The objective of this study was to evaluate computerized learning technology interventions that can empower patients in the self-management of diabetes and support diabetes education over a distance.
Methods:
We searched Medline (1966–2006), CINAHL (1982–2006), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (first quarter 2007) databases. We also reviewed reference lists from included studies to identify additional studies. We included 25 articles representing 21 randomized controlled trials that evaluated a computerized learning technology and measured the outcome of patient care. We extracted patient sample, intervention, educational content topics, outcome measures, and statistical significance.
Results:
Of 21 eligible trials, 18 trials (85.7%) reported significant positive outcomes. Almost 44% (43.8%) of the outcomes demonstrated significant improvements (49 of 112 outcomes).
Conclusions:
Patient self-management behaviors are important in chronic disease management, and initial evidence suggests that computerized learning technology interventions can play a significant role in the future.
StrineTWOkoroCAChapmanDPBecklesGLABalluzLMokdadAH. The impact of formal diabetes education on the preventive health practices and behaviors of persons with type 2 diabetes. Prev Med. 2005; 41: 79–84.
2.
American Diabetes Association. Basic diabetes information [cited 2007 Ap 18]. Available from: http://www.diabetes.org/.
3.
NicolucciACavaliereDScorpiglioneNCarinciFCapaniFTognoniGBenedettiMM. A comprehensive assessment of the avoidability of long-term complications of diabetes. A case-control study. SID-AMD Italian Study Group for the Implementation of the St. Vincent Declaration. Diabetes Care. 1996; 19: 927–33.
4.
Pasagian-MacaulayABaschCEZybertPWylie-RosettJ. Ophthalmic knowledge and beliefs among women with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 1997; 23: 433–7.
5.
MullenPDSimons-MortonDGRamirezGFrankowskiRFGreenLWMainsDA. A meta-analysis of trials evaluating patient education and counseling for three groups of preventive health behaviors. Patient Educ Couns. 1997; 32: 157–73.
6.
PadgettDMumfordEHaynesMCarterR. Meta-analysis of the effects of educational and psychological intervention on management of diabetes mellitus. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988; 41: 1007–30.
7.
Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
8.
WagnerEHAustinBVon KorffM. Improving outcomes in chronic illness. Manag Care Q1996; 4 (2): 12–25.
9.
American Association of Diabetes Educators. Standards for outcomes measurement of diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Educ. 2003; 29 (5): 804–16.
10.
BalasEAKrishnaSKretschmerRACheekTRLobachDFBorenSA. Computerized knowledge management in diabetes care. Med Care. 2004; 42 (6): 610–21.
11.
BalasEABorenSAGriffingG. Computerized management of diabetes: a synthesis of controlled trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998; 5 (S): 295–9.
12.
KrishnaSBalasEASpencerDCGriffinJZBorenSA. Clinical trials of interactive computerized patient education: implications for family practice. J Fam Pract. 1997; 45 (1): 25–33.
BarreraMGlasgowREMcKayHGBolesSMFeilEG. Do internet-based support interventions change perceptions of social support? An experimental trial of approaches for supporting diabetes self-management. Am J Commun Psychol. 2002; 30 (5): 637–54.
15.
BloomfieldSCalderJEChisholmVKelnarCJSteelJMFarquharJWEltonR. A project in diabetes education for children. Diabet Med. 1990; 7: 137–42.
16.
BrownSJLiebermanDAGermenyBAFanYCWilsonDMPastaDJ. Educational video game for juvenile diabetes: results of a controlled trial. Med Inform. 1997; 22 (1): 77–89.
17.
EstabrooksPANelsonCCXuSKingDBaylissEAGaglioBNuttingPAGlasgowRE. The frequency and behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005; 31 (3): 391–400.
18.
GerberBSBrodskyIGLawlessKASmolinLIArozullahAMSmithEVBerbaumMLHeckerlingPSEiserAR. Implementation and evaluation of a low-literacy diabetes education computer multimedia application. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28 (7): 1574–80.
19.
GlasgowRELa ChancePAToobertDJBrownJHampsonSERiddleMC. Long-term effects and costs of brief behavioural dietary intervention for patients with diabetes delivered from the medical office. Patient Educ Couns. 1997; 32 (3): 175–84.
20.
GlasgowREToobertDJHampsonSE. Effects of a brief officebased intervention to facilitate diabetes dietary self-management. Diabetes Care. 1996; 19 (8): 835–42.
21.
GlasgowRENuttingPAKingDKNelsonCCCutterGGaglioBRahmAKWhitesidesH. Randomized effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted intervention to improve diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28 (1): 33–9.
22.
GlasgowRENuttingPAKingDKNelsonCCCutterGGaglioBRahmAKWhitesidesHAmthauerH. A practical randomized trial to improve diabetes care. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19 (12): 1167–74.
23.
GlasgowREToobertDJ. Brief, computer-assisted diabetes dietary self-management counseling: effects on behavior, physiologic outcomes, and quality of life. Med Care. 2000; 38 (11): 1062–73.
24.
GlasgowREToobertDJHampsonSEStryckerLA. Implementation, generalization and long-term results of the “choosing well” diabetes self-management intervention. Patient Educ Couns. 2002; 48 (2): 115–22.
25.
GraueMWentzel-LarsenTHanestadBRSovikO. Evaluation of a programme of group visits and computer-assisted consultations in the treatment of adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2005; 22 (11): 1522–9.
26.
LevetanCSDawnKRRobbinsDCRatnerRE. Impact of computer-generated personalized goals on HbA(1c). Diabetes Care. 2002; 25 (1): 2–8.
27.
LoRLoBWellsEChardMHathawayJ. The development and evaluation of a computer-aided diabetes education program. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1996; 13: 19–27.
28.
McKayHGKingDEakinEGSeeleyJRGlasgowRE. The diabetes network internet-based physical activity intervention: a randomized pilot study. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24 (8): 1328–34.
29.
McMahonGTGomesHEHohneS HicksonHuTMLevineBAConlinPR. Web-based care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28 (7): 1624–9.
30.
NebelITKlemmTFasshauerMMüllerUVerlohrenHJKlaibergAPaschkeR. Comparative analysis of conventional and an adaptive computer-based hypoglycaemia education programs. Patient Educ Couns. 2004; 53 (3): 315–8.
31.
SheldonAW. Computer-assisted diet and exercise training in the behavioral treatment of type i diabetes [dissertation]. University of Miami; 1996.
32.
SmithLWeinertC. Telecommunication support for rural women with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2000; 26 (4): 645–55.
33.
TattiPLehmannED. A prospective randomised-controlled pilot study for evaluating the teaching utility of interactive educational diabetes simulators. Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2003; 16 (1): 7–23.
34.
TurninMCBeddokRHClottesJPMartiniPFAbadieRGBuissonJCSoulé-DupuyCBonneuMCamaréRAntonJPTelematic expert system Diabeto. New tool for diet self-monitoring for diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1992; 15 (2): 204–12.
35.
WheelerLAWheelerMLOursPSwiderC. Use of CAI/video in diabetes patient nutritional education. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1983; 961–4.
36.
WheelerLAWheelerMLOursPSwiderC. Evaluation of computer-based diet education in persons with diabetes mellitus and limited educational background. Diabetes Care. 1985; 8: 537–44.
37.
WisePHDowlatshahiDCFarrantSFromsonSMeadowsKA. Effect of computer-based learning on diabetes knowledge and control. Diabetes Care. 1986; 9: 504–8.
38.
YehYTChiuYTLiuCTWuSJLeeTI. Development and evaluation of an integrated patient-oriented education management system for diabetes. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006; 122: 172–5.
39.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2007. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30 (Suppl 1): S4–S41.
40.
BaumanAEFardyHJHarrisPG. Getting it right: why bother with patient-centred care?. Med J Aust. 2003; 179 (5): 253–6.
