To help students reach their full potential, additional challenges beyond the standard curriculum may be necessary for some. In Dutch secondary vocational education, education for talented students is organized in two prevalent ways: through participation in honors programs that foster community building and through professional competitions. Given the apparent contradiction and potential tension between community building and competition, this research explores these concepts and their interplay to create optimal learning environments for talented students. A scoping review was conducted, analyzing 101 studies and identifying six overarching themes: Added Value, Characteristics & Conditions, Design & Development, Collaboration, Membership & the Role of Actors, and Enhanced Learning & the Role of Actors. Findings confirmed the benefits of both community building and competition in honors education. Despite a literature gap regarding their combination, this review provides insights into how these concepts can be merged to create enriching learning environments by synthesizing the themes.
AbizadaA.MirzaliyevaF. (2021). Success of honors program in Azerbaijan: Do honors students perform better than nonhonors students?Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20973999
ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
4.
BaileyM. S. (2020). Claiming debate’s value for honors student learning. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 21(2), 49–66. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/657
5.
BernsteinE.LysniakU. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs and implementation of competitive activities for multicultural students. Urban Education, 52(8), 1019–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915602535
6.
BishopK.WaltersH. (2007). The National Ocean Sciences Bowl: Extending the reach of a high school academic competition to college, careers, and a lifelong commitment to science. American Secondary Education, 35(3), 63–76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41406090
7.
BrinkelN.Van ReesF.RuisM.SlootsF. (2015). Community building at honors programs in continental Europe. Honors in Practice, 11, 93–109.
8.
BurguilloJ. C. (2010). Using game theory and competition-based learning to stimulate student motivation and performance. Computers and Education, 55(2), 566–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.018
9.
CampbellJ. R.WalbergH. J. (2010). Olympiad studies: Competitions provide alternatives to developing talents that serve national interests. Roeper Review, 33(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.530202
ChankselianiM.RellyS. J. (2016). Three-capital approach to the study of young people who excel in vocational occupations: A case of Worldskills competitors and entrepreneurship. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 3(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.3.1.4
12.
ChankselianiM.RellyS. J.LaczikA. (2016). Overcoming vocational prejudice: How can skills competitions improve the attractiveness of vocational education and training in the UK?British Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3218
13.
ColquhounH. L.LevacD.O’BrienK. K.StrausS.TriccoA. C.PerrierL.KastnerM.MoherD. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
14.
CziborE.OnderstalS.SloofR.Van PraagM. C. (2014). Does relative grading help male students? Evidence from a field experiment in the classroom [Working paper]. Tinbergen Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/102349
15.
DaiD. Y. (2019). Toward a new era of gifted education: Principles, policies, and strategies. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 9(1), 2–15.
16.
DaiD. Y. (2020). Rethinking human potential from a talent development perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 43(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219897850
De JongN. A.BoonM.Van GorpB.BüttnerS. A.KamansE.WolfensbergerM. V. C. (2021). Framework for analyzing conceptions of excellence in higher education: A reflective tool. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(5), 1468–1482. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1915964
19.
DeegM. D.BooneA. L.ChenA.ShirleyT. (2024). Why honors?: A qualitative investigation and taxonomy of student motivations for enrolling in honors programs. Studies in Higher Education, 49(12), 2797–2811. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323615
20.
EcarnotF.SerondeM. F.ChopardR.SchieleF.MeneveauN. (2015). Writing a scientific article: A step-by-step guide for beginners. European Geriatric Medicine, 6(6), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2015.08.005
21.
EvripidouS.GeorgiouK.DoitsidisL.AmanatiadisA. A.ZinonosZ.ChatzichristofisS. A. (2020). Educational robotics: Platforms, competitions and expected learning outcomes. IEEE Access, 8, 219534–219562. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042555
22.
FairleyJ.PrysockA.ArcherA. (2009, June). Using hands-on learning in an after-school engineering program to promote STEM careers to high school students [Paper presentation]. American Society for Engineering Education 116th Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX, USA.
23.
FrancoA.MalhotraN.SimonovitsG. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484
24.
GoldsteinA.VenkerE.WengC. (2017). Evidence appraisal: A scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(6), 1192–1203. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx050
25.
HaenenJ.VinkS.SjoerE.AdmiraalW. (2024). Challenge and learning in honours education: A quantitative and qualitative study on students’ and teachers’ perceptions. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(1), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1973408
26.
HartupM. (2020). Teaching as a whole. Journal of National Collegiate Honors Council, 21(2), 13–17.
27.
Heijne-PenningaM.WolfensbergerM. V. C. (2018). “Creating community” as a teaching strategy for honors students. Journal of the European Honors Council, 2(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.31378/jehc.8
28.
HillA. T.ArnettK. P.LopezC. A.BaglinoJ. A.PerovichN.MoranA. E.HebertA. T.BradleyA. (2020, June). Analyzing the effectiveness of competition and interdisciplinary teams in student learning [Paper presentation]. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On Line. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34151
HutterK.HautzJ.FüllerJ.MuellerJ.MatzlerK. (2011). Communitition: The tension between competition and collaboration in community-based design contests. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00589.x
31.
IgnatovaS.BobykinaI.RKoleevaE. (2021). Increasing students’ motivation by integrating projects on foreign languages into learning process. E3S Web of Conferences, 273(12157), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312157
32.
IssaG.HussainS. M.Al-BahadiliH. (2014). Competition-based learning: A model for the integration of competitions with project-based learning using open source LMS. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2014010101
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research (2nd ed.). Interaction Book Company.
35.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (2013). The impact of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning environments on achievement. In HattieJ.AndermanE. (Eds.), International handbook of student achievement (pp. 372–374). Routledge.
36.
JohnsonD. W.MaruyamaG.JohnsonR.NelsonD.SkonL. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.47
37.
KaoC. Y. (2011). The dilemma of competition encountered by musically gifted Asian male students: An exploration from the perspective of gifted education. High Ability Studies, 22(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2011.576085
38.
KerzmannT. L.WernerE. J.Jr (2012, June). TurboFlow: Integrated engineering design through an energy efficient building competition [Paper presentation]. 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, USA.
39.
KingmaT.DommerholtK.RijsdijkL. (2017). The honours learning environment of Windesheim University of Applied Sciences. Journal of the European Honors Council, 1(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31378/jehc.19
40.
KohK.ChaffeeJ.GoodmanE. (2009). Networking an honors community out of fragmentation. Honors in Practice – Online Archive, 5, 161–170. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchchip/89
41.
KoolA.MainhardT.JaarsmaD.Van BeukelenP.BrekelmansM. (2017). Effects of honours programme participation in higher education: A propensity score matching approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(6), 1222–1236. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1304362
42.
KragtenL.LangelooA.BakkerC.WolfensbergerM. V. C. (2022). The role of community building and competition in (honours) education – A scoping review protocol. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HF36W
KristensenF.TroengO.SafaviM.NarayananP. (2015). Competition in higher education – Good or bad?Lund University. http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/8519693
45.
LadewigA.KellerM.KlusmannU. (2020). Sense of belonging as an important factor in the pursuit of physics: Does it also matter for female participants of the German Physics Olympiad?Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 548781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.548781
46.
LegohF. (2019). Creativity competition for gifted students’ communication and self-esteem development. In WallaceB.SiskD. A.SeniorJ. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gifted and talented education (pp. 422–431). Sage Publications Ltd.
47.
LevacD.ColquhounH. L.O’BrienK. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, Article 69.https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
MonacoT. M.GoodnerJ. (1990). The “extra” in extracurricular activities for gifted. Institute of Educational Science. https://eric.ed.gov/?
50.
MorrisonA.PolisenaJ.HusereauD.MoultonK.ClarkM.FianderM.Mierzwinski-UrbanM.CliffordT.HuttonB.RabbD. (2012). The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: A systematic review of empirical studies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 28(2), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462312000086
51.
NebelS.SchneiderS.ReyG. D. (2016). From duels to classroom competition: Social competition and learning in educational videogames within different group sizes. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(A), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.035
52.
NokelainenP. (2018). Modeling the characteristics of vocational excellence: A case study with Finnish WorldSkills competitors. Talent Development and Excellence, 10(1), 15–30.
53.
Nussbaumer-StreitB.KleringsI.DobrescuA. I.PersadE.StevensA.GarrittyC.KamelC.AffengruberL.KingV. J.GartlehnerG. (2020). Excluding non-English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: A meta-epidemiological study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 118, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.011
54.
Ofori-BoaduA. N.PyleR. B.Borders-TaylorI.Bock HyengC. A.GrahamT. E. (2019, June). Advancing HBCU students’ interests in residential construction careers through an NAHB program: An industry-university collaboration [Paper presentation]. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–32046
55.
OuzzaniM.HammadyH.FedorowiczZ.ElmagarmidA. (2016). Rayyan – A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5, Article 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
56.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71. http://www.prisma-statement.org/ (Accessed: September 19, 2022)
57.
PetersM. D. J.MarnieC.TriccoA. C.PollockD.MunnZ.AlexanderL.McInerneyP.GodfreyC. M.KhalilH. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
PetersM. D. J.GodfreyC.McInerneyP.KhalilH.LarsenP.MarnieC.PollockD.TriccoA. C.MunnZ. (2022). Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 20(4), 953–968. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00242
60.
PylväsL.NokelainenP. (2017). Finnish Worldskills achievers’ vocational talent development and school-to-work pathways. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 4(2), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.4.2.1
61.
RaymentS.GarrieK.KaurI.McVickerG.StoreyE.WinterJ.De GirolamoL. A.RimmerC.NegusD.NelsonC.LoughlinM.DaleJ. (2022). Investigating student engagement and making science real during a pandemic: Bioskills at home, a case study. Education Sciences, 12(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020106
62.
RinnA. N.PluckerJ. A. (2019). High-ability college students and undergraduate honors programs: A systematic review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(3), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219855678
63.
RuchP.BoyerC.ChichesterC.TbahritiI.GeissbühlerA.FabryP.GobeillJ.PilletV.Rebholz-SchuhmannD.LovisC.VeutheyA. L. (2007). Using argumentation to extract key sentences from biomedical abstracts. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(2–3), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.002
SciarabbaD. (2012). Sports and competition in higher education: A search for values and ethics. Forum on Public Policy Online, 2012(2), 1–16.
66.
SmithK. N.JaegerA. J.ThomasD. (2021). “Science Olympiad is why I’m here”: The influence of an early STEM program on college and major choice. Research in Science Education, 51(Suppl 1), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09897-7
StobbeL.HogenstijnM. (2017). Introduction to the special issue: Honors communities. Journal of the European Honors Council, 2(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.31378/jehc.11
69.
TebeanuA. V.MacarieG. F. (2013). Cooperation and competitiveness in the educational environment from the students’ perspective. An essay analysis. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 811–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.211
TiesingaL.WolfensbergerM. V. C. (2014). De cultuur van honoursstudenten en de mogelijke invloed op de reguliere studiecultuur. Tijdschrift Voor Hoger Onderwijs, 31/32(4/1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.5553/TvHO/016810952014032001002
72.
TriccoA. C.LillieE.ZarinW.O’BrienK.ColquhounH. L.KastnerM.LevacD.NgC.SharpeJ. P.WilsonK.KennyM.WarrenR.WilsonC.StelfoxH. T.StrausS. E. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(15), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
73.
TriccoA. C.LillieE.ZarinW.O’BrienK. K.ColquhounH. L.LevacD.MoherD.PetersM. D. J.HorsleyT.WeeksL.HempelS.AklE. A.ChangC.McGowanJ.StewartL.HartlingL.AldcroftA.WilsonM. G.GarrittyC., … StrausS. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Van EijlP. J.Van GinkelS.PilotA.HermsenL. (2013). Stimuleren van een honourscommunity. In CoppoolseR.Van EijlP. J.PilotA. (Eds.), Hoogvliegers: Ontwikkeling naar professionele excellentie (pp. 165–176). Rotterdam University Press.
77.
Van GinkelS.Van EijlP. J.PilotA.ZubizarretaJ. (2012). Building a vibrant honors community among commuter students. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 13(2), 197–218. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/363
78.
Van VijfeijkenM.Van den BerghL.BakxA. (2024). Gelijke kansen en aandacht voor begaafdheid: Een (on)verenigbaar ideaal?Tijdschrift OnderwijsPraktijk Studies, 2, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.54657/TOPS.19205
WabikeP. (2021). Enhancing learning through community membership: Honours students’ perceptions of community membership and its impact on learning. Journal of Educational Issues, 7(2), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v7i2.18814
81.
WarnerS.DixonM. A.ChalipL. (2012). The impact of formal versus informal sport: Mapping the differences in sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(8), 983–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21506
82.
WawrzynskiM. R.MaddenK.JensenC. (2012). The influence of the college environment on honors students’ outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 53(6), 840–845. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0074
83.
WilliamsP.SheridanS. (2010). Conditions for collaborative learning and constructive competition in school. Educational Research, 52(4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2010.524748
84.
WolfensbergerM. V. C. (2012). Teaching for excellence: Honors pedagogies revealed. Waxmann Verlag.
85.
WolfensbergerM. V. C. (2015). Talent development in European higher education: Honors programs in the Benelux, Nordic and German-speaking countries. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12919-8
86.
WolfensbergerM. V. C.Van EijlP. J.PilotA. (2012). Laboratories for educational innovation: Honors programs in the Netherlands. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 13(2), 149–170. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal
87.
YoungJ. H.IIIStoryL.TarverS.WeinauerE.KeelerJ.McQuirterA. (2016). The honors college experience reconsidered: Exploring the student perspective. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council –Online Archive, 17(2). 177–189. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/524
88.
ZubizarettaJ. (2023). A defiant honors response to regime change. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 24(1), 3–12.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
