To investigate the effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) on uterine electromyography (EMG) activity in term pregnant women during labor.
Methods:
Nulliparous pregnant women in spontaneous term labor (N = 30) were enrolled (PCEA group, n = 20 and control group, n = 10). Five time periods (30 minutes each) were defined for noninvasive abdominal recordings and analysis of uterine EMG activity, that is, period I: before PCEA treatment with 2-cm cervical dilation; periods II to IV: each period successively at 30, 60, and 120 minutes after PCEA; and period V: second stage of labor with cervix at 10 cm dilation. Control patients without PCEA were monitored during the same times. The number of bursts/30 min, power density spectrum peak frequency, mean amplitude, and duration of uterine EMG bursts were measured to assess uterine EMG activity. Maternal, fetal, and labor characteristics were also recorded. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance followed by other tests.
Results:
Electromyography parameters are significantly lower (P < .001) after PCEA (periods II to IV) compared to controls but similar between groups by period V (P > .05). Also, patients with PCEA have a slower rate of cervical dilation (P < .003, period IV only) and longer labor in both stage 1 and stage 2 (P < .05). All patients have similar (P > .05) positive labor outcomes.
Conclusions:
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia initially suppresses uterine EMG and slows cervical dilation thereby prolonging labor. However, the EMG activity recovers with labor progress with no effects on delivery outcomes.
GarfieldRESaadeGBuhimschiC. Control and assessment of the uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour. Hum Reprod Update.1998;4(5):673–695.
2.
KawarabayashiTKishikawaTSugimoriH. Effect of oxytocin on spontaneous electrical and mechanical activities in pregnant human myometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155(3):671–676.
3.
DemianczukNTowellMEGarfieldRE. Myometrial electrophysiologic activity and gap junctions in the pregnant rat. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;149(5):485–491.
4.
Ekman-OrdebergGStjernholmYWangHStygarDSahlinL. Endocrine regulation of cervical ripening in humans—potential roles for gonadal steroids and insulin-like growth factor-I. Steroids. 2003;68(10-13):837–847.
5.
WordRALiXHHnatMCarrickK. Dynamics of cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: mechanisms and current concepts. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25(1):69–79.
6.
EulianoTYMarosseroDNguyenMTEulianoNRPrincipeJEdwardsRK. Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(1):54.e1–e7.
7.
ManerWLGarfieldRE. Identification of human term and preterm labor using artificial neural networks on uterine electromyography data. Ann Biomed Eng. 2007;35(3):465–473.
8.
EswaranHPreisslHWilsonJDMurphyPLoweryCL. Prediction of labor in term and preterm pregnancies using non-invasive magnetomyographic recordings of uterine contractions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(6):1598–1602.
9.
EswaranHPreisslHWilsonJDMurphyPRobinsonSELoweryCL. First magnetomyographic recordings of uterine activity with spatial-temporal information with a 151-channel sensor array. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):145–151.
10.
SchlembachDManerWLGarfieldREMaulH. Monitoring the progress of pregnancy and labor using electromyography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;144(suppl 1):S33–S39.
11.
GarfieldREManerWLMacKayLBSchlembachDSaadeGR. Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients versus term labor patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):23–29.
12.
LemanHMarqueCGondryJ. Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999;46(10):1222–1229.
13.
GarfieldREManerWLMaulHSaadeGR. Use of uterine EMG and cervical LIF in monitoring pregnant patients. BJOG. 2005;112(suppl 1):103–108.
14.
EulianoTYNguyenMTDarmanjianS. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(1):66.e1–e6.
15.
Lavand’hommeP. Chronic pain after vaginal and cesarean delivery: a reality questioning our daily practice of obstetric anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010;19(1):1–2.
16.
AlexanderJMLucasMJRaminSMMcIntireDDLevenoKJ. The course of labor with and without epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(3):516–520.
17.
HaydonMLLarsonDReedEShrivastavaVKPreslickaCWNageotteMP. Obstetric outcomes and maternal satisfaction in nulliparous women using patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):271. e1–e6.
18.
ClarkACarrDLoydGCookVSpinnatoJ. The influence of epidural analgesia on cesarean delivery rates: a randomized, prospective clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(6 pt1):1527–1533.
19.
LeightonBLHalpernSH. The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5 suppl nature):S69–S77.
20.
Gerli SFavilliAcanforaMMBiniVGiorginiCDi RenzoGC. Effect of epidural analgesia on labor and delivery: a retrospective study. J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(3):458–460.
21.
Willdeck-LundGLindmarkGNilssonBA. Effect of segmental epidural analgesia upon the uterine activity with special reference to the use of different local anaesthetic agents. Acta Anaesth Scand. 1979;23(6):519–528.
22.
McCaugheyHSJrCoreyELEastwoodDThorntonWN. Effects of synthetic anesthetics on the spontaneous motility of human uterine muscles in vitro. Obstet Gynecol. 1962;19(3):233–240.
23.
CarstenMEMillerJD. A new look at uterine muscle contraction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157(5):1303–1315.
24.
WongCAScavoneBMPeacemanAM. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(7):655–665.
25.
LucovnikMKuonRJChamblissLR. Use of uterine electromyography to diagnose term and preterm labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(2):150–157.
26.
GarfieldREManerWL. Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007;18(3):289–295.
27.
GarfieldRESaadeGBuhimschiC. Control and assessment of the uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4(5):673–695.
28.
VasakBGraatsmaEMHekman-DrostE. Uterine electromyography for identification of first-stage labor arrest in term nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(3):232.e1–e8.
29.
HassanMTerrienJMuszynskiCAlexanderssonAMarqueCKarlssonB. Better pregnancy monitoring using nonlinear correlation analysis of external uterine electromyography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60(4):1160–1166.
30.
HaranGElbazMFejginMDBiron-ShentalT. A comparison of surface acquired uterine electromyography and intrauterine pressure catheter to assess uterine activity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(5):412. e1–e5.
31.
CheekTGSamuelsPMillerFTobinMGutscheBB. Normal saline i.v. fluid load decreases uterine activity in active labour. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77(5):632–635.
32.
BehrensOGoeschenKLuckHJFuchsAR. Effects of lumbar epidural analgesia on prostaglandin F2 alpha release and oxytocin secretion during labor. Prostaglandins.1993;45(3):285–296.
33.
LeightonBLHalpernSH. The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5 suppl nature):S69–S77.
34.
RahmVAHallgrenAHogbergHHurtigIOdlindV. Plasma oxytocin levels in women during labor with or without epidural analgesia: a prospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(11):1033–1039.
35.
RadevR. Uterine contractile activity in the postoperative period depending on the type of anesthesia. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 1990;29(4):26–30.
36.
LiebermanEDavidsonKLee-ParritzAShearerE. Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(5 pt 1):974–982.
37.
FraserWDMarcouxSKraussIDouglasJGouletCBoulvainM. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia. The PEOPLE (Pushing Early or Pushing Late with Epidural) Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1165–1172.
38.
RobertsCLTorvaldsenSCameronCAOliveE. Delayed versus early pushing in women with epidural analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2004;111(12):1333–1340.
