A total of 118 hr of sports news broadcast programming was subject to gender clock-time analysis, half from Entertainment and Sports Programming Network (ESPN’s) SportsCenter and half from 2013 startup network Fox Sports 1’s Fox Sports Live. Results showed that both programs featured women’s sports less than 1% of the time, with only modest gains found in an Olympic month (February 2014) of presumed heavy women’s sports exposure compared to a fall (October/November 2013) coding period. Moreover, both programs featured the same top five sports in nearly identical proportionality and story lengths of women’s spots were consistently 70% of a men’s spot regardless of program. Results indicate that Fox Sports Live is replicating SportsCenter’s programming choices far more than challenging them from a gender perspective.
BillingsA. C.AngeliniJ. R.MacArthurP. J.BissellK.SmithL. R. (2014). (Re)calling London: The gender frame agenda within NBC’s primetime broadcast of the 2012 Olympiad. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91, 38–58.
5.
CocheR. (2013). Is ESPN really the women’s sports network? A content analysis of ESPN’s internet coverage of the Australian open. Electronic News, 7, 72–88.
6.
CohenB. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 687–699.
8.
CookyC.MessnerM. A.HextrumR. H. (2013). Women play sport but not on TV: A longitudinal study of televised media. Communication and Sport, 1, 203–230.
9.
DavisK. K.TuggleC. A. (2012). A gender analysis of NBC’s coverage of the 2008 summer Olympics. Electronic News, 6, 51–66.
DelormeN. (2014). Were women really underrepresented in media coverage in summer Olympic games (1984-2008)? An invitation to open a methodological discussion regarding sex equity in sports media. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 121–147.
GalilyY.CohenN.LevyM. (2011). (Not) stronger, higher, or swifter: Representation of female Olympic athletes in the Israeli press. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 12, 57–78.
17.
GitlinT. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media and the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
18.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper Row.
19.
GreerJ. D.HardinM.HomanC. (2009). ‘Naturally’ less exciting? Visual production of men’s and women’s track and field coverage during the 2004 Olympics. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 53, 173–189.
20.
KaneM. J. (2013). The better sportswomen get, the more the media ignore them. Communication & Sport, 1, 231–236.
LicenS.BillingsA. C. (2013). Cheering for ‘our’ champs while watching ‘sexy’ female throwers: Representation of nationality and gender in Slovenian 2008 summer Olympic television coverage. European Journal of Communication, 28, 379–396.
23.
McCombsM.ShawD. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.
24.
MessnerM. A.DuncanM. C.WillmsN. (2006). This revolution is not being televised. Contexts: Understanding People in Their Social Worlds, 5, 34–38.
PoniatowskiK.HardinM. (2012). The more things change, the more they…: Commentary during women’s ice hockey at the Olympic Games. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 622–641.
TankardJ. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 95–106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
TurnerJ. S. (2014). A longitudinal content analysis of gender and ethnicity portrayals on ESPN’s SportsCenter from 1999-2009. Communication and Sport, 2(4), 303–327.
30.
VincentJ.CrossmanJ. (2012) Patriots at play: Analysis of newspaper coverage of the gold medal contenders in men’s and women’s ice hockey at the 2010 winter Olympic Games, International Journal of Sport Communication, 5, 87–108.
31.
WeberJ. D.CariniR. M. (2013). Where are the female athletes in sports illustrated? A content analysis of covers (2000-2011). International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 48, 196–203.
