EhrhardtNMontourLBerberianP, et al. A randomized clinical trial of a culturally tailored diabetes education curriculum with and without real-time continuous glucose monitoring in a Latino population with type 2 diabetes: the CUT-DM with continuous glucose monitoring study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025: 19322968251331526.
2.
ShiferawWSAkaluTYDestaM, et al. Effect of educational interventions on knowledge of the disease and glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12):e049806.
3.
RodriguezKRyanDDickinsonJKPhanV. Improving quality outcomes: the value of diabetes care and education specialists. Clin Diabetes. 2022;40(3):356-365.
4.
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 7. Diabetes technology: standards of care in diabetes-2025. Diabetes Care. 2025;48(suppl 1):S146-S166.
5.
LeeHParkSEKimEY. Glycemic variability impacted by SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP 1 agonists in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(18):4078.
6.
GilbertTRNoarABlalockOPolonskyWH. Change in hemoglobin A1c and quality of life with real-time continuous glucose monitoring use by people with insulin-treated diabetes in the landmark study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021;23(S1):S35-S39.
