Waco Independent School District (WISD) initiated a project offering AP Spanish Language to Hispanic students in the eighth grade. The Hispanic students in this AP Spanish Language class and a similar comparison group answered survey questions on parental involvement, composition of peer group, sense of belonging at school, academic attitudes, and academic aspirations. Data gathered indicated that the students enrolled in the AP course made friends with peers who cared more about grades, enjoyed reading in English, and were more optimistic about their future family, future job, and their service to the community. These results suggest that Spanish-speaking skills can be viewed as a strength and can be used as a gateway, rather than a barrier, to academic success. Enrolling at-risk native Spanish-speaking students in an AP Spanish Language class during their eighth-grade year can create a peer group that honors the students’ native language. This academically supportive peer group can play a role in students’ decisions to enroll in higher level coursework in high school. Because beliefs about self and school are deep rooted and peer group influences are intensifying during middle school, the academic benefits of AP participation need to be extended to Spanish-speaking Hispanic students. AP Spanish Language programs such as this seems to be a feasible way to target Hispanic middle school students and create an academically supportive peer group that will positively influence students’ educational aspirations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AguirreN.HernandezN. E. (2002). Portraits of success: Programs that work. In CastellanoJ. A.DiazE. I. (Eds.), Reaching new horizons: Gifted and talented education for culturally and linguistically diverse students (pp. 200–219). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
AndermanL. H. (2003). Academic and social perceptions as predictors of change in middle school students' sense of school belonging. Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 5–22.
3.
AndersonA. R.ChristensonS. L.SinclairM. F.LehrC. A. (2004). Check and connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 95–113.
4.
AspiazuG. G.BauerS. C.SpillettM. D. (1998). Improving the academic performance of Hispanic youth: A community education model. Bilingual Research Journal, 22, 103–123.
5.
BattistichV.SolomonD.WatsonM.SchapsE. (1997). Caring school communities. Educational Psychologist, 32, 627–658.
6.
BehnkeA. O.PiercyK. W.DiversiM. (2004). Educational and occupational aspirations of Hispanic youth and their parents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26, 16–35.
7.
BenensonJ. F.HeathA. (2006). Males withdraw more in one-on-one interactions, whereas females withdraw more in groups. Developmental Psychology, 42, 272–282.
8.
BoydR. R.TashakkoriA. (1994, November). A comparison of the Hispanic dropout and non-dropout between the 8th and 10th grades. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midsouth Educational Research Association, Nashville, TN.
9.
BrownB.TheobaldW. (1998). Learning contexts beyond the classroom: Extracurricular activities, community organizations, and peer groups. In BormanK.SchneiderB. (Eds.), The adolescent years: Social influences and educational challenges. Ninety-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 109141). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
10.
CoburnJ.NelsonS. (1989). Teachers do make a difference: What Indian graduates say about their school experience (Report No. RC-107-103). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
11.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
College Board. (2001). Access to excellence: A report of the Commission of the Future of the Advanced Placement Program. New York, NY: Author.
13.
College Board. (2002, September). Summary of evaluation results of Advanced Placement Program (AP) vertical teams for English (Research Notes: RN-17). New York, NY: Author.
14.
CurryW.MacDonaldW.MorganR. (1999). The Advanced Placement Program: Access to excellence. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 17–22.
15.
DarderA. (1991). Culture and power in the classroom: A critical foundation for bicultural education. New York, NY: Bergin & Garvey.
16.
DoughertyC.MellorL.JianJ. (2006). The relationship between Advanced Placement and college graduation: 2005 AP study series [Report]. Austin, TX: National Center for Educational Accountability.
Fierro-TreviñoM. J.PérezR.KettlerT. (2005, April). Middle school AP Spanish: Are you crazy? Paper presented at the annual conference of The Southwest Conference on Language Teaching, Irving, TX.
20.
FlanneryM. E. (2007). Advancing the middle ground. NEA Today, 25(5), 24–29.
21.
GearyP. A. (1988, April). “Defying the odds?”: Academic success among at-risk minority teenagers in an urban high school (Report No. UD-026-258). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
22.
GibsonM. A.GándaraP.KoyomaJ. P. (2004). The role of peers in the schooling of U.S. Mexican youth. In GibsonM. A.GándaraP.KoyomaJ. P. (Eds.), School connections: U.S. Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
23.
HoffD. J. (2002). College Board to extend reach to middle school. Education Week, 21(27), 10.
24.
KettlerT.ShiuA.JohnsenS. K. (2006a). Gifts of language diversity: Building educational aspirations with Latino students in middle school. Gifted Education Communicator, 37(4), 13–16.
25.
KettlerT.ShiuA.JohnsenS. K. (2006b). AP as an intervention for middle school Hispanic students. Gifted Child Today, 29(1), 39–46.
26.
KlopfensteinK. (2004). Advanced Placement: Do minorities have equal opportunity?Economics of Education Review, 23, 115–131.
27.
Lewis-CharpH.YuH. C.FriedlaenderD. (2004). The influence of intergroup relations on school engagement: Two cases. In GibsonM. A.GándaraP.KoyomaJ. P. (Eds.), School connections: U.S. Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement (pp. 107–128). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
MaleckiC. K.DemarayM. K. (2006). Social support as a buffer in the relationship between socioeconomic status and academic performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 21, 375–395.
29.
MartinezC. R.DeGarmoD. S.EddyJ. M. (2004). Promoting academic success among Latino youths. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26, 128–151.
30.
MartinezM.KloppotS. (2005). The link between high school reform and college access and success for low-income and minority youth. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum and Pathways to College Network.
31.
McDonoughP. (2004). The school-to-college transition: Challenges and prospects. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
32.
NduraE.RobinsonM.OchsG. (2003). Minority students in high school Advanced Placement courses: Opportunity and equity denied. American Secondary Education, 32(1), 21–38.
33.
NicholsS. L. (2006). Teachers' and students' beliefs about student belonging in one middle school. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 255–271.
34.
OstermanK. F. (2000). Students' need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70, 323–367.
35.
PerkinsR.KleinerB.RoeyS.BrownJ. (2004). The high school transcript study: A decade of change in curricula and achievement, 1990-2000 (NCES 2004-455). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
36.
RomoH. D.FalboT. (1996). Hispanic high school graduation. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
37.
RutterM. (1984). Resilient children. Why some disadvantaged children overcome their environments, and how we can help. Psychology Today, 18, 57–65.
38.
SantoliS. P. (2002). Is there an Advanced Placement advantage?American Secondary Education, 30(3), 23–25.
39.
SaylorE. S.AriesE. (1999). Ethnic identity and change in social context. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 549–566.
40.
SchneiderM. E.WardD. J. (2003). The role of ethnic identification and perceived social support in Hispanics' adjustment to college. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25, 539–554.
41.
ShulmanS. (1993). Close relationships and coping behavior in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 267–283.
42.
SolorzanoD. G.OrnelasA. (2004). A critical race analysis of Latino/a and African American Advanced Placement enrollment in public high schools. High School Journal, 87, 215–229.
43.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 1–40.
44.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of U.S.-Mexican youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
45.
SteinbergL. (1996). Ethnicity and adolescent achievement. American Educator, 28, 44–48.
46.
TierneyW. G.JunA. (2001). A university helps prepare low income youths for college: Tracking school success. The Journal of Higher Education, 72, 205–225.
47.
ValadezJ. R. (2002). The influence of social capital on mathematics course selection by Hispanic high school students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24, 319–339.
48.
Waco Independent School District. (2005). Waco I.S.D. is aiming high: 2004 annual report. Waco, TX: Author.
49.
WernerE.SmithR. (1988). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York, NY: Adams, Bannister, and Cox.
50.
WoolleyM. E.KolK. L.BowenG. L. (2009). The social context of school success for Latino middle school students: Direct and indirect influences of teachers, family, and friends. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 43–70.
