This study aimed to evaluate whether cognitive and affective dimensions of reading self-concepts in English and Russian are distinct constructs and to examine whether the relationships among cognitive and affective variables are invariant across gender. A total of 349 tenth-grade Azeri students were selected from 12 schools in Baku, Azerbaijan. This study adapted the Self-Description Questionnaire and Cényelvi mérés for assessment of reading self-concepts and achievements in two foreign languages. The results of structural equation modeling demonstrated that cognitive and affective self-concepts were independent, but strongly interrelated constructs. The separated components of the reading self-concept construct showed a more explicit structure than a conflated model. The relationships among cognitive and affective self-concepts with achievements in the reading domain were invariant across gender. The results of this study can encourage future research on the examination of more domain-specific self-concepts that conceptualizes twofold multidimensional structure.
Abu-HilalM. M. (2005). Generality of self-perception models in Arab culture: Result from ten years of research. In MarshH.CravenR.McInerneyD. (Eds.), The new frontiers of self research (pp. 157–196). Information Age Publishing.
2.
Abu-HilalM. M.AbdelfattahF. A.AlshumraniS. A.AbduljabbarA. S.MarshH. W. (2013). Construct validity of self-concept in TIMSS’s student background questionnaire: A test of separation and conflation of cognitive and affective dimensions of self-concept among Saudi eighth graders. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 1201–1220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0162-1
3.
ArensA. K.JansenM. (2016). Self-concepts in reading, writing, listening and speaking: A multidimensional and hierarchical structure and its generalizability across native and foreign languages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 646–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000081
4.
ArensA. K.JansenM.PreckelF.SchmidtI.BrunnerM. (2020). The structure of academic self-concept: A methodological review and empirical illustration of central models. Review of Educational Research, 10(20), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320972186
5.
ArensA. K.YeungA. S.CravenR. G.HasselhornM. (2011). The twofold multidimensionality of academic self-concept: Domain specificity and separation between competence and affect components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 970–981. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025047
6.
ArensA. K.YeungA. S.CravenR. G.HasselhornM. (2013). A short German version of the Self-Description Questionnaire I: Theoretical and empirical comparability. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 36(4), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.710503
7.
ArensA. K.YeungA. S.HasselhornM. (2014). Native language self-concept and reading self-concept: Same or different?Journal of Experimental Education, 82(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.813362
8.
AunolaK.LeskinenE.Onatsu-ArvilommiT.NurmiJ.-E. (2002). Three methods for studying developmental change: A case of reading skills and self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902320634447
9.
BongM. (1998). Tests of the internal/external frames of reference model with subject-specific academic self-efficacy and frame-specific academic self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.102
10.
BongM.SkaalvikE. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382
11.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
12.
CalsynR. J.KennyD. A. (1977). Self-concept of ability and perceived evaluation of others: Cause or effect of academic achievement?Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.69.2.136
ChapmanJ. W.TunmerW. E. (1995). Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.154
15.
ChapmanJ. W.TunmerW. E. (1997). A longitudinal study of beginning reading achievement and reading self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01244.x
16.
ChapmanJ. W.TunmerW. E. (2003). Reading difficulties, reading-related self-perceptions, and strategies for overcoming negative self-beliefs. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308205
17.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
18.
ChenF. F.SousaK. H.WestS. G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(3), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_7
19.
ConradiK.JangB. G.McKennaM. C. (2014). Motivation terminology in reading research: A conceptual review. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 127–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9245-z
20.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
21.
CsapóB. (2014). A szegedi iskolai longitudinális program [The Hungarian educational longitudinal program]. In PálJ.VajdaZ. (Eds.), Szegedi Egyetemi Tudástár 7Bölcsészet- és társadalomtudományok (pp. 117–166). Szegedi Egyetemi Kiadó.
22.
CsapóB.MolnárG. (2019). Online diagnostic assessment in support of personalized teaching and learning: The eDia System. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01522
23.
CsapóB.NikolovM. (2009). The cognitive contribution to the development of proficiency in a foreign language. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.01.002
24.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
25.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213003
26.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
27.
HanF. (2019). Self-concept and achievement in math among Australian primary students: Gender and cultural issues. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00603
28.
HansfordB. C.HattieJ. A. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170275
29.
HuL.-T.BentlerP. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Sage.
30.
IrwingP. (1996). Evaluative and affective dimensions of self-concept: A test of construct validity using structural equations modeling. Psychological Reports, 79(3), 1127–1138. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1996.79.3f.1127
31.
JacobsJ. E.LanzaS.OsgoodD. W.EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grade one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00421
32.
JansenM. F.SchererR.SchroedersU. (2015). Students’ self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations to antecedents and educational outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.002
33.
KasperskiR.ShanyM.KatzirT. (2016). The role of RAN and reading rate in predicting reading self-concept. Reading and Writing, 29, 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9582-z
34.
KatzirT.LesauxN. K.KimY.-S. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9112-8
35.
KlineR. B. (2005). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
36.
LafontineD.DupontV.JaegersD.SchillingsP. (2019). Self-concept in reading: Factor structure, cross-cultural invariance and relationships with reading achievement in an international context (PIRLS 2011). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.11.005
37.
MarshH. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129–149. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00028312023001129
38.
MarshH. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.417
39.
MarshH. W. (1990). Self-Description Questionnaire–II manual. University of Western Sydney.
40.
MarshH. W. (1993). The multidimensional structure of academic self-concept: Invariance over gender and age. American Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 841–860. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163206
41.
MarshH. W.AyotteV. (2003). Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.687
42.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In PhyeG. D. (Ed.), Educational psychology series. Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 131–198). Academic Press.
43.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 133–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x
44.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G.DebusR. (1998). Structure, stability, and development of young children’s self-concepts: A multicohort-multioccasion study. Child Development, 69, 1030–1053. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06159.x
45.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G.DebusR. (1999). Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: A developmental perspective. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45(4), 567–601. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23093373?seq=1
46.
MarshH. W.HattieJ. (1996). Theoretical perspectives on the structure of self-concept. In BrackenB. A. (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 38–90). John Wiley.
MarshH. W.HauK.-T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal/external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.56
49.
MarshH. W.HauK.-T.GraysonD. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In Maydeu-OlivaresA.McArdleJ. J. (Eds.), Multivariate applications book series. Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
MarshH. W.KöllerO. (2004). Unification of theoretical models of academic self-concept/achievement relations: Reunification of east and west German school systems after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00034-1
51.
MarshH. W.KuyperH.Seaton ParkerP. D.MorinA. J. S.MöllerJ.AbduljabbarA. S. (2014). Dimensional comparison theory: An extension of the internal/external frame of reference effect on academic self-concept formation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.003
52.
MarshH. W.MartinA. J.HauK.-T. (2006). A multimethod perspective on self-concept research in educational psychology: A construct validity approach. In EidM.DienerE. (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 441–456). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11383-030
53.
MarshH. W.ParkerP. D.GuoJ.PekrunR.BasarkodG. (2020). Psychological comparison processes and self-concept in relation to five distinct frames of reference effects: Pan-human cross-cultural generalizability over 68 countries. European Journal of Personality, 34, 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2232
MarshH. W.XuM.MartinA. J. (2012). Self-concept: A synergy of theory, method, and application. In HarrisK. R. G.UrdanT.McCormickC. B.SinatraG. M.SwellerJ. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 427–458). American Psychological Association.
56.
MarshH. W.YeungA. S. (1997). Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.41
57.
MarshH. W.YeungA. S. (1998). Longitudinal structural equation models of academic self-concept and achievement: Gender differences in the development of math and English constructs. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 705–738. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163464
58.
MillsapR. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. Routledge.
59.
Ministry of Education of Azerbaijan Republic. (2010). The new curriculum of state standards of specific subject programs (Decision 103). Ministry of Education of Azerbaijan Republic. http://www.e-qanun.az/framework/19682
MöllerJ.PohlmannB. (2010). Achievement differences and self-concept differences: Stronger associations for above or below average students?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3). https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X485234
62.
MöllerJ.PohlmannB.KöllerO.MarshH. W. (2009). A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1129–1167. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0034654309337522
63.
MöllerJ.RetelsdorfJ.KöllerO.MarshH. W. (2011). The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model an integration of models of relations between academic achievement and self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1315–1346. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0002831211419649
64.
MorganP. L.FuchsD. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children’s reading skills and reading motivation?Exceptional Children, 73(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300203
NikolovM.SzabóG. (2015). A study on Hungarian 6th and 8th graders’ proficiency in English and German at dual-language schools. In HallóD.KárolyK. (Eds.), Inspirations in foreign language teaching: Studies in applied linguistics. Language pedagogy and language teaching (pp. 184–206). Pearson Education.
67.
PajaresF.MillerM. D.JohnsonM. J. (1999). Gender differences in writing self-beliefs of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.50
68.
ParkerP. D.MarshH. W.CiarrochiJ.MarshallS.AbduljabbarA. S. (2014). Juxtaposing math self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.797339
69.
PinxtenM.MarshH. W.De FraineB.Van Den NoortgateW.Van DammeJ. (2014). Enjoying mathematics or feeling competent in mathematics? Reciprocal effects on mathematics achievement and perceived math effort expenditure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12028
70.
RaykovT. (2009). Evaluation of scale reliability for unidimensional measures using latent variable modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42(3), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175609344096
71.
RetelsdorfJ.KöllerO.MöllerJ. (2011). On the effects of motivation on reading performance growth in secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.11.001
72.
RetelsdorfJ.KöllerO.MöllerJ. (2014). Reading achievement and reading self-concept—Testing the reciprocal effects model. Learning and Instruction, 29, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.004
73.
RutkowskiL.GonzalezE.JoncasM.von DavierM. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10363170
74.
SassD. A.SchmittT. A. (2013). Testing measurement and structural invariance. In TeoT. (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methods for educational research (pp. 315–345). Sense Publishers.
75.
SchiefeleU.SchaffnerE.MöllerJ.WigfieldA. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030
76.
ShafiyevaU.KennedyS. (2010). English as a foreign language in Azerbaijan: English teaching in the post-Soviet era. English Today, 26(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078409990629
77.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/1170010
78.
ShavelsonR. J.MarshH. W. (1986). On the structure of self-concept. In SchwarzerR. (Ed.), Anxiety and cognitions (pp. 305–330). Lawrence Erlbaum.
79.
ValentineJ. C.DuBoisD. L.CooperH. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3
80.
WangJ.WangX. (2020). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus (2nd ed.). John Wiley.
81.
WarmT. A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54, 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294627
82.
WigfieldA.GuthrieJ. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
83.
WigfieldA.KarpathianM. (1991). Who am I and what can I do? Children’s self-concepts and motivation in achievement situations. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 233–261. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_3
84.
WuM. L.AdamsR. J.WilsonM. R.HaldaneS. A. (2007). ACER ConQuest version 2.0: Generalised item response modelling software [Computer software]. ACER Press.
85.
XuM. K.MarshH. W.HauK. T.HoI. T.MorinA. S. J.AbduljabbarA. S. (2013). The internal/external frame of reference of academic self-concept: Extension to a foreign language and the role of language of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 489–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031333
86.
YangL.ArensA. K.WatkinsD. A. (2014). Testing the twofold multidimensionality of academic self-concept: A study with Chinese vocational students. Educational Psychology, 36(9), 1651–1669. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.995597
87.
YeungA. S.WongE. K. P. (2004). Domain specificity of trilingual teachers’ verbal self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 360–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.360
