The Editorial Word: Trustworthiness

Adler R. H. (2022). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 38(4), 598–602. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/08903344221116620

American Psychological Association (2020). JARS-Qual | Table 1. https://apastyle.apa.org/jars/qual-table-1.pdf

Anzaldúa G. E. (2002). Speaking in tongues: A letter to third world women writers. In Moraga C. L. Anzaldúa G. E. (Eds.), This bridge called my back (4th ed., pp. 183–193). Third Woman Press.

Bali M. (2013). Critical Thinking in Context: Practice at an American Liberal Arts University in Egypt. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield. https://blog.mahabali.me/social-research/researcher-subjectivity-research-paradigms-and-postmodern-sensibilities/

Bhattacharya K. (2023). [@drkrkakali]. If anyone gives you a hard time over your sample size, tell them Dr. Gloria Ladson-Billings said, “8 is enough.” [Tweet]. Twitter. https://x.com/drkakali/status/1666555148158791682

Creswell J. W. Creswell J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

Creswell J. W. Miller D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1477543. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

Creswell J. Poth C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Hennink M. Kaiser B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292(114523), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Hesse-Biber S. N. Leavy P. (2004). Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice. Oxford University Press.

Jen E. Pereira N. Peterson J. (2015). A multigenerational dialogue about qualitative research in gifted education: Challenges and adaptation. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Convention of the National Association for Gifted Children. Phoenix, AZ.

Lather P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00112.x

LeCompte M. D. Goetz J. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/https://www.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052001031

Lincoln Y. S. Guba E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Lincoln Y. S. Guba E. G. (2013). The constructivist credo. Left Coast.

McGuire K. M. Edwards K. T. Dancy E. T. II , (2022). Blacklove stories. In Tachine A. R. Nicolazzo Z. (Eds.), Weaving an otherwise: In-relations methodological practice (pp. 111–125). Stylus.

Merriam S. B. Tisdell E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed). Jossey-Bass.

Museus S. D. Wang A. C. (2022). Refusing neoliberal logics in research design. In Tachine A. R. Nicolazzo Z. (Eds.), Weaving an otherwise: In-relations methodological practice (pp. 15–28). Stylus.

Paris D. Winn M. T. (2014). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. Sage.

Peterson J. S. (2019). Presenting a qualitative study: A reviewer’s perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219844789

Piper D. Jacobe J. Yazzie R. Calderon D. (2019). Indigenous methodologies in graduate school: Accountability, relationships, and tensions. In Windchief S. San Pedro T. (Eds.), Applying indigenous research methods: Storying with people and communities (pp. 86–100). Routledge.

Tachine A. R. Nicolazzo Z. (2022). Weaving an otherwise: In-relations methodological practice. Stylus.

Windchief S. San Pedro T. (2019). Applying Indigenous research methods: Storying with people and communities. Routledge.

Winn M. T. (2014). Part I: Trust, feeling, and change: What we learn, what we share, what we do. In Paris D. Winn M. T. (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 1–2). Sage.