Parent Engagement in Identifying and Serving Diverse Gifted Students: What Is the Role of Leadership?

Abstract

Parents play a vital role in identifying and cultivating talent for diverse gifted children but their experiences with schools and educational leaders are rarely studied. To examine parent perspectives on identifying and serving diverse gifted students, we conducted six focus groups with 39 parents of K-12 children from culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse backgrounds (CLED), and/or identified as twice exceptional (2E). Thematic analysis and its six-phase approach was used to analyze data. We found (a) that the majority of parents advocated for their gifted and talented children, (b) a lack of consistent and comprehensive strategies by educational leaders to promote parent engagement, (c) disproportionate communication from district leaders rendered engagement efforts less effective, (d) GT identification remained problematic to some parents, and (e) front line educators served a critical role in the bilateral relationship between school and family. Implications are discussed for researchers and educational leaders.

Keywords

identification parents underrepresentation gifted leadership diversity qualitative twice-exceptional

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Hroub

Whitebread

(2019). Dynamic assessment for identification of twice-exceptional learners exhibiting mathematical giftedness and specific learning disabilities. Roeper Review, 41(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1585396

Atwood

E. D.

(2018). Understanding school and community contexts: Leading for success along the Texas-Mexico border. Journal of Curriculum, Teaching, Learning and Leadership in Education, 3(1), Article 2. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/ctlle/vol3/iss1/2

Atwood

E. D.

Jimerson

J. B.

Holt

(2019). Equity-oriented data use: Identifying and addressing food insecurity at Copper Springs Middle School. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 22(3), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458919859932

Auerbach

(2010). Beyond coffee with the principal: Toward leadership for authentic school–family Partnerships. Journal of School Leadership, 20(6), 728–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461002000603

Auerbach

(Ed.). (2012). School leadership for authentic family and community partnerships: Research perspectives for transforming practice. Routledge.

Benner

A. D.

Boyle

A. E.

Sadler

(2016). Parental involvement and adolescents’ educational success: The role of prior achievement and socioeconomic status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0431-4

Bennett

J. V.

Ylimaki

R. M.

Dugan

T. M.

Brunderman

L. A.

(2014). Developing the potential for sustainable improvement in underperforming schools: Capacity building in the socio-cultural dimension. Journal of Educational Change, 15(4), 377–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-013-9217-6

Bernal

E. M.

(2001). Three ways to achieve a more equitable representation of culturally and linguistically different students in GT programs. Roeper Review, 24(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190209554134

Bertrand

Freelon

Rogers

(2018). Elementary principals’ social construction of parents of color and working-class parents: Disrupting or reproducing conflicting and deficit orientations of education policy? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26, Article 102. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3546

10.

Bertrand

Rodela

K. C.

(2018). A framework for rethinking educational leadership in the margins: Implications for social justice leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(1), 10–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775117739414

11.

Besnoy

K. D.

Swoszowski

N. C.

Newman

J. L.

Floyd

Jones

Byrne

(2015). The advocacy experiences of parents of elementary age, twice-exceptional children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(2), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215569275

12.

Bogotch

I. E.

(2002). Educational leadership and social justice: Practice into theory. Journal of School Leadership, 12(2), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460201200203

13.

Bolívar

J. M.

Chrispeels

J. H.

(2011). Enhancing parent leadership through building social and intellectual capital. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 4–38. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210366466

14.

Boonk

Gijselaers

H. J. M.

Ritzen

Brand-Gruwel

(2018). A review of the relationship between parental involvement indicators and academic achievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.001

15.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

16.

Brooks

J. S.

(2012). Black school, White school: Racism and educational (mis) leadership. Teachers College Press.

17.

Card

Giuliano

(2016). Universal screening increases the representation of low income and minority students in gifted education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 13678–13683. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160504311

18.

Clarke

Braun

Hayfield

(2015). Thematic analysis. In Smith

J. A.

(Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed., pp. 222–248). SAGE.

19.

Cooper

C. W.

(2009). Performing cultural work in demographically changing schools: Implications for expanding transformative leadership frameworks. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(5), 694–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X09341639

20.

Crenshaw

K. W.

(2017). On intersectionality: Essential writings. The New Press.

21.

Dantley

M. E.

(2005). African American spirituality and Cornel West’s notions of prophetic pragmatism: Restructuring educational leadership in American urban schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(4), 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04274274

22.

Dantley

M. E.

Green

T. L.

(2015). Problematizing notions of leadership for social justice: Reclaiming social justice through a discourse of accountability and a radical, prophetic, and historical imagination. Journal of School Leadership, 25(5), 820–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500502

23.

Dare

Nowicki

E. A.

(2015). Twice-exceptionality: Parents’ perspectives on 2e identification. Roeper Review, 37(4), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1077911

24.

Epstein

J. L.

(2001). Introduction to the special section. New directions for school, family, and community partnerships in middle and high schools. NASSP Bulletin, 85(627), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650108562701

25.

Epstein

J. L.

Salinas

K. C.

(2004). Partnering with families and communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 121–129.

26.

Esquierdo

J. J.

Arreguín-Anderson

(2012). The “invisible” gifted and talented bilingual students: A current report on enrollment in GT programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353211432041

27.

Ezzani

M. D.

(2015). Coherent district reform: A case study of two California school districts. Cogent Education, 2(1), Article 1018698. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1018698

28.

Ezzani

M. D.

(2019). Principal and teacher instructional leadership: A cultural shift. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(3), 576–585.

29.

Ezzani

M. D.

Brooks

M. C.

(2015). (Mis)understanding Islam in a suburban Texas school district. Religion and Education, 42(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2015.1013408

30.

Ezzani

M. D.

Mun

R. U.

Lee

L. E.

(2021). District leaders focused on systemic equity in identification and services for gifted education: From policy to practice. Roeper Review, 43(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.1881853

31.

Foley-Nicpon

Assouline

S. G.

Colangelo

(2013). Twice-exceptional learners: Who needs to know what? Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490021

32.

Ford

D. Y.

Grantham

T. C.

(2003). Providing access for culturally diverse gifted students: From deficit to dynamic thinking. Theory Into Practice, 42(3), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4203_8

33.

Galloway

M. K.

Ishimaru

A. M.

(2015). Radical recentering: Equity in educational leadership standards. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(3), 372–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15590658

34.

Geller

J. D.

Doykos

Craven

Bess

K. D.

Nation

(2014). Engaging residents in community change: The critical role of trust in the development of a Promise Neighborhood. Teachers College Record, 116, 1–42.

35.

Gillborn

(2015). Intersectionality, critical race theory, and the primacy of racism: Race, class, gender, and disability in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414557827

36.

Grantham

T. C.

(2005). Parent advocacy for culturally diverse gifted students. Theory Into Practice, 44(2), 138–147. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3497032

37.

Green

T. L.

(2015). Leading for urban school reform and community development. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 679–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15577694

38.

Guba

E. G.

(1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777

39.

Hamilton

McCoach

D. B.

Tutwiler

S. M.

Siegle

Gubbins

E. J.

Callahan

C. M.

Brodersen

A. V.

Mun

R. U.

(2018). Disentangling the roles of institutional and individual poverty in the identification of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738053

40.

Hertzog

N. B.

Bennet

(2004). In whose eyes? Parents’ perspectives on the learning needs of their gifted children. Roeper Review, 26(2), 96–104.

41.

Hertzog

N. B.

Mun

R. U.

DuRuz

Holliday

A. A.

(2018). Identification of strengths and talents in young children. In Pfeiffer

S. I.

Shaunessy-Dedrick

Foley-Nicpon

(Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 301–316). APA Books.

42.

Hodges

Tay

Maeda

Gentry

(2018). A meta-analysis of gifted and talented identification Practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752107

43.

Horsford

S. D.

Holmes-Sutton

T. F.

(2012). Parent and family engagement: The missing piece in urban education reform (The Lincy Institute Policy Brief Education Series No. 2). https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/lincy_publications/15

44.

Horsford

S. D.

Sampson

(2014). Promise neighborhoods: The promise and politics of community capacity building as urban school reform. Urban Education, 49(8), 955–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914557645

45.

Huff

R. E.

Houskamp

B. M.

Watkins

A. V.

Stanton

Tavegia

(2005). The experiences of parents of gifted African American children: A phenomenological study. Roeper Review, 27(4), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190509554321

46.

Ishimaru

A. M.

(2013). From heroes to organizers: Principals and education organizing in urban school reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(1), 3–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12448250

47.

Ishimaru

A. M.

(2019). From family engagement to equitable collaboration. Educational Policy, 33(2), 350–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817691841

48.

Jolly

J. L.

Matthews

M. S.

(2014). Parenting. In Plucker

J. A.

Callahan

C. M.

(Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 481–492). Prufrock Press.

49.

Jonsen

Jehn

K. A.

(2009). Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 4(2), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640910978391

50.

Khalifa

(2018). Race and education series. Culturally responsive school leadership. Harvard Education Press.

51.

Krueger

R. A.

Casey

M. A.

(2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE.

52.

Kyzar

Jimerson

J. B.

(2018). Bridging the school-home divide in the middle grades: A process for strengthening school-family partnerships. Middle School Journal, 49(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2018.1399331

53.

Lockhart

Mun

R. U.

(2020). Developing a strong home-school connection to better identify and serve culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 43(4), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520940743

54.

Lomotey

(1989). African-American principals: School leadership and success (No. 124). Greenwood Publishing Group.

55.

Lopez

G. R.

Scribner

J. D.

Mahitivanichcha

(2001). Redefining parental involvement: Lessons from high-performing migrant-impacted schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 253–288. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002253

56.

Maddocks

D. L. S.

(2018). The identification of students who are gifted and have a learning disability: A comparison of different diagnostic criteria. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752096

57.

Martınez

E. A.

(1988). Child behavior in Mexican-American/Chicano families: Maternal teaching and child rearing practices. Family Relations, 37(3), 275–280.

58.

Martinez

Wizer-Vecchi

(2016). Fostering family engagement through shared leadership in the district, schools, and community. Voices in Urban Education, 44, 6–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/584562

59.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

60.

Miller

Wills

Scanlan

(2013). Educational leadership and the social frontier: Developing Promise Neighborhoods in urban and tribal settings. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(4), 543–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12471531

61.

Moll

Amanti

Neff

Gonzalez

(1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534

62.

Mun

R. U.

Ezzani

M. D.

Lee

L. E.

(2020). Culturally responsive leadership in gifted education: A systematic literature review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 43(2), 108–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220912009

63.

Mun

R. U.

Ezzani

M. D.

Lee

L. E.

Ottwein

J. K.

(2021). Building systemic capacity to improve identification and services in gifted education: A case study of one district. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(2), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0016986220967376

64.

Mun

R. U.

Hemmler

Langley

S. D.

Ware

Gubbins

E. J.

Callahan

C. M.

McCoach

D. B.

Siegle

(2020). Identifying and serving English Learners in gifted education: Looking back and moving forward. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 43(4), 297–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220955230

65.

Mun

R. U.

Hertzog

N. B.

(2019). The influence of parental and self-expectations on Asian American women who entered college early. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(2), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218823559

66.

Mun

R. U.

Langley

S. D.

Ware

Gubbins

E. J.

Siegle

Callahan

C. M.

McCoach

D. B.

Hamilton

(2016, December). Effective practices for identifying and serving English Learners in gifted education: A systematic review of the literature. National Center for Research on Gifted Education.

67.

Nyumba

Wilson

Derrick

C. J.

Mukherjee

(2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860

68.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Corwith

(2018). Poverty, academic achievement, and giftedness: A literature review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738015

69.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Lee

Thomson

(2014). Family environment and social development in gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214526430

70.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Steenbergen-Hu

(2017). Blending research-based practices and practice-embedded research: Project Excite closes achievement and excellence gaps for underrepresented gifted minority students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701836

71.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

Subotnik

R. F.

(2018). The role of the family in talent development. In Pfeiffer

S. I.

Shaunessy-Dedrick

Foley-Nicpon

(Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 465–477). APA Books.

72.

Owens

C. M.

Ford

D. Y.

Lisbon

A. J.

Owens

M. T.

(2016). Shifting paradigms to better serve twice-exceptional African-American learners. Behavioral Disorders, 41(4), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.17988/bedi-41-04-196-208.1

73.

Park

Foley-Nicpon

Choate

Bolenbaugh

(2018). “Nothing fits exactly”: Experiences of Asian American parents of twice-exceptional children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(3), 306–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218758442

74.

Plucker

J. A.

Peters

S. J.

(2016). Excellence gaps in education. Harvard Education Press.

75.

Rinn

A. N.

Mun

R. U.

Hodges

(2020). 2018-2019 state of the states in gifted education. National Association for Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. https://www.nagc.org/2018-2019-state-states-gifted-education

76.

Rubenstein

L. D.

Schelling

Wilczynski

S. M.

Hooks

E. N.

(2015). Lived experiences of parents of gifted students with Autism Spectrum Disorder: The struggle to find appropriate educational experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215592193

77.

Salinas

K. C.

Jansorn

N. R.

(2003). Promising partnership practices 2003. Center on School, Family, and Community Partnerships, Johns Hopkins University.

78.

Sanders

(2009). Collaborating for change: How an urban school district and a community-based organization support and sustain school, family, and community partnerships. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1693–1712.

79.

Shenton

A. K.

(2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201

80.

Shirley

(1997). Community organizing for urban school reform. University of Texas Press.

81.

Siegle

Gubbins

E. J.

O’Rourke

Langley

S. D.

Mun

R. U.

Luria

S. R.

Little

C. A.

McCoach

D. B.

Knupp

Callahan

C. M.

Plucker

J. A.

(2016). Barriers to underserved students’ participation in gifted programs and possible solutions. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216640930

82.

Tillman

L. C.

(2004). (Un) intended consequences? The impact of the Brown v. Board of Education decision on the employment status of Black educators. Education and Urban Society, 36(3), 280–303. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013124504264360

83.

U.S. Department of Education. (2014). The dual capacity-building framework for family-school partnerships. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

84.

Valencia

R. R.

(2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Routledge.

85.

Valencia

R. R.

(Ed.). (2012). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Routledge.

86.

Walker

V. S.

(2000). Valued segregated schools for African American children in the South, 1935–1969: A review of common themes and characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 253–285. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003253

87.

Wang

C. W.

Neihart

(2015). How do supports from parents, teachers, and peers influence academic achievement of twice-exceptional students. Gifted Child Today, 38(3), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217515583742

88.

Warren

M. R.

(2005). Communities and schools: A new view of urban education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 75, 133–173.

89.

Yosso

T. J.

(2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006

90.

Young

M. H.

Balli

S. J.

(2014). Gifted and talented education (GATE): Student and parent perspectives. Gifted Child Today, 37(4), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514544030