MicroRNAs (miRNAs) act as important epigenetic posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression. We aimed to gain more understanding of the complex gene expression regulation of endometrial receptivity by analyzing miRNA signatures of fertile human endometria. We set up to analyze miRNA signatures of receptive (LH + 7, n = 4) versus prereceptive (LH + 2, n = 5) endometrium from healthy fertile women. We found hsa-miR-30b and hsa-miR-30d to be significantly upregulated, and hsa-miR-494 and hsa-miR-923 to be downregulated in receptive endometrium. Three algorithms (miRanda, PicTar, and TargetScan) were used for target gene prediction. Functional analyses of the targets using Ingenuity Pathways Analysis and The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery indicated roles in transcription, cell proliferation and apoptosis, and significant involvement in several relevant pathways, such as axon guidance, Wnt/β-catenin, ERK/MAPK, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), p53 and leukocyte extravasation. Comparison of predicted miRNA target genes and our previous messenger RNA microarray data resulted in a list of 12 genes, including CAST, CFTR, FGFR2, and LIF that could serve as a panel of genes important for endometrial receptivity. In conclusion, we suggest that a subset of miRNAs and their target genes may play important roles in endometrial receptivity.
HarperMJ. The implantation window. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;6(2):351–371.
2.
BoivinJBuntingLCollinsJANygrenKG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1506–1512.
3.
EdwardsRG. Clinical approaches to increasing uterine receptivity during human implantation. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(suppl 2):60–66.
4.
MacklonNSStoufferRLGiudiceLCFauserBC. The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Endocr Rev. 2006;27(2):170–207.
5.
ShaAGLiuJLJiangXMGenome-wide identification of micro-ribonucleic acids associated with human endometrial receptivity in natural and stimulated cycles by deep sequencing. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(1):150–155 e155.
6.
MunroSKFarquharCMMitchellMDPonnampalamAP. Epigenetic regulation of endometrium during the menstrual cycle. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16(5):297–310.
7.
EggerGLiangGAparicioAJonesPA. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature. 2004;429(6990):457–463.
8.
HeLHannonGJ. MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(7):522–531.
9.
GhildiyalMZamorePD. Small silencing RNAs: an expanding universe. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(2):94–108.
10.
CreightonCJBenhamALZhuHDiscovery of novel microRNAs in female reproductive tract using next generation sequencing. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9637.
11.
BhattacharyyaSNHabermacherRMartineUClossEIFilipowiczW. Relief of microRNA-mediated translational repression in human cells subjected to stress. Cell. 2006;125(6):1111–1124.
12.
CarthewRWSontheimerEJ. Origins and mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs. Cell. 2009;136(4):642–655.
13.
LimLPLauNCGarrett-EngelePMicroarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs. Nature. 2005;433(7027):769–773.
14.
Griffiths-JonesS.miRBase: microRNA sequences and annotation. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA2010;Chapter 12:Unit 12.9.1-10.
15.
MirandaKCHuynhTTayYA pattern-based method for the identification of MicroRNA binding sites and their corresponding heteroduplexes. Cell. 2006;126(6):1203–1217.
16.
FriedmanRCFarhKKBurgeCBBartelDP. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 2009;19(1):92–105.
17.
LamEWShahKBrosensJJ. The role of microRNAs and FOXO transcription factors in cycling endometrium and cancer. J Endocrinol. 2012;212(1):13–25.
18.
HuSJRenGLiuJLMicroRNA expression and regulation in mouse uterus during embryo implantation. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(34):23473–23484.
19.
ChakrabartyATranguchSDaikokuTJensenKFurneauxHDeySK. MicroRNA regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 during embryo implantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(38):15144–15149.
20.
KuokkanenSChenBOjalvoLBenardLSantoroNPollardJW. Genomic profiling of microRNAs and messenger RNAs reveals hormonal regulation in microRNA expression in human endometrium. Biol Reprod. 2010;82(4):791–801.
21.
RevelAAchacheHStevensJSmithYReichR. MicroRNAs are associated with human embryo implantation defects. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(10):2830–2840.
22.
NoyesRWHertigATRockJ. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;122(2):262–263.
23.
AltmäeSMartinez-ConejeroJASalumetsASimonCHorcajadasJAStavreus-EversA. Endometrial gene expression analysis at the time of embryo implantation in women with unexplained infertility. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16(3):178–187.
24.
FernandoRLNettletonDSoutheyBRDekkersJCRothschildMFSollerM. Controlling the proportion of false positives in multiple dependent tests. Genetics. 2004;166(1):611–619.
LewisBPBurgeCBBartelDP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005;120(1):15–20.
27.
DennisGJrShermanBTHosackDADAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4(5):P3.
28.
BenjaminiYDraiDElmerGKafkafiNGolaniI. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res. 2001;125(1-2):279–284.
29.
RiesewijkAMartinJvan OsRGene expression profiling of human endometrial receptivity on days LH+2 versus LH+7 by microarray technology. Mol Hum Reprod. 2003;9(5):253–264.
30.
BetelDKoppalAAgiusPSanderCLeslieC. Comprehensive modeling of microRNA targets predicts functional non-conserved and non-canonical sites. Genome Biol. 2010;11(8):R90.
31.
VasudevanSTongYSteitzJA. Switching from repression to activation: microRNAs can up-regulate translation. Science. 2007;318(5858):1931–1934.
32.
PlaceRFLiLCPookotDNoonanEJDahiyaR. MicroRNA-373 induces expression of genes with complementary promoter sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(5):1608–1613.
33.
HaouziDMahmoudKFourarMIdentification of new biomarkers of human endometrial receptivity in the natural cycle. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(1):198–205.
34.
MirkinSArslanMChurikovDIn search of candidate genes critically expressed in the human endometrium during the window of implantation. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(8):2104–2117.
35.
PanQLuoXToloubeydokhtiTCheginiN. The expression profile of micro-RNA in endometrium and endometriosis and the influence of ovarian steroids on their expression. Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;13(11):797–806.
36.
LiRQiaoJWangLMicroRNA array and microarray evaluation of endometrial receptivity in patients with high serum progesterone levels on the day of hCG administration. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:29.
37.
von RangoUClassen-LinkeIKruscheCABeierHM. The receptive endometrium is characterized by apoptosis in the glands. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(11):3177–3189.
38.
ZhangDLeiCZhangW. Up-regulated monoamine oxidase in the mouse uterus during the peri-implantation period. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(4):861–866.
39.
IgciYZArslanAAkarsuEDifferential expression of a set of genes in follicular and classic variants of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Pathol. 2011;22(2):86–96.
40.
PanSHChaoYCHungPFThe ability of LCRMP-1 to promote cancer invasion by enhancing filopodia formation is antagonized by CRMP-1. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(8):3189–3205.
41.
MichelVBakovicM. The solute carrier 44A1 is a mitochondrial protein and mediates choline transport. FASEB J. 2009;23(8):2749–2758.
42.
LiuJLuWGYeFHes1/Hes5 gene inhibits differentiation via down-regulating Hash1 and promotes proliferation in cervical carcinoma cells. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20(7):1109–1116.
43.
CoffeeRLJrTessierCRWoodruffEA3rdBroadieK. Fragile X mental retardation protein has a unique, evolutionarily conserved neuronal function not shared with FXR1P or FXR2P. Dis Model Mech. 2010;3(7-8):471–485.
44.
Gaziel-SovranASeguraMF, Di Micco R, et al. miR-30b/30d regulation of GalNAc transferases enhances invasion and immunosuppression during metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2011;20(1):104–118.
45.
WangXZhangXRenXPMicroRNA-494 targeting both proapoptotic and antiapoptotic proteins protects against ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiac injury. Circulation. 2010;122(13):1308–1318.
46.
QianKHuLChenHHsa-miR-222 is involved in differentiation of endometrial stromal cells in vitro. Endocrinology. 2009;150(10):4734–4743.
47.
AghajanovaLHamiltonAEGiudiceLC. Uterine receptivity to human embryonic implantation: histology, biomarkers, and transcriptomics. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008;19(2):204–211.
48.
DriakDDvorskaMSvandovaIChanges in expression of some apoptotic markers in different types of human endometrium. Folia Biol (Praha). 2011;57(3):104–111.
49.
AltmäeSReimandJHovattaOResearch resource: interactome of human embryo implantation: identification of gene expression pathways, regulation, and integrated regulatory networks. Mol Endocrinol. 2012;26(1):203–217.
50.
DickinsonREDuncanWC. The SLIT-ROBO pathway: a regulator of cell function with implications for the reproductive system. Reproduction. 2010;139(4):697–704.
51.
ChenQZhangYLuJEmbryo-uterine cross-talk during implantation: the role of Wnt signaling. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009;15(4):215–221.
52.
KolerMAchacheHTsafrirASmithYRevelAReichR. Disrupted gene pattern in patients with repeated in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(10):2541–2548.
53.
LiuYKodithuwakkuSPNgPYExcessive ovarian stimulation up-regulates the Wnt-signaling molecule DKK1 in human endometrium and may affect implantation: an in vitro co-culture study. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(2):479–490.
54.
KaoLCTulacSLoboSGlobal gene profiling in human endometrium during the window of implantation. Endocrinology. 2002;143(6):2119–2138.
55.
HorcajadasJAPellicerASimonC. Wide genomic analysis of human endometrial receptivity: new times, new opportunities. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(1):77–86.
56.
HuWFengZTereskyAK, Levine AJ. p53 regulates maternal reproduction through LIF. Nature. 2007;450(7170):721–724.
57.
FengZZhangCKangHJRegulation of female reproduction by p53 and its family members. FASEB J. 2011;25(7):2245–2255.
58.
MassutoDAKneeseECJohnsonGATransforming growth factor beta (TGFB) signaling is activated during porcine implantation: proposed role for latency-associated peptide interactions with integrins at the conceptus-maternal interface. Reproduction. 2010;139(2):465–478.
59.
GenbacevODPrakobpholAFoulkRATrophoblast L-selectin-mediated adhesion at the maternal-fetal interface. Science. 2003;299(5605):405–408.
60.
DominguezFYanez-MoMSanchez-MadridFSimonC. Embryonic implantation and leukocyte transendothelial migration: different processes with similar players?FASEB J. 2005;19(9):1056–1060.
61.
DahiyaNSherman-BaustCAWangTLMicroRNA expression and identification of putative miRNA targets in ovarian cancer. PLoS One. 2008;3(6):e2436.
62.
BorenTXiongYHakamAMicroRNAs and their target messenger RNAs associated with endometrial carcinogenesis. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110(2):206–215.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
