GoldenSHBrownTYehHCMaruthurNRanasinghePBergerZSuhYWilsonLMHaberlEBBassEB. Methods for insulin delivery and glucose monitoring: Comparative effectiveness. Comparative effectiveness review number 57. Prepared by Johns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Center under contract number 290-2007-10061-I. AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC036-EF. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012. http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/?pageaction=displayproduct&productID=749.
2.
YehHCBrownTTMaruthurNRanasinghePBergerZSuhYDWilsonLMHaberlEBBrickJBassEBGoldenSH. Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157 (5): 336–47.
3.
DelbecqALVan de VenAHGustafsonDH. Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. In: LinstoneHATuroffM, eds. The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
4.
O'HaireCMcPheetersMNakamotoEKLaBrantLMostCLeeKGrahamECottrellEGuiseJM. Methods for engaging stakeholders to identify and prioritize future research needs. Methods future research needs report no. 4. Prepared by the Oregon Evidence-Based Practice Center and the Vanderbilt Evidence-Based Practice Center under contract number 290-2007-10057-I. AHRQ publication number 11-EHC044-EF. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011.
5.
YehHCLauBDGoldenSHDonnerTBrownTTBassEB. Insulin delivery and glucose monitoring methods: Future research needs. Future research needs paper number 32. Prepared by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Center under contract number. 290-2007-10061-I. AHRQ publication number 13-EHC037-EF. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013.
