Failure or Reasonable Move?: Portrayal of American Pullout from Afghanistan in Russian and American International Media

Abstract

This study examined competing narratives about the actions of the United States abroad through an analysis of 314 news items of the 2021 American withdrawal from Afghanistan by two media organizations: Russian Sputnik and American Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. The textual analysis revealed five dominant themes in Sputnik: Americans as losers and Taliban as winners, Americans as incompetent, Americans as unreliable, insensitive, and irresponsible, Americans as duplicitous, and Americans as a threat to world peace; and four dominant themes in RFE/RL: The Taliban taking over the country quickly, Americans successfully leading the evacuations, Americans having good faith and defending the decision to pull out, and Americans as naïve and lacking good judgment. The findings are interpreted in light of the image theory and second-level agenda setting theory.

Keywords

Image theory national images news Sputnik Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Afghanistan

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

M. G.

Brewer

M. B.

Livingston

R. W.

(2005). Putting stereotype content in context: Image theory and interethnic stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(6), 781–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271550

Alexander

M. G.

Levin

Henry

P. J.

(2005). Image theory, social identity, and social dominance: Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images. Political Psychology, 26(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00408.x

Anholt

(2010). Places: Identity, image and reputation. Palgrave Macmillan.

Attride-Sterling

(2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307

Baum

M. A.

Groeling

T. J.

(2009). War stories. Princeton University Press.

Besova

A. A.

Cooley

S. C.

(2009). Foreign news and public opinion: Attribute agenda-setting theory revisited. Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies, 30(2), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560054.2009.9653403

Boulding

K. E.

(1959). National images and international systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275900300204

Brandt

Taussig

(2020). The Kremlin’s disinformation playbook goes to Beijing. Brookings Institution.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

10.

Brewer

P. R.

Graf

Willnat

(2003). Priming or framing: Media influence on attitudes toward foreign countries. International Communication Gazette, 65(6), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549203065006005

11.

Brown

(2008). Arts diplomacy: The neglected aspect of cultural diplomacy. Routledge.

12.

Brown

(2012). The four paradigms of public diplomacy: Building a framework for comparative government external communications research. Institute of Communication Studies. University of Leeds.

13.

Čabaravdić, S. (2009). RSE već 15 godina sa vama. Retrieved from: https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/1377412.html

14.

Carroll

C. E.

McCombs

(2003). Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public’s images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540188

15.

Chernobrov

Briant

E. L.

(2022). Competing propagandas: How the United States and Russia represent mutual propaganda activities. Politics, 42(3), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720966171

16.

Cone

(1999). Presuming a right to deceive: Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty, the CIA, and the news media. Journalism History, 24(4), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00947679.1999.12062497

17.

Cull

N. J.

(2008). Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311952

18.

Davis

(2020). Imagining Iran: Insights from image theory. IUP Journal of International Relations, 14(4), 19–36. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3817213.

19.

Deverett

Wagnsson

Olsson

E. K.

(2021). Destruct, direct and suppress: Sputnik narratives on the Nordic countries. The Journal of International Communication, 27(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2020.1817122

20.

Douai

(2011). The age of web diplomacy: Exploration of international broadcasting online. First Monday, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i2.3247

21.

Džumhur

(1983). Pisma iz Azije . Prva Književna Komuna.

22.

Ghanbari Baghestan

Nizam Osman

(2021). The image of Donald Trump in major Malaysian newspapers: A deeper “mistrust” than Obama’s time. In Kamalipour

Y. R.

(Ed.), Global media perceptions of the United States: The Trump effect (pp. 189–200). Rowman & Littlefield.

23.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

Abrams

Dardenne

Ferreira

M. C.

Gonzalez

Hachfeld

Huang

L.-L.

Hutchison

Kim

H.-J.

Manganelli

A. M.

Masser

Mucchi-Faina

Okiebisu

Rouhana

Saiz

J. L.

Sakalli-Ugurlu

Volpato

Yamamoto

Yzerbyt

(2006). Anti-American sentiment and America’s perceived intent to dominate: An 11-nation study. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2804_10

24.

Gurganus

Rumer

(2019). Russia’s global ambitions in perspective. Carnegie Endowment for International Piece . https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep20991.1.pdf

25.

Xianhong

Xing

(2012). The image of the United States in the Chinese media: An examination of the evaluative component of framing. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 676–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.09.001

26.

Herrmann

R. K.

Fischerkeller

M. P.

(1995). Beyond the enemy image and spiral model: Cognitive-strategic research after the Cold War. International Organization, 49(3), 415–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033336

27.

Hook

S. W.

Spanier

(2019). American foreign policy since World War II. CQ Press, An Imprint of Sage Publications, Inc.

28.

Howell

(1997). The writers’ war board: U.S. domestic propaganda in World War I. The Historian, 59(4), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6563.1997.tb01376.x

29.

Izadi

(2009). U.S. international broadcasting: The case of Iran. The Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society, 39(2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.3200/JAML.39.2.132-148

30.

Juwayeyi

M. M.

(2021). Congressional concerns over partisanship and a lack of professional independence: Critical junctures and the evolution of U.S. government agencies. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 23(3), 164–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/15226379211033850

31.

Kragh

Asberg

(2017). Russia’s strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures: The Swedish case. Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(6), 773–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1273830

32.

Krasner

S. D.

(1991). Global communications and national power: Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics, 43(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010398

33.

Lincoln

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

34.

Liu

Yang

Y. E.

(2015). Examining China’s official media perception of the United States: A content analysis of People’s Daily coverage. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 20(4), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-015-9340-8

35.

Lozano

J. C.

Martínez-Garza

F. J.

(2021). Coverage of Donald Trump in three Mexican national newspapers. In Kamalipour

Y. R.

(Ed.), Global media perceptions of the United States: The Trump effect (pp. 201–214). Rowman & Littlefield.

36.

McCracken

(1987). Advertising: Meaning or information. In Wallendorf

Anderson

(Eds.), NA - advances in consumer research (Vol. 14, pp. 121–124). Association for Consumer Research.

37.

McNelly

J. T.

Izcaray

(1986). International news exposure and images of nations. Journalism Quarterly, 63(3), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908606300315

38.

NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. (2020, April). Russia’s narratives toward the Western Balkans: Analysis of Sputnik Serbia. https://stratcomcoe.org/pdfjs/?file=/publications/download/analysis_of_sputnik_serbia_30-04_v4-1.pdf?zoom=page-fit

39.

National Intelligence Council. (2017). Assessing Russian activities and intentions in recent US elections. Retrieved from https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

40.

Nimmo

(2016, January). Sputnik. Propaganda in a New Orbit: Information Warfare Initiative Paper No. 2. Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA).

41.

Nossiter

Schmitt

(2021, October 5). U.S. war in Afghanistan ends as final evacuation flights depart. The New York Times . https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/30/world/asia/afghanistan-us-occupation-ends.html

42.

NPR. (2021, August 28). European leaders have tense reactions to U.S.-Afghanistan Conflict. Retrieved December 3, 2021, from https://www.npr.org/2021/08/28/1031965222/european-leaders-have-tense-reactions-to-u-s-afghanistan-conflict

43.

Nye

J. S.

(2004). Soft power and American foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly, 119(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/20202345

44.

O'Keeffe

Oliver

(2010). International Broadcasting and its Contribution to Public Diplomacy. Lowy Institute. https://archive.lowyinstitute.org/publications/international-broadcasting-and-its-contribution-public-diplomacy

45.

Orttung

R. W.

Nelson

(2019). Russia Today’s strategy and effectiveness on YouTube. Post-Soviet Affairs, 35(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1531650

46.

Osipova-Stocker

Shiu

Layou

Powers

(2022). Assessing impact in global media: Methods, innovations, and challenges. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 18(3), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00240-4

47.

Pamment

(2013). New Public Diplomacy in the 21^st Century: A Comparative Study of Policy and Practice. Routledge.

48.

Petrinca

(2019). Radio waves, memories, and the politics of everyday life in socialist Romania: The case of Radio Free Europe. Centaurus; International Magazine of the History of Science and Medicine, 61(3), 178–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12232.

49.

Pew Research Center. (2021). Majority of U.S. public favors Afghanistan troop withdrawal; Biden criticized for his handling of the situation . https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/08/31/majority-of-u-s-public-favors-afghanistan-troop-withdrawal-biden-criticized-for-his-handling-of-situation/

50.

Potter

E. H.

(2019). Russia’s strategy for perception management through public diplomacy and influence operations: The Canadian case. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(4), 402–425. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-14401070

51.

Pjesivac

Luther

Imre

. (2018). Constructing an image of the United States in the British and French editorials about WikiLeaks. The Journal of International Communication, 24, 216–237. 10.1080/13216597.2018.1492432

52.

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL). (2021). About us. https://pressroom.rferl.org/about-us

53.

Rawnsley

G. D.

(2015). To know us is to love us: Public diplomacy and international broadcasting in contemporary Russia and China. Politics, 35(3-4), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12104

54.

Samorukov

Vuksanovic

(2023, January). Untarnished by war: Why Russia’s soft power is so resilient in Serbia. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace . https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/88828

55.

Savage

(2000). One voice, different tunes: Issues raised by dual analysis of a segment of qualitative data. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01432.x

56.

Serir

Akhgar

Gannon

Gambrell

(2021, August 16). Kabul airport plunges into chaos as Taliban patrol capital. AP News . https://apnews.com/article/afghanistan-taliban-784681c4400b097cf73b93cec34c5c61

57.

Simons

(2014). Russian Public diplomacy in the 21^st century: Structure, means, and message. Public Relations Review, 40(3), 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.03.002

58.

Snow

(2009). Rethinking public diplomacy. In Snow

Taylor

(Eds.), Routledge handbook of public diplomacy (pp. 3–12). Routledge.

59.

Sputnik. (2021). About us. Retrieved December 3, 2021, from https://sputniknews.com/docs/index.html

60.

Strauss

Corbin

J. M.

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.

61.

Stronski

Himes

(2019). Russia’s game in the Balkans. Carnegie Endowment for International Piece . https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep20988.1?seq=1

62.

Sunter

(2020, December 21). Disinformation in the Western Balkans. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2020/12/21/disinformation-in-the-western-balkans/index.html

63.

Thussu

D. K.

(2019). International communication: Continuity and change. Bloomsbury publishing.

64.

U.S. Agency for Global Media. (2021). 2021 performance and accountability report. https://www.usagm.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/FY-2021-USAGM-PAR-FINAL.pdf

65.

Wanta

(2018). Media influence on the public’s perceptions of countries. In Ingenhoff

White

Buhmann

Kiousis

(Eds.), Bridging Disciplinary Perspectives of Country Image Reputation, Brand, and Identity (pp. 230–241). Routledge.

66.

Wanta

Golan

Lee

(2004). Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100209

67.

Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs. (2021). Costs of war. https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/afghan

68.

Wike

Poushter

Silver

Fetterolf

Mordecai

(2021, June 10). America’s image abroad rebounds with transition from Trump to Biden. Pew Research Center . https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/06/10/americas-image-abroad-rebounds-with-transition-from-trump-to-biden/

69.

Willbur

D. S.

(2021). Propaganda or not: Examining the claims of extensive Russian information operations within the United States. Journal of Information Warfare, 20(3), 146–156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27125004.

70.

Willnat

Tang

Shi

Zhan

(2022). Media use and national image: How Americans and Chinese perceive the U.S.–China trade war. International Communication Gazette, 84(7–8), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485221093000

71.

Zhang

Luther

C. A.

(2020). Transnational news media coverage of distant suffering in the Syrian civil war: An analysis of CNN, Al-Jazeera English and Sputnik online news. Media, War & Conflict, 13(4), 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219846029