Chemical Constituents of the Aerial Part of Valeriana officinalis var. latifolia Miq. With COX-2 Inhibitory Activity

Abstract

Twelve compounds, including a new iridoid (1) and 11 known compounds, were obtained from the aerial part of Valeriana officinalis var. latifolia Miq. Their structures were assigned by spectroscopic and mass spectrometric methods. All isolates were screened in vitro for cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitory activity. Two compounds (9 and 10) exhibited significant COX-2 inhibitory activity, with IC₅₀ values ranging from 0.67 to 6.77 μM. The possible recognition mechanism between compound 9 and COX-2 was predicted by molecular docking analysis.

Keywords

valerianaceae iridoids lignans COX-2 inhibitors

Introduction

Valeriana officinalis var. latifolia Miq., a perennial herb, is widely distributed throughout China, such as Guizhou, Qinghai, Sichuan, Hebei, and Henan.¹ As a traditional folk medicine, the roots of this plant have been used for the treatment of insomnia for centuries.² Previous chemical studies on V. officinalis revealed the presence of a variety of sesquiterpenes,³ iridoids,³ lignans,⁴ and alkaloids.² However, its aerial parts have seldom been investigated. Thus, this study on the chemical constituents of the aerial part led to the discovery of a new iridoid (1) and the identification of 11 known compounds (Figure 1). Herein, we report the isolation, structural elucidation, and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitory activities of these isolates.

Figure 1.

Chemical structures of 1-12.

Results and Discussion

6α-Hydroxy-7α-(hydroxymethyl)-4-methylenehexahydrocyclopenta[c]pyran-1(3H)-one acetonide (1) has the molecular formula C₁₃H₁₈O₄ according to HR-ESI-MS (m/z 261.1093, [M + Na]⁺, calcd for C₁₄H₂₂O₄ 261.1097). Its infrared (IR) absorptions implied the presence of an ester carbonyl group (1730, 1658 cm⁻¹) and a terminal double bond (890, 829, 767 cm⁻¹). The ¹H-NMR spectrum indicated the presence of 2 singlet methyl groups (δ_H 1.37, s, 3H; 1.48, s, 3H) and 2 protons of terminal olefins (δ_H 5.02, d, J = 2.0 Hz; 5.16, d, J = 2.0 Hz). The ¹³C NMR and DEPT spectra (Table 1) of 1 exhibited 13 carbon signals, including an ester carbonyl (δ_C 174.8), a characteristic terminal double bond (δ_C 113.4 and 142.0), a hemiketal carbon (δ_C 97.7), 2 methyl groups (δ_C 19.1 and 29.5), 3 methylenes (δ_C 38.9, 60.6, and 71.9), and 4 methines (δ_C 39.9, 42.2, 43.9, and 71.4). Further comparison of the 1D NMR data of compound 1 with those of 2 implied that both compounds shared a similar skeleton.⁵ The only differences were the presence of 2 methyl and a hemiketal carbon.⁵ In the heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) spectrum, correlations from Me-13 (δ_H 1.37) and Me-14 (δ_H 1.48) to C-12 (δ_C 97.7) and from H₂-10 (δ_H 3.95 and 4.21) to C-12 (δ_C 97.7) confirmed this deduction. Moreover, a cyclopentane ring was identified from the ¹H-¹H COSY cross-peaks of H₂-5 (δ_H 1.62 and 2.19)/H-6 (δ_H 4.36), H-6 (δ_H 4.36)/H-7 (δ_H 2.25), H-7 (δ_H 2.25)/H-8 (δ_H 3.36), H-8 (δ_H 3.36)/H-9 (δ_H 3.51), H-9 (δ_H 3.51)/H₂-5 (δ_H 1.62 and 2.19), and H-7 (δ_H 2.25)/H₂-10 (δ_H 3.95 and 4.21) (Figure 2). The HMBC correlations of H₂-11 (δ_H 5.02 and 5.16) to C-3 (δ_C 71.9), C-4 (δ_C 142.0), and C-9 (δ_C 39.9), H₂-3 (δ_H 4.61 and 4.73) to C-1 (δ_C 174.8), and H-8 (δ_H 3.36) to C-1 (δ_C 174.8) enabled identification of the structure. Thus, the planar structure was established as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Key HMBC () and ¹H–¹H COSY () correlations of 1 and key NOESY () correlations of 1.

Table 1.

¹H (600 MHz) and ¹³C (150 MHz) NMR Data of 1 in CDCl₃.

Pos.	δ_H (J in Hz)	δ _C
1		174.8
3a	4.73, d, (11.6)	71.9
3b	4.61, d, (11.6)	71.9
4		142.0
5a	2.19, m	38.9
5b	1.62, m
6	4.36, m	71.4
7	2.25, m	42.2
8	3.36, dd, (12.0, 8.6)	43.9
9	3.51, m	39.9
10a	3.95, dd, (12.3, 1.2)	60.6
10b	4.21, dd, (12.3, 3.5)	60.6
11a	5.16, d, (2.0)	113.4
11b	5.02, d, (2.0)
12		97.7
13	1.37, s	29.5
14	1.48, s	19.1

The relative configuration was assigned by a NOESY experiment (Figure 2). The NOESY correlations from H-9 (δ_H 3.51) to H-6 (δ_H 4.36) and H-7 (δ_H 2.25) and from H-8 (δ_H 3.36) to H-6 (δ_H 4.36) implied that those protons were on the same side of the molecule and were assigned arbitrarily as β-oriented. Thus, the relative configuration of compound 1, different from that of compound 2, was assigned. The absolute configuration was established from the calculated electronic circular dichroism (ECD).⁶ Compound 1 had 4 stereocenters at C-6, C-7, C-8, and C-9. The absolute configuration for compound 1 had 16 different molecules, and the ECD spectra for all possible compounds were calculated in Supporting Information. The results indicated that the absolute configuration was determined as (6S, 7S, 8R, and 9R)-1, which is also in good agreement with its relative configuration (Figure 3). Therefore, the structure of this compound was established.

Figure 3.

Calculated and experimental electronic circular dichroism (ECD) of (6S,7S,8R,9R)-1 and (6R,7R,8S,9S)-1.

Eleven known compounds were elucidated by extensive nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) methods and compared with the reported data in the literatures. Their structures were assigned as 6β-hydroxy-7β-(hydroxymethyl)-4-methylenehexahydrocyclopenta[c]pyran-1(3H)-one (2),⁵ isobicyclogermacrenal (3),⁷ friedelin (4),⁸ lupenone (5),⁹ 24-methylenecycloartenone (6),¹⁰ trans-phytol (7),¹¹ 2-hydroxy-4,6-dimetboxyacetopbenone (8),¹² syringaresinol (9),¹³ 1-hydroxypinoresinol (10),¹⁴ 4’,5,7-trimethoxyflavone (11),¹⁵ and β-sitostenone (12)¹⁶ (Figure 1). This is the first report to identify 9 compounds (1 and 4-11) in this plant, of which 8 (1, 4-9, and 11) were isolated from the family Valerianaceae for the first time.

6α-Hydroxy-7α-(hydroxymethyl)-4-methylenehexahydrocyclopenta[c]pyran-1(3H)-one acetonide (1), with a 6-membered acetal, might be derived from a diol of this compound and acetone. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry experiments were used to determine whether the crude extracts of the plant contained compound 1. The results indicated that compound 1 was not included in the aerial part of the plant (Figure S33 in Supporting Information). Thus, this compound might be an artificial compound that formed during the separation. Moreover, the relative configuration of 2 was assigned by comparing the 1D NMR data with those in the literature.⁵ In addition, an Overhauser effect difference (NOEdiff) experiment was used for compound 2 to confirm its relative configuration. Overhauser effect (NOE) correlations from H-9 (δ_H 3.46) to H-8 (δ_H 3.00), H-5β (δ_H 2.15), and H-11b (δ_H 5.07) and the absence of correlations from H-9 to H-6 and H-7 assigned the relative configuration of compound 2 (Figure S32 in Supporting Information). Compounds 1 and 2 had different relative configurations.

Cyclooxygenase-2 is a crucial target for the development of agents to treat inflammation.¹⁷ All compounds were evaluated for COX-2 inhibitory activity at a concentration of 100 μM. Four active compounds (5, 8, 9, and 10) were further tested for their IC₅₀ values (IC₅₀: 0.67-93.5 μM) (Table 2). Two lignans (9 and 10) exhibited significant activity with IC₅₀ values lower than 10 μM.

Table 2.

COX-2 Inhibitory Effects of the Isolates.^b

Com.	IC₅₀
5	93.5 ± 1.5
8	68.8 ± 2.1
9	0.67 ± 0.05
10	6.77 ± 0.16
Celecoxib^b	0.02 ± 0.01

Abbreviation: COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2.

^aCompounds 1-4, 6, 7, 11, and 12 were inactive with IC₅₀ > 100 μM.

^bCelecoxib was used as a positive control.

To investigate the molecular recognition mechanism between compound 9 and COX-2, compound 9 was applied to in silico analysis with a human COX-2 protein model (PDB code: 3LN1).¹⁸ As shown in Figure 4, the structure of 9 was packed into the catalytic site of the protein formed by TYR-341, GLN-178, PRO-500, ALA-502, ARG-499, and VAL-509. Moreover, 4 hydrogen bonds were observed to form between compound 9 and TYR-341, GLN-178, PRO-500, and ARG-499.

Figure 4.

Binding pose of compound 9 with cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2).

Experimental Section

General Experimental Procedures

1D and 2D NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance NEO 600 spectrometer using TMS as an internal standard. ESI-MS and HR-ESI-MS were recorded on Agilent 1100 and Thermo ultimate 3000/Q EXACTIVE FOCUS mass spectrometers, respectively, optical rotations on a JASCOP-1020 polarimeter, UV spectra on a Shimadzu UV-2401PC spectrometer, IR spectra on a Bruker FT-IR Tensor-27 and iCAN 9 infrared spectrophotometer with KBr disks, and CD spectra with an Applied Photophysics Chirascan spectrometer. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (300-400 mesh; Qingdao Marine Chemical Co. Ltd), Sephadex LH-20 (40-70 µm, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech AB), and RP-C18 gel (40-63 µm, Merck). Semipreparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed on an instrument consisting of a Hanbon NP7005c controller, a Hanbon NP7005 pump, and a Hanbon NU3000c UV detector with a YMC-Triart-C18 column (250 × 10.0 mm, 5 μm).

Plant Material

Valeriana officinalis var. latifolia Miq., collected in Tongren, Guizhou Province of China, was identified by Dr Mingjin Huang. A voucher specimen (H20180913) was deposited in the Key Laboratory of Chemistry for Natural Products of Guizhou Province and Chinese Academy of Science.

Extraction and Isolation

The air-dried and powdered aerial parts of V officinalis (10 kg) were refluxed with methanol (3 × 40 L), 3 times (3 × 3 h). The combined solution was evaporated under vacuum to obtain 4.0 kg residue, which was suspended in water and then partitioned with ethyl acetate (EA) (3 × 15 L). The EA part (600 g) was separated on a silica gel column eluted with PE (light petroleum)/acetone gradient elution (50:1-1:0) to afford 7 fractions (Fr.1-Fr.7). Fr.2 (40.2 g) was applied to an MCI gel column, eluted with a gradient of CH₃OH/H₂O (60:40-95:5) to obtain 5 fractions (Fr.2A-Fr.2G). Fr.2D (5.2 g) was separated by column chromatography over silica gel to get 1 (20 mg), 2 (13 mg), 4 (9 mg), and 8 (12 mg). Fr. 2E (3.2 g) was separated by column chromatography over silica gel and further purified by semipreparative HPLC with X-bridge eluted with CH₃OH/H₂O (2.0 mL/min, CH₃OH:H₂O = 85:15, vol/vol) to yield 3 (12 mg, t _R = 15 min), 5 (21 mg, t _R = 23 min), and 12 (7 mg, t _R = 38 min). Fr. 2F (1.5 g) was applied to Sephadex LH-20 and then further purified by semipreparative HPLC with X-bridge eluted with CH₃OH/H₂O (2.0 mL/min, CH₃OH:H₂O = 78:22, vol/vol) to obtain 10 (5.0 mg, t _R = 27 min) and 11 (7.6 mg, t _R = 35 min). Fr. 3 (20 g) was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel eluted with dichloromethane/acetone (100:1-1:1) and further purified on Sephadex LH-20 to obtain 6 (20 mg), 7 (9.5 mg), and 9 (38 mg).

6α-Hydroxy-7α-(hydroxymethyl)-4-methylenehexahydrocyclopenta[c]pyran-1(3H)-one acetonide (1). Colorless oil, [α]²⁵_D −29.4 (c 0.18, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λ_max (log ε) 202 (4.17) nm; CD (MeOH) λ_max (Δε) 202 (+11.1), 223 (−80.3) nm; IR (KBr) ν_max 2989, 2934, 2892, 1730, 1658, 1469, 1379, 1305, 1272, 1224, 1196, 1149, 1078, 1040, 890, 829, 767, 667, 518 cm⁻¹; ¹H and ¹³C NMR data, see Table 1; positive HR-ESI-MS m/z: [M + Na]⁺ 261.1093 (calcd. for C₁₃H₁₈O₄Na, 261.1097).

6β-Hydroxy-7β-(hydroxymethyl)-4-methylenehexahydrocyclopenta[c]pyran-1(3H)-one (2). Colorless oil, [α]²³_D −26.8 (c 0.2, MeOH) ¹H NMR (δ_H, CD₃OD, 400 MHz): 5.19 (1H, s, H-11a), 5.07 (1H, s, H-11b), 4.73 (2H, m, H-3), 4.39 (1H, m, H-6), 3.87 (1H, dd, J = 11.1, 4.8 Hz, H-10a), 3.79 (1H, dd, J = 11.1, 8.0 Hz, H-10b), 3.46 (1H, m, H-9), 3.00 (1H, dd, J = 11.0, 9.6 Hz, H-8), 2.41 (1H, m, H-7), 2.15 (1H, m, H-5β), and 1.66 (1H, m, H-5α). ¹³C NMR (δ_C, CD₃OD, 100 MHz): 40.8 (C-9), 41.3 (C-5), 44.8 (C-8), 52.0 (C-7), 61.8 (C-10), 72.4 (C-3), 73.4 (C-6), 113.7 (C-11), 144.1 (C-4), and 177.3 (C-1).

Bioassays

The inhibitory activities of the isolated compounds toward COX-2 were evaluated using a COX-2 Inhibitor Screening Kit (Beyotime).¹⁷ Stock solutions of test samples were prepared and diluted in DMSO. Celecoxib was used as a positive control. According to the manufacturer's protocols, a recombinant human COX-2 enzyme in 96-well plates was incubated with varying concentrations of test samples for 10 min at 37 °C. Then, COX-2 probe and substrate were added to each well, respectively, and incubated for another 15 min at 37 °C in the dark. The intensity of fluorescence was measured using a microplate reader (BioTek) with an excitation wavelength of 560 nm and an emission wavelength of 590 nm.

Computational Section

A docking study was performed, as described previously.^17,18 For enzyme preparation, a 3LN1 human COX-2 model was downloaded from the Protein Database (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/3LN1, code: 3LN1).¹⁸ The ligand was bound with 3LN1 at the molecular simulative level by utilizing Ledock.¹⁹ Hydrogen atoms were added and the crystallographic water molecules in 3LN1 were removed. At neutral pH, all the dissociable residues in the system were set to their protonated states. Celecoxib, the inhibitor of COX-2 in 3LN1, was used as a reference compound to define the active site of 3LN1 for docking. All the parameters were default. Finally, the binding pose of compound 9 with 3LN1 was generated by MOE2019.

Conclusions

A new iridoid (1) and 11 known compounds were isolated from the aerial part of V officinalis var. latifolia Miq. This acetonide (1) is an artificial compound that formed during the separation. Their structures were assigned by spectroscopic methods. Nine compounds (1 and 4-11) were identified in this plant for the first time. Two lignans (9 and 10) exhibited significant COX-2 inhibitory activity with IC₅₀ values ranging from 0.67 to 6.77 μM. The possible recognition mechanism between compound 9 and COX-2 was predicted by molecular docking analysis.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-npx-10.1177_1934578X221078628 - Supplemental material for Chemical Constituents of the Aerial Part of Valeriana officinalis var. latifolia Miq. With COX-2 Inhibitory Activity

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-npx-10.1177_1934578X221078628 for Chemical Constituents of the Aerial Part of Valeriana officinalis var. latifolia Miq. With COX-2 Inhibitory Activity by Weikang Ming, Zizhen Zhang, Yanan Li, Ping Yi, Miaomiao Wang, Zhengbin An, Fei Li, Wei Gu, Xiaojiang Hao and Chunmao Yuan in Natural Product Communications

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No. U1812403 and 81760630), the Science and Technology Plan of Guizhou Province (Grant No. QKHZC [2018]2824), Science and Technology Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine and National Medicine of Guizhou Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (QZYY-2019-066), Natural Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province (J[2019]1216), High-level Innovative Talents in Guizhou Province (Thousand Levels of Talent for Chunmao Yuan in 2018), “Light of the West” Talent Cultivation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences for Chunmao Yuan (RZ [2020]82), the 13th Batch of Outstanding Young Scientific and Technological Talents in Guizhou Province (QKHPTRC [2021]5633), and Guizhou Provincial Engineering Research Center for Natural Drugs.

ORCID iD

Chunmao Yuan

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Hong

Fred

Charles

. Flora of China. 1986, 73:27-44

Patočka

Jakl

. Biomedically relevant chemical constituents of Valeriana officinalis. J Appl Biomed. 2010;8(1):11‐18.

Wang

Ran

, et al. Iridoids and sesquiterpenoids from the roots of Valeriana officinalis. J Nat Prod. 2009;72(9):1682‐1685.

Schumacher

Scholle

Hölzl

, et al. Lignans isolated from Valerian: identification and characterization of a new olivil derivative with partial agonistic activity at A1 adenosine receptors. J Nat Prod. 2002;65(10):1479‐1485.

Zhang

, et al. Terpenoids from the roots and rhizomes of Nardostachys chinensis. J Nat Prod. 2005;68(7):1131‐1133.

Wang

Bao

, et al. Peganumine A, a β-carboline dimer with a new octacyclic scaffold from Peganum harmala. Org Lett. 2014;16(15):4028‐4031.

Wang

Ran

Chen

, et al. Germacrane-type sesquiterpenoids from the roots of Valeriana officinalis var. latifolia. J Nat Prod. 2010;73(9):1563‐1567.

Abbas

Al-Massarany

Khan

, et al. Phytochemical and biological studies on Saudi Commiphora opobalsamum L. Nat Prod Res. 2007;21(3):383‐391.

Bourjot

Leyssen

Eydoux

. Chemical constituents of Anacolosa pervilleana and their antiviral activities. Fitoterapia. 2012;83(6):1076‐1080.

10.

Jayasinghe

ULB

Vithana

HSK

Wannigama

, et al. 24-Methylenecycloartenone from Bhesa nitidissima. Fitoterapia. 2001;72(5):594‐595.

11.

Kim

Lee

Choi

, et al. Terpene and phenolic constituents of Lactuca indica L. Arch Pharm Res. 2008;31(8):983‐988.

12.

Brown

. Two new compounds from Artemisia annua. J Nat Prod. 1992;55(12):1756‐1760.

13.

Chen

Chang

, et al. Lignans and kauranes from the stems of Annona cherimola. J Chin Chem Soc. 1998;45(5):629‐634.

14.

Tsukamoto

Hisada

Nishibe

. Lignans from bark of the Olea plants. II. Chem Pharm Bull. 1985;33(3):1232‐1241.

15.

Nadri

Naser

Zukifli

, et al. Antioxidant activity of Piper caninum and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition by methoxylated flavones. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2015;12(2):120‐125.

16.

Chang

, et al. Isolation of antibacterial diterpenoids from Cryptomeria japonica bark. Nat Prod Res. 2008;22(12):1085‐1093.

17.

Zeng

Yang

, et al. Chemical constituents from the flowers of Hypericum monogynum L. with COX-2 inhibitory activity. Phytochemistry. 2021;193:112970.

18.

Wang

Limburg

Graneto

, et al. The novel benzopyran class of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Part 2: the second clinical candidate having a shorter and favorable human half-life. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20(23):7159‐7163.

19.

Zhao

Dong

Lafleur

, et al. Discovery of a novel chemotype of tyrosine kinase inhibitors by fragment-based docking and molecular dynamics. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2012;3(10):834‐838.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

3.75 MB