Subtle balance of inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bond strength in aqueous solutions often governs the structure and dynamics of molecular species used as potential drugs and in supramolecular applications. In silico molecular dynamics study of water solution of manzamine A has been performed with different atomic charges in order to investigate the influence of charge distribution choice on predicting qualitative and quantitative features of the simulated systems. Various well known charge schemes (MK-ESP, RESP, Mulliken, AM1-BCC, Gasteiger-Hückel, Gasteiger-Marsili, MMFF94, and Dynamic Electronegativity Relaxation - DENR) led to qualitatively different pictures of dynamic behavior of the intramolecular hydrogen bond. The reported calculation framework represents a relatively rare case where differences in charge distributions lead to noticeable differences in simulated properties, thus providing a useful test case for force field and charge distribution development, provided high quality experiments are conducted to use as references.
OsolodkinDI, ShulgaDA, PalyulinVA, ZefirovNS. (2010) Interaction of manzamine A with glycogen synthase kinase 3β: a molecular dynamics study. Russian Chemical Bulletin, 59, 1983–1993.
2.
LaportMS, SantosOC, MuricyG. (2009) Marine sponges: potential sources of new antimicrobial drugs. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 10, 86–105.
3.
YousafM, HammondNL, PengJ, WahyuonoS, McIntoshKA, CharmanWN, MayerAMS, HamannMT. (2004) New manzamine alkaloids from an Indo-Pacific sponge. Pharmacokinetics, oral availability, and the significant activity of several manzamines against HIV-I, AIDS opportunistic infections, and inflammatory diseases. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 47, 3512–3517.
4.
IbrahimMA, ShilabinAG, PrasannaS, JacobM, KhanSI, DoerksenRJ, HamannMT. (2008) 2-N-Methyl modifications and SAR studies of manzamine A. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 16, 6702–6706.
5.
HamannM, AlonsoD, Martín-AparicioE, FuertesA, Pérez-PuertoMJ, CastroA, MoralesS, NavarroML, del Monte-MillánM, MedinaM, PennakaH, BalaiahA, PengJ, CookJ, WahyuonoS, MartínezA. (2007) Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) inhibitory activity and structure– activity relationship (SAR) studies of the manzamine alkaloids. Potential for Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Natural Products, 70, 1397–1405.
6.
FriesnerRA, MurphyRB, RepaskyMP, FryeLL, GreenwoodJG, HalgrenTA, SanschagrinPC, MainzDT (2006) Extra precision Glide: Docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 49, 6177–6196.
7.
SYBYL 8.0, Tripos Inc., St. Louis (MO), USA.
8.
SakaiR, HigaT, JeffordCW, BernardinelliG. (1986) Manzamine A, a novel antitumor alkaloid from a sponge. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 108, 6404–6405.
9.
SinghUC, KollmanPA. (1984) An approach to computing electrostatic charges for molecules. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 5, 129– 145;
10.
BeslerBH, MerzKM, KollmanPA (1990) Atomic charges derived from semiempirical methods. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 11, 431–39.
11.
BaylyCI, CieplakP, CornellW, KollmanPA. (1993) A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 97, 10269–10280.
12.
JakalianA, JackDB, BaylyCI. (2002) Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 23, 1623–1641.
13.
HalgrenTA. (1996) Merck molecular force field. II. MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatic parameters for intermolecular interactions. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 17, 520–552.
14.
GasteigerJ, MarsiliM. (1980) Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity - a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron, 36, 3219–3228.
15.
ShulgaDA, OliferenkoAA, PisarevSA, PalyulinVA, ZefirovNS. (2008) Fast tools for calculation of atomic charges well suited for drug design. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 19, 153–165;
16.
TsarevaDA, OsolodkinDI, ShulgaDA, OliferenkoAA, PisarevSA, PalyulinVA, ZefirovNS. (2011) General purpose electronegativity relaxation charge models applied to CoMFA and CoMSIA study of GSK-3 inhibitors. Molecular Informatics, 30, 169–180.
17.
WangJ, WolfRM, CaldwellJW, KollmanPA, CaseDA. (2004) Development and testing of a general Amber force field. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 25, 1157–1174.
18.
VegaC, AbascalJLF, CondeMM, AragonesJL. (2009) What ice can teach us about water interactions: a critical comparison of the performance of different water models. Faraday Discussions, 141, 251–276;
19.
SpoelD, MaarenPJ, BerendsenHJC. (1998) A systematic study of water models for molecular simulation: Derivation of water models optimized for use with a reaction field. Journal of Chemical Physics, 108, 10220–10230.
MiyamotoS, KollmanPA. (1992) SETTLE: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 13, 952–962.
