News organizations increasingly use Facebook to expand their reach and foster audience engagement. However, this free platform exposes news audiences to user comments before accessing and reading news articles. This exposure shapes the visible opinion climate and has the potential to influence readers. Through the application of the hostile media bias hypothesis, the influence of Facebook comments on COVID-19 related news articles and a knowledge-based assessment on perceptions of news bias and credibility are tested using a nationwide sample of Facebook users (N = 450). Findings show that user comments enhance negative perceptions of bias and diminish perceptions of favorability. The ability for knowledge-based assessments to alleviate this negative influence may induce reactance and needs further investigation.
ArceneauxK.JohnsonM.CrydermanJ. (2013). Communication, persuasion, and the conditioning value of selective exposure: Like minds may unite and divide but they mostly tune out. Political Communication, 30(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737424
FeldmanL. (2011). Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect. Political Behavior, 33(3), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9139-4
6.
FicoF.RichardsonJ. D.EdwardsS. M. (2004). Influence of story structure on perceived story bias and news organization credibility. Mass Communication & Society, 7(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0703_3
7.
GearhartS.MoeA.ZhangB. (2020). Hostile media bias on social media: Testing the effect of user comments on perceptions of news bias and credibility. Human Behavior & Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.185
Giner-SorollaR.ChaikenS. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1008
GuntherA. C.ChiaS. C. (2001). Predicting pluralistic ignorance: The hostile media perception and its consequences. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(4), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800405
HinnantA.JenkinsJ.SubramanianR. (2016). Health journalist role conceptions: Existing and emerging professional identities. Journalism Practice, 10(6), 763–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1053509
14.
HinnantA.Len-RíosM. E.OhH. J. (2012). Are health journalists’ practices tied to their perceptions of audience? An attribution and expectancy-value approach. Health Communication, 27(3), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.578331
15.
HoustonJ. B.HansenG. J.NisbettG. S. (2011). Influence of user comments on perceptions of media bias and third-person effect in online news. Electronic News, 5(2), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243111407618
16.
KimM. (2015). Partisans and controversial news online: Comparing perceptions of bias and credibility in news content from blogs and mainstream media. Mass Communication & Society, 18(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.877486
17.
LeeE.-J. (2012). That’s not the way it is: How user-generated comments on the news affect perceived media bias. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01597.x
18.
LeeE.-J.TandocE. C.Jr. (2017). When news meets the audience: How audience feedback online affects news production and consumption. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12123
19.
LeeT.KimY.CoeK. (2018). When social media become hostile media: An experimental examination of news sharing, partisanship, and follower count. Mass Communication & Society, 21(4), 450–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1429635
MikulincerM. (1988). Reactance and helplessness following exposure to unsolvable problems: The effects of attributional style. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54(4), 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.679
22.
MuddimanA.StroudN. J. (2017). News values, cognitive biases, and partisan incivility in comment sections. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 586–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12312
PerloffR. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16(2), 236–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016002004
ValloneR. P.RossL.LepperM. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 49(3), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
34.
Vázquez-HerreroJ.Direito-RebollalS.López-GarcíaX. (2019). Ephemeral journalism: News distribution through Instagram stories. Social Media + Society, 5(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119888657
WaltherJ. B.DeAndreaD.KimJ.AnthonyJ. C. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36(4), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01384.x
WillnatL.WeaverD. H.WilhoitG. C. (2019). The American journalist in the digital age: How journalists and the public think about journalism in the United States. Journalism Studies, 20(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1387071
40.
WinterS.MetzgerM. J.FlanaginA. J. (2016). Selective use of news cues: A multiple-motive perspective on information selection in social media environments. Journal of Communication, 66(4), 669–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12241
41.
WortmanC. B.BrehmJ. W. (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 277–336). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60253-1
42.
ZhangB.GearhartS. (2020). Collecting online survey data: A comparison of data quality among a commercial panel and MTurk. Survey Practice, 13, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2020-0015
