The long-term predictive validity of out-of-school activities in adolescence as predictors of later vocational choice and accomplishment was investigated in 91 young adults who had been identified as intellectually gifted as adolescents. The baseline measure tapped leisure activities and accomplishments in eight specific activity domains (science/mathematics, social, dance, music, art, creative writing, drama, and sports). It was administered when research participants were in the senior year of high school. The criterion measure was administered approximately 13 years later and provided a classification of current occupation according to the Roe vocational fields and a measure of adult work accomplishment. We found a significant relationship between the domain of out-of-school activity in adolescence and the domain of vocational activity in adulthood. Moreover, subjects whose adolescent out-of-school activities matched adult occupation had a higher level of work accomplishment than subjects for whom such a match was absent.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertR. A. (1993). The contribution of early family history to the achievement of eminence, Paper presented at the National Research Symposium on Talent Development, Iowa City, IA.
2.
BarrettG. V. (1994). Empirical data says it all. American Psychologist, 49, 69–71.
3.
BarrettG. V.DepinetR. L. (1991). A reconsideration of testing for competence rather than for “intelligence.”. American Psychologist, 46, 1012–1024.
4.
BarronF.HarringtonD. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.
5.
BloomB. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.
6.
BoyatzisR. E. (1994). Rendering unto competence the things that are competent. American Psychologist, 49, 64–66.
7.
ColangeloN.ZaffranR. T. (1979). New voices in counseling the gifted. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
8.
CowanJ. J. (1994). Barrett and Depinet versus McClelland. American Psychologist, 49, 64–65.
9.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RathundeK.WhalenS. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
DelisleJ.SquiresS. (1989). Career development for gifted and talented youth: Position statement Division on Career Development (DCD) and The Association for the Gifted (TAG). Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 97–101.
11.
DellasM.GaierE. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 55–73.
12.
EltonC. F.ShevelL. R. (1969). Who is talented? An analysis of achievement. (Res. Rep. No. 31). Iowa City: American College Testing Program.
13.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1994). Professional development module: Talent identification and development. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
14.
FeldhusenJ. F. (Ed.). (1995). Talent development [Special Issue]. Roeper Review, 18(2).
15.
GagnéF. (1995). From giftedness to talent: A developmental model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Review, 18(2), 103–111.
16.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind. The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
17.
GionR. M. (1965). Personnel testing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
GogelE. M.McCumseyJ.HewettG. (1985). What parents are saying. Gifted Child Today8(6), 7–9.
19.
HollandJ. L. (1961). Creative and academic performance among talented adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(6), 136–147.
20.
HollandJ. L. (1985). The making of vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environment (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21.
HollandJ. L.AustinA. W. (1962). The prediction of the academic, artistic, scientific, and social achievement of undergraduates of superior scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(6), 132–143.
22.
HollandJ. L.NicholsR. C. (1964). Prediction of academic and extracurricular achievement in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(2), 55–65.
23.
HollandJ. L.RichardsJ. M.Jr. (1965). Academic and nonacademic accomplishment: Correlated or uncorrelated? (Res. Rep. No. 7). Iowa City: American College Testing Program.
24.
HollingerC. L.FlemingE. S. (1984). Internal barriers to the realization of potential: Correlates and interrelationships, among gifted and talented female adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly28(3), 135–139.
25.
HongE.MilgramR. M. (1996). The structure of giftedness: The domain of literature as an exemplar. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(1), 31–40.
26.
HongE.MilgramR. M.GorskyH. (1995). Original thinking as a predictor of creative performance in young children. Roeper Review, 18(2), 147–149.
27.
HongE.MilgramR. M.WhistonS. C. (1993). Leisure activities in adolescents as a predictor of occupational choice in young adults: A longitudinal study. Journal of Career Development, 19, 221–229.
28.
HongE.WhistonS. C.MilgramR. M. (1993). Leisure activities in career guidance for gifted and talented adolescents: A validation study of the Tel-Aviv Activities Inventory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(2), 65–68.
29.
HoytK. B.HebelerJ. R. (Eds.). (1974). Career education for gifted and talented students. Salt Lake City, UT: Olympic.
KerrB. A. (1986). Career counseling for the gifted: Assessments and interventions. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64(9), 602–604.
32.
KerrB. A. (1988). Career counseling for gifted girls and women. Journal of Career Development, 14(4), 259–268.
33.
KerrB. A.MillerJ. V. (Eds.). (1986). Counseling the gifted and talented [Special issue]. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64(9).
34.
McClellandD. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence.”. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14.
35.
McClellandD. C. (1994). The knowledge-testing-educational complex strikes back. American Psychologist, 49(1), 66–69.
36.
McDanielsC. (1984). The role of leisure in career development. Journal of Career Development, 11(1), 64–70.
37.
McLaughlinD. H.TiedemanD. V. (1974). Eleven-year career stability and change as reflected in Project Talent data through the Flanagan, Holland, and Roe occupational classification systems. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 5(2), 177–196.
38.
MeirE. I.YaariY. (1988). The relationship between congruent specialty choice within occupations and satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33(1), 99–117.
39.
MilgramR. M. (1973, 1983, 1987, 1990). Tel Aviv activities and accomplishments inventory: Adolescent Form. Ramat Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University, School of Education.
40.
MilgramR. M. (Ed.). (1989). Teaching gifted and talented children learners in regular classrooms. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
41.
MilgramR. M. (Ed.). (1991). Counseling gifted and talented children learners in regular classrooms. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42.
MilgramR. M. (1994). Tel Aviv activities and accomplishments inventory: Adult form. Ramat Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University, School of Education.
43.
MilgramR. M.DunnR.PriceG. E. (Eds.). (1993). Teaching gifted and talented learners for learning style: An international perspective. New York: Praeger.
44.
MilgramR. M.HongE. (1994). Creative thinking and creative performance in adolescents as predictors of creative attainments in adults: A follow-up study after 18 years. In SubotnikR.ArnoldK. (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 212–228). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
45.
MilgramR. M.MilgramN. A. (1976). Creative thinking and creative performance in Israeli students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(3), 255–259.
46.
MilgramR. M.YitzhakV.MilgramN. A. (1977). Creative activity and sex-role identity in elementary school children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45(2), 371–376.
47.
MillerJ. V. (Ed.). (1981). Career education for gifted and talented [Special issue]. Journal of Career Education, 7(4).
48.
NunesT.SchliemannA. D.CarraherD. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
OsipowS. H. (1983). Theories of career development (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
50.
RavenJ. C.CourtJ. H.RavenJ. (1977). Manual for Ravens progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. London: H. K. Lewis.
51.
RenzulliJ. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York: Cambridge University.
52.
RenzulliJ. S. (1994). Schools are places for talent development. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
53.
RichardsJ. M.HollandJ. L.Jr.LutzS. W. (1967). Prediction of student accomplishment in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 343–355.
54.
RoeA. (1956). The psychology of occupations. New York: Wiley.
55.
SchwartzL. L. (1991). Guiding gifted girls. In MilgramR. M. (Ed.), Counseling gifted and talented children learners in regular classrooms (pp. 143–160). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
56.
SternbergR. J. (1996). Myths, countermyths, and truths about intelligence. Educational Researcher, 25(2), 11–16.
57.
SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. New York: Cambridge.
58.
SternbergR. J.WagnerR. K. (1993). The g-ocentric view of intelligence and job performance is wrong. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(1), 1–4.
59.
SternbergR. J.WagnerR. K.OkagakiL. (1993). Practical intelligence: The nature and role of tacit knowledge in work and at school. In ReeseH.PuckettJ. (Eds.), Advances in lifespan development (pp. 205–227). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60.
SubotnikR. F.ArnoldK. D.NobleK. D. (Eds.). (1995). Adult women's talent development [Special issue]. Roeper Review, 18(1).
61.
SuperD. E. (1984). Leisure: What it is and might be. Journal of Career Development, 11(1), 71–80.
62.
TannenbaumA. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
63.
TermanL. M.OdenM. H. (1947). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 4. The gifted child grows up: Twenty-five years follow-up of a superior group. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
64.
TermanL. M.OdenM. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 4. The gifted child at mid-life: Thirty-five years follow-up of the superior child. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
65.
TreffingerD. J.FeldhusenJ. F. (1996). Talent recognition and development: Successor to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(2), 181–193.
66.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ. (1983). A practical guide to counseling the gifted in a school setting. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
67.
WallachM. A.WingC. W.Jr. (1969). The talented student: A validation of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
68.
WingC. W.Jr.WallachM. A. (1971). College admissions and the psychology of talent. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
69.
ZaffranR. T.ColangeloN. (1977). Counseling with gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21(3), 305–321.
