Our aspirations for gifted learners in talent development programs need to go beyond the development of expertise, creative productivity, and eminence. It is argued that wisdom development should be the ultimate goal of educating gifted learners. It is not merely what talents gifted learners develop, but how they use these talents, which will determine how meaningfully they lead their lives, and contribute to the lives of others in society. A theoretically grounded Leading Wisdom Development Framework (LWDF) is presented which articulates developmental levels of wisdom: emerging wisdom, developing wisdom, enhancing wisdom, and advancing wisdom. The framework outlines leadership actions which include deepening teaching quality and collective teacher capacity, strengthening programming, enabling student agency, collaborating with the wider community, and anchoring changes into the school culture. Effective leaders create conditions for integrated wisdom and talent development of gifted learners so that they can use their talents for the greater good of others.
AjzenI. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Open University Press.
2.
AmbroseD. (2019). Giftedness and wisdom. In SternbergR. J.GlückJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 465–482). Cambridge University Press.
3.
AmbroseD. (2022). Strengthening the moral-ethical capacities of the gifted and talented in turbulent, 21st-century conditions. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. (Ed.), Talent development in gifted education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 41–56). Routledge.
4.
AmbroseD.SternbergR. J. (2016). Previewing a collaborative exploration of gifted education and talent development in the 21st century. In AmbroseD.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), Giftedness and talent in the 21st century (pp. 3–14). Sense.
ArdeltM. (2004). Wisdom as expert knowledge system: A critical review of a contemporary operationalization of an ancient concept. Human Development, 47(5), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1159/000079154
7.
ArdeltM. (2008). Self-development through selflessness: The paradoxical process of growing wiser. In WaymentH. A.BauerJ. J. (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego (pp. 221–233). American Psychological Association.
8.
Aristotle (1984). Nicomachean ethics. (D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published ca. 340 B.C.E.).
9.
Aristotle (2000). The metaphysics. (H. Lawson-Tancred, Trans.). Penguin. (Original work published ca. 350 B.C.E.).
10.
ArlinP. K. (1990). Wisdom: The art of problem finding. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 230–243). Cambridge University Press.
BaltesP. B.StaudingerU. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.122
BluckS.GlückJ. (2005). From the inside out: People’s implicit theories of wisdom. In SternbergR. J.JordanJ. (Eds.), A handbook of wisdom: psychological perspectives (pp. 84–109). Cambridge University Press.
15.
BlumR. W. (2005). A case for school connectedness. Educational Leadership, 62(7), 16–20.
CainS. (2012). Quiet: the power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking. Crown.
19.
CallahanC. M.MoonT. R.OhS. (2017). Describing the status of programs for the gifted: A call for action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 20–49. https://doi.org/10.117/0162353216686215
20.
Chandra HandaM. (2013). Leading differentiated high performance learning. Australian Educational Leader, 35(3), 22–26.
Chandra HandaM. (2020). Examining students’ and teachers’ perceptions of differentiated practices, student engagement, and teacher qualities. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(4), 530–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20931457
23.
ChuaJ. (2019). Talent development in dance: Perspectives from gatekeepers in Hong Kong and Poland. In SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (Eds.), The psychology of high performance (pp. 291–300). American Psychological Association.
24.
CityE.ElmoreR.FiarmanS.TeitelL. (2009). Instructional rounds in education: A network approach to improving teaching and learning. Harvard Education Press.
CotabishA. (2017). Science curricular considerations for advanced learners. In VanTassel-BaskaJ.LittleC. A. (Eds.), Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners (pp. 277–302). Prufrock Press.
27.
DaiD. Y.ColemanL. J. (2005). Epilogue: Conclusions and implications for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(3–4), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2005-336
28.
DamonW. (2008). The path to purpose: How young people find their calling in life. Free Press.
DweckC. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
33.
DweckC. S. (2012). Mindsets and malleable minds: Implications for giftedness and talent. In SubotnikR. F.RobinsonA.CallahanC. M.JohnsonP. (Eds.), Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education (pp. 7–18). National Center for Research on Giftedness and Talent.
34.
EdmondsonR.WoernerM. H. (2019). Sociocultural foundations of wisdom. In SternbergR. J.GlückJ. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 40–68). Cambridge University Press.
35.
EricssonA.PoolR. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Mariner.
36.
FischerA. (2015). Wisdom – The answer to all the questions really worth asking. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(9), 73–83.
37.
FranklV. E. (2006). Man’s search for meaning. Beacon Press.
38.
GagnéF.McPhersonG. E. (2016). Analyzing musical prodigiousness using Gagné’s integrative model of talent development. In McPhersonG. E. (Ed.), Musical prodigies (pp. 3–114). Oxford University Press.
39.
GallagherS. A. (2015). Adapting problem-based learning for gifted students. In KarnesF. A.BeanS. M. (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 413–443). Prufrock Press.
40.
GierczykM.PfeifferS. I. (2021). The impact of school environment on talent development: A retrospective view of gifted British and Polish college students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(4), 567–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211034909
41.
GlückJ.BluckS.WeststrateN. M. (2019). More on the MORE life experience model: What we have learned (so far). The Journal of Value Inquiry, 53(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1077/s10790-108-9661-x
42.
GoddardR.GoddardY.KimE.MillerR. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 467–476.
43.
HertzogN. B. (2017). Designing the learning context in school for talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217705712
44.
Hmelo-SilverC. E.DeSimoneC. (2013). Problem-based learning: An instructional model of collaborative learning. In Hmelo-SilverC. E.ChinnC. A.ChanC. K. K.O’DonnellA. M. (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 370–385). Routledge.
45.
HopkinsD.BaumberJ. (2019). Getting to the heart of system reform – A micro strategy for large scale educational change. Educationalfutures, 10(2), 3–27.
IntezariA.PauleenD. J. (2013). Students of wisdom: An integral meta-competencies theory of practical wisdom. In KüpersW.PauleenD. J. (Eds.), A handbook of practical wisdom: Leadership, organization and integral business practice (pp. 156–174). Taylor & Francis.
48.
JesteD. V.ArdeltM.BlazerD.KraemerH. C.VaillantG.MeeksT. W. (2010). Expert consensus on characteristics of wisdom: A Delphi method study. The Gerontologist, 50(5), 668–680. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq022
49.
JesteD. V.ThomasM. L.LiuJ.DalyR. E.TuX. M.TreichlerE. B. H.PalmerB. W.LeeE. E. (2021). Is spirituality a component of wisdom? Study of 1,786 adults using expanded San Diego Wisdom Scale (Jeste-Thomas Wisdom Index). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 132(January), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.09.033
50.
KanevskyL.KeighleyT. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredomand honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554235
51.
KaramiS.GhahremaniM.Parra-MartinezF. A.GentryM. (2020). A polyhedron model of wisdom: A systematic review of the wisdom studies in psychology, management and leadership, and education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815263
52.
KotterJ. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
53.
KramerD. A. (2000). Wisdom as a classical source of human strength: Conceptualization and empirical inquiry. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2000.19.1.83
54.
KriselS. C. (2018). Programming for talent development inside of school. In Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C. (Eds.), Talent development as a framework for gifted education (pp. 43–62). Prufrock Press.
55.
KunzmannU. (2004). Approaches to a good life: The emotional-motivational side to wisdom. In LinleyP. A.JosephS. (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 504–517). Wiley.
LeiderR. J. (2015). The power of purpose: Find meaning, live longer, better. Berrett-Koehler.
58.
LeithwoodK.LouisK. S. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. Jossey-Bass.
59.
LeppienJ. H. (2018). The parallel curriculum model. In CallahanC. M.Hertberg-DavisH. L. (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 322–332). Routledge.
MaslowA. H. (1998). Toward a psychology of being (3rd ed.). Wiley.
62.
Mora-FloresE.KaplanS. N. (2022). Interdisciplinary learning: Connecting language and literacy across the curriculum. Gifted Child Today, 45(2), 110–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762110708345
63.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2015). The role of out-of-school programs in talent development for secondary students. In DixonF. A.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (pp. 261–282). Prufrock Press.
64.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C.WardmanJ.TanL. S.LeeS.-Y. (2021). Sociocultural perspectives on the talent development megamodel. In SmithS. R. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-pacific (pp. 101–127). Springer.
65.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF.SubotnikR. F. (2018). The role of the family in talent development. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), APA Handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 465–477). American Psychological Association.
66.
OppongE.ShoreB. M.MuisK. R. (2019). Clarifying the connections among giftedness, metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Implications for theory and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(2), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218814008
67.
ParkN.PetersonC. (2008). The cultivation of character strengths. In FerrariM.PotworowskiG. (Eds.), Teaching for wisdom (pp. 59–77). Springer.
68.
PatrickH.GentryM.OwenS. V. (2006). Motivation and gifted adolescents. In DixonF. A.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (pp. 165–189). Prufrock Press.
69.
PluckerJ.BarberH. (2021). Talent development plans help guide consistent, equitable service delivery. Gifted Child Today, 44(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520963673
70.
PreckelF.GolleJ.GrabnerR.JarvinL.KozbeltA.MullensiefenD.Olszewski-KubiliusP.SchneiderW.SubotnikR.VockM.WorrellF. (2020). Talent development in achievement domains: A psychological framework for within- and cross-domain research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 691–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895030
71.
PregotM. V. (2021). Principals’ depth of perception of knowledge on special education programs: How much do they really know?International Journal of Educational Reform, 30(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056787920967114
72.
RenzulliJ. S. (2016). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. In ReisS. M. (Ed.), Reflections on gifted education: Critical works by Joseph M. Renzulli and colleagues (pp. 31–54). Prufrock Press.
RinnA.CrutchfieldK. (2021). Developing psychosocial skills at school. In RobbinsJ. H.JollyJ. L.KarnesF. A.BeanS. M. (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 81–100). Routledge.
75.
RobinsonV.GrayE. (2019). What difference does school leadership make to student outcomes?Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 49(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2019.1582075
76.
ŚarmaV. (1993). The Panćatantra (C. Rajan, Trans.). Penguin. (Original work published ca. 200 B.C.E.).
77.
SchleicherA. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-centruy school system. OECD.
SiskD. A. (2022). Managing emotional intensities of gifted students in interdisciplinary study. Gifted Child Today, 45(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175211071006
82.
SmithE. E. (2017). The power of meaning: Crafting a life that matters. Rider.
83.
StaudingerU. M.LopezD. F.BaltesP. B. (1997). The psychometric location of wisdom-related performance: Intelligence, personality, and more?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(11), 1200–1214. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672972311007
84.
SternbergR. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge University Press.
SternbergR. J. (2001). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36(4), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3604_2
88.
SternbergR. J. (2005). The WICS model of giftedness. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 327–342). Cambridge University Press.
89.
SternbergR. J. (2019). Race to Samarra: The critical importance of wisdom in the world today. In SternbergR. J.GlückJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 3–9). Cambridge University Press.
90.
SternbergR. J. (2020). Transformational giftedness. In CrossT. L.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (Eds.), Conceptual frameworks for giftedness and talent development (pp. 203–243). Prufrock Press.
91.
SternbergR. J. (2022). Identification for utilization, not merely possession, of gifts: What matters is not gifts but rather deployment of gifts. Gifted Education International, 38(3), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211013345
SternbergR. J.ReznitskayaA.JarvinL. (2007). Teaching for wisdom: What matters is not just what students know, but how they use it. London Review of Education, 5(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460701440830
97.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
98.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. (2018). Talent development as the most promising focus of giftedness and gifted education. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), APA Handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 231–245). American Psychological Association.
99.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. (2019). High performance: The central psychological mechanism for talent development. In SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (Eds.), The psychology of high performance (pp. 7–20). American Psychological Association.
100.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. (2021). The talent development megamodel: A domain-specific conceptual framework based on the psychology of high performance. In SternbergR. J.AmbroseD. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 425–442). Palgrave Macmillan.
101.
SubotnikR. F.JarvinL. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 343–357). Cambridge University Press.
102.
TannenbaumA. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. Macmillan.
103.
TannenbaumA. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychological approach. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21–52). Cambridge University Press.
104.
TimperleyH.EllF.Le FevreD.TwyfordK. (2020). Leading professional learning: Practical strategies for impact in schools. ACER Press.
105.
TimperleyH.KaserL.HalbertJ. (2014). Seminar series 234: A framework for transforming learning in schools: Innovation and the spiral of inquiry. CSE.
106.
TimperleyH.WilsonA.BarrarH.FungI. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. New Zealand Ministry of Education.
107.
TomlinsonC. A.AllanS. D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. ASCD.
108.
TomlinsonC. A.KaplanS. N.RenzulliJ. S.PurcellJ. H.LeppienJ. H.BurnsD. E.StricklandC. A.ImbeauM. B. (2009). The parallel curriculum (multimedia kit): A design to develop learner potential and challenge advanced learners. Corwin press.
109.
TreffingerD. J.FeldhusenJ. F. (1996). Talent recognition and development: Successor to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329601900205
110.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (2022). Talent development actualized. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. (Ed.), Talent development in gifted education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 243–264). Routledge.
111.
WebsterJ. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.65.2.d
112.
WeststrateN. M.BluckS.GlückJ. (2019). Wisdom of the crowd. In SternbergR. J.GlückJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 97–121). Cambridge University Press.
113.
WorrellF. C. (2018). Motivation: A critical lever for talent development. In Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. (Eds.), Talent development as a framework for gifted education: Implications for best practices and applications in schools (pp. 253–280). Prufrock Press.
114.
WorrellF. C.SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2018). Talent development: A path toward eminence. In PfeifferS. I.Shaunessy-DedrickE.Foley-NicponM. (Eds.), APA Handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 247–258). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-016
115.
WorrellF. C.SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2021). Giftedness and eminence: Clarifying the relationship. Gifted and Talented International, 36(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2022.2049461
ZoharA.BarzilaiS. (2015). Metacognition and teaching higher order thinking (HOT) in science education: Students’ learning, teachers’ knowledge and instructional practices. In WegerifR.LiL.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking (pp. 229–242). Routledge.
