Twitter impacts what is covered by journalists, which affects what viewers think is important. This article explores the association between Trump’s tweets and cable and network television news coverage through the theoretical framework of agenda building. During a 3-week period in January 2020, a content analysis of story topics and publication times of Fox News, CNN, ABC, and NBC (N = 1,436) was conducted in conjunction with Trump’s tweets (N = 277). The findings showed a strong correlation between Fox News and @realDonaldTrump’s tweets and a moderate correlation with CNN. About half of Trump’s tweets reflected Fox News stories, hosts, or guests. More than 40% of news stories mentioned Trump, while his tweets were in stories at least 10% of the time. The results showed that Trump and Fox News had a strong influence over agenda building in the United States’ television news landscape.
AtkinsonC. (2019). Semiotic analysis and public policy: Connecting theory and practice. Taylor & Francis.
2.
BardM. T. (2017). Propaganda, persuasion, or journalism? Fox News’ prime-time coverage of health-care reform in 2009 and 2014. Electronic News, 11, 100–118.
CobbR.ElderC. (1971). The politics of agenda-building: An alternative perspective for modern democratic theory. The Journal of Politics, 33, 892–915.
7.
ConwayB.KenskiK.WangD. (2015, July1). The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12124
8.
DearingJ. W.RogersE. M. (1996). Communication concepts 6: Agenda-setting. Sage.
GroshekJ.GroshekM. (2013). Agenda trending: Reciprocity and the predictive capacity of social networking sites in intermedia agenda setting across topics over time. Media and Communication, 1, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.71
IyengarS.KinderD. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press.
14.
JamiesonK. H.TaussigD. (2017, November11). Disruption, demonization, deliverance, and norm destruction: The rhetorical signature of Donald J. Trump. The Journal of Public and International Affairs, 132, 619–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12699
15.
KayamO. (2018, October12). Donald Trump’s rhetoric. Language & Dialogue, 2, 183–208.
16.
KellnerD. (2016). American nightmare: Donald Trump, media spectacle, and authoritarian populism. Sense Publishers.
17.
LeeJ.XuW. (2018, June). The more attacks, the more retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s agenda setting on Twitter. Public Relations Review, 44, 201–213.
18.
McCombsM.ShawD. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 178–187.
Perez-CurielC.NaharroP. (2019). Political influencers. A study of Donald Trump’s personal brand on Twitter and its impact on the media and users. Communication and Society, 32, 55–75. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.1.57-75
28.
PerloffR. (2018). The dynamics of political communication: Media and politics in a digital age (2nd ed.). Routledge.
RichC. (2015). Writing and reporting news: A coaching method. Cengage.
33.
RogersE. M.DearingJ. W.(1988). Agenda-setting research: Where has it been, where is it going?Annals of the International Communication Association, 11, 555–594.
34.
ShermanG. (2014). The loudest voice in the room: How the brilliant, bombastic Roger Ailes built Fox News—And divided a country. Random House.
35.
ShoemakerP.ReeseS. D. (2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective (3rd ed.). Routledge.
XiongY.ChoM.BoatwrightB. (2019). Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the #MeToo movement. Public Relations Review, 45, 10–23.
