This study examines how advanced professional training in strength-based assessment influences graduate students’ knowledge, skills, attitudes, and beliefs about supporting twice-exceptional learners. The study was conducted within a graduate institution dedicated to strength-based, talent-focused education and employed a design-based research methodology to iteratively refine a practicum course in which students learned to administer and interpret the Suite of Tools™, a strength-based assessment. Within this context, students were trained to apply theories of ecological systems, self-determination, and talent development to real-world cases of twice-exceptional learners. Quantitative and qualitative data indicated growth in confidence, conceptual understanding, and commitment to implementing strength-based practices. Participants emphasized the need for additional modeling and experiential learning opportunities. Findings illustrate how advanced training can translate theory into professional practice and offer recommendations for developing graduate programs that prepare educators to identify and cultivate the strengths of twice-exceptional learners.
AlsamaniO. A.AlsamiriY. A.AlfaidiS. D. (2023). Elementary school teachers’ perceptions of the characteristics of twice-exceptional students. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1150274
3.
AmranH.MajidR. (2019). Learning strategies for twice-exceptional students. International Journal of Special Education, 33, 954–976.
4.
ArbenzG. C.GanderF.RuchW. (2022). Breadth, polarity, and emergence of character strengths and their relevance for assessment. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(3), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.2018026
BaumS. M.CooperC. R.NeuT. W. (2001). Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38(5), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.1036
BaumS. M.SchaderR. M.OwenS. (2017). To be gifted and learning disabled: Strength-based strategies for helping twice exceptional students with LD, ADHD, ASD, and more. Prufrock Press.
9.
BozicN.LawthomR.MurrayJ. (2017). Exploring the context of strengths – A new approach to strength-based assessment. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2017.1367917
10.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2016). A meta-analysis of educator training to improve implementation of interventions for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(3), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516653477
11.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
12.
BrualdiA. C. (1996). Multiple intelligences: Gardner's theory (ERIC Digest No. ED410226). ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED410226.
13.
BuckleyJ. A.EpsteinM. H. (2004). The behavioral and emotional rating scale-2 (BERS-2): Providing a comprehensive approach to strength-based assessment. The California School Psychologist, 9(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03340904
14.
Burger-VeltmeijerA.MinnaertA. (2023). Needs-based assessment of twice-exceptional gifted students: The S&W-Heuristic. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(1), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.101.13830
15.
CliftonD.AndersonE. (2002). Strengths quest: Discover and develop your strengths in academics, career, and beyond. Gallup Organization.
16.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
ElderB. C.RoodC. E.DamianiM. L. (2018). Writing strength-based IEPs for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 14(1), 116–155. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1182587.pdf.
19.
FengL.SassT. R. (2013). What makes special-education teachers special? Teacher training and achievement of students with disabilities. Economics of Education Review, 36, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.06.006
20.
Foley-NicponM.AssoulineS. G.ColangeloN. (2013). Twice-exceptional learners: Who needs to know what?Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490021
GarrettR.SteinbergM. P. (2014). Examining teacher effectiveness using classroom observation scores. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(2), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714537551
24.
GierczykM.HornbyG. (2021). Twice-exceptional students: Review of implications for special and inclusive education. Education Sciences, 11(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI11020085
25.
HuongT.HaoP.VyP. (2025). Needs for primary school teacher educators’ continuing professional development responding to academic program quality assurance. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1), 3920–3932. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6254
26.
JacksonM.PetersK.JenE.RiveraJ. (2025). Coaching strength-based parenting: Online program’s impact on mothers’ competence with twice-exceptional children.Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 48(3), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532251352617
27.
JenE.MoonS.SamarapungavanA. (2015). Using design-based research in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(3), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215583871
28.
KalinowskiE.EgertF.GronostajA.VockM. (2019). Professional development on fostering students’ academic language proficiency across the curriculum—A meta-analysis of its impact on teachers’ cognition and teaching practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, Article 102971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102971
29.
KennedyM. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching?Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
30.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
31.
Kowalczuk-WalędziakM.LopesA.MenezesI.TormentaN. (2017). Teachers pursuing a doctoral degree: Motivations and perceived impact. Educational Research, 59(3), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2017.1345287
32.
KüryL.FischerC. (2025). The self-perceptions of twice-exceptional children: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 15(1), Article 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010044
33.
LoC. O.PorathM. (2017). Paradigm shifts in gifted education: An examination vis-à-vis its historical situatedness and pedagogical sensibilities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(4), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217722840
34.
LopezS. J.LouisM. C. (2009). The principles of strengths-based education. Journal of College and Character, 10(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-1639.1041
35.
MerchieE.TuytensM.DevosG.VanderlindeR. (2016). Evaluating teachers’ professional development initiatives: Towards an extended evaluative framework. Research Papers in Education, 33(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1271003
MorrisT. H. (2019). Experiential learning – A systematic review and revision of kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Choice Reviews Online, 42(01), 42–0624. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-0624
40.
PetersonJ. S. (2019). Presenting a qualitative study: A reviewer’s perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219844789
41.
PreckelF.SchmidtI.StumpfE.MotschenbacherM.VoglK.ScherrerV.SchneiderW. (2017). High-ability grouping: Benefits for gifted students’ achievement development without costs in academic self-concept. Child Development, 90(4), 1185–1201. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12996
42.
RegisD. P.TupasJ. P. C.SoniedoF. D.LauzonM. R. M. (2022). Determining the effectiveness of professional training of teachers in a local college. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(12), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i12.4600
43.
ReisS. M.BaumS. M.BurkeE. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534976
44.
ReisS. M.GelbarN.MadausJ. (2023). Pathways to academic success: Specific strength-based teaching and support strategies for twice exceptional high school students with autism spectrum disorder. Gifted Education International, 39(3), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294221124197
45.
ReisS. M.MadausJ.GelbarN.BaumS. (2025). Strength-based pedagogy for smart students with disabilities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003511861
46.
ReisS. M.RenzulliS. J. (2021). Parenting for strengths: Embracing the challenges of raising children identified as twice exceptional. Gifted Education International, 37(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420934435
47.
RenzulliJ. (1998). Three-ring conception of giftedness. In Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students. Creative Learning Press.
Ronksley-PaviaM.HanleyJ. (2022). Strength-based approaches for supporting twice-exceptional learners: Preliminary findings from a systematic quantitative literature review [Conference Paper]. 17th Asia Pacific Conference on Giftedness 2022. Taipei, Taiwan.
50.
RyanR.DeciE. L. (2018). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
51.
SamudreM. D.LeJeuneL. M.AndersonE. J.ViottoJ. A.BrockM. E.NicholsH. (2023). A meta-analysis on behavioral support training and general education teacher implementation. Exceptional Children, 90(2), 164–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231172175
52.
SchaderR.BaumS. (2024). Suite of tools (Rev. ed.; originally developed 2016): Interview-based assessment. Bridges Education Group.
WilderL. K.BraatenS.WilhiteK.AlgozzineB. (2006). Concurrent validity of the strength-based behavioral objective sequence. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 22(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1300/j370v22n01_07
YouH.ParkS.HongM.WarrenA. (2024). Unveiling effectiveness: A meta-analysis of professional development programs in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 62(4), 971–1005. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21985
61.
YsselN.NeumeisterK. S.BurneyV. (2020). Students with special needs who are gifted and talented (twice exceptional). In K. Hytten (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1218
