Although controversial, increasing paternal age has been shown to negatively affect assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes and success rates. Most studies investigating the effect of paternal age on ART outcomes use a donor oocyte model to minimize maternal aneuploidy contribution. This study sought to determine whether increasing paternal age is associated with adverse in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes when aneuploidy is minimized using preimplantation genetic screening. There were 573 single thawed euploid embryo transfers from 473 patients undergoing oocyte donor and autologous IVF cycles. Cycles were categorized according to paternal age at oocyte retrieval, and an age adjustment was performed for maternal age in order to evaluate for an isolated paternal age effect. Fertilization rate was found to decrease significantly with increasing paternal age (P = .04). After controlling for oocyte age, there was no significant difference in pregnancy outcomes across all paternal age categories after euploid embryo transfer, including implantation rate (P = .23), clinical pregnancy rate (P = .51), and spontaneous abortion rate (P = .55). Therefore, if a couple is able to produce and transfer a single thawed euploid embryo, no difference in IVF pregnancy outcomes is identified with increasing paternal age.
BellverJGarridoNRemohiJPellicerAMeseguerM. Influence of paternal age on assisted reproduction outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(5):595–604. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60305-7.
2.
PaulsonRJMilliganRCSokolRZ. The lack of influence of age on male fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(5):818–822. doi:10.1067/mob.2001.113852.
3.
de La RochebrochardEde MouzonJThepotFThonneauP; French National IVFRA. Fathers over 40 and increased failure to conceive: the lessons of in vitro fertilization in France. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(5):1420–1424. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.040.
4.
RobertshawIKhouryJAbdallahMEWarikooPHofmannGE. The effect of paternal age on outcome in assisted reproductive technology using the ovum donation model. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(5):590–593. doi:10.1177/1933719113506497.
5.
FrattarelliJLMillerKMillerBTElkind-HirschKScottRTJrMale age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(1):97–103. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.009.
6.
AgarwalASaidTM. Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;(9):331–345. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmg027.
7.
MoskovtsevSIWillisJMullenBM. Age-related decline in sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity in patients evaluated for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):496–499. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.075.
8.
BrahemSMehdiMElghezalHSaadA. The effects of male aging on semen quality, sperm DNA fragmentation and chromosomal abnormalities in an infertile population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:425–432. doi:10.1007/s10815-011-9537-5.
9.
RosenbuschBE. Cytogenetics of human spermatozoa: what about the reproductive relevance of structural chromosome aberrations?J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12(6):375–383. doi:10.1007/BF02215729.
Garcia-FerrayraJLunaDVillegasL. High aneuploidy rates observed in embryos derived from donated oocytes are related to male aging and high percentages of sperm DNA fragmentation. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2015;9:21–27. doi:10.4137/CMRH.S32769.
12.
VagniniLBaruffiRLMauriAL. The effects of male age on sperm DNA damage in an infertile population. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15:514–519. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60382-3.
13.
LopesSJurisicovaASunJGCasperRF. Reactive oxygen species: potential cause for DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:896–900. PMID: 9619544.
14.
MorrisIDIlottSDixonLBrisonDR. The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:990–998. PMID: 11925396.
15.
GandiniLLombardoFPaoliD. Full-term pregnancies achieved with ICSI despite high levels of sperm chromatin damage. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1409–1417. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh233.
16.
LunaMFinklerEBarrittJ. Paternal age and assisted reproductive technology outcome in ovum recipients. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1772–1775. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.036.
17.
BraudePBoltonVMooreS. Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature. 1988;332:459–461. doi:10.1038/332459a0.
18.
DuncanFEHornickJELampsonMASchultzRMSheaLDWoodruffTK. Chromosome cohesion decreases in human eggs with advanced maternal age. Aging Cell. 2012;11:1121–1124. doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00866.x.
19.
PalermoGMunnéSCohenJ. The human zygote inherits its mitotic potential from the male gamete. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1220–1225. PMID: 7962421.
20.
KongAFriggeMLMassonG. Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk. Nature. 2012;488:471–475. doi:10.1038/nature11396.
21.
JenkinsTGAstonKIMeyerTCarrellDT. The sperm epigenome, male aging, and potential effects on the embryo. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015:81–93. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18881-2_4.
22.
Sagi-DainLSagiSDirnfeldM. Effect of paternal age on reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation model: a systematic review. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):857–865. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.036.
23.
HartonGLMunneSSurreyM; PGD Practitioners Group. Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(6):1695–1703. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.2002.
24.
GrifoJAHodes-WertzBLeeHLAmperloquioEClarke-WilliamsMAdlerA. Single thawed euploid embryo transfer improves IVF pregnancy, miscarriage, and multiple gestation outcomes and has similar implantation rates as egg donation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(2):259–264. doi:10.1007/s10815-012-9929-1.
25.
Gutiérrez-MateoCCollsPSánchez-GarciaJ. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:953–958. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.010.
26.
HaddadGDengMWangCT. Assessment of aneuploidy formation in human blastocysts resulting from donated eggs and the necessity of the embryos for aneuploidy screening. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;31(6):999–1006. doi:10.1007/s10815-015-0492-4.
27.
Garcia-VelascoJAIsazaVCaligaraCPellicerARemohiJSimonC. Factors that determine discordant outcome from shared oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(1):54–60. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00545-4.
28.
Reig-ViaderRCapillaLVila-CejudoM. Telomere homeostasis is compromised in spermatocytes from patients with idiopathic infertility. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):728–738. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.005.
29.
AllsoppRCVaziriHPattersonC. Telomere length predicts replicative capacity of human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:10114–10118. PMID: 1438199.
30.
AstonKIHuntSCSusserE. Divergence of sperm and leukocyte age-dependent telomere dynamics: implications for male-driven evolution of telomere length in humans. Mol Hum Reprod. 2012;18:517–522. doi:10.1093/molehr/gas028.
31.
BairdDMBritt-ComptonBRowsonJAmsoNNGregoryLKiplingD. Telomere instability in the male germline. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:45–51. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi424.
32.
AtunesDMFKalmbackKHWangF. A single-cell assay for telomere DNA content shows increasing telomere length heterogeneity, as well as increasing mean telomere length in human spermatozoa with advancing age. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:1685–1690. doi:10.1007/s10815-015-0574-3.
33.
FranasiakJMFormanEJHongKH. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):656–663. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004.
