The decision-making process of academically talented students when making the transition to college is complex. This study investigates the factors that contribute to the selectivity of the colleges by Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate students for application. A multilevel model was created to find which college-level and student-level variables were associated with college selectivity. This study found that students selected colleges with higher mean SAT scores when prestige of the college was the reason, the students had higher achievement, and the college was farther away. Academic self-concept and perceived challenge of their high school curriculum had no effect on the college selectivity. These findings have implications for high school administrators and college admissions offices.
AlonS.DominaT.TiendaM. (2010). Stymied mobility or temporary lull? Intergenerational discontinuities in Hispanic college destinations. Social Forces, 88, 1807-1832.
2.
BriggsS. (2006). An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: The case of higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 705-722.
3.
ByromT. (2009). I don’t want to go to a crummy little university: Social class, higher education choice, and the paradox of widening participation. Improving Schools, 12, 209-224.
4.
CallenderC.JacksonJ. (2008). Does the fear of debt constrain the choice of University and subject of study?Studies in Higher Education, 33, 405-429.
5.
College Board. (2008). The college handbook (46th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
CongerD.LongM. C. (2010). Why are men falling behind? Explanations for the gender gap in college outcomes. Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 627, 184-214.
10.
FiebigJ. N. (2008). Gifted American and German adolescent women: A longitudinal examination of attachment, separation, gender roles, and career aspirations. High Ability Studies, 19, 67-81.
11.
GibbonsF. X.BuunkB. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129-142.
12.
GriffithA.RaskK. (2007). The influence of the U.S. News and World Report collegiate rankings on the matriculation decisions of high-ability students: 1995-2004. Economics of Education Review, 26I, 244-255.
13.
HooverE. (2008, February). Colleges face tough sell to freshman, survey finds. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54, A1.
14.
International Baccalaureate Organization. (2010). The diploma programme. Available at http://www.ibo.org/diploma/
15.
KerrB. A. (1981). Career education strategies for the gifted. Journal of Career Education, 7, 318-324.
16.
KimJ.Des JardinsS.McCallB. P. (2009). Exploring the effects of student expectations about financial aid on postsecondary choice: A focus on income and racial/ethnic differences. Research in Higher Education, 50, 741-774.
17.
LangD. W. (2009). Articulation, transfer, and student choice in a binary post-secondary system. Higher Education: International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 57, 355-371.
18.
LeeV. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational psychologist, 35, 125-141.
19.
LongM. C.TiendaM. (2010). Beyond admissions: Lessons from Texas. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 627, 6-11.
20.
MarshH. W. (1991). Failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students’ ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 445-480.
21.
MarshH. W. (2004). Negative effects of school-average achievement on academic self-concept: A comparison of the big-fish-little-pond effect across Australian states and territories. Australian Journal of Education, 48, 5-26.
22.
MarshH. W.ParkerJ. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 213-231.
23.
McCoachD. B.AdelsonJ. L. (2010). Dealing with dependence (Part I): Understanding the effects of clustered data. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 152-155.
24.
MilgrimR. M.HongE. (1999). Multipotential abilities and vocational interests in gifted adolescents: Fact or fiction?International Journal of Psychology, 34, 81-93.
25.
NagyG.TrautweinU.BaumertJ.KollerO.GarrettJ. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 323-345.
26.
NoresM. (2010). Differences in college major choice by citizenship status. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 627, 125-141.
27.
RenzulliJ. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246-279). New York, NY: Cambridge Press.
28.
RidleyK.WhiteK.StylesB.MorrisonJ. (2005). Factors affecting applications to Oxford and Cambridge—Repeat survey. Slough, Berkshire, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/143184.pdf
29.
SanbornM. P. (1979). Career development: Problems of gifted and talented students. In ColangeloN.ZaffrannR. T. (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 284-300). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
30.
SchrorerA. C. P.DornF. J. (1986). Enhancing the career and personal development of gifted college students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 64, 567-571.
SmithH. (2007). Playing a different game: The contextualized decision-making processes of minority ethnic students in choosing a higher education institution. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 10, 415-437.
33.
SparfeldtJ. R. (2007). Vocational interests of gifted adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1011-1021.
34.
TalahongvaP. (2008). A good education? Students judge tribal colleges by many criteria. Tribal College Journal of American Indian Higher Education, 19, 30-33.
35.
Texas Educational Agency. (2009). 2008-2009 Academic excellence indicator system: Campus reports. Available from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us
36.
Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project. (2001). Texas higher education opportunity project. Available from http://theop.princeton.edu/
37.
Van CampD.BardenJ.SloanL. R.ClarkR. P. (2009). Choosing an HBCU: An opportunity to pursue racial self-development. Journal of Negro Education, 78, 457-768.
38.
WilsonH. E. (2008, March). Perceived Challenge and Academic Self-Concept (PCSC) Scale. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City.
39.
WilsonH. E. (2009). A model of academic self-concept: Perceived difficulty, social comparison, and achievement among academically accelerated secondary school students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
