The angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGFA) plays a critical role during early pregnancy in many species including the rat, and any alterations in VEGFA levels can severely impact blastocyst implantation rates. The rat ovarian hyperstimulation (OH) model is useful in studying how the induction of superovulation affects VEGFA levels and endometrial receptivity to blastocyst implantation. The present study shows that the major isoform in the rat uterus, Vegf188, is reduced at the time of receptivity in OH compared to normal pregnancy, whereas there is no change in Vegf164 and Vegf120 messenger RNA (mRNA). The VEGFA receptor 2 (VEGFR2) protein levels are also reduced at the time of receptivity in OH. Our ovariectomy studies show that Vegf164, Vegf188, and Vegf120 are significantly decreased by estrogen, and, to a lesser extent progesterone, when compared to control animals. Although no change in the percentage of endometrial blood vessels was seen across all stages of pregnancy, at the time of receptivity in OH pregnancies, blood vessels were typically larger compared to other stages. The altered progesterone–estrogen ratio seen in OH, taken together with our ovariectomy studies, explains the changes to Vegfa mRNA in OH at the time of receptivity. Since VEGFA is important during implantation, the changes to Vegfa and VEGFR2 levels in the endometrium may help explain the observed lower endometrial receptivity following OH. This study aimed to analyse how ovarian hyperstimulation alters the levels of vascular endothleial growth factor and its major receptor, VEGFR2 in the uterus in a rat model.
PaulsonRJSauerMVLoboRA. Embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: importance of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 1990;53(5):870–874.
2.
ErtzeidGStorengR. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(2):221–225.
3.
MurphyCR. Uterine receptivity and the plasma membrane transformation. Cell Res. 2004;14(4):259–267.
4.
KramerBMaganAde WetG. Hyperstimulation affects vascular permeability at implantation sites in the rat endometrium. J Assist Reprod Gen. 1993;10(2):163–168.
5.
JovanovicAKramerB. The effect of hyperstimulation on transforming growth factor beta(1) and beta(2) in the rat uterus: possible consequences for embryo implantation. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(5):1509–1517.
6.
LindsayLAMurphyCR. Ovarian hyperstimulation affects fluid transporters in the uterus: a potential mechanism in uterine receptivity. Reprod Fert Develop. 2014;26(7):982–990.
7.
BiyiksizPCFilizSVuralB. Is sildenafil citrate affect endometrial receptivity? An immunohistochemical study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27(10):767–774.
8.
RabbaniMLRogersPA. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in endometrial vascular events before implantation in rats. Reproduction. 2001;122(1):85–90.
9.
De-VriesCEscobedoJAUenoHHouckKFerraraNWilliamsLT. The fms tyrosine-like kinase, a receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor. Science. 1992;255(5047):989–991.
10.
TermanBIDoughervermazenMCarrionME. Identification of the KDR tyrosine kinase as a receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor. Biochem Biophys Res Comms. 1992;187(3):1579–1586.
11.
ShalabyFRossantJYamaguchiTP. Failure of blood-island formation and vasculogenesis in Flk-1-deficient mice. Nature. 1995;376(6535):62–66.
12.
OlssonAKDimbergAKreugerJClaesson-WelshL. VEGF receptor signalling – in control of vascular function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2006;7(5):359–371.
13.
WintherHAhmedADantzerV. Immunohistochemical localization of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its two specific receptors, Flt-1 and KDR, in the porcine placenta and non-pregnant uterus. Placenta. 1999;20(1):35–43.
14.
WalterLMRogersPAGirlingJE. Differential expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-A isoforms in the mouse uterus during early pregnancy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21(6):803–811.
15.
ArcondeguyTLacazetteEMillevoiSPratsHTouriolC. VEGF-A mRNA processing, stability and translation: a paradigm for intricate regulation of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(17):7997–8010.
16.
ReynoldsLPKillileaSDRedmarDA. Angiogenesis in the female reproductive system. FASEB J. 1992;6(3):886–892.
17.
MurphyBFBelovKThompsonMB. Evolution of viviparity and uterine angiogenesis: vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in oviparous and viviparous skinks. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2010;314(2):148–156.
18.
WhittingtonCMGrauGEMurphyCRThompsonMB. Unusual angiogenic factor plays a role in lizard pregnancy but is not unique to viviparity. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2015;324(2):152–158.
19.
WhittingtonCMDanastasKGrauGEMurphyCRThompsonMB. Expression of VEGF 111 and other VEGF-A variants in the rat uterus is correlated with stage of pregnancy. J Comp Physiol B. 2017;187(2):353–360.
20.
LeungDWCachianesGKuangWJGoeddelDVFerraraN. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science. 1989;246(4935):1306–1309.
21.
HouckKALeungDWRowlandAMWinerJFerraraN. Dual regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor bioavailability by genetic and proteolytic mechanisms. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(36):26031–26037.
22.
WalterLMRogersPAGirlingJE. The role of progesterone in endometrial angiogenesis in pregnant and ovariectomised mice. Reproduction. 2005;129(6):765–777.
23.
GrotaLJEik-NesKB. Plasma progesterone concentrations during pregnancy and lactation in the rat. J Reprod Fertil. 1967;13(1):83–91.
24.
LjungkvistI.Attachment reaction of rat uterine luminal epithelium. 3. The effect of estradiol, estrone and estriol on the morphology of the luminal epithelium of the spayed, virgin rat. Acta Soc Med Ups. 1971;76(3-4):139–157.
25.
HewittDPMarkPJWaddellBJ. Glucocorticoids prevent the normal increase in placental vascular endothelial growth factor expression and placental vascularity during late pregnancy in the rat. Endocrinology. 2006;147(12):5568–5574.
26.
MineurPColigeACDeroanneCF. Newly identified biologically active and proteolysisresistant VEGF-A isoform VEGF111 is induced by genotoxic agents. J Cell Bio. 2007;179(6):1261–1273.
27.
QiJWQinTTXuLX. TNFSF15 inhibits vasculogenesis by regulating relative levels of membrane-bound and soluble isoforms of VEGF receptor 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(34):13863–13868.
28.
KanekoYLindsayLAMurphyCR. Focal adhesions disassemble during early pregnancy in rat uterine epithelial cells. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2008;20(8):892–899.
29.
El-AssaadFWhewayJHuntNHGrauGECombesV. Production, fate and pathogenicity of plasma microparticles in murine cerebral malaria. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(3):e1003839.
30.
PsychoyosAMartelD. Problems related to the implantation of the human egg after in vitro fertilization. Acta Eur Fertil. 1985;16(2):107–109.
31.
RobertsWGPaladeGE. Increased microvascular permeability and endothelial fenestration induced by vascular endothelial growth factor. J Cell Sci. 1995;108(Pt 6):2369–2379.
32.
HornungDLebovicDIShifrenJLVigneJLTaylorRN. Vectorial secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor by polarized human endometrial epithelial cells. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(5):909–915.
33.
FanXKriegSKuoCJ. VEGF blockade inhibits angiogenesis and reepithelialization of endometrium. FASEB J. 2008;22(10):3571–3580.
34.
LindsayLAMurphyCR. Redistribution of aquaporins 1 and 5 in the rat uterus is dependent on progesterone: a study with light and electron microscopy. Reproduction. 2006;131(2):369–378.µ
35.
MadawalaRJDowlandSPoonCELindsayLAMurphyCR. Caveolins redistribute in uterine epithelial cells during early pregnancy in the rat: an epithelial polarisation strategy?Histochem Cell Biol. 2014;142(5):555–567.
36.
Cullinan-BoveKKoosRD. Vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor expression in the rat uterus: rapid stimulation by estrogen correlates with estrogen-induced increases in uterine capillary permeability and growth. Endocrinology. 1993;133(2):829–837.
37.
WalterLMRogersPAGirlingJE. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A isoform and (co)receptor expression are differentially regulated by 17beta-oestradiol in the ovariectomised mouse uterus. Reproduction. 2010;140(2):331–341.
38.
LjungkvistI.Attachment reaction of rat uterine luminal epithelium. IV. The cellular changes in the attachment reaction and its hormonal regulation. Fertil Steril. 1972;23(11):847–865.
39.
MurphyCRRogersAW. Effects of ovarian hormones on cell membranes in the rat uterus. III. The surface carbohydrates at the apex of the luminal epithelium. Cell Biophys. 1981;3(4):305–320.
40.
CohenTNahariDCeremLWNeufeldGLeviBZ. Interleukin 6 induces the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(2):736–741.
TsuzukiTOkadaHChoH. Hypoxic stress simultaneously stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor via hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and inhibits stromal cell-derived factor-1 in human endometrial stromal cells. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(2):523–530.
43.
MakkarGNgEHYYeungWSBHoPC. Reduced expression of interleukin-11 and interleukin-6 in the periimplantation endometrium of excessive ovarian responders during in vitro fertilization treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(8):3181–3188.
44.
KaziAAKoosRD. Estrogen-induced activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and edema in the uterus are mediated by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. Endocrinology. 2007;148(5):2363–2374.
45.
BermontLLamielleFFauconnetSEsumiHWeiszAAdessiGL. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression by insulin-like growth factor-1 in endometrial adenocarcinoma cells. Int J Cancer. 2000;85(1):117–123.
YuanALinCYChouCH. Functional and structural characteristics of tumor angiogenesis in lung cancers overexpressing different VEGF isoforms assessed by DCE- and SSCE-MRI. PloS One. 2011;6(1):e16062.
48.
NakatsuMNSainsonRCAPérez-del-PulgarS. VEGF121 and VEGF165 regulate blood vessel diameter through vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in an in vitro angiogenesis model. Lab Invest. 2003;83(12):1873–1885.
49.
JonovichGMayerYAzpirozA. Ovarian stimulation affects the levels of regulatory endometrial NK cells and angiogenic cytokine VEGF. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;65(2):146–153.
