Increasingly various technologies are being tested to deliver behavioral health care. Delivering services via videoconferencing shows promise. Given that the patient-provider relationship is a strong predictor of patient adherence to medical regimens, addressing relationship quality when services are not delivered face-to-face is critical. To that end, we compared the therapeutic alliance when behavioral health care was delivered to youth with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and their caregivers in-clinic with the same services delivered via Internet-based videoconferencing (i.e., Skype™).
Methods:
Seventy-one adolescents with poorly controlled T1DM (hemoglobin A1c ≤9%) and one of their caregivers received up to 10 sessions of a family-based behavioral health intervention previously shown to improve adherence to diabetes regimens and family functioning; 32 were randomized to the Skype condition. Youth and caregivers completed the working alliance inventory (WAI), a 36-item measure of therapeutic alliance, at the end of treatment. Additionally, the number of behavioral health sessions completed was tracked.
Results:
No significant differences in WAI scores were found for those receiving behavioral health care via Skype versus in-clinic. Youth WAI goal and total scores were significantly associated with the number of sessions completed for those in the clinic group.
Conclusion:
Behavioral health can be delivered to youth with T1DM via Internet-based videoconferencing without significantly impacting the therapeutic relationship. Thus, for those adolescents with T1DM who require specialized behavioral health care that targets T1DM management, Internet-based teleconferencing represents a viable alternative to clinic-based care.
JohnsonSBKellyMHenrettaJCCunninghamWRTomerASilversteinJH. A longitudinal analysis of adherence and health status in childhood diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol.1992; 17 (5): 537–53.
2.
AndersonBJMillerJPAuslanderWFSantiagoJV. Family characteristics of diabetic adolescents: Telationships to metabolic control. Diabetes Care.1981; 4 (4): 586–94.
3.
BobrowESAvRuskinTWSillerJ. Mother-daughter interaction and adherence to diabetes regimens. Diabetes Care.1985; 8 (2): 146–51.
4.
GustafssonPACederbladMLudvigssonJLundinB. Family interaction and metabolic balance in juvenile diabetes mellitus. A prospective study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract.1987; 4 (1): 7–14.
5.
HauserSTJacobsonAMLavoriPWolfsdorfJIHerskowitzRDMilleyJEBlissRWertliebDSteinJ. Adherence among children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus over a four-year longitudinal follow-up: II. Immediate and long-term linkages with the family milieu. J Pediatr Psychol.1990; 15 (4): 527–42.
6.
Miller-JohnsonSEmeryREMarvinRSClarkeWLovingerRMartinM. Parent-child relationships and the management of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Consult Clin Psychol.1994; 62 (3): 603–10.
7.
WysockiT. Associations among teen-parent relationships, metabolic control, and adjustment to diabetes in adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol.1993; 18 (4): 441–52.
8.
WysockiTHarrisMAGrecoPBubbJDandaCEHarveyLMMcDonellKTaylorAWhiteNH. Randomized, controlled trial of behavior therapy for families of adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Psychol.2000; 25 (1): 23–33.
9.
WysockiTMillerKGrecoPHarrisMAHarveyLMTaylorAElder-DandaCMcDonellKWhiteNH. Behavior therapy for families of adolescents with diabetes: Effects on directly observed family interactions. Behav Ther.1999; 30: 496–515.
10.
WysockiTGrecoPHarrisMABubbJWhiteNH. Behavior therapy for families of adolescents with diabetes: Maintenance of treatment effects. Diabetes Care.2001; 24 (3): 441–6.
11.
WysockiTHarrisMABucklohLMMertlichDLochrieASTaylorASadlerMMaurasNWhiteNH. Effects of behavioral family systems therapy for diabetes on adolescents' family relationships, treatment adherence, and metabolic control. J Pediatr Psychol.2006; 31 (9): 928–38.
12.
WysockiTHarrisMABucklohLMMertlichDLochrieASTaylorASadlerMWhiteNH, Randomized, controlled trial of behavioral family systems therapy for diabetes: Maintenance and generalization of effects on parent-adolescent communication. Behav Ther.2008; 39 (1): 33–46.
13.
WysockiTHarrisMABucklohLMMertlichDLochrieASMaurasNWhiteNH, Randomized trial of behavioral family systems therapy for diabetes: Maintenance of effects on diabetes outcomes in adolescents. Diabetes Care.2007; 30 (3): 555–60.
14.
HarrisMAFreemanKABeersM.Family therapy for adolescents with poorly controlled diabetes: Initial test of clinical significance. J Pediatr Psychol.2009; 34 (10): 1097–107.
15.
HarrisMAMertlichD.Piloting home-based behavioral family systems therapy for adolescents with poorly controlled diabetes. Child Health Care.2003; 32: 65–79.
16.
DevineniTBlanchardEB, A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based treatment for chronic headache. Behav Res Ther.2005; 43 (3): 277–92.
17.
JeromeLWZaylorC.Cyberspace: Creating a therapeutic environment for telehealth applications. Prof Psychol Res Pract.2000; 31: 478–83.
18.
PalermoTMWilsonAC, Health applications in pediatric psychology. In: RobertsMCSteeleRG, eds. Handbook of pediatric psychology. 4th ed.New York: Guilford; 2009, 227–37.
19.
BarakAHenLBoniel-NissimMShapiraN.A comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of internet-based psycho-therapeutic interventions. J Technol Hum Serv.2008; 26: 109–60.
20.
HaileyDRoineROhinmaaA.The effectiveness of telemental health applications: A review. Can J Psychiatry.2008; 53 (11): 769–78.
21.
StinsonJWilsonRGillNYamadaJHoltJ.A systematic review of internet-based self-management interventions for youth with health conditions. J Pediatr Psychol.2009; 34 (5): 495–510.
22.
Van AllenJDavisAMLassenS.The use of telemedicine in pediatric psychology: Research review and current applications. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am.2011; 20 (1): 55–66.
23.
WhittemoreRGreyMFaulknerMJaserSDeamaterAMurphyK.Recruitment and participation of youth in an internet psycho-educational intervention study. Diabetes.2009; 58Suppl 1: A486.
24.
MulvaneySARothmanRLLybargerCWallstonKA, Modeling problem solving with an internet-based self-management intervention for adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes.2009; 58Suppl 1: A482.
25.
HorvathAODel ReACFluckigerCSymondsD.Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy (Chic).2011; 48 (1): 9–16.
26.
HorvathAOSymondsBD, Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. J Couns Psychol.1991; 38 (2): 139–49.
27.
KrupnickJLSotskySMSimmensSMoyerJElkinIWatkinsJPilkonisPA, The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: Findings in the national institute of mental health treatment of depression collaborative research program. J Consult Clin Psychol.1996; 64 (3): 532–9.
28.
MorganRDPatrickARMagalettaPR, Does the use of telemental health alter the treatment experience? Inmates' perceptions of telemental health versus face-to-face treatment modalities. J Consult Clin Psychol.2008; 76 (1): 158–62.
29.
Lingley-PottiePMcGrathPJ, A paediatric therapeutic alliance occurs with distance intervention. J Telemed Telecare.2008; 14 (5): 236–40.
30.
GlueckaufRLFritzSPEcklund-JohnsonEPLissHJDagesPCarneyP.Videoconferencing-based family counseling for rural teenagers with epilepsy: Phase 1 findings. Rehab Psychol.2002; 47: 49–72.
31.
DukeDCFreemanKAHirschfieldBBostonBHarrisMA, Videoconferencing: More is better? 2012 International Clinical Diabetes Technology Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, June 2012.
32.
RobinALFosterSL, Negotiating parent-adolescent conflict: A behavioral-family systems approach. New York: Guilford; 1989.
33.
RubinRRYoung-HymanDPeyrotM.Parent-child responsibility and conflict in diabetes care. Diabetes.1989; 38Suppl 2: 28A.
34.
HoodKKButlerDAAndersonBJLaffelLM, Updated and revised Diabetes Family Conflict Scale. Diabetes Care.2007; 30 (7): 1764–9.
35.
HorvathAOGreenbergLS. Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. J Counsel Psychol.1989; 36: 223–33.
36.
WysockiTHarrisMAGrecoPMertlichDBucklohL. Behavioral family systems therapy (BFST) for adolescents with a chronic illness: Treatment and implementation manual. Unpublished manual. 2001.
37.
BaronRMKennyDA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol.1986; 51 (6): 1173–82.
38.
KnaevelsrudCMaerckerA. Does the quality of the working alliance predict treatment outcome in online psychotherapy for traumatized patients?J Med Internet Res.2006; 8 (4): e31.
39.
CluverJSSchuylerDFruehBCBresciaFAranaGW. Remote psychotherapy for terminally ill cancer patients. J Telemed Telecare.2005; 11 (3): 157–9.
40.
RuskinPESilver-AylaianMKlingMAReedSABradhamDDHebelJRBarrettDKnowlesF3rdHauserP. Treatment outcomes in depression: Comparison of remote treatment through telepsychiatry to in-person treatment. Am J Psychiatry.2004; 161 (8): 1471–6.
41.
SimpsonSKnoxJMitchellDFergusonJBrebnerJBrebnerE. A multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of eating disorders via videoconferencing in north-east Scotland. J Telemed Telecare.2003; 9Suppl 1: S37–8.
42.
RichardsonLKFruehBCGrubaughALEgedeLElhaiJD. Current directions in videoconferencing tele-mental health research. Clin Psychol (New York).2009; 16 (3): 323–38.
GreeneCJMorlandLADurkalskiVLFruehBC. Noninferiority and equivalence designs: Issues and implications for mental health research. J Trauma Stress.2008; 21 (5): 433–9.
45.
O'ReillyRBishopJMaddoxKHutchinsonLFismanMTakharJ. Is telepsychiatry equivalent to face-to-face psychiatry? Results from a randomized controlled equivalence trial. Psychiatr Serv.2007; 58 (6): 836–43.
46.
AndersonRESpenceSHDonovanCLMarchSProsserSKenardyJ. Working alliance in online cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety disorders in youth: Comparison with clinic delivery and its role in predicting outcome. J Med Internet Res.2012; 14 (3): e88.
47.
MorlandLAGreeneCJRosenCSFoyDReillyPShoreJHeQFruehBC. Telemedicine for anger management therapy in a rural population of combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized noninferiority trial. J Clin Psychiatry.2010; 71 (7): 855–63.
