Despite the explosive growth in stereotype threat (ST) research over the decades, a substantive amount of variability in ST effects still cannot be explained by extant research. While some attribute this unexplained heterogeneity to yet unidentified ST mechanisms, we explored an alternate hypothesis that ST theory is often misspecified in experimental research design, which introduces experimental noise (and hence variability) in stereotype threat effects unlikely to be explained by extant moderators. This study used multilevel meta-analysis to examine the impact of ST misspecification in research design on ST outcomes. Results revealed that ST effects were artificially inflated in studies that failed to include essential conditions necessary for its occurrence. Because most studies in the meta-analysis had either excluded or partially included these conditions, findings from this study suggest that ST effects on women’s performance might be smaller than previously reported in primary and secondary (meta-analytic) studies.
AmbadyN.PaikS. K.SteeleJ.Owen-SmithA.MitchellJ. P. (2004). Deflecting negative self-relevant stereotype activation: The effects of individuation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.08.003
2.
American Association of University Women. (2010). Why so few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509653
AndersonB. M.MartinJ. A. (2018). What K-12 teachers need to know about teaching gifted black girls battling perfectionism and stereotype threat. Gifted Child Today, 41(3), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518768339
5.
AndersonR. D. (2001). Stereotype threat: The effects of gender identification on standardized test performance [Doctoral dissertation]. James Madison University.
6.
AramovichN. P. (2014). The effect of stereotype threat on group versus individual performance. Small Group Research, 45(2), 176–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414523508
7.
ArmentaB. (2010). Stereotype boost and stereotype threat effects: The moderating role of ethnic identification. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(1), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017564
8.
AronsonJ.FriedC. B.GoodC. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
9.
BakkerM.van DijkA.WichertsJ. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459060
10.
BakkerM.WichertsJ. M. (2011). The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 666–678. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0089-5
11.
BeasleyM. A.FischerM. J. (2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 15(4), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9185-3
12.
BeggC. B.MazumdarM. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446
13.
BeilockS. L.RydellR. J.McConnellA. R. (2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.256
BrodishA. B.DevineP. G. (2009). The role of performance avoidance goals and worry in mediating the relationship between stereotype threat and performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.005
16.
BrownR. P.PinelE. C. (2003). Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 626–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00039-8
17.
BurnetteJ. L.PollackJ. M.HoytC. L. (2010). Individual differences in implicit theories of leadership ability and self-efficacy: Predicting responses to stereotype threat. Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(4), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.20138
CadinuM.MaassA.FrigerioS.ImpagliazzoL.LatinottiS. (2003). Stereotype threat: The effect of expectancy on performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.145
20.
CadinuM.MaassA.LombardoM.FrigerioS. (2006). Stereotype threat: The moderating role of locus of control beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.303
21.
CadinuM.MaassA.RosabiancaA.KiesnerJ. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking. Psychological Science, 16(7), 572–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01577.x
22.
CampbellS. M.CollaerM. L. (2009). Stereotype threat and gender differences in performance on a novel visuospatial task. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(4), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01521.x
23.
ChalabaevA.MajorB.SarrazinP.CuryF. (2012). When avoiding failure improves performance: Stereotype threat and the impact of performance goals. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9241-x
24.
ChenX.SoldnerM. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf
25.
CherneyI. D.CampbellK. L. (2011). A league of their own: Do single-sex schools increase girls’ participation in the physical sciences?Sex Roles, 65(9–10), 712–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0013-6
CottingD. I. (2003). Shedding light in the black box of stereotype threat: The role of emotion [Unpublished dissertation]. City University of New York.
28.
CrispR. J.BacheL. M.MaitnerA. T. (2009). Dynamics of social comparison in counter-stereotypic domains: Stereotype boost, not stereotype threat, for women engineering majors. Social Influence, 4(3), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510802607953
29.
CullenM. J.HardisonC. M.SackettP. R. (2004). Using SAT-grade and ability-job performance relationships to test predictions derived from stereotype threat theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.220
30.
DeemerE. D.LinC.SotoC. (2016). Stereotype threat and women’s science motivation: Examining the disidentification effect. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(4), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715616064
31.
DennehyT. C.Ben-ZeevA.TanigawaN. (2014). “Be prepared”: An implemental mindset for alleviating social-identity threat. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(3), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12071
32.
DunstB.BenedekM.BergnerS.AthenstaedtU.NeubauerA. C. (2013). Sex differences in neural efficiency: Are they due to the stereotype threat effect?Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7), 744–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.007
ElizagaR. A.MarkmanK. D. (2008). Peers and performance: How in-group and out-group comparisons moderate stereotype threat effects. Current Psychology, 27(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-008-9041-y
35.
ErikssonK.LindholmT. (2007). Making gender matter: The role of gender-based expectancies and gender identification on women’s and men’s math performance in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00588.x
36.
EvansE. A. (2015). Young, gifted, Black, and blocked: A critical inquiry of barriers that hinder Black students’ participation in gifted and advanced placement programs. http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1355
37.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
38.
FinniganK. M.CorkerK. S. (2016). Do performance avoidance goals moderate the effect of different types of stereotype threat on women’s math performance?Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.05.009
39.
FloreP. C.WichertsJ. M. (2015). Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 53(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002
40.
FogliatiV. J.BusseyK. (2013). Stereotype threat reduces motivation to improve: Effects of stereotype threat and feedback on women’s intentions to improve mathematical ability. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313480045
41.
FordT. E.FergusonM. A.BrooksJ. L.HagadoneK. M. (2004). Coping sense of humor reduces effects of stereotype threat on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(5), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262851
42.
GaldiS.CadinuM.TomasettoC. (2014). The roots of stereotype threat: When automatic associations disrupt girls’ math performance. Child Development, 85(1), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12128
43.
GanleyC. M.MingleL. A.RyanA. M.RyanK.VasilyevaM.PerryM. (2013). An examination of stereotype threat effects on girls’ mathematics performance. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1886–1897. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031412
44.
GavinM.CasaT.AdelsonJ.CarrollS.SheffieldL.SpinelliA. M. (2007). Project M3: Mentoring mathematical minds—A research-based curriculum for talented elementary students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(4), 566–585. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2007-552
45.
GonzalesP. M.BlantonH.WilliamsK. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 659–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202288010
46.
GoodC.AronsonA.HarderJ. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004
47.
GouldW. W. (1997). stata49: Interrater agreement. Stata Technical Bulletin, 40, 2–8. (Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, Vol. 7, pp. 20–28, Stata Press)
48.
GrandJ. A.RyanA. M.SchmittN.HmurovicJ. (2011). How far does stereotype threat reach? The potential detriment of face validity in cognitive ability testing. Human Performance, 24(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2010.518184
49.
GreenwaldA. G. (2012). There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611434210
50.
HarderJ. A. (1999). The effect of private versus public evaluation on stereotype threat for women in mathematics [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Texas.
51.
HedgesL. V.TiptonE.JohnsonM. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
HornC. (2014). The Young Scholars model. In AdamsC. M.ChandlerK. L. (Eds.), Effective program models for gifted students from underserved populations (pp. 45–60). Prufrock Press.
54.
Huedo-MedinaT. B.JohnsonB. T. (2011). Estimating the standardized mean difference effect size and its variance from different data sources: A spreadsheet.
IoannidisJ. P. (2007). Why most published research findings are false: Author’s reply to Goodman and Greenland. PLOS Medicine, 4(6), Article e215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040215
57.
IoannidisJ. P. (2012). Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464056
58.
JamiesonJ. P. (2009). The role of motivation in blatant stereotype threat, subtle stereotype threat, and stereotype priming [Doctoral dissertation]. http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20000007
59.
John-HendersonN. A.RheinschmidtM. L.Mendoza-DentonR.FrancisD. D. (2014). Performance and inflammation outcomes are predicted by different facets of SES under stereotype threat. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(3), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613494226
60.
JohnsonH. J.Barnard-BrakL.SaxonT. F.JohnsonM. K. (2012). An experimental study of the effects of stereotype threat and stereotype lift on men and women’s performance in mathematics. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.567312
61.
KellerJ. (2002). Blatant stereotype threat and women’s math performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles, 47(3), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021003307511
62.
KellerJ. (2007). Stereotype threat in classroom settings: The interactive effect of domain identification, task difficulty and stereotype threat on female students’ maths performance. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(Pt 2), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X113662
63.
KellerJ.MolixL. (2008). When women can’t do math: The interplay of self-construal, group identification, and stereotypic performance standards. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.007
64.
KitK. A.TuokkoH. A.MateerC. A. (2008). A review of the stereotype threat literature and its application in a neurological population. Neuropsychology Review, 18, 132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-008-9059-9
65.
KleinS. B. (2014). What can recent replication failures tell us about the theoretical commitments of psychology?Theory & Psychology, 24(3), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314529616
66.
KrayL. J.ThompsonL.GalinskyA. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.942
67.
LambdinC. (2012). Significance tests as sorcery: Science is empirical—Significance tests are not. Theory & Psychology, 22(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311429854
68.
LawrenceJ. S.MarksB. T.JacksonJ. S. (2010). Domain identification predicts black students’ underperformance on moderately-difficult tests. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9159-8
69.
LeskoA. C.CorpusJ. H. (2006). Discounting the difficult: How high math-identified women respond to stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 54(1–2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-8873-2
MaxwellS. E. (2004). The persistence of under-powered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.2.147
72.
McGloneM. S.AronsonJ. (2006). Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 486–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2006.06.003
73.
McIntyreR. B.PaulsonR. M.TaylorC. A.MorinA. L.LordC. G. (2010). Effects of role model deservingness on overcoming performance deficits induced by stereotype threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.774
74.
McKownC.StramblerM. J. (2009). Developmental antecedents and social and academic consequences of stereotype-consciousness in middle childhood. Child Development, 80(6), 1643–1659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01359.x
75.
MrazekM. D.ChinJ. M.SchmaderT.HartsonK. A.SmallwoodJ.SchoolerJ. W. (2011). Threatened to distraction: Mind-wandering as a consequence of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.011
NeuburgerS.JansenP.HeilM.Quaiser-PohlC. (2012). Gender stereotype activation and mental rotation performance in elementary-school children. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 220(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000097
80.
NguyenH. D.RyanA. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012702
OswaldD. L.HarveyR. D. (2000). Hostile environments, stereotype threat, and math performance among undergraduate women. Current Psychology, 19(4), 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-000-1025-5
83.
PashlerH.HarrisC. R. (2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463401
84.
PenningtonC. R.HeimD.LevyA. R.LarkinD. T. (2016). Twenty years of stereotype threat research: A review of psychological mediators. PLOS ONE, 11(1), Article e0146487. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146487
85.
PerryS. P.SkitkaL. J. (2009). Making lemonade? Defensive coping style moderates the effect of stereotype threat on women’s math test performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(5), 918–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.05.013
86.
PichoK.BrownS. W. (2011). Can stereotype threat be measured? A validation of the Social Identities and Attitudes Scale (SIAS). Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(3), 374–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200302
87.
PichoK.RodriguezA.FinnieL. (2013). Exploring the moderating role of context on the mathematics performance of females under stereotype threat: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(3), 299–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.737380
88.
PichoK.SchmaderT. (2018). When do stereotypes impair math performance? A study of stereotype threat among Ugandan adolescents. Sex Roles, 78(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0780-9
89.
PichoK.StephensJ. M. (2012). Culture, context and stereotype threat: A comparative analysis of Young Ugandan women in coed and single-sex schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.517576
90.
RamirezG.HooperS. Y.KerstingN. B.FergusonR.YeagerD. (2018). Teacher math anxiety relates to adolescent students’ math achievement. AERA Open, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418756052
91.
RivardoM. G.RhodesM. E.CamaioneT.LeggJ. M. (2011). Stereotype threat leads to reduction in number of math problems women attempt. North American Journal of Psychology, 13, 5–16.
92.
RosenbergM. S. (2005). The file drawer problem revisited: A general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution, 59, 464–468. https://doi.org/10.1554/04-602
RydellR. J.McConnellA. R.BeilockS. L. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 949–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014846
96.
RydellR. J.Van LooK. J.BoucherK. L. (2014). Stereotype threat and executive functions: Which functions mediate different threat-related outcomes?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213513475
97.
SackettP. R.RyanA. M. (2012). Concerns about generalizing stereotype threat research findings to operational high-stakes testing. In InzlichtM.SchmaderT. (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and applications (pp. 249–263). Oxford University Press.
98.
SchmaderT.JohnsM. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440
99.
SchmaderT.JohnsM.BarquissauM. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50(11), 835–850. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000029101.74557.a0
100.
SchmaderT.JohnsM.ForbesC. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336
101.
SeitchikA. E.JamiesonJ.HarkinsS. G. (2014). Reading between the lines: Subtle stereotype threat cues can motivate performance. Social Influence, 9(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.746206
102.
SekaquaptewaD.ThompsonM. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00508-5
103.
SeronC.SilbeyS. S.CechE.RubineauB. (2016). Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 43(2), 178–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888415618728
104.
ShewachO. R.SackettP. R.QuintS. (2019). Stereotype threat effects in settings with features likely versus unlikely in operational test settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(12), 1514–1534. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000420
105.
SijtsmaK.VeldkampC. L.WichertsJ. M. (2015). Improving the conduct and reporting of statistical analysis in psychology. Psychometrika, 81(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9444-2
106.
SmaldinoP. E.McElreathR. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), Article 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384
107.
SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M.QuinnD. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
108.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.52.6.613
109.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.5.797
110.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.AronsonJ. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 379–440). Academic Press.
111.
Steenbergen-HuS.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2017). Factors that contributed to gifted students’ success on STEM pathways: The role of race, personal interests, and aspects of high school experience. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(2), 99–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217701022
112.
SteinbergJ. R.OkunM. A.AikenL. S. (2012). Calculus GPA and math identification as moderators of stereotype threat in highly persistent women. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(6), 534–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.727319
113.
StoetG.GearyD. C. (2013). Sex differences in mathematics and reading achievement are inversely related: Within- and across-nation assessment of 10 years of PISA data. PLOS ONE, 8(3), Article e57988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057988
114.
StrickerL. J.RockD. A.BridgemanB. (2015). Stereotype threat, inquiring about test takers’ race and gender, and performance on low-stakes tests in a large-scale assessment (ETS RR–15-02). Educational Testing Service. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1109678.pdf
115.
StrickerL. J.WardW. C. (2004). Stereotype threat: Inquiring about test takers’ ethnicity and gender, and standardized test performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 665–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02564.x
116.
StroebeW.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2012). Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 670–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460687
117.
ThomanD. B.WhiteP. H.YamawakiN.KoishiH. (2008). Variations of gender–math stereotype content affect women’s vulnerability to stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 58(9–10), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9390-x
118.
TomasettoC.AlparoneF. R.CadinuM. (2011). Girls’ math performance under stereotype threat: The moderating role of mothers’ gender stereotypes. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 943–949. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024047
119.
TomasettoC.AppoloniS. (2013). A lesson not to be learned? Understanding stereotype threat does not protect women from stereotype threat. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9210-6
120.
WenF.ZuoB.WuY.DongX.WangW. (2016). Reducing the effect of stereotype threat: The role of coaction contexts and regulatory fit. Social Psychology of Education, 19, 607–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9344-z
121.
WichertsJ. M. (2005). Stereotype threat research and the assumptions underlying analysis of covariance. American Psychologist, 60(3), 267–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.60.3.267
122.
WoutD.DansoH.JacksonJ.SpencerS. (2008). The many faces of stereotype threat: Group- and self-threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 792–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.005
123.
Wright-AdamsV. (2014). Stereotype threat and the academic task performance of African American women. (2014-99210-064). Psycinfo.
124.
YzerbytV.MullerD.JuddC. M. (2004). Adjusting researchers’ approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
