Effects of Summer Academic Programs in Middle School on High School Test Scores,Course-Taking,and College Major

Abstract

Through their participation in a seventh-grade talent search in 19961997, students qualified to attend a summer program at Duke University's Talent Identification Program (Duke TIP). Of the North Carolina students in this group, some attended at least one summer program in middle school and others had qualified for but did not attend a summer program at Duke TIP. The two groups did not differ significantly on gender, parent education level, or ethnicity. Some positive effects of Duke TIP summer programs were found on later academic achievement and educational choices using both standardized objective measures and self-reports of high school and college academic experiences. We found that students who participated in a Duke TIP math program in middle school did indeed take more AP math courses in high school, but there were no effects for other types of advanced math classes or for any other subjects. Additionally, compared to Search Only students, students who took a math/science course at Duke TIP were more likely to major in math/science in college. More Duke TIP students than Search Only students aspired to earn a doctorate. Anecdotally, we also have heard from many former Duke TIP participants how much Duke TIP has affected their lives, and it is noteworthy that we are now able to empirically document some of these effects.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnett

L. B.

Durden

W. G.

(1993). Education patterns of academically talented youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 161–168.

Benbow

C. P.

(2006, May). Julian C. Stanley keynote address. Paper presented at the Wallace Biennial Symposium on Talent Development, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Benbow

C. P.

Lubinski

(Eds.). (1996). Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issue. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Campbell

J. R.

Wagner

Walberg

H. J.

(2000). Academic competitions and programs designed to challenge the exceptionally talented. In Heller

K. A.

Mönks

F. J.

Sternberg

R. J.

Subotnik

R. F.

(Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed.; pp. 523–535). New York: Elsevier.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cross

T. L.

Coleman

L. J.

(1993). The social cognition of gifted adolescents: An exploration of the stigma of giftedness paradigm. Roeper Review, 16, 37–40.

Cunningham

L. G.

Rinn

(2007). The role of gender and previous participation in a summer program on gifted adolescents' self-concepts over time. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 326–353.

Donlon

T. F.

(1984). The College Board technical handbook for the Scholastic Aptitude Test and Achievement Tests. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

Emerick

L. J.

(1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students' perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 140–146.

10.

Enersen

D. L.

(1993). Summer residential programs: Academics and beyond. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 169–176.

11.

Entwisle

D. R.

Alexander

K.L.

(1992). Summer setback: Race, poverty, school composition, and mathematics achievement in the first two years of school. American Sociological Review, 57, 72–84.

12.

Feldhusen

J. F.

(1991). Saturday and summer programs. In Colangelo

Davis

G. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 197–208). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

13.

Howell

D. C.

(2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.

14.

Kanevsky

Keighley

(2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26, 20–28.

15.

Lee

S.-Y.

Matthews

M. S.

Olszewski-Kubilius

(2008). A national picture of talent search and talent search educational programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 55–69.

16.

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2006). Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316–345.

17.

Mills

C. J.

Ablard

K. E.

Lynch

S. J.

(1992). Academically talented students' preparation for advanced-level course work after an individually-paced precalculus class. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 3–17.

18.

Neihart

(2004). Risk and resilience in gifted children: A conceptual framework. In Neihart

Reis

S. M.

Robinson

N. M.

Moon

S. M.

(Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 113–122). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

19.

Olszewski

Kulieke

M. J.

Willis

G. B.

(1987). Changes in the self-perceptions of gifted students who participate in rigorous academic programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 287–303.

20.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Grant

(1996). Academically talented women and mathematics: The role of special programs and support from others on acceleration, achievement, and aspirations. In Arnold

Noble

K. D.

Subotnik

R. F.

(Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 281–294). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

21.

Putallaz

Baldwin

Selph

(2005). The Duke University Talent Identification Program. High Ability Studies, 16, 41–54.

22.

Reynolds

N. G.

Conaway

B. J.

(2003). Factors affecting mathematically talented females' enrollment in high school calculus. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 218–228.

23.

Schiel

J. L.

Stocking

V. B.

(2001). Benefits of TIP Summer Residential Program participation, as reflected by subsequent academic performance in high school. In Colangelo

Assouline

S. G.

(Eds.), Talent development IV: Proceedings of the 1998 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. (pp. 435–438). Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.

24.

Siegle

McCoach

D. B.

(2004). Promoting a positive achievement attitude with gifted and talented students. In Neihart

Reis

S. M.

Robinson

N. M.

Moon

S. M.

(Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 237–249). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

25.

Silverman

L. K.

(1993). Counseling needs and programs for the gifted. In Heller

K. A.

Mönks

F. J.

Passow

A. H.

(Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 631–647). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

26.

Swiatek

M. A.

Benbow

C. P.

(1991). A ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 528–538.