The notion that greater learning outcomes will be achieved if the cognitive work is distributed amongst a group of individuals working together versus working alone has received mixed support when explored empirically (e.g., Daiute & Dalton 1993;Johnson & Johnson, 1991). This study examined the relationship between small-group collaborative learning structures and the potential predictors of groups' overall academic performance. We sought to identify specific factors that distinguished high-performing groups from low-performing groups in the classroom. Class attendance and individual-level academic performance were positively related to group-level academic performance. Further, it was predicted that groups consisting of an exceptionally high-performing member, or superstar, would achieve greater group-level academic performance than groups consisting of members who performed similarly. However, the greater the distance between the highest-performing member's score and the average of the other group members' scores on individual-level tasks, the lower the score on group-level tasks. This difference between the highest scoring group member and the rest of the members is referred to as the Superstar Difference Score. Qualitative and quantitative analyses indicated that the Superstar Difference Score is a reliable, negative predictor of group-level academic performance. Practical implications for classroom instructors and future directions for education research resultant from this study's superstar effect are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsM. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
BrandonD. P.HollingsheadA. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 48, 109–126.
3.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: Nation Academy Press.
4.
BrownJ. S.CollinsA.DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning, Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
5.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
CunninghamA. E.StanovichK. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945.
7.
DaiuteC.DaltonB. (1993). Collaboration between children learning to write: Can novices be masters?Cognitive and Instruction, 10, 281–333.
8.
FogartyR.PeteB. M. (2007). How to differentiate learning: Curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Washington, DC: Corwin Press.
9.
GilliesR.BoyleM. (2006). Ten elementary teachers' discourse and reported pedagogical practices during cooperative learning. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 429–451.
10.
GreenwoodJ. (1999). Understanding the “cognitive revolution” in psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 35, 1–22.
11.
HagmanJ.HayesJ. (1986). Cooperative learning: Effects of task, reward, and group size on individual achievement. Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
12.
HatanoG.InagakiK. (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In ResnickL. B.LevineJ. M.TeasleyS. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 331–348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13.
HutchinsE. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its' speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265–288.
14.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
15.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1991). Social interdependence theory and university instruction: Theory into practice. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 119–129.
16.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1996). Cooperative learning and traditional American values: An appreciation. NASSP Bulletin, 80(579), 63–65.
17.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (2000). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (2002). Social interdependence theory and university instruction: Theory into practice. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 119–129.
19.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.SmithK. A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
20.
JonassenD. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?Educational Technology, Research, & Development, 39(3), 5–14.
21.
JonassenD.KwonH. (2001). Communication patterns in computer-mediated vs. face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 49(10), 35–52.
22.
MasonL. H. (2006). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283–296.
23.
MertonR. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, New Series, 159, 56–63.
24.
MertonR. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
MichaelsenL. K.KnightA. B.FinkL. D. (2002). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups. Westport, CT: Praeger.
26.
MichaelsenL. K.WatsonW. E.SchwartzkopfA.BlackR. H. (1992). Group decision-making: How you frame the question determines what you find. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 106–108.
27.
MunozC.HuserA. (2008). Experiential and cooperative learning: Using a situation analysis project in principles of marketing. Journal of Education for Business, 83, 214–220.
28.
MurphyP. K.AlexanderP. A. (2005). Understanding how students learn: A guide for instructional leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
29.
OnwuegbuzieA.CollinsK.ElbedourS. (2003). Aptitude-by-treatment interactions and Matthew effects in graduate-level cooperative-learning groups. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 217–230.
30.
OrmrodJ. E. (2008). Human learning (5th ed.). Alexandria, VA: Prentice Hall.
31.
ResnickL.LevineS.TeasleyL. (1991). Perspectives of socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
RhysK.FetherstonB. (2008). Productive contradictions: Dissonance, resistance, and change in an experiment with cooperative learning. Journal of Peace Education, 5, 97–111.
33.
RodgerS.MurrayH. G.CummingsA. L. (2007). Gender differences in cooperative learning with university students. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53, 157–173.
34.
SalomonG.PerkinsD. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1–24.
35.
SalomonG.PerkinsD. N.GlobersonT. (1992). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2–9.
36.
SlavinR. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
37.
SlavinR. E.HurleyE. A.ChamberlainA.ReynoldsW. M.MillerG. E. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and research. In ReynoldsW. M.MillerG. J.WeinerI. B. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 177–198). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
38.
SlavinR. E.KarweitN. (1981). Cognitive and effective outcomes of an intensive student team learning experience. Journal of Experimental Education, 50, 29–35.
39.
StanovichK. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
WatsonW. E.KumarK.MichaelsenL. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590–602.
43.
WebbG. (1992). On pretexts for higher education development activities. Higher Education, 24, 351–361.
44.
WolfordP. L.HewardW. L.AlberS. R. (2001). Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities to recruit peer assistance during cooperative learning group activities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 161–173.
45.
YilmazK. (2008). A vision of history teaching and learning: Thoughts on history education in secondary schools. The High School Journal, 92, 37–46.
46.
ZakariaE.IksanZ. (2007). Promoting cooperative learning in science and mathematics education: A Malaysian perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 3, 35–39.
47.
ZuheerK. M. M. (2008). The effect of using a program based on cooperative learning strategy on developing some oral communication skills of students, at English department, faculty of education, Sana's University (ERIC Document Reproductive Services No. 502845). Retrieved from ERIC database.
