Comments on the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy Requirements

Abstract

Keywords

error grid accuracy IFCC CGM

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pleus

Eichenlaub

Dabla

, et al. Clinical assessment and acceptance criteria for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system performance: a proposed guideline by the IFCC Working Group on CGM. Clin Chim Acta. 2025:120728. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2025.120728.

Sandberg

Fraser

Horvath

, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: consensus statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(6):833-835. doi:10.1515/cclm-2015-0067.

Krouwer

JS.

Minimum requirements for continuous glucose monitors: what does it mean. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025;19(5):1417-1418. doi:10.1177/19322968251343645.

Vigersky

Shin

The myth of MARD (mean absolute relative difference): limitations of MARD in the clinical assessment of continuous glucose monitoring data. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024;26(S3):38-44. doi:10.1089/dia.2023.0435.

Krouwer

JS.

Validation of the Diabetes Technology Society error grid. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025;19(3):853-854. doi:10.1177/19322968251320653.