Diabetic foot complications represent significant morbidity and precede most of the lower extremity amputations performed. Peripheral neuropathy is a frequent complication of diabetes shown to affect gait. Glycosylation of soft tissues can also affect gait. The purpose of this review article is to highlight the changes in gait for persons with diabetes and highlight the effects of glycosylation on soft tissues at the foot-ground interface.
Methods:
PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EBSCOhost® on-line databases were searched for articles pertaining to diabetes and gait. Bibliographies from relevant manuscripts were also searched.
Findings:
Patients with diabetes frequently exhibit a conservative gait strategy where there is slower walking speed, wider base of gait, and prolonged double support time. Glycosylation affects are observed in the lower extremities. Initially, skin thickness decreases and skin hardness increases; tendons thicken; muscles atrophy and exhibit activation delays; bones become less dense; joints have limited mobility; and fat pads are less thick, demonstrate fibrotic atrophy, migrate distally, and may be stiffer.
Interpretation:
In conclusion, there do appear to be gait changes in patients with diabetes. These changes, coupled with local soft tissue changes from advanced glycosylated end products, also alter a patient's gait, putting them at risk of foot ulceration. Better elucidation of these changes throughout the entire spectrum of diabetes disease can help design better treatments and potentially reduce the unnecessarily high prevalence of foot ulcers and amputation.
BohannonRWAndrewsAWThomasMW. Walking speed: reference values and correlates for older adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996; 24 (2): 86–90.
2.
AminianKNajafiBBulaCLeyvrazPRobertP. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes. J Biomech. 2002; 35: 689–99.
3.
ShawJEvan SchieCHCarringtonALAbbottCABoultonAJ. An analysis of dynamic forces transmitted through the foot in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21 (11): 1955–9.
4.
YavuzerGYetkinITorunerFBKocaNBolukbasiN. Gait deviations of patients with diabetes mellitus: looking beyond peripheral neuropathy. Eura Medicophys. 2006; 42 (2): 127–33.
5.
YavuzMErdemirABotekGHirschmanGBBardsleyLDavisBL. Peak plantar pressure and shear locations: relevance to diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30 (10): 2643–5.
6.
MalufKSMuellerMJ. Novel Award 2002. Comparison of physical activity and cumulative plantar tissue stress among subjects with and without diabetes mellitus and a history of recurrent plantar ulcers. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003; 18 (7): 567–75.
7.
MorratoEHHillJOWyattHRGhushchyanVSullivanPW. Physical activity in U.S. adults with diabetes and at risk for developing diabetes, 2003. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30 (2): 203–9.
8.
Tudor-LockeCBassettDRJr. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med. 2004; 34 (1): 1–8.
9.
Tudor-LockeCEBellRCMyersAMHarrisSBLauzonNRodgerNW. Pedometer-determined ambulatory activity in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002; 55 (3): 191–9.
10.
ArmstrongDGAbu-RummanPLNixonBPBoultonAJ. Continuous activity monitoring in persons at high risk for diabetes-related lower-extremity amputation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001; 91 (9): 451–5.
11.
NajafiBHelbostadJLMoe-NilssenRZijlstraWAminianK. Does walking strategy in older people change as a function of walking distance?Gait Posture. 2009; 29 (2): 261–6.
12.
AlletLArmandSde BieRAGolayAMonninDAminianKde BruinED. Reliability of diabetic patients' gait parameters in a challenging environment. Gait Posture. 2008; 28 (4): 680–6.
13.
MuellerMJMinorSDSahrmannSASchaafJAStrubeMJ. Differences in the gait characteristics of patients with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy compared with age-matched controls. Phys Ther. 1994; 74 (4): 299–308; discussion 309–13.
14.
PetrofskyJLeeSBweirS. Gait characteristics in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005; 93 (5–6): 640–7.
15.
BrachJSTalkowskiJBStrotmeyerESNewmanAB. Diabetes mellitus and gait dysfunction: possible explanatory factors. Phys Ther. 2008; 88 (11): 1365–74.
16.
VileikyteLLeventhalHGonzalezJSPeyrotMRubinRRUlbrechtJSGarrowAWatermanCCavanaghPRBoultonAJ. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and depressive symptoms: the association revisited. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28 (10): 2378–83.
17.
CavanaghPRSimoneauGGUlbrechtJS. Ulceration, unsteadiness, and uncertainty: the biomechanical consequences of diabetes mellitus. J Biomech. 1993; 26Suppl 1: 23–40.
18.
ResnickHEVinikAISchwartzAVLeveilleSGBrancatiFLBalfourJGuralnikJM. Independent effects of peripheral nerve dysfunction on lower-extremity physical function in old age: the Women's Health and Aging Study. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23 (11): 1642–7.
19.
TurgutNKarasalihogluSKücükugurluogluYBalciKEkukluGTütüncülerF. Clinical utility of dorsal sural nerve conduction studies in healthy and diabetic children. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115 (6): 1452–6.
CourtemancheRTeasdaleNBoucherPFleuryMLajoieYBardC. Gait problems in diabetic neuropathic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77 (9): 849–55.
22.
SaccoICAmadioAC. Influence of the diabetic neuropathy on the behavior of electromyographic and sensorial responses in treadmill gait. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003; 18 (5): 426–34.
23.
AndersenHGadebergPCBrockBJakobsenJ. Muscular atrophy in diabetic neuropathy: a stereological magnetic resonance imaging study. Diabetologia. 1997; 40 (9): 1062–9.
24.
TajaddiniAScoffoneHMBotekGDavisBL. Laser-induced auto-fluorescence (LIAF) as a method for assessing skin stiffness preceding diabetic ulcer formation. J Biomech. 2007; 40 (4): 736–41.
25.
ThomasVJPatilKMRadhakrishnanSNarayanamurthyVBParivalavanR. The role of skin hardness, thickness, and sensory loss on standing foot power in the development of plantar ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus—a preliminary study. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2003; 2 (3): 132–9.
26.
WangYNSandersJE. How does skin adapt to repetitive mechanical stress to become load tolerant?Med Hypotheses. 2003; 61 (1): 29–35.
27.
BoltonNRSmithKEPilgramTKMuellerMJBaeKT. Computed tomography to visualize and quantify the plantar aponeurosis and flexor hallucis longus tendon in the diabetic foot. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005; 20 (5): 540–6.
28.
GiacomozziCD'AmbrogiEUccioliLMacellariV. Does the thickening of Achilles tendon and plantar fascia contribute to the alteration of diabetic foot loading?Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005; 20 (5): 532–9.
29.
ZimnySSchatzHPfohlM. The role of limited joint mobility in diabetic patients with an at-risk foot. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27 (4): 942–6.
30.
DelbridgeLPerryPMarrSArnoldNYueDKTurtleJRReeveTS. Limited joint mobility in the diabetic foot: relationship to neuropathic ulceration. Diabet Med. 1988; 5 (4): 333–7.
31.
FernandoDJMassonEAVevesABoultonAJ. Relationship of limited joint mobility to abnormal foot pressures and diabetic foot ulceration. Diabetes Care. 1991; 14 (1): 8–11.
32.
WrobelJSBirkmeyerNJDercoliJLConnollyJE. Do clinical examination variables predict high plantar pressures in the diabetic foot?J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003; 93 (5): 367–72.
33.
WrobelJSConnollyJEBeachML. Associations between static and functional measures of joint function in the foot and ankle. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2004; 94 (6): 535–41.
34.
TurnerDEHelliwellPSBurtonAKWoodburnJ. The relationship between passive range of motion and range of motion during gait and plantar pressure measurements. Diabet Med. 2007; 24 (11): 1240–6.
BrashPDFosterJVennartWAnthonyPTookeJE. Magnetic resonance imaging techniques demonstrate soft tissue damage in the diabetic foot. Diabet Med. 1999; 16 (1): 55–61.
37.
BusSAMaasMCavanaghPRMichelsRPLeviM. Plantar fat-pad displacement in neuropathic diabetic patients with toe deformity: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27 (10): 2376–81.
38.
CheungYYDoyleyMMillerTBKennedyFLynchFJrWrobelJSPaulsonKWeaverJ. Magnetic resonance elastography of the plantar fat pads: preliminary study in diabetic patients and asymptomatic volunteers. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006; 30 (2): 321–6.
39.
GoodingGAStessRMGrafPMMossKMLouieKSGrunfeldC. Sonography of the sole of the foot. Evidence for loss of foot pad thickness in diabetes and its relationship to ulceration of the foot. Invest Radiol. 1986; 21 (1): 45–8.
40.
HsuTCLeeYSShauYW. Biomechanics of the heel pad for type 2 diabetic patients. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002; 17 (4): 291–6.
41.
LottDJHastingsMKCommeanPKSmithKEMuellerMJ. Effect of footwear and orthotic devices on stress reduction and soft tissue strain of the neuropathic foot. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007; 22 (3): 352–9.
42.
MalufKSMuellerMJStrubeMJEngsbergJRJohnsonJE. Tendon Achilles lengthening for the treatment of neuropathic ulcers causes a temporary reduction in forefoot pressure associated with changes in plantar flexor power rather than ankle motion during gait. J Biomech. 2004; 37 (6): 897–906.
43.
SalsichGBMuellerMJHastingsMKSinacoreDRStrubeMJJohnsonJE. Effect of Achilles tendon lengthening on ankle muscle performance in people with diabetes mellitus and a neuropathic plantar ulcer. Phys Ther. 2005; 85 (1): 34–43.
44.
BusSAUlbrechtJSCavanaghPR. Pressure relief and load redistribution by custom-made insoles in diabetic patients with neuropathy and foot deformity. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004; 19 (6): 629–38.
45.
FarleyCTMorgenrothDC. Leg stiffness primarily depends on ankle stiffness during human hopping. J Biomech. 1999; 32 (3): 267–73.
46.
SalsichGBBrownMMuellerMJ. Relationships between plantar flexor muscle stiffness, strength, and range of motion in subjects with diabetes-peripheral neuropathy compared to age-matched controls. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000; 30 (8): 473–83.
47.
SalsichGBMuellerMJ. Effect of plantar flexor muscle stiffness on selected gait characteristics. Gait Posture. 2000; 11 (3): 207–16.
48.
SalsichGBMuellerMJSahrmannSA. Passive ankle stiffness in subjects with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy versus an age-matched comparison group. Phys Ther. 2000; 80 (4): 352–62.
49.
GerritsEGLutgersHLKleefstraNGraaffRGroenierKHSmitAJGansROBiloHJ. Skin autofluorescence: a tool to identify type 2 diabetic patients at risk for developing microvascular complications. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31 (3): 517–21.
50.
BondsDELarsonJCSchwartzAVStrotmeyerESRobbinsJRodriguezBLJohnsonKCMargolisKL. Risk of fracture in women with type 2 diabetes: the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91 (9): 3404–10.
51.
ArmstrongDGPetersEJAthanasiouKALaveryLA. Is there a critical level of plantar foot pressure to identify patients at risk for neuropathic foot ulceration?J Foot Ankle Surg. 1998; 37 (4): 303–7.
52.
StessRMJensenSRMirmiranR. The role of dynamic plantar pressures in diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 1997; 20 (5): 855–8.
53.
FrykbergRGLaveryLAPhamHHarveyCHarklessLVevesA. Role of neuropathy and high foot pressures in diabetic foot ulceration. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21 (10): 1714–9.
54.
LaveryLAArmstrongDGWunderlichRPTredwellJBoultonAJ. Predictive value of foot pressure assessment as part of a population-based diabetes disease management program. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26 (4): 1069–73.
55.
VevesAMurrayHJYoungMJBoultonAJ. The risk of foot ulceration in diabetic patients with high foot pressure: a prospective study. Diabetologia. 1992; 35 (7): 660–3.
56.
ArmstrongDGLaveryLAHoltz-NeidererKMohlerMJWendelCSNixonBPBoultonAJ. Variability in activity may precede diabetic foot ulceration. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27 (8): 1980–4.
57.
AlbertSFChristensenLC. Diabetic foot pressure studies: comparison study of patient-selected shoes versus clinician selected shoes. Lower Extremity. 1994; 1: 21–7.
58.
AshryHRLaveryLAMurdochDPFrolichMLaveryDC. Effectiveness of diabetic insoles to reduce foot pressures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1997; 36 (4): 268–71; discussion 328–9.
59.
BrownMRudicelSEsquenaziA. Measurement of dynamic pressures at the shoe-foot interface during normal walking with various foot orthoses using the FSCAN system. Foot Ankle Int. 1996; 17 (3): 152–6.
60.
LongJTKleinJ PSirotaNMWertschJJJanisseDHarrisGF. Biomechanics of the double rocker sole shoe: gait kinematics and kinetics. J Biomech. 2007; 40 (13): 2882–90.
61.
LordMHoseinR. Pressure redistribution by molded inserts in diabetic footwear: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1994; 31 (3): 214–21.
62.
MuellerMJLottDJHastingsMKCommeanPKSmithKEPilgramTK. Efficacy and mechanism of orthotic devices to unload metatarsal heads in people with diabetes and a history of plantar ulcers. Phys Ther. 2006; 86 (6): 833–42.
63.
NovickAStoneJBirkeJABrasseauxDMBroussardJBHoardASHawkinsES. Reduction of plantar pressure with the rigid relief orthosis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1993; 83 (3): 115–22.
64.
PostemaKBurmPEZandeMELimbeekJ. Primary metatarsalgia: the Influence of a custom moulded insole and a rockerbar on plantar pressure. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1998; 22 (1): 35–44.
65.
UccioliLToffoloMVolpeAPasqualittoPFerriAMonticoneGMenzingerG. Efficacy of different shoes and insoles in reducing plantar pressures in diabetic neuropathic patients. Diabetologia. 1997; 40 (Suppl 1): A–489.
66.
HastingsMKMuellerMJPilgramTKLottDJCommeanPKJohnsonJE. Effect of metatarsal pad placement on plantar pressure in people with diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28 (1): 84–8.
67.
BuschKChantelauE. Effectiveness of a new brand of stock “diabetic” shoes to protect against diabetic foot ulcer relapse. A prospective cohort study. Diabet Med. 2003; 20 (8): 665–9.
68.
ColagiuriSMarsdenLLNaiduVTaylorL. The use of orthotic devices to correct plantar callus in people with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995; 28 (1): 29–34.
69.
ReiberGESmithDGWallaceCMVathCASullivanKHayesSYuOMartinDMaciejewskiM. Footwear used by individuals with diabetes and a history of foot ulcer. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002; 39 (5): 615–22.
70.
UccioliLFagliaEMonticoneGFavalesFDurolaLAldeghiAQuarantielloACaliaPMenzingerG. Manufactured shoes in the prevention of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18 (10): 1376–8.
71.
KnowlesEABoultonAJ. Do people with diabetes wear their prescribed footwear?Diabet Med. 1996; 13 (12): 1064–8.
72.
NixonBPArmstrongDGWendellCVazquezJRRabinovichZKimbrielHRRosalesMABoultonAJ. Do US veterans wear appropriately sized shoes?: the Veterans Affairs shoe size selection study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2006; 96 (4): 290–2.
73.
ArmstrongDGHoltz-NeidererKWendelCMohlerMJKimbrielHRLaveryLA. Skin temperature monitoring reduces the risk for diabetic foot ulceration in high-risk patients. Am J Med. 2007; 120 (12): 1042–6.
74.
ArmstrongDGLaveryLA. Predicting neuropathic ulceration with infrared dermal thermometry. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1997; 87 (7): 336–7.
75.
ArmstrongDGLaveryLALiswoodPJToddWFTredwellJA. Infrared dermal thermometry for the high-risk diabetic foot. Phys Ther. 1997; 77 (2): 169–75; discussion 176–7.
76.
ArmstrongDGSangalangMBJolleyDMabenFKimbrielHRNixonBPCohenIK. Cooling the foot to prevent diabetic foot wounds: a proof-of-concept trial. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005; 95 (2): 103–7.
77.
LaveryLAHigginsKRLanctotDRConstantinidesGPZamoranoRGArmstrongDGAthanasiouKAAgrawalCM. Home monitoring of foot skin temperatures to prevent ulceration. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27 (11): 2642–7.
MuellerMJZouDLottDJ. “Pressure gradient” as an indicator of plantar skin injury. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28 (12): 2908–12.
80.
ZouDMuellerMJLottDJ. Effect of peak pressure and pressure gradient on subsurface shear stresses in the neuropathic foot. J Biomech. 2007; 40 (4): 883–90.
81.
NajafiBCrewsRTArmstrongDGRogersLCAminianKWrobelJ. Can we predict outcome of surgical reconstruction of Charcot neuroarthropathy by dynamic plantar pressure assessment?–A proof of concept study. Gait Posture. 2010; 31 (1): 87–92.
82.
MackeyJRDavisBL. Simultaneous shear and pressure sensor array for assessing pressure and shear at foot/ground interface. J Biomech. 2006; 39 (15): 2893–7.
83.
PerryJEHallJODavisBL. Simultaneous measurement of plantar pressure and shear forces in diabetic individuals. Gait Posture. 2002; 15 (1): 101–7.
84.
YavuzMBotekGDavisBL. Plantar shear stress distributions: comparing actual and predicted frictional forces at the foot-ground interface. J Biomech. 2007; 40 (13): 3045–9.
85.
YavuzMTajaddiniABotekGDavisBL. Temporal characteristics of plantar shear distribution: relevance to diabetic patients. J Biomech. 2008; 41 (3): 556–9.
86.
LedermannHPMorrisonWBSchweitzerME. MR image analysis of pedal osteomyelitis: distribution, patterns of spread, and frequency of associated ulceration and septic arthritis. Radiology. 2002; 223 (3): 747–55.
87.
BalducciSIacobellisGParisiLDi BiaseNCalandrielloELeonettiFFalluccaF. Exercise training can modify the natural history of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Diabetes Complications. 2006; 20 (4): 216–23.
88.
RichardsonJKSandmanDVelaS. A focused exercise regimen improves clinical measures of balance in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82 (2): 205–9.
89.
MacLeanCDavisIMHamillJ. Influence of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics in healthy runners. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006; 21 (6): 623–30.
90.
SuicoJGMarriottDJVinicorFLitzelmanDK. Behaviors predicting foot lesions in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Gen Intern Med. 1998; 13 (7): 482–4.
91.
PayneCB. Biomechanics of the foot in diabetes mellitus. Some theoretical considerations. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998; 88 (6): 285–9.
92.
Van SchieCH. A review of the biomechanics of the diabetic foot. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2005; 4 (3): 160–70.
