The Influence of the Great Recession on the Identification of Students From Non-White Populations in the State of Texas

Abstract

The Great Recession is an economic crisis which has had repercussions through different facets of U.S. society. Texas, despite overall economic health, enacted severe cuts to education as a result of the Great Recession. A potential consequence of these austerity measures is the identification of Black, Latinx, and Native American students for gifted education services. This article examines effects of the Great Recession and educational budget policy on the identification of Black, Latinx, and Native American students for gifted services in Texas. Publicly available data were acquired from the Texas Education Agency on district demographic data from 1999 to 2015. A longitudinal mixed effect model was used to analyze rates of representation of Asian, Black, Latinx, and Native American students relative to White students. Results suggest that budgetary cuts to gifted education programs following the Great Recession did not adversely affect the representation of Black, Latinx, and Native American students in gifted education programs and that Asian students increased their representation in gifted programs.

Keywords

underrepresentation Great Recession Texas gifted education longitudinal

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ananat

E. O.

Gassman-Pines

Francis

D. V.

Gibson-Davis

C. M.

(2011). No children left behind: The effects of statewide job loss on student achievement. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Baker

B. D.

McIntire

(2003). Evaluating state funding for gifted education programs. Roeper Review, 25, 173-179. doi:10.1080/02783190309554225

Barr

Turner

S. E.

(2013). Expanding enrollments and contracting state budgets the effect of the great recession on higher education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 650, 168-193. doi:10.1177/0002716213500035

Bates

Maechler

Bolker

Walker

(2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version, 1(7), 1-23.

Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2017). Gross domestic product by metropolitan area, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.bea.gov/news/2018/gross-domestic-product-metropolitan-area-2017

Card

Giuliano

(2016). Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 13678-13683. doi:10.1073/pnas.1605043113

Carroll

R. J.

Ruppert

(1988). Transformation and weighting in regression (Vol. 30). New York, NY: CRC Press.

Comptroller of Public Accounts. (2010). Biennial revenue estimate 2010-2011. Retrieved from https://comptroller.texas.gov/transparency/reports/biennial-revenue-estimate/2010-11/outlook.php

Eckes

S. E.

(n.d.). Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act. Education Law. Retrieved from http://usedulaw.com/352-jacob-k-javits-gifted-and-Talentedstudents-education-act.html

10.

Elhoweris

Mutua

Alsheikh

Holloway

(2005). Effect of children’s ethnicity on teachers’ referral and recommendation decisions in gifted and talented programs. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 25-31. doi:10.1177/07419325050260010401

11.

Elsby

M. W.

Shin

Solon

(2016). Wage adjustment in the Great Recession and other downturns: Evidence from the United States and Great Britain. Journal of Labor Economics, 34, 249-291. doi:10.1086/682407

12.

Esquierdo

J. J.

Arreguín-Anderson

(2012). The invisible gifted and talented bilingual students: A current report on enrollment in GT programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35, 35-47. doi:10.1177/0162353211432041

13.

Fanelli

Bertrand

Rogers

Medina

Freelon

(2010). Before the recession: Conditions, opportunities, and outcomes in California public schools. REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 173.

14.

Faraway

J. J.

(2014). Linear models with R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.

15.

Ford

D. Y.

(2003). Two other wrongs don’t make a right: Sacrificing the needs of diverse students does not solve gifted education’s unresolved problems. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 283-291. doi:10.4219/jeg-2003-302

16.

Ford

D. Y.

Harris

J. J.

III Tyson

C. A.

Trotman

M. F.

(2001). Beyond deficit thinking: Providing access for gifted African American students. Roeper Review, 24, 52-58. doi:10.1080/02783190209554129

17.

Ford

D. Y.

King

R. A.

Jr. (2014). No Blacks allowed: Segregated gifted education in the context of Brown v. Board of Education. The Journal of Negro Education, 83, 300-310. doi:10.7709/jnegroeducation.83.3.0300

18.

Freelon

Rogers

Betrand

(2012). Overburdened and underfunded: California public schools amidst the Great Recession. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 2, 152-176. doi:10.4471/remie.2012.08

19.

Gentry

Fugate

C. M.

Castellano

J. A.

(2014). Gifted Native American students: Literature, lessons, and future directions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 98-110. doi:10.1177/0016986214521660

20.

Herr

O. E.

Castro

Canty

(2012). Striving for excellence: Resilience among gifted students from different cultural, linguistic, and low-socioeconomic backgrounds. Review of Higher Education and Self Learning, 5, 1-15.

21.

Hodges

(2018). Assessing the influence of No Child Left Behind on gifted education funding in Texas: A descriptive study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29, 321-342. doi:10.1177/1932202X18779343

22.

Hodges

Tay

Desmet

Ozturk

Pereira

(2018). The effect of the 2008 recession on gifted education funding across the state of Texas. AERA Open, 4(3), 1-11. doi:10.1177/2332858418786224

23.

Hodges

Tay

Maeda

Gentry

(2018). A meta-analysis of gifted and talented identification practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 147-174. doi:0016986217752107

24.

Hopkins

Garrett

(2010). Separate and unequal: The underrepresentation of African American students in gifted and talented programs. Black History Bulletin, 73(1), 24.

25.

Kettler

Russell

Puryear

J. S.

(2015). Inequitable access to gifted education: Variance in funding and staffing based on locale and contextual school variables. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38, 99-117. doi:10.1177/0162353215578277

26.

Kitano

M. K.

DiJiosia

(2002). Are Asian and Pacific Americans overrepresented in programs for the gifted? Roeper Review, 24, 76-80. doi:10.1080/02783190209554133

27.

Knight

D. S.

(2017). Are high-poverty school districts disproportionately impacted by state funding cuts? School finance equity following the Great Recession. Journal of Education Finance, 43, 169-194.

28.

Leachman

Mai

(2014). Most states still funding schools less than before the recession. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

29.

Lukusa

T. M.

Lee

S. M.

C. S.

(2014). Review of zero-inflated models with missing data. Current Research in Biostatistics, 7, 1-12.

30.

Mishel

Bivens

Gould

Shierholz

(2012). The state of working America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

31.

Mordechay

(2017). The effects of the Great Recession on educational attainment: Evidence from a large urban high school district. The Urban Review, 49, 47-71. doi:10.1007/s11256-016-0381-x

32.

Murnane

(2013). U.S. high school graduation rates: Patterns and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 370-422. doi:10.1257/jel.51.2.370

33.

Naglieri

J. A.

Ford

D. Y.

(2005). Increasing minority children’s participation in gifted classes using the NNAT: A response to Lohman. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 29-36. doi:10.1177/001698620504900104

34.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Digest of education statistics 2002, Table 54. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d02/dt054.asp

35.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Digest of education statistics 2012, Table 53. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_053.asp

36.

Neumeister

K. L.

Adams

C. M.

Pierce

R. L.

Cassady

J. C.

Dixon

F. A.

(2007). Fourth-grade teacher’s perceptions of giftedness: Implications for identifying and serving diverse gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 479-499. doi:10.4219/jeg-2007-503

37.

Plucker

J. A.

Burroughs

Song

(2010). Mind the (other) gap! Bloomington: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, Indiana University.

38.

Plucker

J. A.

Makel

M. C.

Matthews

M. S.

Peters

S. J.

Rambo-Hernandez

K. E.

(2017). Blazing new trails: Strengthening policy research in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 210-281. doi:10.1177/0016986217701838

39.

R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.R-project.org/

40.

Slocumb

P. D.

Olenchak

F. R.

(2006). Equity in gifted education: A state initiative. Austin: Texas Education Agency Division of Curriculum, Advanced Academic Services.

41.

Stoll

M. A.

(2013). Great recession spurs a shift to local moves. (US2010 Project). Brown University. Retrieved from https://s4.ad.brown.edu/Projects/Diversity/Data/Report/report02202013.pdf

42.

Texas Education Agency. (2013). School finance 101: Funding of Texas public schools. Retrieved from http://tea.texas.gov/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=2147511834

43.

Texas Education Agency. (2014a). Enrollment in Texas public schools 2013-14. Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency.

44.

Texas Education Agency. (2014b). Secondary school completion and drop outs in Texas public schools2012-13. Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency.

45.

VanTassel-Baska

Johnson

Avery

L. D.

(2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from project star. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 110-123. doi:10.1177/001698620204600204

46.

Warne

R. T.

Price

C. J.

(2016). A single case study of the impact of policy changes on identification for gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39, 49-61.

47.

Wright

B. L.

Ford

D. Y.

Young

J. L.

(2017). Ignorance or indifference? Seeking excellence and equity for under-represented students of color in gifted education. Global Education Review, 4, 45-60.

48.

(2003). Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Statistics in Medicine, 22, 3527-3541. doi:10.1002/sim.1572

49.

Yoon

S. Y.

Gentry

(2009). Racial and ethnic representation in gifted programs: Current status of and implications for gifted Asian American students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 121-136. doi:10.1177/0016986208330564