The underrepresentation of English language learners (ELLs) in gifted programs remains a severe and pervasive problem; however, few studies exist concerning the educational experiences of high-potential ELLs. This study focused on Hispanic ELLs in Grades 2 through 6 from four Midwestern schools. In all, 22 students, 20 parents, and 22 teachers were interviewed to gain a better understanding of the students’ schooling experiences. Phenomenology and grounded theory provided theoretical frameworks. Students revealed that they enjoyed school, had positive interactions with peers and teachers, and were committed to doing well in school. Results of this study also revealed that the participants were well integrated in school. This study adds to the limited research concerning high-potential Hispanic ELLs and provides insights into these students’ educational experiences, highlighting the need to focus on their strengths rather than on their deficits. Emphasized is the need to identify high potential from underserved populations for gifted education services.
AguirreN. M.HernandezN. E. (2010). Differentiating the curriculum for gifted second language learners: Teaching them to think. In CastellanoJ. A.FrazierA. D. (Eds.), Special populations in gifted education: Understanding our most able students from diverse backgrounds (pp. 273-285). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
ArgulewiczE. N.ElliottS. N.HallR. (1982). Comparison of behavioral ratings of Anglo-American and Mexican-American gifted children. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 469-472.
4.
AudS.FoxM.KewalRamaniA. (2010). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups (NCES 2010-015). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
5.
BernalE. M. (1974). Gifted Mexican-American children: An ethno-scientific perspective. California Journal of Educational Research, 25, 261-273.
6.
BernalE. M. (2002). Three ways to achieve a more equitable representation of culturally and linguistically different students in GT programs. Roeper Review, 24, 82-88.
7.
BernalE. M. (2007). The plight of the culturally diverse student from poverty. In VanTassel-BaskaJ.StambaughT. (Eds.), Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners (pp. 63-37). Washington, DC: National Association of Gifted Children.
BrullesD.CastellanoJ. A.LaingP. C. (2010). Identifying and enfranchising gifted English language learners. In CastellanoJ. A.FrazierA. D. (Eds.), Special populations in gifted education: Understanding our most able students from diverse backgrounds (pp. 305-313). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
10.
CastellanoJ. A. (2003). The “browning” of American schools: Identifying and educating gifted Hispanic students. In CastellanoJ. A. (Ed.), Special populations in gifted education: Working with diverse gifted learners (pp. 29-43). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
CastellanoJ. A.FrazierA. D. (2010). Special populations in gifted education: Understanding our most able students from diverse backgrounds. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
CTB/McGraw-Hill. (2007). LAS Links: Connecting assessment, language, and learning. Monterey, CA: Author.
15.
CumminsJ. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
16.
Darling-HammondL.ChungR.FrelowF. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach?Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 286-302.
17.
DavisG. A.RimmS. B.SiegleD. (2010). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
18.
EscamillaK.ChavezL.VigilP. (2005). Rethinking the “Gap:” High stakes testing and Spanish-speaking students in Colorado. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 132-144.
19.
FordD. Y. (2007). Diamonds in the rough: Recognizing and meeting the needs of gifted children from low SES backgrounds. In VanTassel-BaskaJ.StambaughT. (Eds.), Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners (pp. 63-37). Washington, DC: National Association of Gifted Children.
20.
FordD. Y.GranthamT. (2003). Teacher reflection and race in cultural contexts. Theory Into Practice, 42, 217-225.
21.
GagnéF. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103-112.
22.
GagnéF. (2005). The DMGT as a developmental model. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 98-119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GentryM. (2008). Project HOPE (Having Opportunities Promotes Excellence): Expanding access to accelerated learning and enrichment programs [Jack Kent Cooke Foundation Grant]. West Lafayette, IN: Gifted Education Resource Institute.
24.
GentryM.PetersS. J. (2009). HOPE Teacher Rating Scale. Unpublished instrument.
25.
GreenF.SpiveyS. P.FerrisL.BernalE. M.IzquierdoE. (2010). Our diversity, our treasure: Connecting Worlds/Mundos Unidos gifted and talented program. In CastellanoJ. A.FrazierA. D. (Eds.), Special populations in gifted education: Understanding our most able students from diverse backgrounds (pp. 287-303). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
26.
GutierrezK. D.OrellanaM. F. (2006). The “problem” of English language learners: Constructing genres of difference. Research in the Teaching of English, 40, 502-507.
27.
HarrisB.PluckerJ. A.RappK. E.MartinezR. S. (2009). Identifying gifted and talented English language learners: A case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, 368-442.
28.
HarrisB.RappK. E.MartinezR.PluckerJ. A. S. (2007). Identifying English language learners for gifted and talented programs: Current practices and recommendations for improvement. Roeper Review, 29, 26-29.
KitanoM. K.DiJiosiaM. (2002). Are Asian and Pacific Americans overrepresented in programs for the gifted?Roeper Review, 24, 76-80.
33.
LeeS.-Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP.PeternelG. (2009). Follow-up with students after 6 years of participation in Project EXCITE. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 137-156.
34.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
LopezD. E.Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2001). Mexican Americans: A second generation at risk. In RumbautR. G.PortesA. (Eds.), Ethnicities: Children of immigrants in America (pp. 57-90). Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
MatthewsM. S. (2006). Working with gifted English language learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
37.
MillerL. S. (2004). Promoting sustained growth in the representation of African Americans, Latinos, and Native Americans among top students in the United States at all levels of the education system (RM04190). Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
38.
MillerR.GentryM. (2010). Developing talents among high-potential students from low-income families in an out-of-school enrichment program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 594-627.
39.
MollL. C. (1988). Some key issues in teaching Latino students. Language Arts, 65, 465-472.
40.
MuhrT. (2004). User’s Manual for ATLAS.ti 6.2. Berlin, Germany: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH.
41.
Office of Civil Rights. (2002). 2002 elementary and secondary civil rights compliance report. National and state projections. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights.
OgbuJ. U. (1978). Minority education and caste: The American system in cross cultural perspective. New York, NY: Academic Press.
44.
OgbuJ. U. (1991). Immigrant and involuntary minorities in comparative perspective. In GibsonM. A.OgbuJ. U. (Eds.), Minority status and schooling: A comparative study of immigrant and involuntary minorities (pp. 3-33). New York, NY: Garland Publishing.
45.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.LeeS.-Y. (2004). Parent perceptions of the effects of the Saturday Enrichment Program on gifted students’ talent development. Roeper Review, 26, 156-165.
46.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.LeeS.-Y.NgoiM.NgoiD. (2004). Addressing the achievement gap between minority and nonminority children by increasing access to gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 127-158.
47.
OrtizA. A.RobertsonP. M.WilkinsonC. Y.LiuY.McGheeB. D.KushnerM. I. (2011). The role of bilingual education teachers in preventing inappropriate referrals of ELLs to special education: Implications to response to intervention. Bilingual Research Journal, 34, 316-333.
48.
PanferovS. (2010). Increasing ELL parental involvement in our schools: Learning from the parents. Theory Into Practice, 49, 106-112.
49.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
PetersS. J.GentryM. (2010). Multi-group construct validity evidence of the HOPE Scale: Instrumentation to identify low-income elementary students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 298-313.
51.
PluckerJ. A.BurroughsN.SongR. (2010). Mind the (other) gap: The growing excellence gap in K-12 education. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
52.
PortesA.Fernández-KellyP. (2008). No margin for error: Educational and occupational achievement among disadvantaged children of immigrants. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 620, 12-36.
53.
PortesA.HaoL. (2004). The schooling of children of immigrants: Contextual effects on the educational attainment of the second generation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 11920-11927.
54.
ReamR. K.Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2007). The mobility/social capital dynamic: Understanding Mexican American families and students. In PaikS. J.WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Narrowing the achievement gap: Strategies for educating Latino, Black, and Asian students (pp. 67-89). New York, NY: Springer.
55.
RenzulliJ. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184.
56.
RenzulliJ. S. (2005). The three-ring conceptions of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246-279). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
57.
RuizR. (1988). Orientations in language planning. In McKayS.WongC. (Eds.), Language diversity: Problem or resource (pp. 3-25). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
RumbautR. G.PortesA. (2001). Ethnicities: Children of immigrants in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
59.
SaézL. (2000). Academic achievement of Latino immigrants. In GregoryS. T. (Ed.), The academic achievement of minority students (pp. 267-286). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
60.
SarouphimK. M. (2002). DISCOVER in high school: Identifying gifted Hispanic and Native American students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 30-38.
61.
ShaunessyE. S.McHattonP. A.HughesC. E.BriceA. R.RatliffM. A. (2007). Understanding the experiences of bilingual, Latino/a adolescents: Voices from gifted and general education. Roeper Review, 29, 174-182.
62.
SnyderT. D.DillowS. A. (2010). Digest of Education Statistics 2009 (NCES 2010-013). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2010013
63.
Speirs NeumeisterK. L.AdamsC. M.PierceR. L.CassadyJ. C.DixonF. A. (2007). Fourth-grade teachers’ perceptions of giftedness: Implications for identifying and serving diverse gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 479-499.
64.
SternbergR. J. (2005). The WICS model of giftedness. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 327-342). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
65.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
Suárez-OrozcoC.Suárez-OrozcoM.TodorovaI. (2008). Learning in a new land: Immigrant students in American society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
SullivanA. L. (2011). Disproportionality in special education identification and placement of English language learners. Exceptional Children, 77, 317-334.
68.
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. (2009). TESOL/NCATE standards for the recognition of initial TESOL programs in P-12 ESL teacher education. Alexandria, VA: Author.
69.
United States Department of Education. (1993). National excellence: The case for developing America’s talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
ValdésG. (2003). Expanding definitions of giftedness: The case of young interpreters from immigrant communities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
ValenciaR. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
75.
ValenciaR. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
76.
Wong-FillmoreL. (1991). When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6, 323-346.
77.
WorrellF. C. (2007). Identifying and including low-income learners in programs for the gifted and talented: Multiple complexities. In VanTassel-BaskaJ.StambaughT. (Eds.), Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners (pp. 63-37). Washington, DC: National Association of Gifted Children.
78.
WynerJ.BridgelandJ.DiiulioJ. (2009). Achievement trap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from lower-income families. Lansdowne, VA: Jack Kent Cooke Foundation.
79.
YoonS.GentryM. (2009). Racial and ethnic representation in gifted programs: Current status of and implications for gifted Asian American students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 121-136.
