ArgulewiczE. N. (1985). Review of Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. In MitchellJ. V.Jr. (Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook (Vol. 2, pp. 1311–1312). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement of the University of Nebraska—Lincoln.
2.
BaldwinA. Y. (2005). Identification concerns and promises for gifted students of diverse populations. Theory Into Practice, 44, 105–114.
3.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equation modeling with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
4.
BorlandJ. H. (1978). Teacher identification of the gifted: A new look. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2, 22–32.
5.
BrodyL. E. (2007). Review of the Gifted and Talented Evaluation Scales. In GeisingerK. F.SpiesR. A.CarlsonJ. F.PlakeB. S. (Eds.), The seventeenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 343345). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement of the University of Nebraska—Lincoln.
6.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.). (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (Vol. 2). Iowa City: The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
7.
DavisG. A.RimmS. B. (2003). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
ElliottS. N.ArgulewiczE. N.TurcoT. L. (1986). Predictive validity of the Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students for gifted children in three sociocultural groups. Journal of Experimental Education, 55, 27–32.
9.
ElliottS. N.BusseR. T.GreshamF. M. (1993). Behavior rating scales: Issues of use and development. School Psychology Review, 22, 313–321.
10.
FeldhusenJ. F.HellerK. A. (Ed.). (1986). Introduction. In HellerK. S.FeldhusenJ. F. (Eds.), Identifying and nurturing the gifted: An international perspective (pp. 19–31). Toronto, Canada: Hans Huber.
11.
FishkinA. S.JohnsonA. S. (1998). Who is creative? Identifying children's creative abilities. Roeper Review, 21, 40–46.
12.
FordD. Y. (1998). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. Journal of Special Education, 32, 4–14.
13.
FrasierM. M.PassowA. H. (1994). Toward a new paradigm for identifying talent potential (RM94112). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
14.
GableR. K.WolfM. B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain: Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.
15.
GagnéF. (1994). Are teachers really poor talent detectors? Comments on Pegnato and Birch's (1959) study of the effectiveness and efficiency of various identification techniques. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 124–126.
16.
GavinM. K. (2005). Are we missing anyone? Identifying mathematically promising students. Gifted Education Communicator, 36(3-4), 24–29.
17.
GavinM. K.CasaT. M.AdelsonJ. L. (2006). Mentoring mathematical minds: An innovative program to develop math talent. Understanding our Gifted, 19(1), 3–6.
18.
GentryM. L. (1999). Promoting student achievement and exemplary classroom practices through cluster grouping: A research-based alternative to heterogeneous elementary classrooms (RM99138). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
19.
GilliamJ. E.CarpenterB. O.ChristensenJ. R. (1996). Gifted and Talented Evaluation Scales. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
20.
HartyH.AdkinsD.SherwoodR. (1984). Predictability of giftedness identification indices for two recognized approaches to elementary school gifted education. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 337–342.
21.
HogeR. D.CudmoreL. (1986). The use of teacher-judgment measures in the identification of gifted pupils. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2, 181–196.
22.
HunsakerS. L.FinleyV. S.FrankE. L. (1997). An analysis of teacher nominations and student performance in gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 19–24.
23.
IsaakD. J.HubertW. A. (1999). Catalyzing the transition from student to scientists—A model for graduate research training. BioScience, 49, 321–326.
24.
JarosewichT.PfeifferS. I.MorrisJ. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 322–336.
25.
JohnsenS. K. (Ed.). (2004). Identifying gifted students: A practical guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
26.
KalantanA. R. (1991). The effects of inservice training on Bahraini teachers: Perceptions of giftedness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs.
27.
LedermanN. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.
28.
MakerC. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 41–50.
29.
MathewS. T. (1997). A review of the Gifted Evaluation Scale. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 101–104.
30.
MatthewsM. S. (2007). Review of the Scales for Identifying Gifted Students. In GeisingerK. F.SpiesR. A.CarlsonJ. F.PlakeB. S. (Eds.), The seventeenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 729–731). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement of the University of Nebraska—Lincoln.
31.
McCarneyS. B.AndersonP. D. (1998). The Gifted Evaluation Scale (2nd ed.): Technical manual. Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services.
32.
OaklandT.FalkenbergB. A.OaklandC. (1996). Assessment of leadership in children, youth and adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 138–146.
33.
PegnatoC. W.BirchJ. W. (1959). Locating gifted children in junior high schools: A comparison of methods. Exceptional Children, 25, 300–304.
34.
PluckerJ. A.CallahanC. M.TomchinE. M. (1996). Wherefore art thou, multiple intelligences? Alternative assessments for identifying talent in ethnically diverse and low income students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 81–92.
35.
PophamW. J. (1995). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
36.
ReisS.HousandA. (2007). Characteristics of gifted and talented learners: Similarities and differences across domains. In KarnesF. A.StephensK. R. (Eds.), Achieving excellence (pp. 62–81). New York, NY: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
37.
ReisS. M.BurnsD. E.RenzulliJ. S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
38.
ReisS. M.GubbinsE. J.BriggsC. J.SchreiberF. J.RichardsS.JacobsJ. K.RenzulliJ. S. (2004). Reading instruction for talented readers: Case studies documenting few opportunities for continuous progress. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 315–338.
39.
ReisS. M.WestbergK. L.KulikowichJ.CaillardF.HébertT.PluckerJ.SmistJ. M. (1993). Why not let high ability students start school in January? The curriculum compacting study (RM93106). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
40.
RenzulliJ. S. (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
41.
RenzulliJ. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261
42.
RenzulliJ. S. (1988). The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 298–309.
43.
RenzulliJ. S.DelcourtM. A. B. (1986). The legacy and logic of research on the identification of gifted persons. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 20–23.
44.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1997a). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
45.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1997b). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
46.
RenzulliJ. S.SmithL. H.WhiteA. J.CallahanC. M.HartmanR. K.WestbergK. L. (2002). Scales for Rating the Behavior Characteristics of Superior Students: Revised edition. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
47.
RogersK. B. (1991). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner (RBDMS9102). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
48.
RohrerJ. C. (1995). Primary teacher conceptions of giftedness: Image, evidence, and nonevidence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 269–283.
49.
RustJ. O. (1985). Review of Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. In MitchellJ. V.Jr. (Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook (Vol. 2, pp. 312–313). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement of the University of Nebraska—Lincoln.
50.
RustJ. O.LoseB. D. (1980). Screening for giftedness with the Slosson and the Scales for Rating Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 446–451.
51.
RyserG. R.McConnellK. (2004). Scales for Identifying Gifted Students: Ages 5 through 18. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
52.
SchaeferB. A.McDermottP. A. (1999). Learning behavior and intelligence as explanation for children's scholastic achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 299–313.
53.
SiegleD. (2004). Identifying students with gifts and talents in technology. Gifted Child Today, 27(4), 30–33, 64.
54.
SiegleD. (2007). Identifying and developing technological giftedness: Exploring another way to be gifted in the 21st century. Gifted Education Communicator, 38(1), 18–21.
55.
SiegleD.PowellT. (2004). Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 21–29.
56.
SiegleD.MooreM. M.MannR. L.WilsonH. E. (in press). Factors that influence in-service and preservice teachers' nominations of students for gifted and talented programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted.
57.
SingerE. M.HoutzJ. C.RosenfieldS. (1992). Teacher-identified characteristics of successful gifted students: A Delphi study. Educational Research Quarterly, 15(3), 5–14.
58.
SmithD. K. (2001). Review of the Gifted Evaluation Scale. In PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C. (Eds.), The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 508–509). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement of the University of Nebraska—Lincoln.
59.
SrourN. H. (1989). An analysis of teacher judgment in the identification of gifted Jordanian students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs.
60.
SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SubhiT. (1997). Who is gifted? A computerized identification procedure. High Ability Students, 8, 189–211.
62.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
63.
TomlinsonC. A. (1995). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
64.
TomlinsonC. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
65.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.JohnsonD.AveryL. D. (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 110–123.
66.
WardS. A. (2005). Review of Gifted Rating Scales. In SpiesR. A.PlakeB. S. (Eds.), The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 404–407). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement of the University of Nebraska—Lincoln.
67.
WardS. A. (2007). Review of gifted rating scales. In GeisingerK. F.SpiesR. A.CarlsonJ. F.PlakeB. S. (Eds.), The seventeenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 731–734). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement of the University of Nebraska—Lincoln.
68.
WorrellF. C.SchaeferB. A. (2004). Reliability and validity of Learning Behaviors Scale (LBS) scores with academically talented students: A comparative perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 287–308.
69.
YoungJ. W. (2001). Review of the Gifted Evaluation Scale. In PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C. (Eds.), The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 509–510). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement of the University of Nebraska—Lincoln.