AblardK. E.MillsC. J.HoffhinesV. L. (1996). The developmental study of talented youth (DSTY): The participants (Technical Report No. 13). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Institute for the Academic Advancement of Youth.
2.
The Advanced Placement program: To AP or not AP?. (1994, March/April). Imagine, 1, 6–7.
3.
AndersenN. (1996, Fall). TAMS flings open windows of opportunity for UNT students. The North Texan, 46 (3), 4–5, 21–23.
4.
AP courses: An option for gifted students. (1989, Fall). Insights, 4, 5–7.
5.
BarnettL. B.DurdenW. G. (1993). Education patterns of academically talented youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 161–168.
6.
BootheD.SethnaB. N.StanleyJ. C. (1996). Special opportunities for exceptionally able high school students: An analysis of six residential early-college entrance programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children, Indianapolis, IN.
7.
BrodyL. E.AssoulineS. G.StanleyJ. C. (1990). Five years of early entrants: Predicting successful achievement in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(4), 138–142.
8.
BrodyL. E.BlackburnC. C. (1996). Nurturing exceptional talent: SET as a legacy of SMPY. In BenbowC. P.LubinskiD. (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.
BrodyL. E.LupkowskiA. E.StanleyJ. C. (1988). Early entrance to college: A study of academic and social adjustment during freshman year. College and University, 63(4), 347–359.
10.
BrodyL. E.StanleyJ. C. (1991). Young college students: Assessing factors that contribute to success. In SouthernW. T.JonesE. D. (Eds.), Academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 102–132). New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
BurtonN. W. (1991). Policy issues in women's choice of college and college major. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
12.
CasserlyP. L. (1986). Advanced Placement revisited. College Board Report, No. 86–6, 1–14.
13.
CelisW.III (1994, December 28). Advanced Placement exam losing its value for some: Colleges rethink blanket acceptance of credits. New York Times. (Reprinted in February 1995, Network News & Views, pp. 94–95).
14.
CohnS. J. (1991). Talent searches. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 166–177). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
ColangeloN.BrowerP. (1987). Gifted youngsters and their siblings: Long-term impact of labeling on their academic and personal self-concepts. Roeper Review, 10(2), 101–103.
16.
CurryW. (1995). Advanced Placement then and now. College Board Review, Nos. 176–177, 23.
17.
DaurioS. P. (1979). Educational enrichment versus acceleration: A review of the literature. In GeorgeW. C.CohnS. J.StanleyJ. C. (Eds.), Educating the gifted: Acceleration and enrichment (pp. 13–63). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
DurdenW. G.MackayL. (1995, November). Rediscovering self-reliance in education: The optimal match. Phi Delta Kappan, 250–251.
19.
EnersonD. L. (1993). Summer residential programs: Academics and beyond. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 169–176.
20.
FarmerH. S. (1985). Model of career and achievement motivation for women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 363–390.
21.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1986). A conception of giftedness. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 112–127). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
FluittJ. L.StricklandM. S. (1984). A survey of early admission policies and procedures. College and University, 59, 129–135.
23.
GoldsteinD.StockingV. B.SawyerR. N. (1992). The talented adolescent: Data from TIP's first decade. In ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.AmbrosonD. L. (Eds.), Talent development (Vol. 1, pp. 298–318). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press.
24.
HoffmanN. (1996, October 18). Colleges need a cease fire in the admissions wars. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B5.
25.
HonanW. H. (1993, September 29). Completing college in only 3 years? Idea is gaining support nationwide. The New York Times. (Reprinted in November 1993, Network News & Views, pp. 100–101.).
26.
JanosP. M.RobinsonN. M.LunneborgC. (1989). Markedly early entrance to college: A multi-year comparative study of academic performance and psychological adjustment. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 495–518.
27.
KolitchE. R.BrodyL. E. (1992). Mathematics acceleration of highly talented students: An evaluation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 78–86.
28.
LevinS. (1995). Summer on campus. New York: The College Board.
29.
MackayL. (1996, September/October). Going public: The powerful pluses of undergraduate education at state institutions. Imagine, 4, 7–9.
30.
NobleK. D.RobinsonN. M.GundersonS. A. (1993). All rivers lead to the sea: A follow-up of gifted young adults. Roeper Review, 15(3), 124–130.
31.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (1989). Development of academic talent: The role of summer programs. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. L.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (Eds.), Patterns of influence on gifted learners (pp. 214–230). New York: Teachers College Press.
32.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (1995). A summary of research regarding early entrance to college. Roeper Review, 18(2), 121–125.
33.
Playing the new admissions game. (1996, April 29). Newsweek, 58.
34.
RavagliaR.SuppesP.StillingerC.AlperT. M. (1995). Computer-based mathematics and physics for gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 7–13.
35.
SheaC. (1994, March 30). Squeezing the calendar: Students say life is fast under a 3-year baccalaureate plan—maybe too fast. Chronicle of Higher Education. (Reprinted in May 1994, Network News & Views, pp. 102–103.).
36.
StanleyJ. C.BenbowC. P. (1983). Extremely young college graduates: Evidence of their success. College and University, 58, 361–372.
37.
StanleyJ. C.BenbowC. P. (1986). Youths who reason extremely well mathematically. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 361–387). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
StanleyJ. C.KeatingD.P.FoxL.H. (Eds.). (1974). Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39.
StecklowS. (1994, February 28). More colleges offer degrees in three years. Wall Street Journal. (Reprinted in April 1994, Network News & Views, p. 81).
40.
SouthernW. T.JonesE. D.StanleyJ. C. (1993). Acceleration and enrichment: The context and development of program options. In HellerK. A.MonksF. J.PassowA. H. (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 387–409). New York: Pergamon.
41.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. L. (1989). Profiles of precocity: A three-year study of talented adolescents. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. L.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (Eds.), Patterns of influence on gifted learners (pp. 29–39). New York: Teachers College Press.
42.
WeberB. (1996, April 28). Inside the meritocracy machine. New York Times Magazine, 44–49, 56–58, 68.
43.
WooE. (1995, February 2). Colleges turn to merit aid in recruiting top students. Los Angeles Times. (Reprinted in April 1995, Network News and Views, pp. 115–116.).