Promoting the education of talented and gifted students is a crucial aspect of establishing a strong society focused on scientific knowledge. This praxis article delves into the implementation of strategies in the Syrian Arab Republic to support and identify gifted students, focusing on initiatives such as the Syrian Scientific Olympiad, the National Centre for Distinguished Students, and Academic Programs for Distinguished Students. Data collection methods utilized in this study shed light on the outcomes of these initiatives and measures taken to promote gifted education in Syria. The analysis of this data provides insights into the impact of these programs on gifted students in crisis-stricken regions. The study emphasizes the significant role played by the Distinction and Creativity Agency in nurturing exceptional talents and fostering personal growth. Overall, the support provided to gifted students contributes to cognitive advancement, psychological well-being, and skill development, enhancing their overall well-being and paving the way for successful futures. The government's commitment to supporting gifted education in the Syrian Arab Republic reflects its dedication to promoting talent and creativity in the Arab region.
AbunaserF. (2023). The role of teachers and coordinators of gifted students’ in developing their students’ leadership abilities in high schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.1
2.
AlmarashdiH. S.MohamedA. H.JarrahA. M. (2023). Towards equity: Exploring gifted and high achieving students’ lived experiences with a mathematical enrichment program based on PISA. Sustainability, 15(5), 4658, MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054658
3.
Al-RaeeiM. (2023). Analysing of the sustainable development goals in Damascus University during Syrian crisis using the strategy in the university and the bibliometrics data from SciVal. Discover Sustainability, 4(1), 24. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-023-00140-y
4.
AzmehC. (2022). Quantity and quality of research output and economic growth: Empirical investigation for all research areas in the MENA countries. Scientometrics, 127(11), 6147–6163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04512-5
5.
BaranovaЕShvetsovaA.AfanasenkovaE. (2020). Areas of correction and development work with intellectually gifted students. In: E3S Web of Conferences, 2020, p. 18128. EDP Sciences.
6.
CaoT. H.JungJ. Y.LeeJ. (2017). Assessment in gifted education: A review of the literature from 2005 to 2016. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(3), 163–203. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17714572
7.
CarmanC. A. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: Fifteen years of definitions of giftedness in research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24(1), 52–70. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12472602
8.
De BoerG. C.MinnaertA. E.KamphofG. (2013). Gifted education in The Netherlands. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(1), 133–150. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212471622
9.
EckertR. D.RobinsJ. H. (2016). Designing Services and Programs for High-Ability Learners: A Guidebook for Gifted Education. Corwin Press.
10.
ErK. O. (2017). Education of gifted and talented individuals in Germany, The Netherlands, Sweden and Turkey: An investigation of education policies and its implementations. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(4), 1154–1170. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2017.04.018
11.
Gomez-ArizagaM. P.Valdivia-LefortM.Castillo-HermosillaH.HébertT. P.Conejeros-SolarM. L. (2020). Tales from within: Gifted students’ lived experiences with teaching practices in regular classrooms. Education Sciences, 10(5), 137. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10050137
12.
HeuserB. L.WangK.ShahidS. (2017). Global dimensions of gifted and talented education: The influence of national perceptions on policies and practices. Global Education Review, 4(1), 4–21. ERIC.
13.
HinterplattnerS.SkogJ.KröhnC.SabitzerB. (2020). The children’s congress: A benefit to all levels of schooling by strengthening computational thinking. International Journal of Learning, 6(4), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.6.4.241-246
14.
HodgesJ.TayJ.MaedaY.GentryM. (2018). A meta-analysis of gifted and talented identification practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 147–174. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752107
15.
Ibáñez GarcíaA.Gallego ÁlvarezT.García RománM. D.Guillén MartínV. M.Tomé MerchánDCastro ZamudioS (2020). University mentoring programmes for gifted high school students: Satisfaction of workshops. Sustainability, 12(13), 5282. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135282
16.
KuykendallT. (2023). Reconstructing gifted education: Moving beyond patching leaks to replacing the broken talent pipeline. Interchange, 54(2), 145–154. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-023-09494-8
17.
PluckerJ. A.McWilliamsJ.GuoJ. (2021). Smart contexts for 21 st century talent development. In Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 295–316). Springer.
18.
SanchezC.BlancN. (2023). Feelings about school in gifted and non-gifted children: What are the effects of a fine art program in primary school?Education Sciences, 13(5), 512. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050512
19.
Steenbergen-HuS.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2016). Gifted identification and the role of gifted education: A commentary on “evaluating the gifted program of an urban school district using a modified regression discontinuity design”. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(2), 99–108. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X16643836
TourónJ.FreemanJ. (2018). Gifted education in Europe: Implications for policymakers and educators. American Psychological Association. Epub ahead of print 2018.
22.
WaiJ.LovettB. J. (2021). Improving gifted talent development can help solve multiple consequential real-world problems. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 31. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020031
23.
WattersJ. J.DiezmannC. M. (2003). The gifted student in science: Fulfilling potential. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 49(3), 46–53.
24.
WorrellF. C.ErwinJ. O. (2011). Best practices in identifying students for gifted and talented education programs. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27(4), 319–340. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2011.615817
