Outsourcing of local broadcast news, fueled by technology and industry economics, is a reality in a number of markets around the United States. Contrasted with the trend toward the “hyperlocal” in newspapers and websites, remote delivery produces newscasts for communities at great distance from the source. Under a framework of localism, this study examines the implications of such a delivery system for communities served, using a content analysis in six television markets—markets as large as Omaha, Nebraska. Using a data set of more than 1,000 stories, the study analyzes how local the outsourced newscasts really are. With local TV news still ranked the most used information source in the United States, how much local information outsourced broadcasts offer viewers is a significant topic to scrutinize.
DanielsG. L. (2008). A centralcasting postmortem and a news-share projection: Using market theory to assess alternative local television news strategies. Electronic News, 2, 138–152.
8.
DominickJ. R.WurtzelA.LomettiG. (1975). Television journalism vs. show business: A content analysis of eyewitness news. Journalism Quarterly, 52, 213–218.
FisherR. A. (1922). On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of p. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85, 87–94.
GansH. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, newsweek, and time. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
13.
Harre'R. (1984). Personal being: A theory of individual psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
HoffstetterC. R.DozierD. M. (1986). Useful news, sensational news: Quality, sensationalism and local TV news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 63, 815–820.
15.
HoodL. (2007). Radio reverb: The impact of “local” news reimported to its own community. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 1–19.
16.
HoodL. (2010). Radio recentered: Local news returns home. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 17, 151–166.
17.
HoodL. (2011). News outsourcing: The producers' perspective. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 18, 295–308.
18.
KanissP. (1991). Making local news. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
KaplanM. (2003, June 2). The ‘local’ in local TV is in danger (p. 77). The Christian Science Monitor is published in Boston, MA.
20.
KellerT.HawkinsS. (2009). Television news: A handbook for writing, reporting, shooting and editing (3rd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway Publishers.
21.
KirbyA. (1988). Context, common sense and the reality of place: A critical reading of Meyrowitz. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 18, 239–250.
22.
KlinenbergE. (2007). Fighting for air: The battle to control America's media. New York, NY: Holt Publishing.
23.
KrippendorffK. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
LombardM.Snyder-DuchJ.Campanella BrackenC. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587–604.
MeyrowitzJ. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
MillsJ. M.DanielsG. L. (2009). SportsCentral as winner or loser? Centralcasting as strategy for efficient local sportscast production. International Journal for Sports Communication, 2, (unpaginated).
29.
Oberholzer-GeeF.WaldfogelJ. (2006). Media markets and localism: Does local news en Espanol boost Hispanic voter turnout?(Working Paper No. w12317). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
PowersR. (1977). The newscasters. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
33.
RiffeD.AustC. F.LacyS. R. (1993). The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 70, 133–139.
SmithL. (2009). Consolidation and news content: How broadcast ownership policy impacts local television news and the public interests. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 10, 387–453.
SteppC. S. (2011). Hyperlocal heroes—A firsthand look at how some members of the burgeoning roster of hyperlocal news Web sites do their jobs. American Journalism Review, 33, 22–27.
42.
TorosyanG.MunroC. (2010). EARwitness testimony: Applying listener perspectives to developing a working concept of “localism” in broadcast radio. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 17, 33–47.
43.
TuggleC. A.CarrF.HuffmanS. (2011). Broadcast news handbook: Writing, reporting & producing in a converging media world (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
44.
TuggleC. A.HuffmanS. (2001). Live reporting in television news: Breaking news or black holes?Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 335–344.
45.
WilsonK. (2008). Television weathercasters as science communicators. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 73–87.
46.
WimmerR. D.DominickJ. R. (2006). Mass media research: An introduction (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth Publishing.
47.
WulfemeyerK. T. (1982). A content analysis of local television newscasts: Answering the critics. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 26, 481–486.
48.
YanichD. (2011). Local TV and shared services agreements: Examining news content in Honolulu. Newark, DE: Center for Research & Community Service, University of Delaware.
49.
YanichD. (2013). Local TV news content and shared services agreements: The Honolulu case. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 242–259.
