction methods. Mosc Univ Chem Bull. 2022;77(5):300‐305. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027131422050108

34.

Huong

Chau

DTM

Hung

Dai

Ogunwande

. Volatile constituents of Distichochlamys citrea MF Newman and Distichochlamys orlowii K. Larsen MF Newman (Zingiberaceae) from Vietnam. J Med Plants Res. 2017;11(9):188‐193. https://doi.org/10.5897/jmpr2016.6337

35.

Van

Nhan

DTT

Hung

Duc

. Chemical composition of the essential oils of Distichochlamys citrea leaves collected from Central Vietnam. Vietnam J Chem. 2017;55(4E23):358‐362.

36.

Hoai

Khan

Duc

. Chemical composition of the essential oils of Distichochlamys citrea from A Luoi – Thua Thien Hue. J Med Pharm. 2014;25:43‐48.

37.

Duc

Thang

. Study on chemical composition of rhizome essential oil of Distichochlamys citrea collected in some provinces at central Vietnam. J Sci An Giang Uni. 2015;8(4):60‐65.

38.

Adams

. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy. Allured Publishing Corporation, Carol Stream; 2007.

39.

NIST. Chemistry Web Book. Data from NIST Standard Reference Database, 69; 2018.

40.

Thinh

Thanh

Thin

Ogunwande

. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils obtained from the leaves and stems of Schisandra perulata Gagnep. J Essent Oil Bearing Plants. 2022;25(4):773‐782. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2022.2124885

41.

Figueiredo

Barroso

Pedro

Scheffer

. Factors affecting secondary metabolite production in plants: volatile components and essential oils. Flavour Fragr J. 2008;23(4):213‐226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1875

42.

Thinh

Chac

Hanh

Korneeva

Hung

Igoli

. Effect of extraction method on yield, chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oil from the fruits of Amomum villosum var. xanthioides. J Essent Oil Bearing Plants. 2022;25(1):28‐37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2022.2049893

43.

Piplani

Bhagwat

Singhvi

, et al. Plant-based larvicidal agents: an overview from 2000 to 2018. Exp Parasitol. 2019;199:92‐103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2019.02.014

44.

Dias

Moraes

DFC

. Essential oils and their compounds as Aedes aegypti L.(Diptera: culicidae) larvicides. Parasitol Res. 2014;113(2):565‐592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-013-3687-6

45.

Andrade-Ochoa

Sánchez-Aldana

Chacón-Vargas

, et al. Oviposition deterrent and larvicidal and pupaecidal activity of seven essential oils and their major components against Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: culicidae): synergism–antagonism effects. Insects. 2018;9(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9010025

46.

Castillo-Morales

Serrano

Villamizar

ALR

Mendez-Sanchez

Duque

. Impact of Cymbopogon flexuosus (Poaceae) essential oil and primary components on the eclosion and larval development of Aedes aegypti. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):24291. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03819-2

47.

Pandey

Tandon

Ahmad

Singh

Tripathi

. Structure–activity relationships of monoterpenes and acetyl derivatives against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: culicidae) larvae. Pest Manag Sci. 2013;69(11):1235‐1238. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3488

48.

Vera

Zambrano

Méndez-Sanchez

Rodríguez-Sanabria

Stashenko

Duque Luna

. Essential oils with insecticidal activity against larvae of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: culicidae). Parasitol Res. 2014;113(7):2647‐2654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-3917-6

49.

Bassole

IHN

Guelbeogo

Nebie

, et al. Ovicidal and larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes of essential oils extracted from three spontaneous plants of Burkina Faso. Parassitologia. 2003;45(1):23‐26.

50.

Sharma

Loach

Gupta

Mohan

Evaluation of larval toxicity, mode of action and chemical composition of citrus essential oils against Anopheles stephensi and Culex quinquefasciatus

. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2022;39:102284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102284

51.

Vieira

Dias

Medeiros

, et al. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Artemisia absinthium Asteraceae leaves. J Essent Oil Bearing Plants. 2017;20(1):123‐131. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2016.1257370

52.

Oliveira

Santiago

Santos

Silva

Martins

Crotti

. Antibacterial activity of essential oils against oral pathogens. Chem Biodivers. 2022;19(4):e202200097. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202200097

53.

Bhatti

Khan

Rani

Ahmad

Choudhary

. Biotransformation of monoterpenoids and their antimicrobial activities. Phytomedicine. 2014;21(12):1597‐1626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2014.05.011

54.

Zielińska-Błajet

Feder-Kubis

. Monoterpenes and their derivatives—recent development in biological and medical applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(19):7078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197078

55.

Salehi

Upadhyay

Erdogan Orhan

, et al. Therapeutic potential of α-and β-pinene: a miracle gift of nature. Biomolecules. 2019;9(11):738. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9110738

56.

Asakawa

. Dietary monoterpenoids. In: Handbook of Dietary Phytochemicals. Springer; 2021:1-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1745-3_17-2

57.

da Silva

ACR

Lopes

de Azevedo Barros

Costa Machado

Alviano

. Biological activities of α-pinene and β-pinene enantiomers. Molecules. 2012;17(6):6305‐6316. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17066305

58.

Huong

Phu

Giang

Chau

DTM

Ogunwande

. Antimicrobial activity and constituents of essential oils from the leaves of Syzygium szemaoense Merrill & LM Perry and Syzygium corticosum (Lour.) Merr. & LM Perry grown in Vietnam. J Essent Oil Bearing Plants. 2022;25(6):1289‐1300. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2022.2159542

59.

Ehsani

Alizadeh

Hashemi

Afshari

Aminzare

. Phytochemical, antioxidant and antibacterial properties of Melissa officinalis and Dracocephalum moldavica essential oils. Vet Res Forum. 2017;8(3):223‐229.

60.

Sonboli

Mojarrad

Gholipour

Ebrahimi

Arman

. Biological activity and composition of the essential oil of Dracocephalum moldavica L. grown in Iran. Nat Prod Commun. 2008;3(9):1547‐1550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X0800300930

61.

Nazzaro

Fratianni

De Martino

Coppola

De Feo

. Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria. Pharmaceuticals. 2013;6(12):1451‐1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph6121451

62.

Bassolé

IHN

Juliani

. Essential oils in combination and their antimicrobial properties. Molecules. 2012;17(4):3989‐4006. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17043989

63.

Lüderitz

Freudenberg

Galanos

Lehmann

Rietschel

Shaw

. Lipopolysaccharides of Gram-negative bacteria. In: Current topics in membranes and transport. Academic Press; 1982:79‐151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2161(08)60309-3 .

64.

Thinh

Thanh

Hanh

Thin

Doudkin

. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of essential oil from fruit of Schisandra perulata. Chem Nat Compd. 2022;58(4):763‐765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-022-03789-5

65.

Chac

Thinh

Doudkin

Minh Hong

Chinh

. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of essential oil from the roots of Tinomiscium petiolare. Chem Nat Compd. 2022;58(4):760‐762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-022-03788-6

66.

Thinh

Khoi

Doudkin

Thin

Ogunwande

. Chemical composition of essential oil and antioxidant activity of the essential oil and methanol extracts of Knema globularia (Lam.) Warb. from Vietnam. Nat Prod Res. 2023;37(10):1625‐1631. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2022.2103698

67.

Huong

Thinh

Hung

Phu

Hieu

Dai

. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and larvicidal activities of essential oils of two Syzygium species from Vietnam. Braz J Biol. 2024;84:e270967. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.270967

68.

Finney

. Probit analysis. Reissue Ed. Cambridge University Press; 2009.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.28 MB

Essential Oils of Distichochlamys benenica : Chemical Constituents,Mosquito Larvicidal and Antimicrobial Activities

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Results and Discussion

Chemical Constituents of EOs

Mosquito Larvicidal Potential of EOs

Antimicrobial Potential of EOs

Conclusions

Materials and Methods

Plant Material and EO Extraction

Analysis of EOs

Mosquito Larvicidal Screening

Antimicrobial Screening

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-npx-10.1177_1934578X231193541 - Supplemental material for Essential Oils of Distichochlamys benenica: Chemical Constituents, Mosquito Larvicidal and Antimicrobial Activities

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

Supplemental Material

References

Supplementary Material