Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study uses a web-based survey of television news directors to examine perceptions of user-generated content (UGC) as well as newsroom policies regarding its use at stations across the United States. Using public sphere and gatekeeping as the theoretical guides, this research found that informal policies were more prevalent than formal policies and that stations shared similar vetting process for using UGC. Additional findings include type of content most used, submission formats, frequency of and main reasons for its use, and overall perceptions of these citizen-submitted materials. The study helps to advance our knowledge about newsroom management’s views of UGC, while providing insight about how television news stations are handling decisions and discussions regarding the use of this ever-growing type of content.

Keywords

user-generated content television news survey news directors newsroom policies gatekeeping

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Press Institute. (2014, 3 17). How Americans get their news. Retrieved from http://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/how-americans-get-news/

Ariens

(2011, 11 11). Dozens of jobs cut at CNN; New York, Atlanta, Washington, DC, Miami, LA staffers pink-slipped. Adweek Blog Network: TVNewser. Retrieved from http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/dozens-of-jobs-cut-at-cnn-new-york-atlanta-washington-dc-miami-la-staffers-pink-slipped/98914

Bentley

Hamman

Ibold

Littau

Meyer

(2006). Sense of community as a driver for citizen journalism. Paper presented at the Association for Journalism in Education and Mass Communication Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA.

Berkowitz

(1987). TV news sources and news channels: A study in agenda-building. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 508–513.

Brown

(2005). ‘Citizen’ journalism is not professional journalism. Quill, 93, 42.

Cerritos College. (n.d.). A brief guide to the analysis of open-ended survey questions. Retrieved from http://cms.cerritos.edu/uploads/ResearchandPlanning/Brief_Guide_to_Open-Ended_Survey_Questions.pdf

Chan-Olmsted

S. M.

L. S.

(2003). Internet business models for broadcasters: How television stations perceive and integrate the internet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 597–617.

Cho

(2014, 1 29). How to make sense of open-ended responses. Survey Monkey Blog. Retrieved from https://www.surveymonkey.com/blog/2014/01/29/open-response-question-types/

Christodoulides

Jevons

Bonhomme

(2012). Memo to marketers: Quantitative evidence for change. How user-generated content really affects brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 52, 53–64.

10.

Cision. (2015). State of the media 2015 report. Retrieved from http://www.cision.com/us/resources/white-papers/state-of-the-media-2015-report/

11.

Clark

R. P.

(2009, 4 28). Who is the fifth estate and what is its role in journalism’s future? The Poynter Institute. Retrieved from http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/top-stories/95483/who-is-the-fifth-estate-and-what-is-its-role-in-journalisms-future/

12.

Colistra

R. F.

(2012). Shaping and cutting the media agenda: Television reporters’ perceptions of agenda- and frame-building and agenda-cutting influences. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 15, 85–146.

13.

Daugherty

Eastin

M. S.

Bright

(2008). Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8, 16–25.

14.

Dillman

D. A.

(2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.

15.

Feighery

(2011). Conversation and credibility: Broadening journalism criticism through public engagement. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 26, 158–175.

16.

Fernando

(2008). Citizen-powered journalism fills a void. Communication World, 25, 8–9.

17.

Gillmor

(2004). We the media: The rise of citizen journalists. National Civic Review, 93, 58–63.

18.

Glaser

Strauss

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.

19.

Goode

(2009). Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media & Society, 11, 1287–1305.

20.

Habermas

(1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

21.

Harrison

(2010). User-generated content and gatekeeping at the BBC hub. Journalism Studies, 11, 243–256.

22.

Holcomb

(2013, 8 20). NBC makes a bet on getting user-generated content from citizen videographers. Pew Research Center: Fact Tank. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/08/20/nbc-makes-a-bet-on-getting-user-generated-content-from-citizen-videographers/

23.

Holton

A. E.

Coddington

Gil de Zúñiga

(2013). Whose news? Whose values? Journalism Practice, 7, 720–737.

24.

Ibelema

Powell

(2001). Cable television news viewed as most credible. Newspaper Research Journal, 22, 41–51.

25.

King

(2012). Vetting citizen journalism. Nieman Reports, 66, 17.

26.

Krumm

Davies

Narayanaswami

(2008). User-generated content. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 7, 10–11. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2008.85

27.

Lewin

(1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: II. Channels of Group Life; Social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1, 143–153. doi:10.1177/001872674700100201

28.

Lewis

(2006). News and the empowerment of citizens. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9, 303–319.

29.

Lewis

S. C.

Kaufhold

Lasorsa

D. L.

(2010). Thinking about citizen journalism. Journalism Practice, 4, 163–179.

30.

Lim

(2011). Intermedia agenda setting and news discourse: A strategic responses model for a competitor’s breaking stories. Journalism Practice, 5, 227–244.

31.

Madrigal

(2013, 4 13). #BostonBombing: The anatomy of a misinformation disaster. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/04/-bostonbombing-the-anatomy-of-a-misinformation-disaster/275155/

32.

Maibach

Wilson

Witte

(2010). Television meteorologists and climate change: A national survey. George Mason University. Fairfax, VA: Center for Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/images/files/TV_News_Directors_&_Climate%20Change%281%29.PDF

33.

Matsa

K. E.

(2015, 4 29). Hispanic media fact sheet. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2015/04/29/hispanic-media-fact-sheet/

34.

Mayer

(2011). Engaging communities: Content and conversation. Nieman Reports, 65, 12–14.

35.

Miller

B. M.

(2010). Community stakeholders and marketplace advocacy: A model of advocacy, agenda building, and industry approval. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22, 85–112.

36.

Miller

(2008). The new journalism: It’s audience participation time. EContent, 31, 30–34. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/213814016?accountid=2837

37.

Moran

K. C.

(2006). Is changing the language enough? The Spanish-language ‘alternative’ in the USA. Journalism, 7, 389.

38.

Nah

Yamamoto

Chung

D. S.

Zuercher

(2015). Modeling the adoption and use of citizen journalism by online newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92, 399–420.

39.

Nip

(2006). Exploring the second phase of public journalism. Journalism Studies, 7, 212–236.

40.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007, 4 12). Participative web: User-created content. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/38393115.pdf

41.

Paulussen

Heinonen

Domingo

Quandt

(2007). Doing it together: Citizen participation in the professional news making process. Observatorio (OBS*), 1, 131–154.

42.

Pew Research Center. (2005, 2 17). Spanish-language TV coverage of the 2004 campaigns. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2005/02/17/iii-local-news-findings/

43.

Pew Research Center. (2015, 4 1). U.S. smartphone use in 2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/03/PI_Smartphones_0401151.pdf

44.

Reading O’Reilly: “What is Web 2.0.” (2011, 1 13). Retrieved from http://thebytekitchen.com/2011/01/13/reading-oreilly-what-is-web-2-0-2005/

45.

Shoemaker

P. J.

Reese

S. D.

(1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.

46.

Singer

J. B.

(2014). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16, 55–73.

47.

Stoeckl

Rohrmeier

Hess

(2007). Motivations to produce user generated content: Differences between webloggers and videobloggers. BLED 2007 Proceedings. Paper 30. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/bled2007/30

48.

Tang

Fang

Wang

(2014). Is neutral really neutral? The effects of neutral user-generated content on product sales. Journal of Marketing, 78, 41–58.

49.

Shao

(2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research, 19, 7–25.

50.

Stanglin

(2013, 4 25). Student wrongly tied to Boston bombings found dead. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2013/04/25/boston-bombing-social-media-student-brown-university-reddit/2112309/

51.

Wahl-Jorgensen

Williams

Wardle

(2010). Audience views on user-generated content: Exploring the value of news from the bottom up. Northern Lights, 8, 177–194.

52.

Wardle

Dubberly

Brown

(2014). Amateur footage: A global study of user-generated content in TV and online news output. New York, NY: Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University.

53.

White

D. M.

(1950). “The Gate Keeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27, 383–390.

User-Generated Content and Television News Stations

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References