The internal/external (I/E) frame of reference entails high, positive association of mathematics and verbal achievements with matching academic self-concepts but negative or near-zero correlation with their nonmatching self-concepts. This study aimed to extend the traditional I/E model by contrasting the mathematics domain with two foreign languages (English and Russian). A total of 540 Azeri eighth-grade students participated in this study. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed distinct domain-specific self-concepts for two foreign languages and mathematics, indicating a negative or near-zero nonsignificant correlations between academic self-concepts and nonmatching achievement domains but high positive, significant correlation between academic self-concepts and matching achievement domains. This study revealed distinct domain-specific self-concepts for two foreign languages, indicating a negative or near-zero nonsignificant correlations between verbal self-concepts and nonmatching verbal achievement domains. It was difficult to form a single verbal domain. The findings could be used to inform the design of interventions to improve learners’ academic self-concept and achievement.
Abu-HilalM. M.AbdelfattahF. A.AlshumraniS. A.AbduljabbarA. S.MarshH. W. (2013).
Construct validity of self-concept in TIMSS’s student background questionnaire: A test of separation and conflation of cognitive and affective dimensions of self-concept among Saudi eighth graders. European Journal of Psychology of Education,28, 1201–1220.
2.
ArensA. K.YeungA. S.CravenR. G.HasselhornM. (2011).
The twofold multidimensionality of academic self-concept: Domain specificity and separation between competence and affect components. Journal of Educational Psychology,103(4), 970–981. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025047
3.
BeauducelA.HerzbergP. Y. (2006).
On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modelling,13, 186–203.
4.
BongM. (1998).
Tests of the internal/external frames of reference model with subject-specific academic self-efficacy and frame-specific academic self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology,90, 102–110. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.102
5.
ByrneB. M. (1998). Multivariate applications book series. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.
Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
ByrneB. M. (2012). Structural equation modelling with Mplus.
Routledge.
7.
Cabinet of Ministries. (2006). Approvement of concept of general education [National Curriculum] (Decree 233).
ChiuM. M.KlassenR. M. (2010).
Relations of mathematics self-concept and its calibration with mathematics achievement: Cultural differences among fifteen-year-olds in 34 countries. Learning and Instruction,20(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.002
10.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment.
Cambridge University Press.
11.
Csapó, B., & Molnár, G. (2019). Online diagnostic assessment in support of personalized teaching and learning: The eDia System. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01522
12.
DaiD. Y. (2001).
A comparison of gender differences in academic self-concept and motivation between high-ability and average adolescents. Journal of Advanced Academics,13, 22–32.
13.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA.HaroldR.BlumenfeldP. (1993).
Age and gender differences in children’s achievement self-perceptions during the elementary school years. Child Development,64, 830–847. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131221
14.
HanF. (2019).
Self-concept and achievement in math among Australian primary students: Gender and cultural issues. Frontiers in Psychology,10, 603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00603
15.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008).
Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods,6, 53–60.
16.
HuL-T.BentlerP. M. (1995).
Evaluating model fit. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99).
Sage.
17.
HuL-T.BentlerP. M. (1998).
Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods,3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
18.
HuL-T.BentlerP. M. (1999).
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Klapp LekholmA.CliffordsonC. (2009).
Effects of student characteristics on grades in compulsory school. Educational Research and Evaluation,15, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610802470425
21.
KlineR. B. (2011). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.).
Guilford Press.
22.
Kurtz-CostesB.RowleyS.Harris-BrittA.WoodsT. A. (2008).
Gender stereotypes about math and science and self-perceptions of ability in late childhood and early adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,54, 386–409. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/239783
23.
LapidusM. I. (2002). A history of Islamic societies (2nd ed.).
Cambridge University Press.
24.
MarshH. W. (1986).
Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal,23, 129–149. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00028312023001129
25.
MarshH. W. (1990). Self-Description Questionnaire—II manual.
University of Western Sydney.
26.
MarshH. W. (1993a).
Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research. In SulsJ. M. (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self: Vol. 4. The self in social perspective (pp. 59–98).
Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
MarshH. W. (1993b).
The multidimensional structure of academic self-concept: Invariance over gender and age. American Educational Research Journal,30(4), 841–860. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312030004841
28.
MarshH. W.ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J. (1988).
A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology,80, 366–380. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.366
29.
MarshH. W.CravenR. (1997).
Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In PhyeG. D. (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 131–198).
Academic Press.
30.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2006).
Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective. Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science,1, 133–163. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2006.00010.x
MarshH. W.HauK. T. (2004).
Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: cross-cultural generalizability of the internal-external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology,96, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.56
33.
MarshH. W.KöllerO. (2004).
Unification of theoretical models of academic self-concept/achievement relations: Reunification of east and west German school systems after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Contemporary Educational Psychology,29, 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00034-1
34.
MarshH. W.KongC. K.HauK. T. (2001).
Extension of the internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept formation: Importance of native and nonnative languages for Chinese students. Journal of Educational Psychology,93, 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.543
35.
MarshH. W.MartinA. J.HauK. T. (2006).
A multimethod perspective on self-concept research in educational psychology: A construct validity approach. In EidM.DienerE. (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 441–456).
American Psychological Association.
36.
MarshH. W.MöllerJ.ParkerP.XuM. K.NagengastB.PekrunR. (2014).
Internal/external frame of reference model. In WrightJ. D. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 425–432).
Elsevier.
37.
MarshH. W.ParkerP. D.GuoJ.PekrunR.BasarkodG. (2020).
Psychological comparison processes and self-concept in relation to five distinct frame of reference effects: Pan-Human cross-cultural generalizability over 68 countries. European Journal of Personality,34, 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2232
MarshH. W.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.KöllerO.BaumertJ. (2005).
Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of casual ordering. Child Development, 76, 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x
40.
MarshH. W.XuM.MartinA. J. (2012).
Self-concept: A synergy of theory, method, and application. In HarrisK. R. G.UrdanT.McCormickC. B.SinatraG. M.SwellerJ. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (
Vol. 1, pp. 427–458).
American Psychological Association.
41.
MidgleyC.KaplanA.MiddletonM. (2001).
Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost?Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.77
42.
Ministry of Education of Azerbaijan Republic. (2010). The new curriculum of state standards of specific subject programs (Decision 103). http://www.e-qanun.az/framework/19682
43.
Ministry of Education of Azerbaijan Republic. (2012). Notes of training planning (Decision 427). http://edu.gov.az/upload/file/emre-elave/2016/427/427-emre-elave11.pdf
44.
MöllerJ.KöllerO. (2001).
Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology,93, 826–835. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.826
45.
MöllerJ.PohlmannB.KöllerO.MarshH. W. (2009).
A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research,79(3), 1129–1167. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0034654309337522
46.
MöllerJ.RetelsdorfJ.KöllerO.MarshH. W. (2011).
The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model an integration of models of relations between academic achievement and self-concept. American Educational Research Journal,48, 1315–1346. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0002831211419649
47.
MöllerJ.StreblowL.PohlmannB.KöllerO. (2006).
An extension of the internal/external frame of reference model of two verbal and numerical domains. European Journal of Psychology of Education,21(4), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173515
Nikolov, M., & Szabó, G. (2015). A study on Hungarian 6th and 8th graders' proficiency in English and German at dual-language schools. In D. Halló & K. Károly (Eds.), Inspirations in foreign language teaching: Studies in applied linguistics. Language pedagogy and language teaching (pp. 184–206). Pearson Education.
50.
OlsanJ. S.PappasL. B.PappasC. J. (1994). An ethnohistorical dictionary of the Russian and Soviet empires.
Greenwood Press.
51.
Programme for International Student Assessment. (2018). Results from PISA 2018, Azerbaijan. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_QAZ.pdf
52.
RaykovT. (2009).
Evaluation of scale reliability for unidimensional measures using latent variable modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,42(3), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175609344096
53.
SchumackerE. R.LomaxG. R. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equitation modelling.
Routledge.
54.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976).
Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research,46(3), 407–441. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170010
55.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2006). Using multivariate statistics.
Allyn & Bacon.
56.
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. (2011). Released mathematics items.
TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), IEA Secretariat. https://nces.ed.gov/timss/pdf/TIMSS2011_G8_Math.pdf
57.
Warm, T. A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54, 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294627
XuM. K.MarshH. W.HauK. T.HoI. T.MorinS. J.AbduljabbarA. S. (2013).
The internal/external frame of reference of academic self-concept: Extension to a foreign language and the role of language of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology,105(2), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031333
60.
YangL.ArensK. A.WatkinsD. A. (2014).
Testing twofold multidimensionality of academic self-concept: A study with Chinese vocational students. An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology,36(9), 1651–11669. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.995597
61.
YeungA. S.CravenR. G.KaurG. (2012).
Gender differences in achievement motivation: Grade and cultural considerations. In McGeowenS. (Ed.), Psychology of gender differences (pp. 59–79).
Nova Science.
62.
YeungA. S.WongK. P. (2004).
Domain specificity of trilingual teachers’ verbal self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology,96(2), 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.360
