One of the major hurdles in studying diabetes pathophysiology is the lack of adequate methodology that allows for direct and real-time determination of glucose transport and metabolism in cells and tissues. In this article, we present a new methodology that adopts frequency-domain fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FD-FLIM) to visualize and quantify the dynamics of intracellular glucose within living cells using a biosensor protein based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET).
Method:
The biosensor protein was developed by fusing a FRET pair, an AcGFP1 donor and a mCherry acceptor to N- and C- termini of a mutant glucose-binding protein (GBP), respectively. The probe was expressed and biosynthesized inside the cells, offering continuous monitoring of glucose dynamics in real time through fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) measurement.
Results:
We transfected the deoxyribonucleic acid of the AcGFP1-GBP-mCherry sensor into murine myoblast cells, C2C12, and continuously monitored the changes in intracellular glucose concentrations in response to the variation in extracellular glucose, from which we determined glucose uptake and clearance rates. The distribution of intracellular glucose concentration was also characterized. We detected a high glucose concentration in a region close to the cell membrane and a low glucose concentration in a region close to the nucleus. The monoexponential decay of AcGFP1 was distinguished using FD-FLIM.
Conclusions:
This work enables continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) within living cells using FD-FLIM and a biosensor protein. The sensor protein developed offers a new means for quantitatively analyzing glucose homeostasis at the cellular level. Data accumulated from these studies will help increase our understanding of the pathology of diabetes.
FoleyJECushmanSWSalansLB, Intracellular glucose concentration in small and large rat adipose cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab.1980;238 (2): E180–5.
2.
ClineGWJuckerBMTrajanoskiZRenningsAJMShulmanGI, A novel 13C NMR method to assess intracellular glucose concentration in muscle, in vivo. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab.1998;274 (2): E381–9.
3.
ClineGWPetersenKFKrssakMShenJHundalRSTrajanoskiZInzucchiSDresnerARothmanDLShulmanGI, Impaired glucose transport as a cause of decreased insulin-stimulated muscle glycogen synthesis in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med.1999;341 (4): 240–6.
4.
RavikumarBStewartAKitaHKatoKDudenRRubinszteinDC, Raised intracellular glucose concentrations reduce aggregation and cell death caused by mutant huntingtin exon 1 by decreasing mTOR phosphorylation and inducing autophagy. Hum Mol Genet.2003;12 (9): 985–94.
5.
TakagiSTakahashiWShinoharaYYasudaSIdeMShohtsuASeioT.Quantitative PET cerebral glucose metabolism estimates using a single non-arterialized venous-blood sample. Ann Nucl Med.2004;18 (4): 297–302.
6.
SmithGSMaYDhawanVGunduzHCarbonMKirshnerMLarsonJChalyTBelakhleffAKramerEGreenwaldBKaneJMLaghrissi-ThodeFPollockBGEidelberD.Serotonin modulation of cerebral glucose metabolism measured with positron emission tomography (PET) in human subjects. Synapse.2002;45 (2): 105–12.
7.
YeKSchultzJS, Genetic engineering of an allosterically based glucose indicator protein for continuous glucose monitoring by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Anal Chem.2003;75 (14): 3451–9.
8.
FehrMLalondeSLagerIWolffMWFrommerWB, In vivo imaging of the dynamics of glucose uptake in the cytosol of COS-7 cells by fluorescent nanosensors. J Biol Chem.2003;278 (21): 19127–33.
9.
FehrMOkumotoSDeuschleKLagerILoogerLLPerssonJKozhukhLLalondeSFrommerWB, Development and use of fluorescent nanosensors for metabolite imaging in living cells. Biochem Soc Trans.2005;33 (Pt 1): 287–90.
10.
JinSVeetilJVGarrettJRYeK.Construction of a panel of glucose indicator proteins for continuous glucose monitoring. Biosens Bioelectron.2011;26 (8): 3427–31.
VeetilJ VJinSYeK.A glucose sensor protein for continuous glucose monitoring. Biosens Bioelectron.2010;26: 1650–5.
13.
JohnSAOttoliaMWeissJNRibaletB.Dynamic modulation of intracellular glucose imaged in single cells using a FRET-based glucose nanosensor. Pflugers Arch.2008;456 (2): 307–22.
14.
FehrMTakanagaHEhrhardtDWFrommerWB, Evidence for high-capacity bidirectional glucose transport across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane by genetically encoded fluorescence resonance energy transfer nanosensors. Mol Cell Biol.2005;25 (24): 11102–12.
15.
TramierMZahidMMevelJCMasseMJCoppey-MoisanM.Sensitivity of CFP/YFP and GFP/mCherry pairs to donor photobleaching on FRET determination by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy in living cells. Microscopy Res Tech.2006;69 (11): 933–9.
16.
ThalerCVogelSS, Quantitative linear unmixing of CFP and YFP from spectral images acquired with two-photon excitation. Cytometry A.2006;69A (8): 904–11.
17.
ZalTGascoigneNR, Photobleaching-corrected FRET efficiency imaging of live cells. Biophy J.2004;86 (6): 3923–39.
18.
PeriasamyA, editor. Methods in cellular imaging. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
19.
HermanBWodnickiPKwonSPeriasamyAGordonGMahajanNWangX.Recent developments in monitoring calcium and protein interactions in cells using fluorescence lifetime microscopy. Journal of Fluorescence.1997;7 (1): 85–91.
20.
ElangovanMDayRNPeriasamyA.Nanosecond fluorescence resonance energy transfer-fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy to localize the protein interactions in a single living cell. J Microsc.2002;205 (1): 3–14.
21.
HarpurAGWoutersFSBastiaensPI, Imaging FRET between spectrally similar GFP molecules in single cells. Nat Biotechnol.2001;19 (2): 167–9.
22.
CremazyFGMandersEMBastiaensPIKramerGHagerGLvan MunsterEBVerschurePJGadellaTJJrvan DrielR. Imaging in situ protein-DNA interactions in the cell nucleus using FRET-FLIM. Exp Cell Res.2005;309 (2): 390–6.
EspositoAGralleMDaniMALangeDWoutersFS, pHlameleons: A family of FRET-based protein sensors for quantitative pH imaging. Biochemistry.2008;47 (49): 13115–26.
25.
SquireABastiaensPI, Three dimensional image restoration in fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. J Microsc.1999;193 (Pt 1): 36–49.
26.
SchneiderPCCleggRM, Rapid acquisition, analysis, and display of fluorescence lifetime-resolved images for real-time applications. Review of Scientific Instruments.1997;68 (11): 4107–19.
27.
LakowiczJR, Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy. (New York: Springer; 2006), 954 pages.
28.
ShcherboDSouslovaEAGoedhartJChepurnykhTVGaintzevaAShemiakinaIIGadellaTWLukyanovSChudakovDM, Practical and reliable FRET/FLIM pair of fluorescent proteins. BMC Biotechnol.2009;9: 24.
29.
GoldmanRDSpectorDL, Live cell imaging: A laboratory manual. (New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2005), 631 pages.
30.
ShanerNCCampbellRESteinbachPAGiepmansBNGPalmerAETsienRY, Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol.2004;22 (12): 1567–72.
StevensNDyerJMartiAASolomonMTurroNJ, FRETView: A computer program to simplify the process of obtaining fluorescence resonance energy transfer parameters. Photochem Photobiol Sci.2007;6 (8): 909–11.
34.
DuncanRRBergmannACousinMAAppsDKShipstonMJ, Multi-dimensional time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) to detect FRET in cells. J Microsc.2004;215 (1): 1–12.
35.
TramierMZahidMMevelJCMasseMJCoppey-MoisanM.Sensitivity of CFP/YFP and GFP/mCherry pairs to donor photobleaching on FRET determination by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy in living cells. Microsc Res Tech.2006;69 (11): 933–9.
36.
GrailheRMerolaFRidardJCouvignouSLe PouponCChangeuxJ PLaguitton-PasquierH.Monitoring protein interactions in the living cell through the fluorescence decays of the cyan fluorescent protein. ChemPhysChem.2006;7 (7): 1442–54.
37.
Van MunsterEBGadellaTW, Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol.2005;95: 143–75.
38.
Van MunsterEBGadellaTWJr.Suppression of photobleaching-induced artifacts in frequency-domain FLIM by permutation of the recording order. Cytometry A.2004;58 (2): 185–94.
KrishnanRVMasudaACentonzeVEHermanB.Quantitative imaging of protein-protein interactions by multiphoton fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy using a streak camera. J Biomed Opt.2003;8 (3): 362–7.
TramierMGautierIPiolotTRavaletSKemnitzKCoppeyJDurieuxCMignotteVCoppey-MoisanM.Picosecond-hetero-FRET microscopy to probe protein-protein interactions in live cells. Biophys J.2002;83 (6): 3570–7.
44.
ChenYMillsJDPeriasamyA.Protein localization in living cells and tissues using FRET and FLIM. Differentiation.2003;71 (9–10): 528–41.
45.
FestyFAmeer-BegSMNgTSuhlingK.Imaging proteins in vivo using fluorescence lifetime microscopy. Mol Biosyst.2007;3 (6): 381–91.
46.
WallrabeHPeriasamyA.Imaging protein molecules using FRET and FLIM microscopy. Curr Opin Biotechnol.2005;16 (1): 19–27.
47.
KooVHamiltonPWWilliamsonK.Non-invasive in vivo imaging in small animal research. Cell Oncol.2006;28 (4): 127–39.
WangEBabbeyCMDunnKW, Performance comparison between the high-speed Yokogawa spinning disc confocal system and single-point scanning confocal systems. J Microsc.2005;218 (Pt 2): 148–59.
50.
Van MunsterEBGoedhartJKremersGJMandersEMGadellaTWJr.Combination of a spinning disc confocal unit with frequency-domain fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Cytometry A.2007;71 (4): 207–14.
51.
BuranachaiCKamiyamaDChibaAWilliamsBCleggR.Rapid frequency-domain FLIM spinning disk confocal microscope: Lifetime resolution, image improvement and wavelet analysis. J Fluoresc.2008;18 (5): 929–42.
