Online learning programs have the potential to provide gifted students expanded access to advanced courses, but little research has been conducted on how well or in what ways the online environment is a good match for gifted students. The study presented here is an in-depth qualitative and quantitative investigation of the perceptions and experiences of academically talented students and their teachers about courses offered through an online program designed specifically for gifted students. Participants in this study included 28 instructors currently teaching at least one online course and 65 students in grades 3-12 currently enrolled in at least one online course offered by a supplemental school offering both online and face-to-face programming for gifted students. According to the gifted students and teachers interviewed and surveyed in this study, the online format is conducive to a more individualized and differentiated learning experience than is often possible in a regular classroom. Students are able to work at a pace consistent with their rate of learning, have more time to reflect, to feel more in control of the learning process, and to engage in more self-directed and independent learning. These benefits and others indicate the online programming can be an effective means of meeting the needs of many gifted students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenM.BourhisJ.BurrellN.MabryE. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional class-rooms in higher educations: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 83–97.
2.
ArchambaultF. X.WestbergK. L.BrownS. W.HallmarkB. W.ZhangW.EmmonsC. L. (1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 103–119.
3.
ArtinoA. R. (2008). Promoting academic motivation and self-regulation: Practical guidelines for online instructors. TechTrends, 52, 37–45.
4.
BernardR. M.AbramiP. C.LouY.BorokhovskiE.WadeA.WozneyL.HuangB. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379–439.
5.
CavanaughC. (2007). Effectiveness of K-12 online learning. In MooreM. (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
CavanaughC.ClarkT.BarbourM. (2008, March). Research and practice in K-12 online learning: A review of literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
8.
DiPietroM.FerdigR. E.BlackE. W.PrestonM. (2008). Best practices in teaching K-12 online: Lessons learned from Michigan Virtual School teachers. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7, 10–35.
9.
DunnR.DunnK.PriceG. E. (1989). Learning Style Inventory. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.
10.
DykmanC. A.DavisC. K. (2008). Online education forum: Part two-Teaching online versus teaching conventionally. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19, 156–163.
11.
FeldhusenH. (1981). Teaching gifted, creative, and talented students in an individualized classroom. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 108–111.
12.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT.ArcherW. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105.
13.
HargroveK. (2005). What makes a “good” teacher “great”?Gifted Child Today, 28(1), 30–31.
14.
HughsonA. (1964). Teaching the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 8, 159.
LiC. S.BeverlyI. (2008). An overview of online education: Attractiveness, benefits, challenges, concerns and recommendations. College Student Journal, 42, 449–458.
17.
MillsC. J. (2003). Characteristics of effective teachers of gifted students: Teacher background and personality styles of students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 272–281.
18.
MooreM. G. (2007). Learners come in different types. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21, 1–2.
OaklandT.JoyceD.HortonC.GluttingJ. (2000). Temperament-based learning styles of identified gifted and non-gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 183–89.
21.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.LeeS. Y. (2004). Gifted adolescents' talent development through distance learning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 7–35.
22.
PiccianoA. G.SeamanJ. (2009). K-12 online learning: A 2008 follow-up of the survey of U.S. school district administrators. New York, NY: The Sloan Consortium.
23.
RavagliaR.SuppesP.StillingerC.AlperT. M. (1995). Computer-based mathematics and physics for gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 7–13.
24.
RiccaJ. (1984). Learning styles and preferred instructional strategies of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 121–126.
25.
RogersK. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 382–396.
26.
SandersonE. (2009, November). Nuts and bold of online learning. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, St. Louis, MO.
27.
ShacharM.NeumannY. (2003). Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytical approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Education, 4, 1–20.
28.
SitzmannT.KraigerK.StewartD.WisherR. A. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59, 623–664.
29.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (2003). Teaching for successful intelligence: Principles, procedures, and practices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27, 207–228.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.BrownE. F. (2007). Toward best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 342–358.
32.
WallaceP. (2005). Distance education for gifted students: Leveraging technology to expand academic options. High Ability Studies, 16, 77–86.
33.
ZhaoY.LeiJ.YanB.LaiC.TanH. S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107, 1836–1884.
