New technologies, such as online networking tools, offer innovative ways to engage patients in their diabetes care. Second Life (SL) is one such virtual world that allows patients to interact in a 3D environment with peers and healthcare providers. This article presents a framework that demonstrates how applications within SL can be constructed to meet the needs of patients with diabetes, allowing them to attend group visits, learn more about lifestyle changes, and foster a sense of support and emotional well-being. This experiential approach to education may prove more engaging, and therefore successful, than existing strategies. Addressing concerns relating to privacy and liability is a necessary first step to engage providers in this new approach to patient care.
GrantRWCaglieroEDubeyAKGildesgameCChuehHCBarryMJSingerDENathanDMMeigsJB. Clinical inertia in the management of Type 2 diabetes metabolic risk factors. Diabet Med.2004; 21 (2): 150–5.
2.
GrantRWCaglieroEMurphy-SheehyPSingerDENathanDMMeigsJB. Comparison of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia management in patients with type 2 diabetes. Am J Med.2002; 112 (8): 603–9.
3.
SaaddineJBCadwellBGreggEW. Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 19882002. Ann Intern Med.2006; 144 (7): 465–74.
4.
SaaddineJBEngelgauMMBecklesGLGreggEWThompsonTJNarayanKM. A diabetes report card for the United States: Quality of care in the 1990s. Ann Intern Med.2002; 136 (8): 565–74.
5.
SaydahSHFradkinJCowieCC. Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA.2004; 291 (3): 335–42.
YeeNBailensonJNUrbanekMChangFMergetD. The unbearable likeness of being digital: The persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments. Cyberpsychol Behav.2007; 10 (1): 115–21.
11.
YeeNBailensonJN. The proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Hum Commun Res.2007; 33 (3): 271–90.
12.
MathurAKvedarJCWatsonAJ. Connected health: A new framework for evaluation of communication technology use in care improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rev.2007; 3 (4): 229–34.
13.
MazziCPKiddM. A framework for the evaluation of Internet-based diabetes management. J Med Internet Res.2002; 4 (1): e1.
14.
ClancyDEHuangPOkonofuaEYeagerDMagruderKM. Group visits: Promoting adherence to diabetes guidelines. J Gen Intern Med.2007; 22 (5): 620–4.
15.
WagnerEH. Diversifying the options for interacting with patients. Postgrad Med J.2007; 83 (986): 723–4.
16.
KirshSWattsSPascuzziKO'DayMEDavidsonDStraussGKernEOAronDC. Shared medical appointments based on the chronic care model: A quality improvement project to address the challenges of patients with diabetes with high cardiovascular risk. Qual Saf Health Care.2007; 16 (5): 349–53.
17.
ClarkD. Virtual world gets another life: Technology offers companies private workspace. The Wall Street Journal.2008 Apr 3;Sect. B: 10.
18.
WatsonAJBellAGKvedarJCGrantRW. Reevaluating the digital divide: Current lack of Internet use is not a barrier to adoption of novel health information technology. Diabetes Care.2008; 31 (3): 433–5.
19.
GrantRWCaglieroEChuehHCMeigsJB. Internet use among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes: The generation and education gap. J Gen Intern Med.2005; 20 (5): 470–3.
20.
Second Life System Requirements. [page on the Internet]. San Francisco (CA): Linden Lab (US). c2008 — [cited 2008 Jun 13] Available from: http://second/ife.com/support/sysreqs.php.
