The growth of new media is changing how news organizations publish their work, and the explosion of social networks is changing the way news consumers of all ages share information. As news outlets face an uncertain future and try to reach younger, newer audiences, the rapid growth of mobile devices means new opportunities to create, share, and consume news content. This study examines how young news consumers share and consume news content, specifically whether they are more likely to get news through social networks (Facebook and Twitter) or directly through news sources (news stations, newspapers, websites, and mobile apps). The findings here indicate that students may hear of news through social media, but rely on other internet sources to confirm it. Local news does not seem to carry as much weight with them, but they can be persuaded to pay attention to their college towns, if only for community news and information. The findings of this study could help producers of news content tailor their information to fit these new “publishing” formats to maintain (or perhaps increase) their audience.
AakerJ. L. (2010). The dragonfly effect: Quick, effective and powerful ways to use social media to drive social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
AhlersD. (2006). News consumption and the new electronic media. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11, 29–52. doi:10.177/1081180X05284317
3.
ArmstrongC. L.CollinsS. J. (2009). Attracting younger audiences: Examining how access to local news content influences perceptions of credibility on younger readers. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 17, 101–114. doi:10.1080/15456870902873176
4.
BoydD. M.EllisonN. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
ChannickR. (2013, May 30). Chicago Sun-Times fires its photographers. The Chicago Tribune. Retrieved fromhttp://www.chicagotribune.com
7.
CheungC. M. K.ChiuP.LeeM. K. O. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook?Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1337–1343. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028
8.
ChyiH. I.YangM. J.LewisS. C.ZhengN. (2010). Use of and satisfaction with newspaper sites in the local market: Exploring differences between hybrid and online only users. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 62–83. Retrieved fromhttp://search.proquest.com.jproxy.lib.ecu.edu/docview/521206793?accountid=10639
DiddiA.LaRoseR. (2006). Getting hooked on news; uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an internet environment. Journal of Broadcast and Electronic Media, 50, 193.
11.
Dutta-BergmanM. J. (2004). The impact of completeness and web use motivation on the credibility of e-health information. Journal of Communication, 54, 253–269.
EmanuelR.AdamsJ.BakerK.DaufinE. K.EllingtonC.FittsE.OkeowoD. (2008). How college students spend their time communicating. International Journal of Listening, 22, 13–28. doi:10.1080/10904010701802139
Gil de ZúñigaH.JungN.ValenzuelaS. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
16.
HaridakisP.HansonG. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 317–335. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838150902908270
17.
KatzK. E.BlumlerJ.GurevitchM. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In BlumerJ.KatzE. (Eds.), The uses of mass communications current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
KimW.JeongO.LeeS. (2010). On social web sites. Information Systems, 35, 215–236. doi:10.1016/j.is.2009.08.003
LazersfeldP. F.StantonF. (1944). Radio research 1942-1943. New York, NY: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce.
21.
LeeC. S.MaL. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 331–339. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002
McCombsM. E.ShawD. L. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting theory: 25 years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43, 58–58.
24.
MeadowsM. (2013). Putting the citizen back into journalism. Journalism, 14, 43–60. doi:10.1177/1464884912442293
25.
MetzgarE.KurpiusD.RowleyK. (2011). Defining hyperlocal media: Proposing a framework for discussion. New Media & Society, 13, 772–787. doi:10.1177/1461444810385095
PapperB. (2011). RTDNA/Hofstra study finds changing social media landscape for TV & Radio. Radio-Television-Digital News Association, Washington, DC.
30.
Perez-CarballoJ.BlaszczynskiC. (2011). Social media usage by business college students. Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Information and Management Sciences. Proceedings, 15, 5–8. Retrieved fromhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/912467917?accountid=10639
PriceC.BrownM. (2010). Adapting small market rural media to the challenges of new media: Interviews with small market rural managers. Online Journal of Rural Research & Policy, 5. Retrieved fromhttp://ojrrp.org/journals/ojrrp/article/view/234
StevensonR. L. (1979). Newspaper readership and community ties. ANPA News Research Report, 18, 2–10.
41.
TakeshitaT. (2006). Current critical problems in agenda-setting research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 275.
42.
UsherN. (2010). Goodbye to the news: How out-of-work journalists assess enduring news values and the new media landscape. New Media & Society, 12, 911–917.
43.
VidaliD.S. (2010). Millennial Encounters with Mainstream Television News: Excess, Void, and Points of Engagement. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20, 372–388.
44.
WangY.LinH.LuarnP. (2006). Predicting consumer intention to use mobile service. Information Systems Journal, 16, 157–179. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00213.x
45.
WeeksB. E.HolbertR. L. (2013). Predicting dissemination of news content in social media: A focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 90. Retrieved May 30, 2013, fromhttp://jmq.sagepub.com/content/current
WilliamsB.Delli CarpiniM. X. (2004). Monica and bill all the time and everywhere: The collapse of gate keeping and agenda setting in the new media environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1208–1222. doi:0.1177/0002764203262344
